HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 77430 0
RESOLUTION NO. 7743
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AZUSA DENYING THE PUBLIC NUISANCE APPEAL OF
EDWIN SUTHEIMER AND AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF
A NUISANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 415 EAST
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ORDERING CORRECTIVE
MEASURES THEREON (CITY CASE NO. 84-102)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DOES RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Azusa
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On March 25, 1985, Edwin M. Sutheimer filed an
appeal from the March 21, 1985 decision of the
Assistant to the City Administrator confirming the
findings of a nuisance at the subject property
located at 415 East Foothill Boulevard, Azusa,
California, more particularly described as Los
Angeles County Assessor's Parcel No. 860829-21;
B. A hearing was held before the City Council of
the City of Azusa pursuant to the provisions of
Azusa Municipal Code §§ 15.08.070 and 15.08.080 on
Mr. Sutheimer's appeal, with evidence being
received from the City through its Code Enforcement
Officer, David Rudisel, and by Eugene Osko, Esq.,
attorney for Mr. Sutheimer;
C. Evidence having been received from the City
and Mr. Sutheimer, and due consideration having
been given to the respective positions of each
side, the City Council specifically finds that
subject property was a nuisance within the meaning
of Azusa Municipal Code §§ 15.08.010 A,D,F and M.
Based upon the following findings:
(1) The house on the subject property was
built in 1930, based upon construction type
and materials. A zone change occurred in
1957, placing the property in the C-2 zone
(restricted commercial), which rendered the
residential use nonconforming with an
amortization period of 20 years from 1957.
The amortization period expired in 1977, at
which time the property was required to
conform to the C-2 zoning standards, pursuant
to § 19.24.010, et seq. of the Azusa Municipal
Code. At the present time, the property has
seven units in violation of the C-2 zoning
standards.
(2) The subject property has certain
dangerous conditions existing upon it,
consisting of exposed wiring and extensive use
of extension cord wiring in violation of the
Los Angeles County Electrical Code and Health
& Safety Code § 17920.3(d), unvented heaters
0
in violation of § 807(c) of the Los Angeles
County Mechanical Code, lack of natural gas
shutoff valves on appliance connections in
violation of § 822 of the Los Angeles County
Health Code and § 503(a) of the Los Angeles
County Mechanical Code, and inadequate exits
and ventilation in violation of § 1205(a) of
the Los Angeles County Building Code.
(3) The subject property also has certain
substandard conditions consisting of damaged
floors, walls and ceilings in violation of
Health & Safety Code § 17920.3(a)13 and
(b)2 and the Los Angeles Building Code,
electrical violations pursuant to Health &
Safety Code § 17920.3(d) and the Los Angeles
County Electrical Code, cockroach infestation
in violation of § 809(b)10 of the Los Angeles
County Health Code, lack of hallway lighting
in violation of § 3306(p) of the Building Code
and Health & Safety Code § 17920.3, inadequate
head clearance in hallway exit from upstairs
in violation of § 3306(p) of the Los Angeles
Building Code, illegal construction (garage
conversions and curtain walls) in violation of
§ 301(a) of the Los Angeles County Building
Code, inadequate sanitation facilities in
violation of § 1205(b) of the Building Code
and § 809(b)l of the Los Angeles County Health
Code, illegal plumbing in violation of
§ 1205(b) of the Los Angeles County Building
Code and § 809(b)1 of the Los Angeles County
Health Code, use of other than habitable rooms
for living, cooking or eating purposes in
violation of § 825 of the Los Angeles County
Health Code, and lack of water supply adequate
to maintain the health of inhabitants in
violation of § 1205(b) of the Building Code
and the Los Angeles County Plumbing Code.
(4) The Los Angeles County Building Code,
Electrical Code, Mechanical Code and Plumbing
Code were adopted by the City pursuant to
§ 15.04.010 of the Azusa Municipal Code. The
Health Code of the County of Los Angeles has
been adopted by the City of Azusa pursuant to
the provisions of § 7.04.010 of the Azusa
Municipal Code.
(5) The City has received complaints of the
violations set forth above and initiated an
investigation in June, 1982, and has attempted
to obtain compliance with the Code require-
ments since that time.
(6) Although the Appellant has corrected some
of the violations and has professed a
willingness to comply with the remaining
violations, this order is nonetheless
necessary to ensure that all violations are
corrected within the time limits set forth,
and that the public health, safety, and
welfare is adequately protected.
SECTION 2. Based upon the findings set forth in
SECTION 1 of this Resolution, the City Council of the City
-2-
PMT/ORD1034
0 0
of Azusa does hereby deny the appeal of Edwin Sutheimer and
specifically affirms the decision of the Assistant to the
City Administrator declaring the subject property to be a
nuisance pursuant to the provisions of § 15.08.010 A,D,F and
M of the Azusa Municipal Code, and that the following order
of Abatement be issued:
A. That the subject property be declared
substandard housing and that the "Notice of
Substandard Housing", recorded with the Los Angeles
County Recorder's Office, be ratified and continue
in effect in accordance with its terms.
B. That the provisions set forth in Section 17299
of the California Revenue and Taxation Code be
implemented.
C. That the property and use be brought into
compliance with all applicable building, health,
fire, and municipal code requirements within sixty
(60) days of this resolution.
D. That should the property owner fail to comply
with this order of abatement or any time frame
herein, the City may seek any civil remedy
necessary to cause abatement.
E. That the City commence criminal prosecution
immediately.
F. That a title report be obtained.
E. That all costs incurred by the City of Azusa
for any attorneys' fees, court costs, title
searches, contractors or any other costs incurred
be charged to the property owner pursuant to
Section 15.08.100, et seq., of the Azusa Municipal
Code.
G. Item E shall be held in abeyance for thirty
(30) days in order for the property owner to apply
for a conditional use permit to operate a boarding
house or other permitted use in theā¢£ -2 zone.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall send a certified
copy of this resolution to Mr. Sutheimer and to his
attorney, Eugene Osko, Esq., by prepaid, first class, United
States mail at the address shown in the public nuisance
appeal filed by Mr. Sutheimer, or as set forth in the public
hearing thereon. Such mailing shall constitute notice to
Mr. Sutheimer and Mr. Osko in accordance with Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.6 and Azusa Municipal Code Section
15.08.100 that any action to review this decision of the
City Council shall be commenced not later than the ninetieth
(90th) day following the adoption of this resolution.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the
adoption of this resolution.
-3-
PMT/ORD1034
0 0
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day
of July , 1985.
L.a
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was
duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa, at a
regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of July
1985, by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: CRUZ, COOK, CAMARENA, MOSES
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: LATTA
AZ411vwl -,
CITY CLERK
-4-
PMT/ORD1034