HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 05-O80 0
ORDINANCE NO. 05-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AZUSA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF AZUSA AND AZUSA PACIFIC
UNIVERSITY
WHEREAS, on September 19,2005 the City Council of the City ofAzusa ("City Council")
adopted the Azusa Pacific University Specific Plan SP -7, and certified the Final Environmental
Impact Report, and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Mitigation Monitoring
Program, and
WHEREAS, local governments are authorized by the Government Code Section 65864 et
seq., to enter into development agreements with any person having legal or equitable interest in real
property for the development of that property; and
WHEREAS, the City and Azusa Pacific University ("APU") have negotiated the terms of a
Development Agreement ("Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the terms of the Agreement, has
conducted a public hearing on August 24, 2005, and believes that it will be in the best interest of the
City, and in the best interest of the public, having adopted Resolution No. 2005-11 recommending
approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement contains all the necessary elements required by Government
Code Section 65864 et seq. and Chapter 88.53 of the City of Azusa Municipal Code,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed Agreement, conducted a duly
noticed public hearing, considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and considered
all public testimony,
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Azusa does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The Development Agreement implements the Azusa Pacific University
Specific Plan, which has been found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Azusa.
The City Council finds that the Development Agreement is therefore also consistent with the Azusa
General Plan.
SECTION 2: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA
Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, the City analyzed the project's potential
environmental impacts in an Environmental Impact Report which was reviewed by the City Council.
E
SECTION 3: Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral
evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council finds the Agreement is consistent with the
General Plan of the City of Azusa and systematically implements the goals and policies of the
General Plan in the following ways:
A. That the proposed amendment is in the public interest, and that there will be a
community benefit resulting from the amendment.
The proposed APU Specific Plan will contribute to the following benefits:
Provide high quality development that will enhance the existing APU East and
West Campuses as well as surrounding neighborhoods.
Contribution to the regional and local economy that include additional
employment opportunities.
Increased sales tax revenues from campus sales, including ticket sales from new
performing arts facility. Increased sales for local businesses from faculty, staff
and students.
Cultural, athletic, and learning opportunities that contribute to the quality of life
for the Azusa community.
Community service to the City, including up to 157,000 hours of services from
students, programs to support healthy families, such as the university's Child and
Family Development Center and its Neighborhood Wellness Center, programs to
provide educational and recreational opportunities for children, and programs to
provide expert assistance from the University's faculty and staff to city and
community leaders.
Provide educational opportunities to local residents including undergraduate,
graduate, doctoral, continuing education, and accelerated degree programs for
nontraditional students and executive seminars.
Additional student housing to reduce pressure on the local rental market.
Adequate parking facilities to meeting parking demand for students and faculty.
Open spaces and mature landscaping to provide aesthetically pleasing vistas that
are welcoming to the Azusa community.
B. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the
General Plan.
The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with and implementation of the General
Plan pertaining to Chapter 4 Economy and Community - Public Services Goals and
Policies, Chapter 3 The Built Environment - Mobility Goals and Policies, Chapter 3
The Built Environment - Urban Form Goals and Policies, and Chapter 3 The Built
Environment - Land Use Goals and Policies.
C. That the proposed Specific Plan will not conflict with the provisions of the zoning
ordinance, subdivision regulations, or any applicable specific plan.
0
The proposal meets all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code for the
proposed District Institutional/School (IS) zoning designation. In addition, all
applicable City divisions and departments have reviewed the proposal and their
comments were incorporated into the Draft Azusa Pacific University Specific Plan.
D. That the proposed Specific Plan will not adversely affect surrounding properties.
An Environmental Impact Report with mitigation measures has been prepared. The
mitigation measures serve to prevent adverse impacts on surrounding sensitive land
uses, and service systems. Five subject areas were found have impacts that are
significant and unavoidable: Air Quality; Cultural Resources; Noise; and Circulation
and Traffic. However, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been included
apart of this submittal.
SECTION 4. The Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property
or the preservation of property values.
SECTION 5. The Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general
welfare of persons residing in the immediate area, nor be detrimental or injurious to the general
welfare of the residents of the City as a whole.
SECTION 6: The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement attached
hereto as Exhibit T, and as amended by Exhibit H, Errata, dated September 15, 2005, and authorizes
the Mayor to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City.
SECTION 7 : This Ordinance shall be posted in accordance with provisions of the Azusa
Municipal Code and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage.
SECTION 8: ;The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published as required by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 3 day of October '2005.
MAYOR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.
CITY OF AZUSA )
0 0
I, VERA MENDOZA, City Clerk of the City of Azusa, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. -o5- regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting
of the City Council on the 19 day of September 2005, by the following vote. That
thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on
the 3 day of October , 2005, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:HARDISON, CARRILLO, ROCHA, HANKS, CHAGNON
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
0 0
Exhibit H
Errata
Revised September 15, 2005
APU Specific Plan, December 2004
The following changes to the December 2004 Draft Azusa Pacific Specific Plan SP -7
("Specific Plan") and related documents include those revisions/corrections
recommended by the Economic and Community Development staff and the Planning
Commission. The Specific Plan will also be changed to correct non -substantive
typographical errors and incorrect cross-references.
Additional changes recommended by the staff on September 15, 2005:
DA. (Development Agreement)
Typo�sanhical errors and incorrect references:
Section 1.1.26 — Typo: delete letter "g."
Section 1.9 — Incorrect reference: change reference to 1.12 to 1.8.
Section 2.7 — Typo: word "of' in the title to the section should be revised to be "or."
Section 2.8 — Incorrect reference: change "3.7 below" to "2.7 above.
Revised proposal concerning the Fiscal Impact Fee:
Section 2.15.1
Owner agrees to pay to the City of Azusa, beginning with the first utility billing cycle
that occurs on or after the Effective Date of this Agreement, a Fiscal Impact Fee
calculated as follows:
[USE EXISTING TEXT]
Add as subparagraph at the end of existing text:
Notwithstandine anvthine herein to the contrary, includine the Term of this
Agreement, Owner agrees to continue making the Fiscal Impact fee payment to the
City of Azusa for so long as the City's existing Utility Users Tax, as set forth in the
City's Municipal Code as of the Effective Date of this Aereement, remains in effect
unless any of the following events occur:
a) the City Council and its voters amend the UUT so as to require payment by all
non -profits in the City;
b) Owner and Citv agree to perform a fiscal impact analvsis of sales taxes and/or
property taxes generated as a direct result of Owner's Project and the result of said
analysis demonstrates that such tax revenue received by the City exceeds the total
sum of the Fiscal Impact Fee payments made to the City in the City's previous
Fiscal Year. The fiscal impact analysis contemplated by this subsection shall not be
performed prior to nineteen (19) years from the Effective Date of the Agreement.
PAI Planning\EntitlementslSP7_APU1Er to Sheet091505final.doc
Exhibit H, Errata • •
Revised September 15, 2005
Page 2 of 9
This subsection shall continue in effect oast the Effective Date of the Agreement.
Further clarification of APU scholarships to AUSD graduates:
Section 2.15.1
Owner agrees that for so long as this Agreement remains in effect, Owner shall seek
to identify Azusa Unified School District (AVSD) high school graduates who are
eligible for admission to Azusa Pacific University (APU). Among those AUSD
students who accent admittance to APU Owner shall award such students of its
choice four-year, $20,000, scholarships to be distributed at $5,000 each year over a
four-year period. In each and every year, Owner agrees that no less than five
students shall be receiving a $5,000 scholarship, provided, however, that Owner's
obligation to fund such scholarships shall not apply where there are less than five
eligible AUSD students enrolled at APU.
DA. Section 2.13. Timing of Development. Add the following:
"Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Owner acknowledges that phased
development of housing and parking shall be done in a manner that provides for
adequate parking and traffic control, and to that end such improvements may be
required by the City before certificates of occupancy are issued for such housing."
SP. Add the following language in order to avoid an inconsistency between the Specific
Plan and the 1999 DDA for the "Krems" property:
"This site is subiect to a 1999 Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA)
covering the former "Krems Property" portion of the West Campus. The DDA
requires the development plan completion before June 2010. Final development
approval shall be consistent with the DDA.
SP. Page 47, last column. Second bullet point under 4.5.6.1 is deleted as it currently reads
and is replaced with the following:
"APU furnishes and installs or pays AL&W the actual cost of 12kV lines needed to
meet the additional loads created by this Specific Plan whether located on or off
campus. The work will be done per AL&W specifications and includes cables and
under -ground substructures."
Add fifth bullet point to read:
"All electric utility work and requirements will be based on AL&W tariff rules and
regulations as amended from time to time."
Additional changes recommended by the Planning Commission on August 24, 2005:
DA. Add the following sentence to Sec 2.14 of the Development Agreement:
Underline = added text; Striketftrexgh = deleted text; Bold = most recent edit
Exhibit H, Errata • •
Revised September 15, 2005
Page 3 of 9
Section 2.14 Public Works. Owner is required by this Agreement to construct certain
public work facilities which will be dedicated to the City or other public agencies upon
completion. Unless required by law to do so, Owner shall not be required to perform
work in the same manner and subject to the same requirements as would be applicable to
the City or such other public agency should it have undertaken such construction,
including, without limitation, the payment of prevailing wages pursuant to Labor Code
Section 1770 et. seq. The City reserves the right to pre -qualify contractors selected
by Owner to construct certain public work facilities.
Additional changes recommended by the staff on August 24, 2005:
DA. Amend the following sections of the Development Agreement:
1.8. This Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the Parties in writing,
in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65868, provided that:
aay maior amendments which relates to the term, permitted uses, density, intensity of
use, height and size of proposed buildings, or provisions for reservation and dedication of
land shall require a public hearing before the Parties may execute an amendment.
1.15 Owner and any Transferee shall be permitted an opportunity to be heard
orally or in writing regarding its performance under this Agreement before the Planning
Commission Citi Couneil and, if the matter is referred or appealed to the City Council
Planning Commission, before said Council Commission.
Changes recommended by the Planning Commission on July 13, 2005:
SP. Edit the document to modify staff's recommendation related to the description of the
building at Stein/Foothill as follows:
"The building proposed for the northeast comer of Stein Lane & Foothill Boulevard is a
40,000 sq. ft. 3 -story structure to accommodate university and university tenants,
providing space for community oriented
commercial/retail services to both the student population and the surrounding
community. No more than 40% of the retail floor area shall be fast food. "".. the
goal of the City to pFoAde appro"mately 20,000 square feet of eammunity SeFvin
retail floor area, a minimum of 6,500 square feet of this building shall be oeeupie
by retail uses. The pr-eeise amount of retail spnee eonstFueted shall be detef!MiBed -by
the Mr-eetor based on- on retan-il mnrdwet analysis eondueted piior- to submitting plans-
for- Design Review approval.The Retail Magmt Analysis will determine the exteB
to whieh eommunity oriented retail uses ean be suppot4ed at this loestion. Sai
and the Gi",. The eonsultuBt's woFk shall be managed by the City and paid for b
TSV♦♦ DDiiTT
.
• Page 54, label the Stein/Foothill comer "Academic/Community Oriented Retail.
Add column, Community Oriented Retail with the following uses allowed with a
Minor Use Permit: bookstore, coffee/juice, ice cream, photocopy/graphics, clothing,
Underline = added text; StFikethreugh = deleted text; Bold = most recent edit
Exhibit H, Errata • •
Revised September 15, 2005
Page 4 of 9
electronics/computers, and food. No more than 40% of the floor area shall be fast
food.
Changes recommended by staff as of July 13, 2005:
EIR-PC Reso. p. 27, last line: replace "SFS" with "Student Financial Services"
EIR-PC_Reso. p. 30, Revise T-2 to read as follows: "The parking requirement for APU
in fiscal year 2022-2023 based on the City of Azusa parking code is 3,088 spaces. The
parking plan in the APU Specific Plan provides a total of 4,657 spaces. Of these 2,767
will be on the East Campus and 1,890 will be on the West Campus. This parking plan
would result in a surplus supply of over 1,500 spaces over the projected requirement.
The university is prepared to construct sufficient parking supply to ensure that upon
completion of the planned development the total number of parking spaces exceeds the
city requirement of 3,088 up to a total of 4,657 spaces. (Ibid.)
EIR-PC_Reso. p. 30, Delete T-4 because that mitigation is already in place.
EIR-PC_Reso. p. 30, Revise the first sentence of T-5 by inserting "left -turn" after the
word "eastbound".
EIR-PC_Reso. p. 30, Revise the first sentence of T-6 by inserting "left -turn" after the
word "southbound".
EIR-PC_Reso. p. 31, Revise the first sentence of T-10 by inserting "left -tum" after the
word "northbound".
EIR-PC_Reso. p. 31, Revise the first sentence of T-13 by inserting "left -tum" in two
places: after the word "northbound" and after the word "southbound".
EIR-Reso. p. 32, fourth paragraph: replace the figure "4,855' with "4,657'.
EIR-Reso. p. 38, last line: replace "SFS" with "Student Financial Services".
EIR-Reso. p. 40, line 3: replace the sum 350,000" with the sum "$25,000".
FEIR . Add text to explains the deletion of mitigations T-4, T-11 and T-15. The revised
traffic mitigation summary prepared by Kaku Associates and dated June 10, 2005 states:
"Although the study had previously identified impacts at these intersections, intersection
19 (Alameda Avenue & Foothill Boulevard) would continue to operate at an acceptable
level of service (LOS D) after the addition of project -generated traffic. At intersection 27
(Citrus Avenue and I-210 EB Off -Ramp), the intersection, which currently operates at an
unacceptable LOS E, would continue to operate at LOS E with the project traffic causing
an increase of 0.017 in the V/C ratio."
Underline = added text; &Fikethfo = deleted text; Bold = most recent edit
Exhibit H, Errata • •
Revised September 15, 2005
Page 5 of 9
MMP. The Mitigation Monitoring Program should be modified consistent with the
referenced changes to the EIR Resolution. For example, the number of parking spaces on
page 1 of the Mitigation Monitoring Program is incorrect and the traffic mitigations on
pages 2-5 need to be modified by adding the term "left -tum" as noted above. Also, the
triggers for traffic mitigations are as follows:
4.2-3: When new entrance is built
4.2-5: Issuance of building permit for first parking structure on either campus.
4.2-6, 4.2-7, 4.2-8: When Foothill Shopping Center is re -developed
4.2-9: When new interior road is constructed
4.2-10, 4.2-12, 4.2-13, 4.2-14: When first dorm building is built on West Campus
Changes recommended by staff as of July 6, 2005:
SP. Page 60. Development Standards. 5.7.3 Parking. Add: "The parking mans eg ment
plan for Azusa Pacific University includes a parking requirement analysis for the campus
reflecting projected increases in students and staff/faculty through Year 2022-23. The
parking requirement for APU in Year 2022-23 based on the City of Azusa Development
Code is 3,088 spaces. The parking management plan also includes a description of the
future parking plan for the campus as part of the Azusa Pacific University Specific Plan.
The parking plan provides a total supply of 4,657 spaces, 2,767 on the east campus and
1,890 spaces on the west campus. It can be seen the proposed campus parking supply of
4,657 spaces would result in a surplus supply of over 1,500 spaces over the projected
requirement. The university is prepared to construct sufficient parking supply to ensure
that the total number of spaces exceeds the city requirement of 3.088 up to a total of
4,657 spaces."
SP. Page 97. Implementation Plan. 7.6.3 Phasing of Parking Facilities. Add: "The parking
management plan for Azusa Pacific University includes a parking requirement analysis
for the campus reflecting projected increases in students and staff/faculty through Yeaz
2022-23. The parking requirement for APU in Year 2022-23 based on the City of Azusa
Development Code is 3,088 spaces. The parking management plan also includes a
description of the future parking plan for the campus as part of the Azusa Pacific
University Specific Plan. The parking plan provides a total supply of 4,657 spaces, 2,767
on the east campus and 1,890 spaces on the west campus. It can be seen the proposed
campus parking supply of 4,657 spaces would result in a surplus supply of over 1,500
spaces over the projected requirement. The university is prepared to construct sufficient
parking supply to ensure that the total number of spaces exceeds the city requirement of
3,088 up to a total of 4,657 spaces."
SP. (Global edit):
• Change "Community Development Director" to "Economic and Community
Development Director"
SP. (Global edit):
Underline = added text; Striketlrrea= deleted text; Bold = most recent edit
Exhibit H, Errata • •
Revised September 15, 2005
Page 6 of 9
• Change "Community Development Department" to "Economic and Community
Development Department'
SP. (Global edit):
• Change "Precise Plan of Design" to "Design Review"
SP. Page 3, Table IA,
Delete line labeled "Parking Ratio." APU is using the City of Azusa Development Code
parking requirements.
SP. Page 27, fourth column,
Delete second bullet point: "l-210 Westbound Off -Ramp and Baseline Road (AM & PM)
SP. Page 28, First Column
Delete fourth bullet point: "Alameda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (PM Only)
Delete eight bullet point: "Citrus Avenue and I-210 Eastbound Off -Ramp (AM Only)
Delete entire paragraph of tenth bullet point referring to I-210 WB Off -Ramp and
Baseline Road.
SP. Page 28, Third Column
Delete entire paragraph of second bullet point referring to Alameda Avenue and Foothill
Boulevard.
Delete entire paragraph of sixth bullet point referring to Citrus Avenue and I-210 EB Off -
Ramp.
SP. Page 29, 4.3.6, third column, fust paragraph
Add: "The far east entrance/exit just west of Palm Drive will remain open to provide
access to the parking garage just to the west of this drive and for fire department access to
the northern buildings on the west campus. Access to the West Campus may require
shared usage with future roadway design proposed for Palm Drive. Future access
concepts will be jointly reviewed by APU and Rosedale representatives and in context
with accepted traffic engineering criteria."
Page 53, 5. 1, second column, middle of first paragraph
Delete: The Standards in this Section are mandatory, adopted as an ordinance by the City
of Azusa, whereas the Design Guidelines in Section 6 are advisory.
Replace with: This Specific Plan will be adopted as an ordinance by the City of Azusa
making the Design Guidelines and Development Standards mandatory.
SP. Edit the document to include a description of the building at Stein/Foothill as
follows:
The design of the building shall provide entrances and storefront display oriented to the
street to contribute to an attractive and inviting street environment. This building is to be
included in Phase III or earlier."
Underline = added text; ethreugh = deleted text; Bold = most recent edit
Exhibit H, Errata 0 •
Revised September 15, 2005
Page 7 of 9
• Page 3, last column, 3rd paragraph, line 9, "... would eventually accommodate
administrative uses, community oriented retail uses, classrooms, ..."
• Page 20, Objectives for Community Connection, last column, last bullet, "fostering
opportunities for joint usage, such as community oriented retail uses on campus".
• Page 23, 4.2.2. add a note that community oriented retail is allowed at the corner of
Stein/Foothill.
• Page 24, Amend Exhibit 4A, Land Use Diagram - West and East Campus. In the
West Campus diagram, the land use "bubble" at the corner of Stein Lane and Foothill
Boulevard should include community oriented retail uses.
• Page 41, Exhibit 4P, label building W35 Academic/Community Oriented Retail
• Page 49, Building W35 should be shown as Academic/Retail
• Page 53, 5.2.1 Land Use Categories. Add Community Oriented Retail
• Page 54, label the Stein/Foothill comer "Academic/Community Oriented Retail. Add
column, Community Oriented Retail with the following uses allowed with a Minor
Use Permit: bookstore, coffee/juice, ice cream, clothing, electronics/computers, and
food. No more than 40% of the floor area shall be fast food.
• Page 57. 5.3.4, first column, last paragraph, " ... Development Code shall not apply.
However, the community oriented retail building at the comer of Stein/Foothill shall
be outward oriented with
the following characteristics:
o The storefronts must face Foothill Boulevard. (and possibly Stein Lane) - not
away from the street.
o The comer of Stein/Footbill cannot be fenced in the way other campus
buildings are allowed to in the Specific Plan.
o Surface parking cannot be located between the public sidewalk and the
storefronts.
o The front (Foothill Blvd.) setback area shall be designed as a pedestrian space
containing amenities such as outdoor seating, landscaping, decorative paving,
public art, or water features.
o Parking for the customers of the retail uses shall be provided to the rear
(north) of the building,
• Page 67, Design Guidelines, add guidelines for retail: "The community oriented retail
building at Stein/Foothill will be designed to enhance and reflect he surrounding
community in concept, character and scale. The design shall provide entrances and
storefront display oriented to the street to contribute to an attractive and inviting street
environment."
• Page 68. Building Setback and Orientation. First column, add a bullet requiring street
orientation for buildings with Community Oriented Retail uses (Stein/Foothill).
• Page 70, 6.2.2 Academic/Administrative Design Guidelines, Make specific reference
to the building at Stein/Foothill.
• Page 89. Exhibit 6L, Specialty Lighting Zones, add note #3 (Special Use) to comer of
Stein/Foothill.
Underline = added text; Strikethreagh = deleted text; Bold = most recent edit
Exhibit H, Errata • •
Revised September 15, 2005
Page 8 of 9
SP. Edit the document to reflect the retention of the marquee sign and the eastern wing
of the Faculty Quad building:
• Page 24, 4.2.3 Cultural Resources. Add the following text in place of the existing
text: "APU acknowledges that some members of the Azusa community value the
marquee of the former Foothill Drive -In Theater. As part of its Specific Plan, the
University has agreed to maintain the marquee in its current location and spend up to
$50,000 to reconstruct the sign. APU will also cooperate with the Azusa Historical
Society in raising any additional funds necessary to reconstruct and maintain the
marquee.
In addition, the University will retain and relocate the eastern wing of the Faculty
Quad building on campus. According to the city's historical resources consultants,
this wing was likely a small residence build on the property circa 1910."
• Page 62. 5.10 Signage, second column, first bullet, add language allowing the
retention of the existing Foothill Drive-in marquee sign. The standard should identify
that the sign will be used for university and city announcements, with no advertising
of commercial entities/products.
• Page 64. Same as above.
• Page 86. Exhibit 6K, show the marquee sign on this illustration.
• Page 92. 6.9.1 Signage Types. Describe the Drive-in marquee sign as an existing sign
that will be retained.
• Page 93. 6.9.2, Signage Locations, last column, last bullet, Identify the marquee sign
under Specialty Signs.
• Page 96. 7.5 Implementation, last column, last paragraph, correct typo — 4.3.3 should
be 4.2.3 - and substitute text regarding the retention of the marquee sign. -
SP. 4.5.2 Drainage
• Page 33, Exhibit 4I, label "University Avenue" on the exhibit.
SP. 4.5.3 Water Supply
• Page 37, Exhibit 4M, label "University Avenue" and "Campus Lane" on the exhibit.
SP. Water System
• Page 40. Exhibit 40, Existing Water System — West Campus, should be labeled
"Existing Sewer System — West Campus"
SP. 5.3.3 Massing
• Page 56, last column, last paragraph, "5.4" should be "5.3.2"
SP. 5.7.3 Parking
• Page 60, column 3, first paragraph, Exhibit 4E should be 4F.
SP. 7.3 Review of Subsequent Development Applications.
• Page 96. Update all prior Code references — i.e. Division 13, Chapter 88, Article III,
Division 12 and 13, etc. — with new Development Code sections.
Underline = added text; St&etlrreugh = deleted text; Bold = most recent edit
Exhibit H, Errata • •
Revised September 15, 2005
Page 9 of 9
• Page 96. 7.3.1 Development Projects Requiring Approval. Second column, first
paragraph. Delete first sentence. "Applications will be reviewed by the Develepment
Review Beam Director in accordance ..."
SP. 7.5 Implementation
Add: "The University will maintain a single integrated campus wide emergency
management plan. This plan will meet the requirements of Development Code Section
88.30.030 (D)"
Underline = added text; S4r-ikethro = deleted text; Bold = most recent edit