Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 92-C1010 NO. 92-C101 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ORDINANCE 92-021 AMENDING TEE CITY GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT REGARDING PROPERTY AT 777 EAST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 428-432 NORTH SAN GABRIEL AVENUE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the State CEQA guidelines, a negative declaration, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, has been prepared and reviewed, finding that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council hereby certifies said negative declaration, with the provision that the mitigation measures, if any, recommended in the initial study, are implemented. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 7th DAY OF July 1992. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a meeting thereof held on the 7th day of July 1992 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: DANGLEIS, MADRID, NARANJO, ALEXANDER, MOSES NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE C TY CLE 22079.1 �GiYOP� ` .< NEGATIVE DECLARATION !09v Date:! NOTICE: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA-Public Resources Code, Section 21100 at. seg.), the City of kzusa has determined that the project referenced hereinafter will not have a significant effect on the environment. PROJECT TITLE: Zone Change No. Z-92-2, General Plan Amendment No. GPA -92-1 and Precise Plan of Design No. P-92-40 PROJECT LOCATION: 777 East Foothill Boulevard Azusa, California 91702 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezoning pvperty from M) to SP_2 and dang ng general PI'm ]and use designation from PID to SP todw'ge university campus, lard use fry ;nr6�err;al use as a PROJECT PROPONENT: Avery/Dennison and Azusa Pacific University A copy of the Initial Study, documenting reasons to support the findings that said project will not have a significant effect and containing any mitigating measures proposed to be included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, is attached hereto for public review. An Environmental Impact Report is not required for this project. APPEALS. Any Person or agency aggrieved by this decision may appeal to the Azusa City Council in compliance with all provisions for filing of such appeals. Any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30).days after the issuance of this decision, or it shall be dis- missed by the City Council. DANIEL M. WATROUS, SENIOR PLANNER (818) 334-5125 Ext.262 CONTACT PERSON TITLE TELEPHONE I.BACKGROOND INITIAL STffDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1. Name of Proponent/Applicant: Avery/Dennison Azusa Pacific University 2. Address and phone number of Proponent/Applicant: 150 North Orange Grove Blvd. Pasadena, California 91103 (818) 304-2000 3. Name of Project (if applicable): 901 East Alosta Avenue Azusa, California 91702 (818) 812-3001 Zone Change No. Z-92-2, Gen•nral Plan Amendment No. GPA -92-1 and Precise Plan of Design No. P-92-40. 4. Description of Project and Address: Changing zoning from M1 to SP -2 and general plan land use designation from PID to SP to change land use from industrial to use as a university campus. 777 East Foothill Boulevard Azusa, California 91702 5. Identification of Environmental Setting: Mired use portion of a predominantly residential suburban community, containing industrial, commercial and residential land uses. �nGus�n�N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY �nzusn ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A copy of the Initial Study for Community Development Dep3rtmen: projects will be available in the community Development Department and in the Azusa Public Library. Comments to the pubI from projects may be made in writing to the Community Development :irector the on project. or at the public hearings on I Project Description: Zr92 2, CPA -92-1 & RA2-40, dialging zaliM from K to SP-2MW gaxxa1 NMEuse ifrau FM to SP t0 chmW "'d use fm industlid PIMII. ENVIRO1 t0 NTAL IMPACTS Use as 8 univwsity f (Explanations of all "yeas and "maybe* answers are required or. attached sheets.) I. EARTH Will theYES project result in: MAYBE No a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substr_etures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? - e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of Boils, either an or off X the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or charges in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inle= or lake? X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 2. AIR Will the project result in: , a. Substantial air emmissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. X The creation of objectionable odors? -- c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change X In climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. WATER Will the project result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water =ve-ents, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and X amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? —� e. discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of sur=ate water �- earth including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quality of ground waters, either through di_ee: _X additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aq,:a=:er by cuts or excavations? h. Change in quality of ground water? '— X I. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise ava_:able _g for public water supplies? _- - - - j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards s_c= as —� flooding or tidal waves? I - - - X C. PLANT LIFE Will the project result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of plants (in_ uding - trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? I X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species or planta? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier X to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X X - 5. ANIMAL LIFE Will the project result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects, or nicrofauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species—g• of animals? c. Introduction of new species or animals into an area, or result in a X barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? X X 6. NOISE Will the project result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. LIGHT AND GLARE Will the project produce new light or g-aze? —X X S. LAND USE Will the project result in: a. Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b. Incompatibility with existing zoning, the General Plan, any specific 1 plan, or other applicable land use control? _ - X 9. NATURAL RESOURCES Will the project result in: , a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? ` b. Substantial depletion of any non-renewable natural resource. 10. RISK OF UPSET Does the project involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION Will the project alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING Will the project affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION Will the project result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people/and or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES Will the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any one of the areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational activities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY Will the project result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of energy or fuel? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES Will the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? - - - - f. Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE 17. HUMAN HEALTH Will the project result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding - mental health)? - --- - - - - b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? - 19. AESTHETICS Will the project result in the obstruction.of any - scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal - _---- result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION Will the project result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL Will the project result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structures, object or building? - 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? ( A short-term impact an the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ( A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings directly or - - indirectly? - - -- - - _ NO X -.X_ X X X X y x X r� `oma ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS i °s A, EXPLANATIONS/MITIGATION DISCUSSION III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION See Attached Sheet . MITIGATION MEASURES Describe mitigation measures included in the project, if any are needed, to avoid potentially significant effects: None Required DETERMINATION (To be completed by Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: R I find the proposed project COULD NOT HAVE a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECARATION has been prepared and is attached. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment; there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added_ to the -project: A -NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILI: BE- PRE--P--A-RED.--I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: April 7. 1992 Signature• Ley Title: SENIOR PLANNER S ATTACHMENT TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ZONE CHANGE NO. Z-92-2, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA -92-1 PLAN OF DESIGN NO. P-92-40 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS EXPLANATIONS/MITIGATION DISCUSSION III. DISCUSSION OF, ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 6.b. Temporary continued use of some industrial buildings while office building is used for classroom and - university offices could expose students, faculty and university employees to some industrial noise. The location of the classroom/office building away from these uses and existing sound buffers should reduce the noise to insignificant levels. S.a. Project would involve a change in long-term use of the property from industrial purposes to use as a university campus annex. 8.b. Project involves a zone change from M1 (Light Manufacturing) to SP -2 (Specific Plan) and an amendment to the land use designation from Planned Industrial Development to Specific Plan. Possible incompatibility with parking requirements do not exist at this time, but will be reviewed at a future date for compliance prior to occupancy of manufacturing buildings by the university. 13.a.&b. Change in use of front building from offices to classrooms and offices could alter the traffic generation and parking demand for the property. Existing circulation system and onsite parking appear to be adequate to handle any projected increase. Reference is also hereby made to all other Environmental Impact � - Reports which have been prepared for projects within the City of Azusa for additional information and knowledge of existing and future environmental conditions in the area. dTYOF NOTICE OF DETERMINATION AZUSA TO: COUNTY CLERK FROM: CITY OF AZUSA CORPORATIONS DIVISION -- Room 106 213 E. Foothill Blvd. P.O. Box 151 Azusa, California 917 Los Angeles, Ca. 90053 OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Meeting Date: April 29, 1992 PROJECT TITLE: Zone Change No. Z-92-2, General Plan Amendment No. GPA -g21 & Precise Plan of Design p -W PROJECT LOCATION: 777 East Foothill Boulevard, Azusa, California 91702 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: QhaW in zoning firm ML to Sp -2 snd gavial plan amad&mant from PID to SP to change land use fran ; Ausu ai to use as a university. This is to advise that the City of Azusa has approved the above de- scribed project and has made the following determinations regarding same; I. The project in its approved form ❑ will, ® will not have significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this pro- ject pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3.[D A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pur- suant to the provisions of cEQA. 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations ❑ was,® was not, adopted for this project.- --- 5. Mitigation measures ❑ were, ® were not, made a condition of approval of the project. - DANIEL M. WATROUS, SENIOR PLANNER (818) 334-5125 Ext 262 CONTACT PERSON TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER QTYOFB F. VICINITY MAP EMPROPOSED �k.qZ. I PROJECT FOR CASE NO. -9 p 4z-yn C2 Ric _ {3` Rlc '?��` Rlc , -0 R3 '•- Rib t M • C 500 10001 N 0 0 �Q C >.UTY Of � NEGATIVE DECLARATION crtvev Date: April 29, 1992 NOTICE: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA-Public Resources Code, Section 21100 at. seg.), the City of Azusa has determined that the project referenced hereinafter will not have a significant effect on the environment. PROJECT TITLE: Zone Change Case No. Z-92-3 and General Plan Amendment No. GPA -92-2 PROJECT LOCATION: 428-432 North San Gabriel Avenue Azusa, California 91702 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezoning property from R3-0 to C2 and changing general plan land use designation from H to GC for future commercial development of a vacant parcel. PROJECT PROPONENT: City of Azusa Redevelopment Agency A copy of the Initial Study, documenting reasons to support the findings that said project will not have a significant effect and containing any mitigating measures proposed to be included in the Project to avoid potentially significant effects, is attached hereto for public review. An Environmental Impact Report is not required for this project. APPEALS. Any person or agency aggrieved by this decision may appeal to the Azusa City Council in compliance with all provisions for filing of such appeals. Any such appeal must be filed within thirty (30).days after the issuance of this decision, or it shall be dis- missed by the City Council. DANIEL M. WATROUS, SENIOR PLANNER (818) 334-5125 Ext. 262 CONTACT PERSON TITLE TELEPHONE M�E INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT I.BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent/Applicant: City of Azusa Redevelopment Agency 2. Address and phone number of Proponent/Applicant: 213 East Foothill Boulevard Azusa, California 91702 (818) 335-5125 3. Name of Project (if applicable): Zone Change No. Z-92-3 and General Plan Amendment No. GPA -92-2 4. Description of Project and Address: Changing zoning from R3-0 to C2 and general plan land use designation from H to GC for future commercial development of a vacant parcel 428-432 North San Gabriel Avenue Azusa, Ca. 91702 5. Identification of Environmental Setting: Small commercial area of a high traffic corridor serving a predominantly residential suburban community. azusn� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT UiY01 � �6m"= INITIAL STUDY �NZUSN ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A copy of the Initial Study for Community Development Department projects will be available to the public In the Community Development Department and in the Azusa Public Library. Comments from the public on the projects may be made in writing to the Community Dovelopment=irector or at the public hearings on the project. , Project Description: Z-92-3, GPAWE 2, cbangi% zMA% fry R9 -O to Q & general plan laid use designatioa f= H to X for future development of a vacant parcel. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - (Explanations of all eyes" and "maybe" answers are required or. attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH Will the project result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? _ d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the cnannel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 2. AIR Will the project result in: a. Substantial air emmissions or deterioration of ambient air Y:ality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change _- in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. WATER Will the project result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water cave -ants, In either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and .� amount of surface water runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? �- e. discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water earth including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quality of ground waters, either through direct - - additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquafier by cuts or excavations? X h. Change in quality of ground water? I. Substantial reduction in the amount --of water otherwise avai.able for public water supplies? J. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards sue: as flooding or tidal waves? X 4. PLANT LIFE Will the project result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction -of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangerea species or plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or In a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _lam 5. ANIMAL LIFE Will the project result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (bird$, land animals, including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects, or nicrofauna)? _y b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X e. Introduction of new species or animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. NOISE Will the project result in: a. Increase in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? y 7. LIGHT AND GLARE Will the project produce new light or g:are? —X6 B. LAND USE Will the project result in: a. Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use cf an area? X _ b. Incompatibility with existing zoning, the General Plan, any specific 1 plan, or other applicable land use control? YES MAYBE NO 9. NATURAL RESOURCES Will the project result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Substantial depletion of any noh=renewable natural resource. _- 10. RISK OF UPSET Does the project involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 11. POPULATION Will the project alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 22. HOUSING Will the project affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION Will the project result ins a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? _ X c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people/and or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? y f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists _ or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES Will the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any one of the areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational activities? a._Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? �^ f. Other governmental services? �- 15. ENERGY Will the project result in: a*Use of substantial amounts of energy or fuel? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. UTILITIES Will the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities? " a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? c. Nater? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? �. 17. HUMAN HEALTH Will the project result in: - a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding " mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS Will the -project result in the obstruction of any- - scenic vista or view open to the public, at will the_ proposal - result result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19. RECREATION Will the project result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL Will the project result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structures, object or building? X 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal , community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? ( A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ( A project may impact an two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the affect of the total of those impacts an the environment is significant.) ' - - d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause__ substantial adverse effects an human beings directly or indirectly? 0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ZuSA�� EXPLANATIONS/MITIGATION DISCUSSION III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 8.a. Project would involve a change in long-term use of the property from residential purposes to commercial uses. 8.b. Project -involves a zone change from R3-0 (Multi -family resident to C2 (General Commercial) and an amendment to the Land Use -Element of the Azusa General Plan to change the land use desip3w f m High Darty Residential to Gaul Cam: r ial. 11. & 12. The reaming of the property umdd replace a potential of 6 apartments mite with f ft a ccmnercial development. The commercial =ming wild be ewa stent with other Simlar uses along Azuls Avenue to the east. IV. MITIGATION MEASURES Describe mitigation measures included in the project, if any are needed, to avoid potentially significant effects: NONE REQUIRED. - DETERMINATION (To be completed by Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: Date: % I find the proposed project COULD NOT HAVE a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECARATION has been prepared and is attached. I find that although the proposed project could have a Significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the pro osed project MAY have a significant effect effect on the %nvironment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is sequired. Signature: �j4&Z,,DANIEL-M, Title: SENIOR PLANNER 0 Fa din to NOTICE OF DETERMINATION t"+AZUSA ' TO: COUNTY CLERK FROM: CITY OF AZUSA CORPORATIONS DIVISION -- Room 106 213 E. Foothill Blvd. P.O. Box 151 Azusa, California 9170 Los Angeles, Ca. 90053 OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH Meeting 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, Ca. 95814 Date: April 29, 1992 PROJECT TITLE: Zone Change Case No. Z-92-3 and General Plan Amendment No. 2 PROTECT LOCATION: 428-432 North San Gabriel Avenue, Azusa, california 91702 PROi'r CT DESCRIPTION: Q in =ning fram R3-0 to C2 aWgenerd plm amadmart h m N to 00 for future cam m -cid developma:t of a vacant parcel. This is to advise that the City of Azusa has approved the above de- scribed project and has made the following determinations regarding same; 1. The project in its approved form ❑ will, ® will not have significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this pro- ject pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. D A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pur- suant to the provisions of CEQA. 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations ❑ was,® was not, adopted for this project. 5. Mitigation measures ❑ were, ® were not, made a condition of approval of the project. DANIEL M. WATROUS, SENIOR PLANNER (818) 334-5125 Ext. 262 CONTACT PERSON TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER 3TYOFs"l VICINITY pp� z -9z-3 fl!!!d PROPOSED PROJECT FOR CASE NO. CrEA-92, .Z 0 rn I • nn u in R or R Y N N °C 0: R N N mi c 0 L T r