HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 92-C0590
0
RESOLUTION NO. 92-059
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AZUSA TO RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
ON MAY 18, 1992
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Closed Sessions of the City Countil are
permitted for various purposes pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957 for the purposes of discussions with the City
Attorney of matters within the attorney-client privilege relating
to litigation and potential litigation, discussion of matters
with the City's authorized labor representative, discussion of
personnel matters relating to the appointment, evaluation,
dismissal, or charges against an employee, or to give
instructions to the City's negotiator regarding the purchase,
sale, exchange, or lease of certain property, among others.
It is the policy of the City Council to strictly adhere to the
requirements of the Brown Act (the California Public Meeting Act)
and to only recess to closed session when absolutely necessary.
SECTION 2. The City Council shall recess to Closed
Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to confer
withits attorneys with respect to a confidential matter within
the attorney-client privilege regarding pending litigation which
has been initiated formally and to which the Agency or City is a
party. The tile of this litigation is: Azusa v. Mack
SECTION 3. The City Council shall recess to closed
session to confer with its attorneys with respect to confidential
matters within the attorne-client privilege pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956(b) in order to discuss potential
litigation and is hereby of the opinion that 1 matter of
substantial exposure to litigation exists with respect to such
items.
SECTION 4. In connection with the litigation matters
discussed above, the City Council specifically finds that:
Discussion of the litigation matters
described above in open session would be prejudicial to
the interests of the City in that matters within the
attorney-client privilege will be discussed and
disclosure of such discussions would violate and waive
the attorney-client privilege and would give an unfair
advantage to the City's adversaries and allow them to
negotiate a settlement of the matters adverse to the
City;
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of
this resolution.
1992. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of May,
AL/t�
—�MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa, at a regular
meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of May, 1992 by the
following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DANGLEIS, MADRID, NARANJO, ALEXANDER,
MOSES
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE