Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - July 2, 1990 - RA0 0 CITY OF AZUSA MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING JULY 2, 1990 - 8:27 P.M. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Azusa met in regular session at the above date and time in the Civic Auditorium. Chairman Moses called the meeting to order. ROLL CALL PRESENT: DIRECTORS: DANGLEIS, STEMRICH, NARANJO, ALEXANDER, MOSES ABSENT DIRECTORS: NONE ALSO PRESENT General Counsel Thorson, Executive Director Diaz, Redevelopment Director Steel, Redevelopment Manager Lyman, City Department Heads, Secretary Solis. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Call to order Roll Call Also Present Pub Prtc Mr. -Ron Lockwood addressed the Agency and stated that he Comments felt that the Agency chose a poor place to construct R. Lockwood apartments in the City. The CONSENT CALENDAR consisting of Items H -2a through H -2d, Cons Cal was approved by motion of Director Naranjo, seconded by appvd; H -2a Director Dangleis, and unanimously carried by roll call Spec Call vote, with the exception of Item H -2a, which was considered under the City Council Special Call portion of the Agenda. a. SPECIAL CALL ITEM Special Call b. A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF Res. #718 AZUSA FINDING THAT SUBSTANTIAL EFFORT IS BEING MADE TO Merged Red MEET THE NEED FOR IOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING IN THE Proj Area MERGED CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND WEST END low mod need REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS c. A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF Res. #719 AZUSA FINDING THAT A SUBSTANTIAL EFFORT IS BEING MADE TO Ranch Cntr MEET THE NEED FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING IN THE low mod need RANCH CENTER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT d. Two separate resolutions authorizing payment of warrants by the Agency were adopted and entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF Res. Nos. 720 AZUSA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS TO BE PAID OUT & 721 OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS. Warrants SCHEDULED ITEMS NONE Sched. Items None 0. 6 SPECIAL CALL ITEMS Spec Call DEFERRED TO CITY COUNCIL/SPECIAL CALL ITEMS. Dfrd to Cncl Spec Call Moved by Director Naranjo, seconded by Director Stemrich and Recess to unanimously carried by roll call to recess until the City Cncl/Spec Council/Special Call section of the Agenda. Call section TIME OF RECESS: 8:30 P.M. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONVENED JOINTLY WITH THE CITY CRA convened COUNCIL AT 9:20 P.M. FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING THE w/Council MINUTES OF THE JUNE 21ST MEETING. Councilman/Director Alexander questioned the Minutes of June Comments 21st regarding the censure motion; that he thought it was Alexander for his full term of office; that since it was not agendized Min of 6/21 that it needed to pass 4 to 1; and that his statement regarding interest rates was not accurate, as he had mentioned that there might be regulations preventing the City from receiving higher interest rates on our money; further that statements made in the Minutes about the audience and Council being emotional did not reflect that Councilman/Director Naranjo tried to stop him from talking by filibustering. Councilman/Director Dangleis advised that the censure motion Comments as stated in the Minutes was not to direct the City Attorney Dangleis to censure Mr. Alexander, rather, to refer the censure motion to the City Attorney. City Attorney/General Counsel then explained that the Comments censure motion did not need a waiver of the Brown Act as it Thorson was part of the discussion of those items that were on the Agenda. General discussion was held regarding proposed amendments to Discussion the Minutes. Councilman/Director Naranjo stated that it was unfortunate Comments that the tape malfunctioned, however, he felt something Naranjo needed to be amended into the Minutes to reflect what actually was said by Councilman/Director Alexander, and that possibly the City Attorney/General Counsel could take depositions of people at that meeting. General discussion was held regarding this issue with the Discussion City Attorney/General Counsel and he advised possible options to clarify the amendments of the Minutes; and discussed liability situations as they deal with public officials, and the free speech aspect, and immunities involved. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Min of 6/14 Dangleis, seconded by Councilman Naranjo and unanimously 6/18 & 6/19 carried by roll call that the Minutes of the meetings of appvd; 6/21 June 14th, June 18th and June 19th, 1990, be approved; and rpt by Cty that with regard to the Minutes of June 21st, that the City Atty Attorney be directed to use whatever means necessary, be it (Council) interviews or other manner and report back to Council on what that section of the Minutes should read, relating to comments made by Councilman Alexander. City Treasurer Talley inquired whether or not he could Comments address the interest received by the City and his investment Talley policies, but was advised that since it was not agendized, it could not be discussed. 07/02/90 PAGE TWO 0 0 It was then moved by Director Dangleis, seconded by Director Naranjo and unanimously carried by roll call that the Minutes of the June 14th and June 18th, 1990 meetings be approved and that the June 21st Minutes be held in abeyance until such time as the City Council Minutes are brought back for approval. IT WAS CONSENSUS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO ADJOURN. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:40 P.M. NEXT RESOLUTION NO. 722 07/02/90 PAGE THREE Min of 6/14 & 6/18 appvd; 6/21 held in abeyance (CRA) Adj ourn