HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 92-R52RESOLUTION NO. 92-R52,q
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AZUSA AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
TO RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION ON , AUGUST 3, 1992
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA AND THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE AZUSA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DO HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Closed Sessions of the City Council and
Board are permitted for various purposes pursuant to Government
Code Section 54957 for the purposes of discussions with the City
or Agency Attorney of matters within the attorney-client
privilege relating to litigation and potential litigation,
discusssion of matters with the City's or Agency's authorized
labor representative, discussion of personnel matters relating to
the appointment, evaluation, dismissal, or charges against an
employee, or to give instructions to the City's or Agency's
negotiator regarding the purchase, sale, exchange or lease of
certain property, among others. It is the policy of the City
Council and the Board of Directors to strictly adhere to the
requirements of the Brown Act (the California Public Meeting Act)
and to only recess to Closed Session when absolutely necessary.
SECTION 2. The City Council and Board of Directors
shall recess to CLOSED SESSION pursuant to Government Code Section
54956 (a) to confer with its attorneys with respect to
confidential matters within the attorney-client privilege
regarding pending litigation which has been inintiated formally
and to which the Agency or City is a party. The titles of these
litigation is Methor V. Azusa RDA
SECTION 3. The City council and Board of Directors shall
recess to closed session to confer with its attorneys with respect
to confidential matters within the attorney-client privilege
pursuant to Government code Section 54956 (b) in order to discuss
one (1) potential litigation and is hereby of the opinion that a
substantial exposure to litigation exists with respect to such
items.
SECTION 4. In connection with the litigation matters
discussed above, the City Council and Board of Directors
specifically find that:
A. Discussion of the litigation matters
described above in open session would be prejudicial
to the interests of the City and the Agency in that
matters within the attorney-client privilege will
be discussed and disclosure of such discussion would
violate and waive the attorney-client privilege and
would give an unfair advantage to the City's and
Agency's adversaries and allow them to negotiate
a settlement of the matters adverse tothe City and
Agency and
0 0
SECTION 5. The City Clerk and Secretary shall certify
the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this, 3rd day of August,
1992.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa and the Board of
Directors of the Azusa Redevelopment Agency, at a regular meeting
thereof, held on the 20th day of, July 1992, by the following
vote of the Council/Agency:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS/BOARDMEMBERS: MADRID, NARANJO, ALEXANDER,
MOSES,
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS/BOARDMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS/BOARDMEMBERS: DANGLEIS,