Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 95-C240 RESOLUTION NO. 95-C24 E/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DENYING AN APPEAL BY PROGRESSIVE BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-94-9 AND PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN P-94-120 WHEREAS, an application was received from the Progressive Buddhist Association for a conditional use permit and precise plan of design to expand and existing retreat center to construct a 9,200 square foot multi-purpose hall (Conditional Use Permit No. 0- 94-9 and Precise Plan of Design No. P-94-120), and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered this request in a duly noticed public hearing on November 30, 1994, and has carefully considered all pertinent evidence and testimony, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission could not make the required findings of fact, therefore adopting Resolution Nos. 94-82 and 94- 83 denying the conditional use permit and precise plan of design request, and WHEREAS, the applicant has appealed the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council, who held a duly noticed public hearing on January 17, 1995, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Azusa carefully considered all the pertinent evidence and testimony regarding Conditional Use Permit No. C-94-9 and Precise Plan of Design No. P- 94-120, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Azusa does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council for the City of Azusa finds that the Rural Residential land use designation contained within the Land Use Element of the Azusa General Plan states that areas such as this site are "suitable for further residential development, but at very low densities." Although no mention is made of the possible intensity of development of nonresidential uses, the intent is clear that these areas should be developed in a manner compatible with a low density rural environment. The establishment and operation of a large multi-purpose building needing 74 parking spaces would raise the activity levels on this site above those found in the surrounding low density areas. This expansion of the retreat would therefore be inconsistent with the objectives of the Azusa General Plan for Rural Residential uses. SECTION 2. The City Council for the City of Azusa finds that neighboring property owners have complained about noise and traffic from some of the activities of the retreat center. This has disturbed the peace and quiet of residents of this rural area, and been detrimental to the enjoyment of their property. Gatherings at the church would not likely result in any menace to the public health, but the increased traffic levels could create safety problems on the narrow street serving the property. SECTION 3. The City Council for the City of Azusa finds that there appears to be adequate are on the site to construct the proposed multi-purpose hall and the parking areas needed to support its use. This level of construction would, however, result in a large paved parking lot at the front of the property, along with a 35 foot high structure and attendant parking lot at the rear. This level of construction is not compatible with the lower intensity of development which occurs on most other rural properties in the area. Page 1 of 2 ® 0 RESOLUTION NO. 95-C24 PAGE 2 OF 2 SECTION 4. The City Council for the City of Azusa finds that Azusa and San Gabriel Canyon Road is a narrow street which is intended to provide access for the rural residents along this road and secondary access for the adjacent condominium complexes. Most other nonresidential uses in this area, such as the nearby Eagles lodge and Mormon church, rely on the higher traffic capacity of Highway 39 to provide for their traffic demand during peak times. The amount of traffic which could arrive or depart from the proposed multi-purpose hall at any one time could create serious congestion along the only road serving the site. SECTION 5. The decision of the Planning Commission denying Conditional Use Permit No. C-94-9 and Precise Plan of Design P-94- 120 is hereby upheld. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 21st day of February , 1995. STEPHEN J z ALEXANDER, MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 21st day of February 1995 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: HARDISON, NARANJO, BEEBE, ALEXANDER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: MADRID Page 2 of 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY