HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 641RESOLUTION NO. 641
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF AZUSA,
AUTHORIZING AND EMPOWERING FR-GDERICK BAKER, CITY ATTORNEY OF SAID
CITY, TO ENTER INTO A STIPULATION IN THE CAUSE NOW PENDING BEFO!M THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AD FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES, ENTITLED COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, PLAINTIFF, VS, ALHAMBRA,
ET AL., DEFENDANTS, No. B-89802.
WHEREAS, the City of Azusa is named as a defendant in the action
entitled County of Los Angeles, plaintiff, vs. The City of Alhambra, et
al., defendants, No. B-89802; and
47
WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable that the said city join the stip-
ulation hereinafter referred to;
NOW, THEREFORE', BE IT RESOTVrI�, that Frederick Raker, City Attorney
of the City of Azusa, be, and he is hereby authorized and empoyered on be-
half of said city to sign and enter aoove entitled action in the said
Superior Caurt,
Adopted and approved this 7th day of February, 1921.
L. Case
President of Board of Trustees.
ATTEST:
_ J. 0._Durrell _
City Clerk of Azusa
STAT' OF CALIFORNIA SS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELS
I, J. 0. Durrell., City Clerk of the City of Azusa do certify that
the foregoing Resolution. Nva.s duly adopted by the Board of Trustees of the
City of Azusa and signed by the president of said Board, at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 8th day of February, 1921,
ty ler Y. of�Azusa
a
48
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
--000--
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, No. B-89802
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT
-vs- AND WAIVER OF CLAIMS OR
THE CITIES OF AIHAMBRA, DEMANDS AGAINST PLAINTIFF.
at al., Defendants. )
--000--
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above
entitled action through their respective counsel, tha-4&ur-et3, the
counsel for each of the respective defendant cities having been duly
authorized so to do by the governing bodies of the said defendant cities,
that the defendant cities in the above entitled action, hereinafter named,
may receive the several sums hereinafter set forth in full satisfaction
of all claim or claims which the said cities may have as against the
County of Los Angeles, or as against each other, or any or either of the
other defendant cities in and to the sum of $38,343.85 tendered to the
court by the plaintiff in this action.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the County of Los Angeles, plain-
tiff in the above entitled action, is hereby released and discharged
from all claims or demands which the defendant cities (other than the
cities in this stipulation hereinafter named), or any of them may have
against the County of Los Angeles for any and all portion or portions
of the said sum of $38,343.85 tendered to the court by the plaintiff in
this action, or any other sum received by the county from the cities
hereinafter named between the first day of October, 1919, and the 311t
day of December, 1920, inclusive under and by virtue 6f the provisions
of the motor Vehicle Act; that said sums to be received and accepted
by the several cities, being as follows, to -wit;
Azusa. . . . . . . . $ 437.00
Eagle Rock . 12.50
El Segundo . . . . . . . . 296.90
Hermosa Beach. 56.00
Huntington Park. 630.00
Sierra Madre 495.50
South Pasadena . . . . . . 15.00
Whittier. 236.00
Venice. 361164.95
TOTAL . . . . $38,343.85
AND IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the said defendant
cities named hereinabove shall and will receive and accept the sums
set opposite their respective names in full satisfaction of all claim
ax claims which the said cities, or either of them, may have as against
the County of Los Angeles, or as against any or all of the other sum
received by the County of Los Angeles from the said cities, or either
of them, between the first day of October, 1919, and the 31st day of
December, 3.920, inclusive, under and by virtue of the provisions of the
Motor Vehicle Act.
DATED this day of ,1921.
A. J. HILL, COUNTY COTTNgTl,
By
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Attorney for Defendant
City of