Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 5548RESOLUTION NO. 5548 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA, IN OPPOSITION TO THE LATEST COURT CONSOLIDATION PLAN SUBMITTED TO THE STATE LEGISLATURE AS ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 238. WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 238 would consolidate the existing localized judicial districts into nine judicial dis- tricts; and WHEREAS, said consolidation has been attempted in varying forms in recent years and in each instance defeated after a hearing thereon; and WHEREAS, a consolidation plan utilizing existing court facilities and personnel would not achieve any monetary saving; and WHEREAS, the reorganization of districts into a smaller number would result in requiring witnesses, officers, prosecutors and counsel to travel, in some instances, substan- tial distances in order to have cases tried; and WHEREAS, said consolidation would make thereby the municipal judicial process more costly in terms of the time of witnesses, defendants, police officers and other officials re- quired by the cities involved in cases to prosecute or defend; and WHEREAS, this City Council favors the principle of home rule as it relates to the election of judges from the communities which they serve; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA, hereby does strongly oppose AB 238 and any proposal to consolidate the existing judicial districts into a smaller number on the basis that it represents a departure from the home rule principle and will not, if it were effectuated, result in any savings or greater efficiency but on the contrary would re- sult in expense and inconvenience to all persons concerned. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Adopted and approved this 17th day of March, 1969. I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of March, 1969, by the follow- ing vote of the Council: AYES: Councilmen: Rubio, Decker, Cooney, Calvert, Solem NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None