HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 07-O6O C I I : ► GRIMSIffIyE1T!
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTERS 88.24.005, DISTRICTS;
88.26.005, CORRIDORS; 88.27, OVERLAY ZONES, AND 88.28,,
SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONES, OF THE CITY OF AZUSA MUNICIPAL
CODE IN ORDER TO ALLOW RETAIL STORES GREATER THAN
50,000 SQUARE FEET TO LOCATE IN THE DOWNTOWN TRANSIT
VILLAGE (DTV), SOUTH AZUSA AVENUE CORRIDOR (CSA),
FOOTHILL CENTER OVERLAY (FCO), AND
INSTITUTIONAL/SCHOOLS (INS) ZONE WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY
DISTRICT IF A USE PERMIT IS FIRST APPROVED (CASE NUMBER
ZCA 225)
WIiEREAS the City Council of the City of Azusa, has given notice thereof as
required by law, held a public hearing on June 4, 2007, with respect to the requested Zoning Code
Amendment No. ZCA-225, to amend Chapters 88.24.005, Districts; 88.26.005, Corridors; 88.27,
Overlay Zones, and 88.28, Special Purpose Zones, of the City of Azusa Municipal Code in order to
allow retail stores greater than 50,000 square feet to locate in the Downtown Transit Village (DTV),
South Azusa Avenue Corridor (CSA), Foothill Center Overlay ((FC(0)), and Institutional/Schools
(Ins) zone within the University District if a Use Permit is first approved.
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code prohibits retail stores greater than 50,000 square
feet to locate in the Downtown Transit Village (DTV), South Azusa Avenue Corridor (CSA),
Foothill Center Overlay (FCO), and Institutional/Schools (Ins) zones; and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency staff has been actively pursuing larger
national retailers, and has targeted several locations within the city for.such uses; and
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Azusa
("Planning Commission") conducted a noticed public hearing on the proposed amendments to the
Development Code at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the revisions to
the Development Code were heard and the revisions were fully studied, discussed and deliberated;
and
WHEREAS, after deliberations, the Planning Commission determined that the
Development Code should be amended to allow retail stores greater than 50,000 square feet only in
the DTV and CSA zones; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully considered all pertinent testimony and the
staff reports presented during the public hearings for the revisions to the Development Code.
WHEREAS, on June 4, 2007, the City Council of the City of Azusa ("City
Council') conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed amendments to the
Development Code at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the
amendments to the Developmenf Code were heard, fully studied, discussed and deliberated; and
Document in June 18, embedded.doc
Ordinance No. 07-06
June 4, 2007
Page 2 of 6
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Based on the entire record before the City Council, all written and oral
evidence presented to the City Council, and the findings made in this Ordinance, the City Council of
the City of Azusa hereby adopts the amendments to the Development Code as set forth in the
attached Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance; and
SECTION 2: The City Council finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the
goals, policies, and objectives of the general plan, any applicable specific plan, development
agreement, Owner Participation Agreement or Disposition and Development Agreement.
The proposed amendment, in and of itself, will not conflict with the goals and policies of the
General Plan. The effect of the amendment is to change the Development Code in a way that
would allow individual retail stores having greater than 50, 000 square feet offoor area to be
constructed in the DTV, CSA, FC(0), and select Ins zones only if a Use Permit is first
approved. The Use Permit process provides a safeguard to assure that the site beingproposed
is adequate for the intended use, and that the project is consistent with General Plan goals
and policies. These proposed amendments will not alter any of the other design criteria or
development standards. However, it is likely that in the future, as landowners implement the
new standards, the owners may seek future amendments to development standards such as
setbacks, heights, etc. If the design policies and other relevant development standards — i. e.
building setbacks and design, bulb height, frontage types, etc. - are adhered to, future
projects will not be in conflict with the General Plan.
SECTION 3: The City Council also finds that the proposed Code amendment will not
adversely affect surrounding properties.
There is no specific development project or specific site associated with this Code
amendment. Additionally, the intensity of any future development project will not be
affected by the proposed amendment. Under the current Code, a 100, 000 square foot
retail commercial building could be built in the specified zones, but the building area
would have to be subdivided into commercial units of 50, 000 square feet or less. If the
Code amendment is approved, that same 100, 000 square foot building could be built
without the interior lease area subdivision — i.e. the building could house a single store.
Given that any development project has to conform to Development Code (i.e. setbacks,
frontage types, building height, etc.) and General Plan, the Code amendment in and of
itself will not adversely affect surrounding properties. For future development projects, if
context sensitive site design features are applied to a project, the presence of a large
format retail store in the specified zones should not degrade the existing visual character
or quality of the site and its surroundings.
Ordinance No. 07-06
June 4, 2007
Page 3 of 6
SECTION 4: The City Council finds that an Initial Study was prepared and noticed for
this project in accordance with CEQA guidelines. The Initial Study concluded that the proposed
project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and the City Council hereby
approves the Negative Declaration.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or portion of
this Ordinance is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portion of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Azusa hereby declares that they would
have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, parz graph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase would be declared invalid, unconstitutional or unenforceable.
SECTION 6. Effective date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage.
SECTION 7. Summary. A summary of this ordinance shall be published in the manner
required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18'' day of June, 2007.
Joseph Rocha
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 07-06
June 4, 2007
Page 4 of 6
I Vera Mendoza, City Clerk of the City of Azusa hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance
No. 07-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Azusa held on the 4h day of June 2007, and that thereafter, said
ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting on the 18th day of June, 2007, by
the following vote of the Council:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )ss.
CITY OF AZUSA )
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: GONZALES, CARRILLO, MACIAS, HANKS, ROCHA
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
Vera Mendoza,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia Carvalho
City Attorney
Exhibit "A"
PROPOSED CODE REVISIONS
88.24.005 - ALLOWABLE USES IN DISTRICTS
TABLE 2-2
P
Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required
Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required
MUP
Minor Use Permit required
MUP
UP
Use Permit required
S
Permit requirement set by Specific Use
Regulations
S
x
Use not allowed
LAND USE TYPE
x
PERMIT REQUIRED BY ZONESpeda
Use
Regulations
DTC
DCC DTV DE DW DWL
RETAIL SALES
General retail, except with any of the following features
General retail, except with any of the following features
Floor area over 50,000 sfUP
UP
X
UP
x
P
X
MUP
X
UP
UP
88.26.005 - ALLOWABLE USES IN CORRIDORS
TABLE 2-3
P
Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required
MUP
Minor Use Permit required
UP
Use Permit required
S
Permit requirement set by Specific Use Regulations
x
Use not allowed
LAND USE TYPE
PERMIT REQUIRED BY ZONE
Special Use Regulations
CAZ
CSG CSA CAH CFB
RETAIL SALES
General retail, except with any of the following features
Floor area over 50,000 sfX
X
X
MUP
X
UP
Chapter 88.27 - Overlay Zones
88.27.040 Foothill Center Overlay.
A. Purpose and Intent. The Foothill Center (FC) Overlay Zone is established to allow for the
transformation over time of the strip commercial retail shopping center at the south-west corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue into a mixed use center which incorporates the design
principles of the Urban Form Element of the General Plan.
B. An application for a zone change to permit the establishment of an (FC) zone shall include and be
accompanied by a master phasing plan for the entire property.
C. Development Standards. The development standards required by the underlying base district
shall apply. In addition, the following shall apply:
1. Frontage Types. Residential buildings are exempt from Chapter 88.29 - Architectural
Standards if the review authority determines that alternative frontage types will result in
a compatible building to street relationship.
2. Setbacks for residential buildings.
a. The minimum setbacks adjacent to Fennimore Avenue shall be ten feet (10') with
no further encroachment.
b. The minimum setbacks adjacent to retail parcels shall be seven feet (7') with no
further encroachment.
Document in June 18, embedded.doc
Ordinance No. 07-06
June 4, 2007
Page 6 of 6
3. Outdoor Lighting. Existing parking areas serving retail buildings may be maintained
without complying with the maximum height limit for outdoor lighting fixtures.
4. Parking.
a. Landscaping of commercial parking areas. Existing parking areas serving retail
buildings may be maintained without complying with the parking lot landscaping
standards.
b. Tandem Parking Stalls. 36 percent tandem parking shall be allowed for
Residential garages.
C. Compact Parking, if provided, shall compromise no more than 10% of the total
parking spaces provided, and shall be located only on one side of an aisle.
d. Guest Parking for the residential units may be provided along the portion of
Fenimore Street within the boundaries of the townhomes.
5. Signs.
a. A Master Sign Plan is required for the commercial component. It may be
processed separately from any planning permit required by the City for the
development of the parcel.
b. Three monument signs, not to exceed 10 feet in height and 30 square feet in sign
face area each, are permitted for the townhome development.
C. Existing nonconforming freestanding signs may be structurally altered, but not
enlarged.
d. Exemptions from Sign Permit Requirements. Symbols, pictures, patterns,
lettering, and illumination approved as architectural ornamentation or decoration
by the review authority are allowed without sign permit or master sign plan
approval.
6. Walls.
a. Residential perimeter walls may exceed six feet (6').
7. Private Open Space.
a. Private Open Space may be provided through balconies, exterior decks and front
patios.
8. Permitted Uses. General Retail stores greater than 50.000 square feet may be
permitted with a Use Permit.
88.28 - ALLOWABLE USES IN SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONES
TABLE 2-4
P Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required
MUP Minor Use Permit required
UP Use Permit required
S Permit requirement set by Specific Use Regulations
X
Use not allowed
LAND USE TYPE
PERMIT REQUIRED BY ZONE
Special Use Regulations
INS
OS REC
RETAIL SALES
General retail except with any of the following features
Floor area over 50.000 sf
X
X
X
UP 5
Notes:
(5) Allowed only on INS zoned properties within the University District.
Str+lwout text = deleted Underlined text = added