Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 7702• 0 RESOLUTION NO. 7702 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT C-347, HARRY GOODLIN/CANYON INN WHEREAS, an Initial Study of Environmental Impact and a Negative Declaration have been prepared for Conditional Use Permit C-347, Harry Goodlin/Canyon Inn (hereinafter "Project") in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines; WHEREAS, a duly -noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission for the City of Azusa on the 6th day of February, 1985, and the City Council of the City of Azusa on March 18, 1985; April 1, 1985 and April 15, 1985, at which times evidence was heard on the proposed Project and the Negative Declaration; WHEREAS, prior to approving the Project the City Council of the City of Azusa considered the Initial Study of Environmental Impact and the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Azusa hereby finds and determines that on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received in the public review process, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant adverse effect upon the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA that the Negative Declaration for the Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this refer- ence incorporated herein, is hereby certified and approved and determined that this Negative Declaration shall be filed with the County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 6th day of May , 1985 . I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City of Azusa at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of May , 1985, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CRUZ, LATTA, MOSES CAMARENA COOK Ilk- .r ' CITY OF AZUSA ' ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT INITIAL STUDY A copy of the Initial Study for Public Works projects will be available' to the public in the Azusa Public Works Department. A copy of the initial study for the Planning Department projects will be in the Planning Department and the Public Library. Comments from the public on the projects may be made, in writing, to the respective department directors . or at the public hearings .for the projects. Project Description: - Condtional Use Permit Case No. C-347, expansion of a nonconforming restaurant and operation of a public dance floor.. II: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT5 (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) . 1. Earth Will the project result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or' in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compac- tion or overcovering of the soil?. I_ c. Change in topography or ground surface.. relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical X features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off Lhe site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion ihich may modify the channel of a river or stream or the.bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? �- g. Exposure of people or property to geo-. logic hazards such as earLhquakes, . landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? A 2. Air Will the project result in: - a. Substantial air emissions or deteriora- tion of ambient air quality? >F" b. 'Elie creation of objectionable odors? X C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in . ' climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water Will the project result iii: a. Changes In currents, or the course or ._ . direction. of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes on' b. r.cite•s, drainage ., patterns, or the rate and amount.of C surface water run of f7 .. Y...,: Ilk:YES MAYBE NO C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X ' e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any.alteration of surf.ace water quality, - including but not limited to tempera- ture, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X_ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- . drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?., X h. Change in quality of ground water? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of: . water otherwise available for public , water supplies?. j. Exposure of people or property to - water related hazards such as flooding . or tidal waves? X - 4. Plant Life Will the project result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (includ- ing trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro- flora and aquatic plants)? t - b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,_ rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life Ili 11 the project result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or. numbers or any species of animals (birds, land animals, including reptiles, fish _ and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, X rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species or animals into an arca, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wild- life habitat? X 6. tioise Will the project result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? X_ b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare Frill th6 project produce .. new light or glare? X -I- C. �• 3IES I4AYDE NO H. Land Use Will the pro* a. Substantial alteralk X planned land use ailK b. Incompatibility wif the General Plan,; X other applicable ]AM. 9. Natural Resources NiIiWl., a. Increase in the rafte. ural resources? X b. Substantial deplete-` able natural resou 10. Risk of U pset Does thaw}'.' risk_o f an explosion a .".._ .. hazardous substances (iii limited to, oil; pestij'i�r. radiation) in the evenW• or upset conditions? X it. Population Will the pio location, distribution rate of the human popuiW,: X 12. Housing Will the projoW housing or create a 'de>Wi housilly ? 13. •Praiisporl'ation/Circulate project result in: _ a. Generation of substa vehicular movement? x b. Effects on exisL-inaMh or demand for new �qq X C. Substantial impact X portation systems- . d.Alterations to presaW . circulation or mova*r X , or goods?_,. e. Alterations to wale&*.' traffic? : X f. Increase in traff*. vehicles, bicyclisK, 14. Public Services IIi1146,:.: effect upon, or resul�E'. or altered governments-, of the following area: . a. Eire protection? X b. Police protection?=: X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other rca&-� e. 19aintenance of puha.. .- - including roads? f. Other yovertimentai . - _4•' — — ' i' 15. Energy Will the projdct result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in dLmand upon'.. existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities Will the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a.- Power or natural gas? b. COlnlllnnlcatiOns systems? YES 14AYBE NO X �x z c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Human 'Ile a1th will the project result in: a. Creation of ally health hazard or po- tential. health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics J7ii1 the project result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ 19. Recreation Will the project result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ex-.. . isting recreational opportunities?:.i 20. Archeolo ical/historical_ Will the project result— ii an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, struc- ture, object or building? 21.I-taiIidatory Findings, of Significance X X' a. Does the project have the potential to' degrade the duality of the environment,' substantially reduce the habitat of a . fish or wildlife species, cause a fish;. or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important. examples of the major periods of California history or X prehistory? , b. Dods the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A:'. short -tern impact on the environment is one which_oc'urs in a relatively brief definitive period of '.time while long- term'.impacts will endure well into the "x future.) — 3 `�i 1 ' YES C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the' impact on each resource is relatively.: small, but where the effect of the total' of those impacts on the environment is significant.); - d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings directly or indirectly? _ MAYBE NO X. IV. miTIGATION MEASURES Describe mitigation measures included in the project, if any are needed, to avoid potentially significant effects:' None required. V, Dato DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation K I find the proposed project COULD NOT have,a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION, has been prepared and is attached.' I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case UCC.lUrC the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE UECLARATIUN WILL UE PREPARED. . I find the proposed project NAY have a significant effect on the environment and an EtJVIRONh1ENTAL IH.PACT. REPORT is required:' .January 18, 1985 � �Signature•�CL�r'�°��uzif.�J) DANIEL ME" .: Title' PLANNING ASSISTANT-'' ^',' NEGATIVE DECLARATION.