Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 92-R230 0 RESOLUTION NO. 92-R23 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF AZUSA TO RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION ON APRIL 6, 1992 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DO HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Closed sessions of the City Council and Board of Directors are permitted for various purposes pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 for the purposes of discussions with the City or Agency Attorney of matters within the attorney- client privilege relating to litigation and potential litigation, discussion of matters with the City's or Agency's authorized labor representative, discussion of personnel matters relating to the appointment, evaluation, dismissal, or charges against an employee, or to give instructions to the City's or Agency negotiator regarding the purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of certain property, among others. It is the policy of the City Council and the Board of Directors to strictly adhere to the requirements of the Brown Act (the California Public Meeting Act) and to only recess to closed session when absolutely necessary. SECTION 2. The City Council and Board of Directors shall recess to closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer with its attorneys with respect to confidential matters within the attorney-client privilege regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the Agency or City is a party. The title of this litigation is Mack v. City of Azusa. SECTION 3. The City Council and Board of Directors shall recess to closed session to confer with its attorneys with respect to confidential matters within the attorney-client privilege pursuant to Government Code Section 54956(b) in order to discuss one (1) potential litigation and is hereby of the opinion that a substantial exposure to litigation exists with respect to such items. SECTION 4. In connection with the litigation matters discussed above, the City Council and Board of Directors specifically find that: A. Discussion of the litigation matters described above in open session would be prejudicial to the interests of the City and the Agency in that matters within the attorney-client privilege will be discussed and disclosure of such discussions would violate and waive the attorney-client privilege and would give an unfair advantage to the City's and the Agency's adversaries and allow them to negotiate a settlement of the matters adverse to the City and the Agency; and SECTION 5. The City Clerk and Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of April , 1992 MAYOR/CHAIRMANOW 13215.1 0 �.J I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa and the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Azusa, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of April , 1992 , by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS/BOARDMEMBERS: DANGLEIS, STEMRICH, NARANJO, ALEXANDER, MOSES NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS/BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS/BOARDMEMBERS: NONE Z� ---, -Z - - '1Z CITY CL?K/SEC ETARY 13215.1