Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 82100 0 RESOLUTION NO. 8210 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DENYING THE PUBLIC NUISANCE APPEAL OF ROBERT CLARK, CAROLE M. CLARK, ANTONIO R. CORRAL AND RICHARD WONG AND AFFIRMING THE FINDING OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDER TO ABATE THE NUISANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 701-705 WEST NINTH STREET, AZUSA, NUISANCE CASE NO. 87-31 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Azusa does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 26, 1987, Carole M. Clark, on behalf of herself, Robert Clark, Antonio R. Corral and Richard Wong filed an appeal from the February 17, 1987 decision of the Assistant City Administrator finding a public nuisance at the subject property located at 701-705 West Ninth Street, Azusa, California, more particularly described as Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel No. 8605-14-8. B. On March 31, 1987, a hearing was held before the City Council of the City of Azusa pursuant to the provisions of Azusa Municipal Code Sections 15.08.070 and 15.08.080 on appellants' appeal. Evidence was received on behalf of the City and on behalf of the applicants, and the City Council specifically received into evidence certain documents including, but not limited to, the files of the Code Enforcement Department, Planning Department, and Finance Department, relating to the subject property. C. Evidence having been received from the City and the applicant and careful consideration having been given to the respective positions of each side, the City Council specifically finds that: (1) The conditions of Precise Plan of Design No. P-2011 have not been complied with and the permit has expired by time limitation. (2) Improvements in the form of curb, gutter and driveway approach were done without benefit of required permits. (3) Use of the property is regulated by the provisions of Chapter 19.56 of the Azusa Municipal Code (Precise Plan Requirements), and without an approved and completed Precise Plan, use of the property is prohibited. The Precise Plan has been allowed to lapse by time limitation. 0 0 (4) The City of Azusa does have an easement for drainage purposes over the property, which easement can be accommodated by constructing a drainage facility on the westerly portion of the property as approved by the City Engineer and as shown on the Precise Plan issued for the property. SECTION 2. Based upon the findings set forth in Section 1 of this resolution, the City Council of the City of Azusa does hereby deny the appeal of Carole Clark and specifically affirms the decision of the Assistant City Administrator of February 17, 1987, and declares the subject property a public nuisance pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.08.010(F & M) of the Azusa Municipal Code, and issues the following Order of Abatement: A. All remaining materials and the storage shed be removed from the property within 30 days of this resolution, or within such time period as the applicant renews the required Precise Plan of Design through the Planning Department. B. The owners of the subject property shall obtain required Public Works permits for the curb, gutter, driveway approach and pave -out within 30 days of the date of this resolution from the Engineering Department of the City of Azusa. C. Should the property owners and/or tenants of the subject property fail to comply with this Order of Abatement, the City of Azusa may cause abatement as needed and charge all costs to the property owners. Said abatement may include, but not be limited to, imposing a lien upon the property for Public Works' permit fees in the amount of $100 and removing any materials left on the property after the time period set forth in this Order of Abatement. D. Should the City of Azusa be required to cause abatement or enforce this Order of Abatement, the property owners and/or tenants shall be charged for all costs incurred. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall send a certified copy of this resolution to Carole Clark, Robert Clark, Antonio Corral and Richard Wong by prepaid, first class, United States mail at the address shown in the Public Nuisance Appeal, or such other address as the City has on file for the parties. Such mailing shall constitute notice to the applicants in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 and Azusa Municipal Code Section 15.08.100 that any action to renew this decision of the City Council shall be commenced not later than the ninetieth (90th) day following adoption of this resolution. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. -2- 0 0 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April , 1987. MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of April 1987, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS AVILA, COOK, CRUZ, LATTA, MOSES NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS NONE IWO— C TY CLERK RES3452 -3-