Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 66510 0 RESOLUTION NO. 6651 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA SUPPORTING INITIATIVE LEGISLATION KNOWN AS "ABATEMENT OF MORAL PUBLIC NUISANCES LAW." WHEREAS, during the past several years, the widespread dissemination of pornographic materials and increase in commercial businesses dealing in hard-core pornography and in lewdness, assignation, and prostitution has created serious law enforcement problems in the local communities throughout the State of Califor- nia, and the failure of existing laws to provide an effective means for controlling these local problems has become a matter of grave concern; and WHEREAS, a substantial number of the people of this State feel that the indiscriminate dissemination of such materials, and the continued toleration of businesses which degrade sex, will, over a long period of time, have an eroding effect on the moral standards of the local communities and will do irreparable harm to the family structure and family values of those communities; and WHEREAS, the California Supreme Court ruled on June 1, 1976 inPeople ex rel. Busch v. Projection Room Theater et al., 17 Cal. 3d'52 also known as trie Busch decision., itFat "conductffensive to a community's moral sensibilities is likewise subject to regu- lation" under the public nuisance statutes in the same manner as conduct which is offensive to the five physical senses of hearing, sight, touch, smell, and taste; and WHEREAS, the California Supreme Court also ruled in the Busch decision that it saw "no satisfactory distinction which would us ify differential treatment of the pictorial representations in obscene magazines and films on the one hand, and 'live' performances on the other" and that " the presentation of either may fairly be described as 'indecent' and equally injurious to public morales" and that the exhibition of obscene magazines and films is a "per se" public nuisance, which can be abated under the public nuisance laws of this state as a moral public nuisance; and WHEREAS, the California Supreme Court in Busch cited with approval the U.S. Supreme Court decision in State ex rel. Ewing v. Without a Stitch, (1974) 37 Ohio St. 2d 953 07 N.E.2d 911, appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question in 421 U.S. 923, 95 S.Ct. 16493 44 L.Ed.2d 82, which upheld on the merits an Ohio public nuisance statute and procedures which auth- orize a State Court to apply stringent penalties (even closure under certain conditions) where moral public nuisances were found to exist under the law; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 37 L.Ed.2d 419, 93 S.Ct. 207 (June�— 1D73T_ih_a'E the determination of community standards is largely a matter for the local communities; and WHEREAS, the elimination of the above-described evils from the communities is in the best interests of the moral and general welfare of the people in the local communities and it appears; . . .J (1) that this can most effectively be accomplished by declaring the same to be a "municipal affair" which is more properly the subject of control by local governments, and (2) that a situation exists wherein the initiative power reserved to the electors of cities and counties by Article IV, Section 1 of the California Constitution, should be envoked for the purpose of enacting general laws through initiative legislation; (a) to provide stronger controls over such moral public nuisances for local governments which are regu- lated by general laws, and (b) to restore to charter cities and counties the home rule powers which are needed to deal further with such municipal affairs, and (c) to put an end to the pre-emption policy pre- sently being applied in the California Courts, which prevents the recognition of the problem as being a municipal affair which requires the application of both local control and home rule powers; and WHEREAS, an Initiative measure known by the title of "Abatement of Moral Public Nuisances Laws', has been drafted to accomplish the above stated objectives, and is presently being circulated for qualifying signatures; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council fully su?ports the princi- ples stated in the Initiative measure, known as the 'Abatement of Moral Public Nuisances Law" and recommends that the same be placed on the ballot as an issue for the general public to decide; and Section 2. That the attention of all citizens of the City of Azusa is invited to the efforts of the sponsoring group, known as "Decency in the Environment Today", which is seeking to obtain the necessary qualifying voter signatures, and are urged to lend their support to such effort, so that the matter may be placed on the ballot as an issue to be decided by the voters of the State of California at the next general election following its qualification.- PASSED ualification. PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of April, 1978 I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of April, 1978, by the follovd.ng vote of Council: AYES: Councilmen: Decker, Fry, Cruz, Moses, Solem NOES; Councilmen: None ABSENT:Councilmen: None