The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution No. 8229Inadvertently Omitted RESOLUTION N0.68090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA TO RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION ON AUGUST 18, 1986, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957 AND MAKING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(a), (b) AND (c). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Closed session of the City Council are permitted for various purposes pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 for the purposes of discussions with the City Attorney of matters within the attorney-client privilege relating to litigation and potential litigation, discussion of matters with the City's authorizied labor representative, discussion of personnel matters relating to the appointment, evaluation, dismissal, or charges against an employee, or to give instructions to the City's negotiatior regarding the purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of certain property, among others. It is the policy of the City Council to strictly adhere to the requirements of the Brown Act (The Calaifornia Public Meeting Act) and to only recess to closed session when absolutely necessary. SECTION 2. The City Council shall recess to closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorneys with respect to confidential matters within the attorney-client privilege regarding litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the City is a party. The title of this litigation is Fred Lyte v. Azusa. SECTION 3. The City Council shall recess to closed session to confer with its attorneys with respect to confidential matters within the attorney-client privilege pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 (b) in order to discuss potential litigation and is hereby of the opinion that a substantial exposure to litigation exists with respect to proposed reservoir design. SECTION 4. The City Council shall recess to closed session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 relating to the appointment, evaluation, dismissal and charges against certain employees. SECTION 5. In connection with the litigation matters discussed above, the City Council specifically finds that: A. Discussion of the litigation matters described above in open session would be prejudicial to the interests of the Council in that matters within the attorney-client privilege will be discussed and disclosure of such discussions would violate and waive the attorney-client privilege and would give an unfair advantage to the Council's adversaries and allow them to negotiate a settlement of the matters adverse to the Council; and - 1 - B. It has received a confidential letter from the City Attorney, as well as verbal advice, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 describing the grounds and the authority for the closed session. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, MAY I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August, 1986, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: AVILA, COOK, CRUZ, LATTA, MOSES NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE L/ / CITY CLERK - 2 - RESOLUTION NO. 8089 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ZONE CHANGE, CASE NO. Z-250, 247 NORTH DALTON AVENUE, AZUSA, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has prepared an initial study of environmental impact and a Negative Declaration for zone change, Case No. Z-250, Angela Hernandez, Applicant, 247 North Dalton Avenue, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, State CEQA Guidelines, and Cities CEQA Procedures; WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on July 9, 1986, at which time evidence was received on the initial study of environmental impact and the proposed negative declaration; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2339, approving the Legative Declara- tion for the proposed zone change; WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City Council on August 4, 1986, at which time evidence was received on the initial study of environmental impact and the proposed Negative Declaration; WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the initial study of environmental impact and the evidence submitted to it at the public hearing and by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the proposed project could not have a significant effect upcii the,.environment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT•RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' AZUSA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Neqative Declaration of environ- mental impact for the proposed zone change case No. Z-250 from C-2 to R-3 'is hereby certified and approved. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1986. r ATTEST: CT'iY CUERK d STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. 1 CITY OF AZUSA ) I, ADOLPH A. SOLIS , City Clerk of the City of Azusa, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution no. 8089 was regularly introduced and placed upon a first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 18th day of August , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmembers: Avila, Cook, Moses NOES: Councilmembers: Latta ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: Cruz ,ITY CLERK 91 CITY OF AZUSA INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT I. BACKGROUND 1•. Name of Proponent/Applicant: Angela Hernandez 2. Address and phone number of Proponent/Applicant: 1168 N. Soldano Drive Azusa, California 91702 (818) 334-0443 3. Name of Project (if applicable): Zone Change Case No. Z-250 4. Description of Project and Address: Zone change from C2 (Restricted Commercial) to R3c (Multi -Family Residential) 247 N. Dalton Avenue Azusa, California 5. Identification of Environmental Setting: Urban -1- ' CITY OF AZUSA ASSE 7T OF ENVIRONMENTAL I14P,6r REPORT INITIAL STUDY A copy'of the Initial Study for Public Works projects will be available to the public in the Azusa Public Works Department. A copy of the initial study for the Planning Department projects will be in the Planning Department and the Public Library. Comments from the public on the projects may be made, in writing, to the respective department directors or at the public hearings for the projects. Project Description: Zone Change Case No. Z-250, zone change from C2 (Restricted Commercial) to R3c (Multi -Family Residential). II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) 1. Earth Will the project result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or'in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil? X C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical - features? _ X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X g, Exposure of people or property to geo- logic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? X 2., Air Will the project result in: a... Substantial air emissions or deteribra- tion of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water Will the project result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? y b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X -2- k YES MAYBE NO Vow C. Allprations to the course or of ' flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to tempera - Lure, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Change in quality of ground water? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding.' or tidal waves? - X 4. Plant Life Will the project result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (includ- ing trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro- flora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life Will the project result in: X X_ X X a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers or any species of animals (birds, land animals, including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X C. Introduction of new species or animals - - into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wild- life habitat? X 6. Noise Will the project result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare Will the project produce new light or glare? X -3-