Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - October 23, 2006 - UBAGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL AZUSA LIGHT & WATER 729 N. AZUSA AVENUE AZUSA, CA 91702 AZUSA UTILITY BOARD DIANE CHAGNON CHAIRPERSON DAVE HARDISON VICE CHAIRPERSON KEITH HANKS BOARD MEMBER MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2006 6:30 PM IOSEPH R. ROCHA BOARD MEMBER ANGEL A. CARRILLO BOARD MEMBER 6:30 p.m. - Convene to Regular Meeting of the Azusa Utility Board and Azusa City Council • Call to Order • Pledge to the Flag • Roll Call A. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Person/Group shall be allowed to speak without Interruption up to five (5) minutes maximum time, subject to compliance with applicable meeting rules. Questions to the speaker or responses to the speaker's questions or comments shall be handled after the speaker has completed his/her comments. Public Participation will be limited to sixty (60) minutes time.) The Consent Calendar adopting the printed recommended action will be enacted with one vote. if Staff or Councilmembers wish to address any Item on the Consent Calendar individually, it will be considered under SPECIAL CALL ITEMS. 001 B. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes. Recommendation: Approve minutes of regular meeting of September 25, 2006 as written. B-1. UB Sept Mm.doc 2. Black & Veatch Contract Extension. Recommendation: Approve the extension of Black i;_ Veatch Engineers' design contract for Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project from October 30, 2006 to December 31, 2006. ELJ B-2. Blk&Veatch Contract Ext.doc 3. Award Contract for Prosect W-178, Water Main Replacement. Recommendation: Approve the award of contract for Water Project W-178 to J.A. Salazar Construction and Supply Co. in amount of $816,290.20, for replacement of water mains in 6' and Barbara Streets, and services in Virginia Street. ELJ B-3. Bid Award W-178.doc 4. Award Professional Services Agreement for Inspection Services on Project W-178. Recommendation: Approve a Professional Service Agreement with SA Associates, Inc. to perform inspection services on Project W-178, water main replacements in 6`h and Barbara Streets, and services in Virginia Street, in amount of $42,000. Insptn Svc Contract.doc 5. Bid Request for Project W-238, Water Main Replacement. Recommendation: Approve bid specifications, and authorize advertising and solicitation of bids for Project W-238, Water Main Replacements, in Cypress Street in Covina, and Sunset Avenue in West Covina. E B -S. Authorization to Bid W-238.doc 2 002 6. Energy a Credit Risk Management Policy Amendment. Recommendation: Approve proposed amendment to the Energy & Credit Risk Management Policy and authorize staff to exercise functions permitted by amended policy. B-6. Risk Mgt Porcy Andnt.doc Request for Qualifications and Proposals (RFQ/P) on Water Rate Study. Recommendation: Authorize staff to issue Request for Qualifications and Proposals for cost of service study for water rates effective July 1, 2007. B-7. RFQ for Water Rate Study. doc 8. First Annual Powerline Skills Rodeo Donation. Recommendation: Authorize a donation of $100 to the East Los Angeles Skills Center for their First Annual Powerline Skills Rodeo. B-8. Donatbn Approval.doc 9. LivinsWise Conservation Education Program. Recommendation: Waive formal bidding requirements and award purchase of turnkey interactive conservation program for Azusa 6`^ grade students to LivingWise in amount of $37,650. B-9. LivingWise Programdoc 10. Apple One Blanket Purchase Order Amendment. Recommendation: Authorize an amendment to the Blanket Purchase Order issued to Apple One for fiscal year ending June 30, 2007 in amount not - to -exceed $15,000. . B-10. AppleOne.doc 1 I . Annual Bi -tech Software Maintenance Service Contract. Recommendation: Waive formal bidding requirements and approve the software maintenance and support contract with Sungard Bi -tech Inc. in the amount of $42,560.18. Un B-li. BI -Tech Pyrmt.doc M, I C. SCHEDULED ITEMS I.... Financing of Water Treatment Plant and Other Water Facilities. Recommendation: Approve the following resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE UTILITY BOARD AND CITY.COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, APPROVING THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE NEW WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND OTHER WATER FACILITIES. whVI C-1. WTP Financing - Plan.doc - 2. Underground Electrical System Repair at 600 West Gladstone Street. Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager or Director of Utilities to award a contract for urgent electrical repair work at 600 West Gladstone Street pursuant to Azusa Municipal Code Section 2-523(a). C-2 Urgent Elec Repair.doc D. STAFF REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS Power Resources Monthly Update E __.._ o-1. My Power Res. ppt 2. Legislative Report D-2. legislative Report.doc 3. Follow-up Report on AB 939 waste diversion shortfall (verbal) 4. Paving project and waterline project coordination (verbal) 5. November Key Accounts breakfast meeting schedule (verbal) 4 004 E. DIRECTORS' COMMENTS F. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION Government Code Section 54956.9(a) SDG&E v. Anaheim, Azusa, et al. Case 2:06 -CV -00592 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -EXISTING LITIGATION Government Code Section 54956.9(x) PG&E, SCE et al. v. Anaheim, Azusa, et al. Case 2:06 -CV -00559 G. ADIOURNMENT Adjournment. %n compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, ifyou need special assistance to participate in a city meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 626-812-5229. Notification three (3) working days prior to the meeting or time when special services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can he made to provide access to the meeting " 005 CITY OF AZUSA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 - 6:30 P.M. The Utility Board Members of the City of Azusa met in regular session, at the above date and time in the Azusa Light and Water Conference Room located at 729 N. Azusa Avenue, California. Chairperson Chagnon called the meeting to order. Call to Order ROLL CALL Roll Cali PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: HARDISON, CARRILLO, ROCHA, HANKS, CHAGNON ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: NONE ALSO PRESENT: Also Present City Attorney Ferre, City Manager Delach, Director of Utilities Hsu, Assistant City Manager Person, Assistant to the Utilities Director Kalscheuer, Assistant Director of Resource Management Tang, Assistant Director of Water Operations Anderson, Electrical Engineer Langit, Assistant Director of Customer Care and Solutions Vanca, Police Captain Streets, City Clerk Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk Toscano. Pub Part Public Participation J. Rosales Mr. Jorge Rosales addressed the Board Members regarding the Home Energy Assistance Program Comments (HEAP), stating that he hopes the City promotes the service to the community, and that they take advantage of this program. He addressed Professional Services Agreement with Huls Environmental LLC, stating that they were $5,000 more than the low bidder, but staff explained why; he thanked staff. In item regarding Bid Solicitation for Water Main Replacement Project W- 178; he expressed concern regarding a proper bid process and meeting State requirements. He noted that the City would be receiving $350,000 Fuel Cost Adjustment, which would amount to $0.57 center per kWh, or a 5.2% reduction of retail rates for utility bills from October 1 through December 31, 2006. Lastly, he expressed concern about a possible penalty from the state for e'non compliance with AB 939 recycling mandate; he stated that Rosedale should be penalized as the large amounts of debris disposed from the site was not recyclable. 006 Mr. Mike Lee addressed the Board Members expressing thanks for the open house gathering at M. Lee the Rosedale Project over the weekend; he thanked Mr. Rosales for the work he does to inform Comments the citizens about what is going on in the community. The CONSENT CALENDAR consisting of items B-1 through B-7 was approved by motion of Board Consent Cal Member Rocha, seconded by Board Member Hanks unanimously carried with the exception of approved item B2, which was considered under the Special Call portion of the meeting. B-2 Spec Call 1. The Minutes of the regular,meeting of June 24, 2006, were approved as written. Min appvd 2. SPECIAL CALL ITEM. 3. The professional services agreement with Huls Environmental LLC, for a three-year Agmt w/Huls agreement for administration of used oil block grant program in the amount of $23,760, Environmental was approved. Used Oil 4. Approval was given for the issuance of a contract purchase order in the amount of $23,700 Royal Crest to Royal Crest Building Maintenance to paint steel street light standards. Bldg Maint Director of Utilities was authorized to sign a quitclaim of Electric Utility Easements on 572- Quitclaim 647 Foothill Boulevard as part of the Electric Service Agreement between the City and Azusa Elect Util APU Pacific University and the City Clerk was directed to have same recorded. 6. Approval was given for the advertisement for bids for Project W-178, water main Advertise bids replacement in 6t' Street and Barbara Street, and replacement of water service lines from Project W - customers to the main in Virginia Street. 178 7. Approval was given to advance engineering fee payment to Verizon for their estimated cost Verizon to relocate telephone lines crossing the site of Canyon Filtration Membrane Treatment Relocation Upgrade and expansion Project in the amount of $39,242.89 and Director of Utilities was Telephone authorized to sign letter accepting terms of relocation. lines Special Call Items Spec Call Itms Board Member Rocha questioned why there was a decrease in participants in the HEAP program HEAP from 2005 to 2006. Assistant Director of Customer Care and Solutions Vanca responded stating Program that every other year the State send representatives to help solicit the program to senior citizens questions which makes it easy to apply to the program; she assured the Board Members that she would arrange for State representatives to come during 2007. Board Member Hanks asked a question regarding utility bill and staff advised they would follow up on it. Board. Member Rocha offered a Resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF UTILITY BOARD/CIN COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, EXTENDING THE Res. 06-C82 LOW INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR AZUSA RESIDENTS. HEAP Program Moved by Board Member Rocha, seconded by Board Member Hanks to waive further reading and adopt. Resolution passed and adopted by the following vote of the Board Members: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: HARDISON, CARRILLO, ROCHA, HANKS, CHAGNON NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: NONE 09/25/06 PAGE TWO 007 Staff Reports/Communications Staff Rpts Assistant Director of Resource Management Tang presented the Monthly Power Resources . B. Tang Update, highlighting the 10 -year renewable energy contract with San Gabriel Valley Municipal Comments Water District (SGVMWD); the contract will provide an additional 1.5% renewable energy toward Power the goal of 20% renewable energy by 2017. He also noted an attached Environmental Project Resources Status Report of the San Juan Generating Station, with photographs and project costs. Director of Utilities Hsu responded to questions regarding possible tours of the San Juan J. Hsu Generating Station, stating that it would take about three days and two nights, it could be Comments coordinated with other cities and the best time would be spring or fall. Tours The 2007 Annual Resource Adequacy Plan was presented, but, there were no comments 2007 Annual regarding the plan. Resource Plan Director of Utilities Hsu highlighted AB 2951, the Capital Facility Fee, stating that it will help with Legislative the dispute between the City and Citrus College. . Update Director of Utilities Hsu addressed quarterly Fuel Cost Adjustment for San Juan Resource stating : Quarterly that when there is anticipated cost it is passed onto customers, but when there is savings, It is Fuel Cost also passed onto customers; in this case on an average the savings will be approximately $3. Director of Utilities Hsu addressed the AB 939 2005 Status Report stating that they don't know at AB 939 this time whether the State will be penalizing the City for not meeting the AB 939 mandated goal Assist Dir Util of 50% waste diversion from the landfills due to the large amount of debris disposed of from the Comments Monrovia Nursery site. He advised that he would keep the Board Members apprised regarding the matter. Assistant to the Director of Utilities Kalscheuer responded to questions from Board Members regarding the methodology and tracking of the waste. Director of Utilities Hsu advised that the Azusa Light and Water Office Building Roof Repair is Roof complete and invited Board Member Hardison and anyone else who is interested to come and Repair see it; further he advised that there is a one year warranty on it. Complete Director of Utilities Hsu presented selection of date for Key Accounts Breakfast Meeting; it was Key Accts consensus that the meeting be tentatively set for Thursday, November 2nd. Meeting Director of Utilities Hsu presented a status report on meeting with Citrus College regarding the Status Citrus Water System Development Fee, stating that a meeting was set up, but cancelled by Citrus College Wtr College. Discussion was held regarding the matter noting that there is a need to work out an Sys Dev Fee agreement with them for the Fee, that the City is not obligated to give them service although they can occupy the building and safety is not an issue. Director of Utilities Hsu provided an update regarding the temporary waterline installed above Update ground on Northrop's parking lot; this line is intended as a temporary replacement for the Northrop underground water mains that broke due to a landslide into Cemex's pit during a rainstorm; the Easement City entered into a temporary license agreement with Northrop on July 6" which will expire on On prop October 4`"; there is still no permanent easement with Northrop or Cemex and staff is still working on this; three thirty day extensions are allowed. Additional discussion was held regarding the need to obtain agreements between Northrop, Cemex and the City. 09/25/06 PAGE THREE M Director's Comments Dir Cmts Director of Utilities Hsu provided -the. Board Members with copies of a document containing Info items information on the history of water in Azusa and the history of the San Gabriel River Water Committee of Nine. City Manager Delach addressed the Board Members stating that ALP sent their structural City Mgr engineers to do a full assessment on the retaining walls on their property and they are structural Comments sound; and further he would provide a copy of neighbors in that community. Moved by Board Member Carrillo, seconded by Board Member Hanks and unanimously carried to Adjourn adjourn. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 7:09 P.M. SECRETARY Next Resolution No. 06-C83. 09/25/06 PAGE FOUR 009 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AZUSA LIGHT &'RATER CONSENT CALENDAR HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES OCTOBER 23, 2006 EXTENSION OF TIME TO BLACK & VEATCH CONTRACT FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board/City Council approve the extension of Black & Veatch Engineers' design contract for the Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project from October 30, 2006, to December 31, 2006. BACKGROUND At its regular meeting held on February 28, 2005, the City Council approved the award of the contract for the consultant design services for the Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project at the Canyon Filtration Plant to Black & Veatch Corp. The contract termination date was April 1 1, 2006. On June 20, 2006, the contract for the design services was extended by the City Council to October 30, 2006, with an anticipated bid date of August 2, 2006. Bids were accepted August 2, 2006, and, due to an error in the bidding documents, City Council rejected all bids at its September 18, 2006 meeting. Council directed that a re -solicitation of bids be conducted. Bids are scheduled to be received on October 31, 2006. This extension of Black & Veatch's design contract will allow Black & Veatch to review the bids and make a recommendation of award for acceptance by the City Council at its November 20, 2006, meeting. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact from the extension of time of this contract. Prepared by: Chet Anderson, Assistant Director - Water Operations 01.0 a-3 A7CJS.A EIGHT &'EATER CONSENT CALENDAR TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PROJECT W-178, WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT IN 6T" AND BARBARA STREETS, AND SERVICES IN VIRGINIA STREET IN THE CITY OF AZUSA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board/City Council approve the award of contract for Water Project W-178 to JA Salazar Construction and Supply Co. for installation of 3,514 Linear Feet of 8 -inch Distribution Main in 6T" and Barbara Streets, and services in Virginia Street. BACKGROUND The Water Division has a program of replacing water mains that are experiencing problems with leaks and that are, for various reasons, experiencing Flow and pressure problems. The mains to be replaced in this project have leak problems requiring constant repair and excessive staff time to make repairs. Also, the mains to be replaced in 6`" and Barbara Streets are in streets designated by Public Works to be resurfaced this year. This project will allow the Water Division to lessen the probability of leaks in the newly paved streets. Advertisement for Bids for this project was approved at the September 25, 2006, Utility Board meeting. Bids were publicly opened October 17, 2006. Eight contractors submitted bids, with each contractor submitting three bids, one for each of three completion times. The bids submitted were as follows with low bids highlighted: Contractor 60 Day Completion 75 Day Completion 90 Day Completion Herman Weissker $1,362,740.65 $1,244,286.38 $1,184,952.01 Highland Engin'ring $1,127,108.15 $1,127,108.15 $1,106,842.36 J. A. Salazar $1,313,371.40 $1,156,278.64 $816;290'20 Ma'ic Brothers $949,869.80 $930,542.80 $872,561.80 J. DeSi io Constr. $928,433.00 $928,433.00 $928,433.00 Robert Brkich Const $926,578.40 $871°578.'40 $871,578.40 Gentry Bros. $897;806:80' $886,806.80 $875,806.80 Allison Co. $1,526,984.80 $1,370,421.80 1 $1,210,338.80 011 FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of this item is $816,290.20. Adequate funding is available for this project through the approved FY 2006-2007 Capital Improvement Project budget, Account 32-80- 000-721-7130/721076-7130. Prepared by: Chet Anderson, Assistant Director - Water Operations l 012 CONSENT CALENDAR TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES < 1` DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH SA ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PERFORM INSPECTION SERVICES ON PROJECT W-178, WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT IN 6T" AND BARBARA STREETS, AND SERVICE REPLACEMENTS IN VIRGINIA STREET. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board/City Council approve of a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $42,000 with SA Associates, Inc. to provide inspection services on Project W-178. BACKGROUND Construction of Project W-178, Water Main Replacement Project on various streets, has been bid and will require inspection. SA Associates has performed past inspection services for the Water Division. Five consultants were requested to submit letter proposals for this project and three consultants responded: SA Associates, $42,000; Civiltec, $45,000; and Willdan, $57,480. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of this item is $42,000. Adequate funding is available for this project through the approved FY 2006-2007 Capital Improvement Project budget, Account 32-80- 000-721-7130/72107B-7130. Prepared by: Chet F. Anderson, Assistant Director- Water Operations 013 AZUSA 414NT l %'ATER CONSENT CALENDAR TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 W SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SEEK BIDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF PROJECT W-238, WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT IN CYPRESS STREET IN THE CITY OF COVINA AND SUNSET AVENUE IN THE CITY OF WEST COVINA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board/City Council approve the bid specifications and authorize advertising for, and solicitation of bids for Project W-238, Water Main Replacements in Cypress Street in the City of Covina and Sunset Avenue in the City of West Covina. BACKGROUND The Water Division has a program of replacing water mains that are experiencing problems with leaks and that are, for various reasons, experiencing Flow and pressure problems. The mains to be replaced in this project have both leak problems requiring constant repair and deliver less flow than is optimal for current residential area standards. The mains to be replaced include 3,100 linear feet of 12 -inch lines and 5,200 linear feet of 8 -inch lines. The bid specifications are available for public review at the 2nd floor front desk of the Azusa Light & Water offices located at 729 N. Azusa Avenue, Azusa, CA 91702. FISCAL IMPACT There is no immediate fiscal impact to bidding of this project. A budget item for this project has been approved by the Board in the FY 2006-2007 Capital Budget Account 32-80-000- 721-7130/72107B-7130. Prepared by: Chet Anderson, Assistant Director- Water Operations 014 AZUSA CONSENT CALENDAR TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F, HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIE� DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE ENERGY & CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board/City Council approve the proposed amendment to the Energy & Credit Risk Management Policy ("Risk Management Policy") and authorize staff to exercise functions permitted by amended policy. BACKGROUND In 1999, the City Council approved a Risk Management Policy setting forth specific guidelines for Electric Utility personnel to follow in purchasing and selling electricity. The Risk Management Policy was amended in July and December of 2002 to update the authority to conduct short term power transactions. The current Risk Management Policy only allows physical and financial electricity products as authorized trading products described in Appendix D.1 of the Policy. However, in recent years a need has arisen to use natural gas as trading product to hedge the cost of electricity. An example of such need can be. exemplified by the recent transactions the City has entered into with California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) for summer peaking power and the renewable energy Contract with the San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District. Under these transactions, the sellers were not willing to provide electricity at a fixed price agreeable to the City but instead tied the pricing for electricity to the pricing of natural gas in the spot market. The rationale for seller is simple: natural gas price has been very volatile and at historically highs at times, tying price of electricity to natural gas price tends to maximize revenues for the sellers. This creates the need for us to manage the unavoidable exposure to volatile natural gas prices. 015 One product that will assist us in managing such exposures is fixed for floating price swaps on natural gas prices. As natural gas prices decline from time to time, we might enter into a price swap to layoff the risk of spot market natural gas price for a fixed natural gas price. Through this type of swap, we can "convert" the pricing for electricity tied to spot market gas price to a fixed price that we are comfortable with without buying the physical gas. Without the ability to do price swap on natural gas, we will have very limited ability to manage the ups and downs of spot market gas prices. The amended Appendix D. I (attached) will include fixed for Floating swaps for natural gas. as one of the Authorized Trading Products. All other aspects of the Policy Will remain unchanged. FISCAL IMPACT The amended Policy provides additional means for the utility to manage its risks and thus it is expected to have a beneficial fiscal impact overall. Prepared by: Bob Tang, Assistant Director of Resource Management I RE AMENDEDAPPENDIX Dt.doc 016 'e AMENDED APPENDIX D.1 (amendment in Bold and Underline) D.1 AUTHORIZED TRADING PRODUCTS & GEOGRAPHIC MARKETS Physical Markets • Electric Power (energy, capacity, and transmission) • US markets accessible to Azusa for physical delivery of power Financial Instruments Electricity: • Fixed for floating swaps on underlying physical markets • Basis swaps on locations traded in the physical markets • Options (puts and calls) for caps, collars, and floors on underlying physical markets Natural Gas: • Fixed for floating swaps on underlying physical markets 017 CONSENT CALENDAR TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES, \ DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS ON WATER RATE STUDY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board/City Council authorize staff to issue a Request for Qualifications/Proposals (RFQ/P) to have a cost of service study conducted for water rates effective July 1, 2007. BACKGROUND Recent court cases and legislation dictate that the Utility conduct a cost of service study for water services to justify the level of any proposed increase. AB 2951, approved on September 30, 2006, requires that such studies be conducted at least every 10 years, and be made available for review by public agencies affected by proposed increases. Also, in the California Supreme Court case of Bighorn -Desert View Water Agency v. /Car! Verj!!,• E.W. Ke/%y, Proposition 218 was interpreted to apply to water service rates, and thus now requires early notification to property owners of pending water rate adjustments. Given these requirements, and the upcoming Water Treatment Plant project, staff is recommending that Azusa Light & Water issue a Request for Qualifications/Proposals to have a cost of service study conducted by a third party to satisfy the requirements of AB 2951 and to prepare a report that can be made available for public review at the time public notices are sent out to alert the public and property owners of proposed water rate adjustments. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact of issuing the RFQ/P other than mailing costs. The cost to conduct the study will be reported when the consulting contract is awarded. Prepared by: Cary I(alscheuer, Assistant to the Director of Utilities 018 a -S AZUSAant a worn CONSENT CALENDAR TO: - HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: DONATION TO EAST LOS ANGELES SKILLS CENTER FOR FIRST ANNUAL POWERLINE SKILLS RODEO RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Utility Board/City Council authorize a donation in the amount of $100 to the East Los Angeles Skills Center for their First Annual Powerline Skills Rodeo. BACKGROUND The East Los Angeles Skills Center is a vocational school that provides, among other things, training for linemen. On November 4`h, students from the East Los Angeles Skills Center's Electrical Powerline Mechanic Trainee program, which includes one of our employees, will participate in an event called the First Annual Powerline Skills Rodeo. Some of the skill performance activities at the rodeo include pole climbing demonstrations, hurtman rescue, physical fitness demonstrations, and power flow demonstrations (see attachment). The East Los Angeles Skills Center has requested donations for door prizes and it is recommended that Azusa Light & Water donate $100 for this event. FISCAL IMPACT $100 would be donated from account 31-40-702-921-7050. Prepared by: Cary Kalscheuer, Assistant to the Director of Utilities Powerrine Skills Rodeo. pdf 019 EO [ LOS ANGELES UNIb'[ED SCHOOL DLi7RICT t� r EAST LOS ANGELES SKILLS CENTER _neo,d! 3921 SELIG PL9CE, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90031 07 _. PHONE: (323) 227-0018 FAX:(323)22-1-2351 -- •[001 [OVO/` East Los Angeles Skills Center 3921 Selig Place Los Angeles, CA- 90031 September 21, 2006 Dear Local Business Owner/Community Partners, ROY ROMER SUPFRWS ND[%70VS Hf=q - ROWLNAIJ.GRORA DiM2T SUPERINTENDENT EOIGVtOSAL SERVICES $ANTNGOJACRSnN AIIISTMT SLPERNY ZDEST wer YRAM1Raz PRIKOPAL On Saturday, November 4tb, students from East Los Angeles Skills Center's (ELASC) Electrical Powerline Mechanic Trainee program will participate in the first Annual Powerline Skills Rodeo. The community fundraising drive will be seeking monetary`donataon 0 -f -I eros fordoorprizes:for our First Annual Powerline Skills Rodeo at ELASC. The East Los Angeles Skills Center was established in 1966 as one of eleven Employment Preparation Centers operated by the Division of Adult and Career Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District. The ELASC has served our communities with 40 years of quality service incorporating a comprehensive approach to education, which includes options academic and vocational training, career awareness, and a strong network of partners, providing support services to ensure our students success in reaching their goals. The Electrical Powerline Mechanic Training program at ELASC provides trainees for entry-level employment in the Powerline Mechanic Training field. It covers the basic mechanical and electrical principles associated with the electrical line working trade. Skills taught include overall safety considerations, power pole climbing skills, knowledge of basic tools and materials involved with the electrical line crafts. We appreciate any support you are able to offer. We have made a commitment to this school and program, and we cannot continue our tradition of success without help from industry and the community. Please remember that any amount helps! All donations are tax deductible. We are asking that all contributions be sent by October 20th to the following address: East Los Angeles Skills Center (323) 224-5970 3921 Selig Place Los Angeles, CA 90031 Thank you for your continued support. Sincerely, ,i 4 dy raw Wendy RaRamifez, Principal "We are an educational facility committed to excellence in providing academic education, skills training, and job placement enhanced by community involvement and support resources enabling all students to become responsible and productive individuals." t1 1 First Annual Towerfine Mechanic Skiffs Robeo" East Los Angeles Skills Center Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Adult & Career Education Saturday, November 4th 9 am to 3:30 pm 3921 Selig Place, Los Angeles, CA 90031 Contact Ph. No. 323.224.5970 Students Skill Performance Activities: ■ Pole Climbing Demonstration ■ Hurtman Rescue ■ Pole Climbing Skills Relay ■ Pole Climbing & Knot Tying Skills Relay ■ Physical Fitness Demonstration ■ Synchronized Climbing ■ Power Flow Demonstration Plus: Little Linepeople Games & Future Student Adult Challenges Come -join Southern California Edison Co. Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Cities of: Burbank, Glendale, and Pasadena Power Companies IBEW Local 47 California/Nevada Joint Apprentice Training Committee And watch the next Generation of "Power Lineman' Proudly Demonstrate their Knowledge & Skills 021 CONSENT CALENDAR TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: LIVINGWISE CONSERVATION EDUCATION PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board/City Council: 1. Waive formal bidding procedures for turnkey interactive conservation program for Azusa sixth grade students; and 2. Award the purchase of a turnkey interactive conservation program for Azusa sixth grade students to LivingWise at a cost of $37,650 to be paid from Public Benefit fund account number 24-40-739-082-6625/RLvWis-6625. BACKGROUND For the last several years Azusa Light & Water Public Benefit funds have funded the LivingWise student interactive conservation program for almost 900 sixth grade students throughout the city each year. The overall goals of the program are to generate immediate savings to residents in the form of lower utility service costs while building resource awareness and environmental responsibility amongst students and their families. Using a teaching plan developed by LivingWise, students are taught about natural resources In their daily lives, reinforced by real-life activities. Each student receives a Resource Action Kit containing a LimeLite NiteLite that uses 3/100`" of a watt, an air filter alarm, a low flow showerhead, and a faucet aerator. Students install these items at home with parental involvement. Students are also provided with a household report card and home checkup. 022 Additionally, each year pre and post surveys are conducted to measure the learning impact and the knowledge gained through the program. The 2005-06 program activities resulted in the following estimated lifetime resource savings: • 4,925,567 kWh of electricity • 225,139 therms of natural gas 75,707,205 gallons of water and waste water FISCAL IMPACT The cost of the program will be $37,650 which is about $1,000 lower than last year. The lower cost is based on lower sixth grade class enrollments and has been adjusted for a slightly higher per unit cost of $40.25. The slight increase in the unit cost is due to higher labor and component costs. The LivingWise program has been budgeted and will be paid out of the Public Benefit Fund account number 24-40-739-082-6625/RLvWis-6625. Prepared by: Paul Reid, Business Development / Public Benefits Coordinator 023 CONSENT CALENDAR TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER IN AMOUNT OF $15,000 TO APPLE ONE, A TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT SERVICE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Utility Board/City Council authorize an amendment in the amount not to exceed $15,000 to the Blanket Purchase Order issued to Apple One for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007. BACKGROUND The Customer Service Division has supplemented its workforce with two Apple One agency employees to temporarily fill-in for two vacant part-time and one full-time Customer Service Representative positions that are in the process of being filled. Due to unexpected delays in the hiring process, temporary fill-in help needs to be extended until the end of the calendar year. Customer contact with Customer Service has increased significantly and continued support is needed to handle the large volume of customer calls and walk-ins, and to fill-in for staff vacancies and absences. Because of the variation in demand for temporary employees, blanket purchase orders are used as opposed to going through a formal bid process. Apple One has proved to be a good resource to the City for temporary help and was issued a blanket purchase order at the outset of the fiscal year. FISCAL IMPACT Allowable expenditures to Apple One will be increased by $15,000. Funds are available in Customer Service Division's outside services budget in account number 31-40-711-903- 6493. Prepared by: Karen Vanca, Assistant Director Customer Care & Solutions 024 s, AZLJSA rrrt + eerrr CONSENT CALENDAR TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES -,4 DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 �P SUBJECT: ANNUAL BI -TECH SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board / City Council waive formal sealed bids in accordance with Azusa Municipal Code Section 2-523 section C, and approve the software maintenance and support contract with Sungard Bi -Tech Inc., in the amount of $42,560.18 BACKGROUND The City currently uses Bi -Tech Software as their financial system. The city needs to retain software support from the vendor to troubleshoot issues or questions in order to limit any potential down time and to continue to receive product enhancements for this software. Since there is no competitive market for maintenance of the proprietary system, use of the alternate purchasing procedure is recommended. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for requested purchase will be provided by the Information Technology Department's approved operating budget for FY 2007, account 48499300006504. Prepared by: Ann Graf, Director of Information Technology Invoioe.pdf 025 SUNGAiRDO SunGard Bi -Tech 890 Fortress Street Chico, CA 95973 530 891 5281 City of Azusa e AttAccounts Payable P.O. Box 1395 Azusa, CA 91702-1395 Phase send this portion with your remittance Rcmit to: SunGard Bi -Tech CO. Box 99023 DATE: 08/23/66 Chicago, IL 60693 INVOICE fl: AR142010 ACCOWr ID: AZUCITY Amount Enclosed: DESCRIPTIONAN X= syssvvvvavcxsrsc=s_-sccsv svvsvv�xacvvscss_vvsyssessssxsvccvz--ssssasvco IFAS 9/1/06-8/31/07 Support 39,845.09 Openlink 9/1/06-8/31/07 Supp. - 1,029.03 CA Sales Tax 0 50%; 1,686.06 Your annual support for IFAS/Openlink has increased 6.1 %. This increase was calculated by adding 2% to the BLS CPI for the 12 month period ending 5/30/06. DELIVERED SEP I 12006 AUG 29 AM11.46 esys_-r�xxs-r_�x-___-�_—_ cosec—vxmx=vamssevcmvxr_xecxxv_ xcvsvexcovvv TOTAL $ 42,560.18 SUNGARDO 026 AGENDA ITEM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: FINANCING OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND OTHER WATER FACILITIES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Utility Board/City Council approve the attached resolution and financial plan for the water treatment plant and other water facilities. BACKGROUND On September 11, 2006, the Utility Board held a workshop to consider various ways to finance the proposed water treatment plant and other water infrastructure to be constructed over the next two years, amounting to about $50 million in cost. While the treatment plant project is being re -bid and bids have not yet been received, adoption of a financing plan is proposed at this time to permit staff and its financial team to prepare all the documents and take certain actions necessary so that when the bid award is made, all the financial documents can be ready for adoption at or around the same time. In reviewing financing options, staff is recommending that the City of Azusa use a fixed rate financing structure with a graduated payment schedule in the initial period of debt repayment, but one that levelizes by the year 2015. This proposed financing structure is a combination of both the level debt structure and wrap debt structure discussed at the September Utility Board workshop. This structure allows the Utility to gradually adjust rates in the initial term of the bond Issuance to meet debt coverage obligations. In fiscal year 2024, when our 2003 debt is fully amortized, our total combined debt service payments will step down by about $1.5 million annually allowing the Utility additional financing options at that time. Staff and the City's Financial Advisor believe selection of this structure is a good business decision since it minimizes risks and takes advantage of the generally low bond rates available at this time. Attached to this report are various charts and graphs depicting key information associated with the recommended, financing structure: (1) debt service repayment schedule; (2) forecasted rate adjustments required to meet debt coverage requirements; (3) forecasted debt coverage; and (4) forecasted annual reserve fund balance. These charts incorporate many of the assumptions presented 027 during the September workshop, however, also reflect updated debt payment schedules based on more recent bond rates, capitalized interest income, and updates to some formulas included in the prior forecast. The Financial Plan consists of the attached resolution and Exhibit A to the resolution, and is intended to provide guidance and authorization to staff to move forward with preparation of documents for the subject financing. These subsequent documents will require approval by the City Council and Azusa Public Financing Authority before any debt can be formally issued. Additionally, future water rate and service fee adjustments will be analyzed, in some cases by third parties, and would also be subject to future approvals by various City Councils over the 30 -year term of debt repayment. -----Highlights of the Financial Plan are outlined below: In order to construct a 16-milllon gallon per day membrane water treatment plant, a 4 -million gallon reservoir, and other water related facilities including the cost of the 890 reservoirs, the following financial plan is proposed: • Issue debt in the amount of approximately $50 to $55 million, subject to final bid amount/award on the water treatment plant project • Issue tax exempt bonds with a fixed rate, stepped financing structure as described in this report • Make commitment to maintain a debt coverage ratio of 160% as a target during the term of the debt for water rate adjustment purposes • That water rates be adjusted effective July 1, 2007, in the amount of about 5%, pursuant to Proposition 218 requirements • That subsequent biennial rate adjustments be made in order to maintain the debt coverage commitment, subject to review at the time of the proposed adjustment - • —That half of the interest income on water reserve funds be used for debt repayment purposes • That the legal issuer of this debt be the Azusa Public Financing Authority FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of this debt issuance will be approximately $105.8 million for principal and interest over 30 years, less capitalized interest; the present value of this expense is about $56.6 million based on a 4% discount rate. In the next ten years, based on the assumptions, water rates would likely have to be increased by about 19% or approximately 2% per year in order to meet debt payments and debt coverage obligations set forth in the attached plan. Prepared by: Joseph F. Hsu, Director of Utilities Chet Anderson, Assistant Director of Water Operations Bob Tang, Assistant Director of Resources Management Cary Kalscheuer, Assistant to the Director of Utilities Reso-Fin9 Plan. doc Financial Forecast.ppt r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE UTILITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL OF - - THE CITY OF AZUSA, APPROVING THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE NEW WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND OTHER WATER FACILITIES. WHEREAS, the City of Azusa and Azusa Light & Water desire to comply with Department of Health Services regulations pertaining to the operation of water treatment facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Azusa and Azusa Light & Water have reached a maximum water _-production capacity of existing water facilities, including pump stations, reservoirs, and the existing water treatment plant; and WHEREAS, Azusa Light & Water has designed through its engineering consultants a 16 -million gallon per day water treatment plant incorporating membrane water filtration technology and estimates the construction cost of the facility to be anywhere from $35 to $40 million; and WHEREAS, Azusa Light & Water faces other project obligations including the construction of reservoirs, transmission lines, and other water pipelines/connections which are estimated to cost between $10 to $15 million; and WHEREAS, the City of Azusa and Azusa Light & Water desires to finance the construction of a new water treatment plant and other water facilities needed to meet future water demand and environmental regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, THE UTILITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA, DOES FIND AND DECLARE THAT: SECTION 1: Adoption of Financial Plan. The Financial Plan attached to this resolution as "Exhibit A," to issue debt in the amount of approximately $50 to $55 million, is hereby adopted. SECTION 2: Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. SECTION 3: Authorization. That the Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED on this 23rd' day of October 2006. Mayor 029 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly Passed by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting of the Utility Board/City Council thereof on the 23rd day of October 2006, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Vera Mendoza, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Best Best & Kreiger, City Attorney 030 v EXHIBIT A FINANCIAL PLAN WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND OTHER WATER FACILITIES In order to construct a 16 -million gallon per day membrane water treatment plant, a 4 -million gallon reservoir, and other water facilities including the cost of the 890 reservoirs, the following financial plan is adopted: Debt Amount and Instrument • Issue debt in the amount of approximately $50 to $55 million, subject to final bid amount/award on the water treatment plant, in the form of tax exempt municipal bonds Debt Structure • Issue debt consisting of a fixed rate, stepped wrap financing structure with levelized payments commencing around the year 2015 Debt Coverage Ratio • Make commitment to maintain a debt coverage ratio of 160% as a target during the term of the debt for water rate adjustment purposes Water Rate Adiustments • That water rates be adjusted effective July 1, 2007, in the amount of 5%, pursuant to Proposition 218 requirements That subsequent biennial rate adjustments be made in order to maintain the debt coverage ratio commitment Use of Reserve Funds • That the interest income on half of all water reserve funds be used for debt repayment Debt Legal Issuer • That the legal issuer of this debt be the Azusa Public Financing Authority 031 Water Treatment Plant Financial Plan rr October 23, 2006 4 �7Q AZUSA L I G H T & W AT E R 1 032 r $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 N C $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $00 Debt Service Payments 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 .2040 Year 031 $6 $5 $4 m c o $:3 $2 $1 $0 rypp'1 ION", tipNI tip1p IONC,, ryp'1�' ry00 le Ol lie tipA� ryppp Years Combined Debt Service O Existing Debt ■ New Debt 3 034 Forecasted Rate Adjustments 6%- 5%- 0 Biennial Rate Adjustment 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 Years 035 Forecast Assumptions Available FY 2006 Budget Actual revenues and expenses used as starting year, adjusted by other assumptions. Starting year costs adjusted for COLAs effective 7/1/2006 Residential growth will be 20/o/year until 2011, and 0.50/6/year thereafter Expenses, generally, will increase by 3% per year, including costs for purchased water Utility will average about $2.5 million/year on capital improvements related mostly to system maintenance (not adjusted annually) Interest income will be 4% annually on reserve balance • Half interest income will be transferred to City for Capital Projects • Other half of interest income will be used for debt service on 2006 issuance • Leased water costs of 8% on retail sales will continue • Franchise fee of 2% on retail sales will continue • Replacement water costs will be $500,000/year, not offset by same amount of revenue • Rates will be increased by 5% in years 2008 and 2010, then 3% biennially thereafter • Miscellaneous revenues will increase by about 2% per year r, J Forecasted Debt Coverage Ratios With Rate Adjustments —A—No Rate Adjustment — — Minimum Required 600% 500% 400% – 300% w � 200% Nks W y 100% — — — 0 U 0% a . o -t00% -200%- -3001/6 -400% 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 Year 6 037 Forecasted Annual Reserves With Biennial Rate Adjustments Nominal Dollars — — Real Dollars $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 .� $20- $15 s10 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025. 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 Years 7 038. AGENDA ITEM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL ,Q FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIOS 7 �D feph I DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF REPAIR WORK TO INSTALL A PERMANENT UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM ON URGENT BASIS AT 600 WEST GLADSTONE STREET IN THE CITY OF AZUSA. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Azusa Utility Board/City Council, authorize the City Manager or Director of Utilities to award a contract for urgent electrical repair work at 600 West Gladstone Street pursuant to Azusa Municipal Code (AMC) Section 2-523(a). BACKGROUND An underground, three phase, 12kV medium voltage cable that was installed many years ago, failed during the early morning hours on Monday, October 16, 2006. The location of the damaged cable is 600 West Gladstone Street. The failed cable provides a feed to a transformer filch serves electricity to mobile homes located at the same address. Because the cable was buried, repair work was not easy to do, and in an attempt to restore electricity to the affected mobile homes, a temporary remedy was installed by the field operations crew on the same day—after all efforts to fix the damaged underground cable were exhausted. The temporary energized 12kV cable is currently lying on the ground protected only by PVC pipes. This temporary fix is inconsistent with prudent utility construction methods and may pose a potentially unsafe condition if the pipes/conduit remains on the ground for an extended period of time. Repair work is therefore imperative. Field crews are aware of the safety concerns and noted that this is only a temporary repair until such time that a new permanent conduit can be installed to the transformer. ME Staff considers this a maintenance repair pursuant to AMC section 2-511, however, given safety concerns, staff is recommending that the City Manager or Director of Utilities be authorized to approve a contract for replacement of underground electric system pursuant to the alternate purchasing procedure included in AMC Section 2-523(a). FISCAL IMPACT At the writing of this report, quotes are being solicited to carryout the needed repairs. It is estimated at this time that repair costs will not exceed $50,000. If this proves to be the case, account number 33-40-733-660-7130 includes sufficient funds. Prepared by: F. Langit Jr., Senior Electrical Engineer 041 Other Capital Projects • WTP Transmission lines $1.5 million • Project W-237 - Water Mains 2.0 million • Project W-238 — Water Mains 2.0 million • Cement Pipe Relining 1.5 million • Street Maint -- Water Mains 2.0 million TOTAL $9.0 Million Power Resources Division Monthly Report ■ Power Resource Update ■ Power Consumption Comparison ■ Wholesale Market Trend 0 Power Resource Budget Update Power Resource Update ■ Substantially ramped up the activities in preparation for the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) market design changes. Various market testing and simulation activities are under way and are expected to continue through. summer 2007 in preparation of November 1, 2007 new market launch date ■ Continue to participate in Southern California Public Power Authority's (SCPPA) Request for Proposal (RFP) for power scheduling and dispatching services. We are looking for alternatives to the current service provider in case existing service cannot be renewed satisfactorily. SCPPA's RFP proposals were received on October 13th and review is under way ■ Continue to participate in Southern California Public Power Authority's (SCPPA) Request for Proposal (RFP). for renewable energy. SCPPA's RFP proposals were received on October 16th and review is under way ■ Continue to represent the Southern California munis on selective CAISO and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) matters. Staff is serving as a member in CAISO technical advisory committee on 2008 Local Capacity Requirement ■ Continue to strategize with Southern California munis for operational alternatives to the CAISO operations. A whitepaper is under preparation formulating the strategic alternatives ■ Evaluating the implications of new energy legislations and making preparations for timely compliance ■ Evaluating the use of natural gas hedging strategies to manage power costs ■ Completing various annual regulatory and financial reports w SEP .,OCT NOV DEC 57.9 54.9 48.0 41.1 36.2 60.8 55.2 63.7 5.780/6 16.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.000/ PEAK DEMAND N MW CITY OF AZUSA ENERGY CONSUMPTION COMPARISON d ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN MWH PERCENT MONTH FY 05-06 FY 06-07 CHANGE JUL 25,839 29,287 13-349/6 AUG 26,758 25,912 -3.160/ SEP 22,725 24,376 7.289/6 OCT 21,746 -100.000/ NOV 19.9-4-2-- -100,000% DEC 20,163 -100-w/. JAN 20,676 -100.00/. FEB 18,397 -100.00% WAR 20,326 -100.000/ APR 100.00% NAY 21.021 -100POPI/ ----- -- JUN -100.00 r/. TOTAL 260,184 79,578 5.829/6 CITY OF AZUSA PEAK DEMAND COMPARISON PERCENT MONTH FY 05-06 FYO&107 CHAN(4i SEP .,OCT NOV DEC 57.9 54.9 48.0 41.1 36.2 60.8 55.2 63.7 5.780/6 16.00% -100.00% -100.00% -100.000/ PEAK DEMAND N MW WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY SPOT MARKET PRICES IN CALIFORNIA ALL PRICES IN $/MWH C.J1 AVERAGE AVERAGE MONTH ON PEAK PRICE OFF PEAK PRICE AUG 05$76.80 $54.14 -- ...SEP $64.96..... OCT 05 -NOV $89.57 $71.27 -$55.39 05 $64.84 DEC 05 $94.47 $80.52 JAN 06 $59.76 $46.30 FEB 06 $53.77 _ ,$46.34 . MAR 06 $46.28 $36.28 APR 06 $49.04 $32.41 MAY06 $48.92 $26.27 JUN 06 $59.52 $30.03 JUL 06 $83.86 $43.66 AUG 06 $63.02 $43.84 SEP 06 $43.70 $31.36 ALL PRICES IN $/MWH C.J1 Power Resource Cost Accounting FY '06-07' -- _ (s) -.. (4) -, ._(5) LONGTERM-' SHORTTERMTRPNSMSSION ANCILLARY SCHEDULING TOTPL WHOLESALE NET MONTH CONTRACTS PURCHASES COSTS SEFYMCE COSTS DISPATCHING COSTS COSTS RE�EI4UES .� COSTS , Jul -06 1,182751521 2,37869535 267,05845 �.Aig-06 � 1,17461023 194335923 24013210 6959148. 2000000 -_ -- 27536931 3925633.73 (1963,923.35)1 1,98171038 j _.— __ 2915408 3407255.64 - (1718,72274)1 1,68853290 { _ Sep -06 1,185 734 80 1 1 860 286 26 240 132 10 20 00000 29154 08 3335 30724 (1648,32240) 1.686,98484-- ,686 984ea Oct-06� F NO*06 f _ 000 _ .r -..._ 000 --t- 000 000 { ( Deo-08.� 0.001 Jan -07 0.00 000 Feb -07 Mar -07 r 0.00 0.00. r____ 000 0.001 Jun -07 0.00 m6l TOTAL $3,543,096551— $6,182,340.84 $747,32265 1 $10959148'. $8584509 $10,668,196.61 ($5,330968.49) $5 337228 12 1 _ 1 ii (1) INCLUDESSCPPALONG TERM CO_NTRPGTS , [2) INCLUDES ALL SHORTTERM PURCHASES FOR HEDGING, LOAD BALANCING PURPOSES, RAR CAPALRY ? (3) :INCLUDES ALL SHORTTEAMPND LONGTRNJSMSSION CONTRACT COSTS J ! _ (4) •COSTS CHPRGED BYCALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEMOPERATOR FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY FUNCTIONS . (5) INCLUDES COSTS FOR SCHEDULING AND DISPATCHING OF ELECTRICfTV , r (6) SUMOF(1) THROUGH L_,. .._... ..._ ...... i._. ___. i (7) WHOLESALE REVENUES DERIVED FROM SALES OF EXCESS POWER+PTO BENEFITS DIFFERENCE OF(6)M1D _ I INFORMATIONAL ITEM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AND AZUSA CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOSEPH F. HSU, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE REPORT Attachments include: (1) a powerpoint presentation prepared by Bob Tang on some energy legislation and its potential impacts on Azusa, and (2) a document from Southern California Public Power Association (SCPPA) on energy and other legislation, including timelines for some key milestones. Prepared by: Cary Kalscheuer, Assistant to the Director of Utilities Attachments: 047 Energy Leg NEW LAWS - Update. ppt TIMELINES.doc 047 G et+ 9002 'CZ aagopo ' x alppdn;_a Ajolein6aN pup anilplsift-I A6.i9u3 A New Energy Legislations: • SB 1— Solar Bill . AB 32 — Greenhouse Gas Reduction . SB 1368 - Greenhouse Gas Limitation in Resource Procurement Process • SB 107 — Renewable Energy . AB 2021 — Energy Efficiency 4 .4 2 Expected Implications to the City SB 1— Imposes requirements on munis to Implement distributed solar programs and assigns financial obligations of about $3 million over a 10 -year period to the City for the program AB 32 — It will eventually impose limits on GHG emissions once the regulations are established in about 18 months. Compliance cost is unknown at this time but potentially significant starting FY 2010-11 SB 1368 — It restricts City's ability toprocure long term baseload resources only to those considered environmental friend )y and potentially at higher costs. Cost and operational impacts are unknown at this time. No immediate impact expected SB 107— It accelerates 20% renewable target from 2017 to 2010 for California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) regulated entities. The munis are expected to be under pressure to comply with spirit of the law as well. Accelerating the compliance date by 7 years may cause the cost of renewable resources to be higher and increase our renewable power costs AB 2021— It will identify through a public process to be conducted by California Energy Commission all achievable cost-effective energy efficiency programs for implementation by munis and Investor Owned utilities alike. Results of the programs will be verified by independent third parties. It is expected that the City may be required to undertake additional energy efficient programs and incur costs to hire independent entities to audit our programs. Higher cost is expected � 3 Q VTV e4 AB 32 (Nunez) 12/31/06 Entities registered with the CA Climate Action Registry by this date and with a GHG reporting/verification program will not have to alter that program, except as necessary to ensure compliance 01/01/07 SB 1368 takes effect 01/01/07 ARB to adopt a list of early action emission reduction measures achievable prior to adopting market-based compliance mechanisms required by AB 32 02/01/07. PUC, through rulemaking, must establish the GHG emission performance standard for all baseload generation, with the emissions rate not higher than the rate for combined -cycle natural gas baseload generation 02/01/07 Enforcement begins immediately after the standard is established 06/01/07 CEC, with PUC, ARB and other stakeholders shall establish GHG standard for municipal utilities, consistent with the PUC standard for IOUs 06/30/07 ARB must publish a list of early action gas emissions reduction measures 01/01/08 ARB to adopt statewide emissions limit on GHG emissions, including process and criteria, effective after 2020 unless amended or repealed; by 01/01/10 must adopt and enforce those measures... authorizes ARB to impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties 01/01/08 ARB to adopt regulations requiring GHG emission sources to monitor and report their emissions to the ARB 01/01/09 ARB to prepare and adopt a rulemaking scoping plan for rules and regulations and update the plan every five years 01/01/10 ARB to adopt regulations to implement measures published 06/30/07 01/01/11 ARB must adopt GHG emission limits and measure to achieve the maximum feasible and cost-effective reductions in GHG, allows the ARB to adopt "a system of market-based declining annual aggregate emission limits" or cap and trade, applicable from 01/01/12 to 12/31/20 Additional Considerations 1) The Governor is authorized, in the event of extraordinary circumstances, catastrophic events or threat of significant economic harm, to adjust deadlines for a period not to exceed one year 2) ARB must consider environmental justice, best available science, economics as well as consult with other state agencies with jurisdiction over utilities 0:51 3) State's retail sellers of electricity must achieve at least 20% of energy sales from renewables 4) PUC, with the ISO, must consider the effects on system reliability and costs to consumers AB 1925 (Blakeslee) 01/01/07 AB 1925 takes effect 11/01/07 CEC must . 1) report to the legislature and recommend how the state can develop parameters on cost-effective geologic sequestration of industrial carbon dioxide, meeting with specific groups to formulate recommendations 2) evaluate potential risks from sequestration of carbon dioxide, potential risks if sequestered carbon dioxide leaks into aquifers and liability from leakage of sequestered carbon dioxide and potentially responsible parties 3) include the report required by AB 1925 in its 2007 Integrated Energy Policy report to the legislature . AB 2021 (Levine) 01/01/07 AB 2021 takes effect 11/01/07 By 11/01/07, and each November 1 every three years thereafter, CEC with the PUC and municipal utilities in a public process, input from other stakeholders, to identify potentially achievable cost-effective energy efficiency savings and establish annual targets for the next 10 years 01/06/08 Within 60 days of adopting annual targets, requires municipal utility to report targets to the CEC; requires the PUC to base its estimate on most recent targets of the PUC and municipal utilities Reporting Each municipal utility must annually report 1) to customers and the CEC, for use in Integrated Energy Policy Report, on investments in energy efficiency and demand reduction programs describing programs, expenditures, cost-effectiveness and savings reductions 2) to the CEC sources of funding energy efficiency and demand reduction investments and assumptions used to determine cost-effectiveness Additional Requirements 1) Independent evaluation, measurement and verification of energy efficiency savings achieved by municipal utility programs 2 052 2) Requires the CEC to provide recommendations to the municipal utility, the legislature and the Governor if improvements can be made regarding the level of annual targets or annual targets AB 2189 (Blakeslee) 01/01/03 When efficiency improvements are undertaken after 01/01/03 to a small hydroelectric generation facility that already meets the definition of eligible renewable resource, and if those improvements exceed 30 MW but do not increase appropriation or diversion of water, then the entire generating capacity of the facility is an eligible renewable resource. 01/01/07 AB 2189 takes effect AB 2951 (Goldberg) 01/01/07 AB 2951 takes effect AB 2951 allows a municipal utility to impose a fee upon a public agency - comparable to nonpublic users - for any product, commodity or service. Prior to imposing a fee, parties must meet these timelines: 1) 60 days advance notice, in writing, when fees will be increased during a public meeting 2) 30 days prior to public meeting, a public agency may request data on which the increase is based, including a meet and discuss if requested 3)120 day Statute of Limitations from the effective date of the change for the public agency to challenge. If public agency fails to pay, etc., municipal utility can take no action before 120 days has lapsed. 4) Cost of service study at least once every 10 years Burden of Proof Municipal utility must prove it has met the procedural requirements above, as well as the cost of service study 01/01/10 Sunset date SB 1 (Murray) 01/01/07 SB 1 takes effect 06/01/08 Requires municipal utilities to adopt, implement and finance a solar initiative program, consistent with the CA Solar initiative adopted by the PUC for the IOUs, annually thereafter to report to customers, the legislature and the CEC related to the program and sets $784 M as the statewide expenditure for municipal utilities 053 SB 107 (Simitian) 01/01/05 Expands the definition of "eligible renewable resource" to include out-of- state generation if the facility began operating after 01/01/05 01/01/07 SB 107 takes effect 10/31/10 Legislature intends that the PUC and the CEC implement the RPS to attain a target of 20% of retail sales of electricity from eligible renewables by 2010. Municipal utilities are excluded from the definition of retail seller. (Legislative intent language does not have the force and effect of statutory language, but the courts may consider it if the statutory language is unclear.) Reporting While municipal utilities are excluded from the definition of retail seller, each municipal utility must annually report to the CEC on its mix of eligible renewable resources and their progress toward meeting their RPS. Target Municipal utility must have an established annual RPS standard target comparable to those for the IOUs in order for the CEC to certify eligible renewable energy resources Authorizes municipal utilities to sell renewable energy credits Requires the CEC to use eligibility criteria and conditions (under existing law developed by the CEC in consultation with the PUC and municipal utilities) for solar energy systems applicable to the CSI Authorizes, if the CEC provides funding for a system to verify compliance with the RPS by retail sellers, to recover all costs from user fees SB 1210 (Torlakson) 01/01/07 SB 1210 takes effect. Eminent Domain SB 1210 prevents issuance of a pre -judgment order of possession (public entity taking possession of property without prior notice or without the opportunity for the owner to respond or seek a hearing) 30 days Thirty days after service of a motion for pre -judgment possession, the record owner of the property must file written opposition. An order of possession will be granted by the court if the owner does not oppose within 30 days, the public entity/plaintiff is entitled to take by eminent domain and the public entity/plaintiff has deposited with the court an amount meeting the statutory requirements of just compensation 60 days Not less than 60 days after service, the public entity/plaintiff must set the court hearing on the motion 4 054 S 90 days If the property is occupied, SB 1210 requires service of the motion on the owner 90 days prior to the hearing. The owner has 30 days to oppose the motion, which the public entity/plaintiff must reply to in not less than 15 days prior to the hearing. An order of possession will be granted by the court if the owner does not oppose within 30 days, the public entity/plaintiff is entitled to take by eminent domain, and has deposited with the court an amount meeting the statutory requirements of just compensation. Motion Opposed The court will grant an order of possession if the public entity/plaintiff is entitled to take by eminent domain and has deposited with the court an amount meeting the statutory requirements of just compensation. There is an overriding need for the public entity/plaintiff to take possession of the property before final judgment and substantial hardship results if the motion of possession is denied and the hardship to the public entity/plaintiff outweighs the hardship to the owner to take possession. SB 1359 (Torlakson) 14 Calendar Days Any person planning an excavation must contact the regional notification center at least 2 working days, and not more than 14 calendar days, prior to starting an excavation. The regional notification center will provide an inquiry identification number valid for 28 days and maintain records for no less than 3 years, and, when within 10 feet of a high priority subsurface installation, must notify the excavator and meet on site SB 1368 (Perata) 01/01/07 SB 1368 takes effect 02/01/07 PUC, through rulemaking, must establish the GHG emission performance standard for all baseload generation, with the emissions rate not higher than the rate for combined -cycle natural gas baseload generation 02/01/07 Enforcement immediately after the standard is established 06/01/07 CEC, with PUC, ARB and other stakeholders shall establish GHG standard for municipal utilities, consistent with the PUC standard for IOUs No IOU or municipal utility may enter into a long-term contract (5 years) unless the baseload generation complies with the GHG emission performance standard established by the PUC and CEC. The CEC must approve municipal utility contracts. PUC with the ISO must consider the effects on system reliability and costs to consumers. 5 055 The PUC is also authorized to, through rulemaking, to continue, modify or replace the b GHG emissions standard applicable to load serving entities ... no requirement to go back to the legislature to seek further authorization. There is no sunset date for this bill. 6 056 Azusa Light & Water Key Accounts Breakfast Meeting A Z U S A LIGHT & WATER November 2, 2006 8:00 a.m. Azusa Women's Club 1 . Electric System & Projects . Energy Mandates & Costs . Electric Rates . Water System & Challenges . Water Projects . Water Rates 2 Electric Utility serves about 15,500 customers . 12% of customers are Commercial & Industrial consumers 69% of sales are to Commercial & Industrial Customers 80% of the electricity supplied by Azusa comes from long term contracts System includes 2 substations, 20 circuits, and about 100 miles of electric lines 3 Electric System Improvements "VTt'l, 4-, "* Au "VTt'l, 4-, "* Electric Rate Comparison Comparison of Monthly Electric Bills (in Dollars) (Small-Medium Commercial/industrial Customers) ANSA Pasadena Burbank Glendale Edison $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 O 50,000 kWh 150 kW may F ?t fz }� rt MV`ih Y 9" � �" TIr l{�yL� 4 F:.f i� •y^j� 5 '�i ,'°(I ' Edison Glendale Burbank Pasadena Azusa $8,311 $6,173 $6,875 $5,104 $5,083 ?�' N9S"_..`_YP' ,-,w „...+v+:merN6-w - r -*'F+ . --�✓ ie .*�wis�mr k ` rs, �.3 Edison Glendale Burbank Pasadena Azusa $8,311 $6,173 $6,875 $5,104 $5,083 5 Electric Rate Comparison (cont.) Comparison of Monthly Electric Bills (in Dollars) (Medium -Large Commercial/Industrial Customers) AZUSA IBM* M1} Pasadena ,000 Edison Glendale Burbank Pasadena Ausa O 100,000 Wh 300 kW �S� ��'i.'111 V$ �Art q`° Burbank Cr{1 '`e $14ie_1 Glendale Ij � 'Wi Edison $0 $2,000. $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 � hLFr•�� f?�r1lTFk, iN.W S � i�4SlGMt, $12,549 ^�,, ��{{llllllN�-xq���°���h��' `�4g "�IfM^ Pi ""����44S:?�� ga' J,� +} y"Y � t��4�h` $10,007 '' hi{}� � i��.} f£wrfr. � "1g3f?"H��1Kf A ��o t4� y°v9 A� . ���� c�`�S6�„'T7.#tl%,?n�PA`� W, wY l'N,{{Ya.+.�!" '. �hrc .� 'fryv"'�,# C,,;;' "^ �S8ntylB9"�Yi-4��,-.'..;.�..' 'i} �4�L�1fraW=" vY � fi �$yJ'm�,SnGJtrY rotr5r"Y> �ft� "{��++� �RiH,. ,i .0404 ��i2.'}}"u VON Y y+? rom7iya:3�?i�� & w@�-4FQ. d sI`� ��mo fhP�i"�"tl"it'P ,Sh�l'TT�`xGnS.�j �..yZWW�.ti,wJ:a.! 11�y iL" 4VI'+ �'04� qr p7,..r�,,3i1'�Y°rY L's'�w�LC '�A+��N Y Y{i Hy,CW�re4y !x Y�.*.i. fLRrDh'e1 '1.;}.j''"i-"-C s�n. f° *" 0 $12,549 � $11,446 $12,839 $10,007 $8,817 0 Annual Cost Impacts • SB 1 - Solar Mandate $3009000 . AB 107 - Renewables Mandate $1505000 . AB 2021 -Energy Efficiency $50,000 • AB 32 - Green House Gases Unknown . Localize Power Purchasing $5009000 • Higher Fuel Costs $5009000 • System Maintenance $500,000 Total: $2,000,000 + Good News About Electric ■ No increase for 2006 ■ 5% Rate increase likely July 1, 2007 ■ No increase for 2008. ■ 5% rate increase likely July 1, 2009 Good News: Rate adjustments Modest and Predictable Keeps your business competitive . Water Utility Serves about 22,000 customers, and 40% are located in Azusa . 14% of Water Customers are Commercial & Industrial customers . 48% of water sales are to Commercial & Industrial customers • System consists of 11 wells, 7 booster pumps, 10 reservoirs, 243 miles of water mains and transmission lines • Water demand increasing • Water production limited • Water costs are high • Environmental regulations more stringent • Capital costs for system maintenance very high 10 Major Water Projects 404 new reservoirs will add 11.85 million gallons of storage — cost >$8 million 16 million gallon/day Water Treatment Plant (WTP) — cost $40 million 11 Other Near -Term Capital Projects • Transmission lines • Project W-237 - Water Mains • Project W-238 - Water Mains • Cement Pipe Relining • Street Maint -- Water Mains $1.5 million 2.0 million 2.0 million 1.5 million 2.0 million $9.0 Million 12 Water Rate Comparison 2" Meter / 50 ccfs / month Monthly Average Cost $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 San Dimas Claremont City of Covina Covina West Covina c d Q Walnut Duarte Rowland Water District City of Glendora Cityof Azusa W 13 Water Rate Comparison 4" Meter / 200 ccfs / month Monthly Average Cost $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 San Dimas Claremont City of Covina Covina _. , . West Covina " c d rn Q Walnut Duarte Rowland Water District Cityof Glendora Cityof Azusa r 14 Water Rate Comparison 8" Meter / 600 ccfs / month Monthly Average Cost $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 San Dimas Claremont City of Covina Covina West Covina c d O1 Walnut Q Duarte Rowland Water District Cityof Glendora City of Azusa _ �N7 Projected .Water Rate Adjustments 6%- %5%O 5%- C3Biennial Rate Adjustment 4% 3%-- 2/0 Y I 1% }� fi N 0% 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 Years 16 r. Good News Abut Nater ■ Utility is planning ahead to meet future growth ■ New Water Filter Plant will be able to treat all types of water, including LOW COST San Gabriel River Water ■ Will meet anticipated water demand and all regulatory requirements Good News: Rate adjustments Modest and Predictable Keeps your business competitive 17 HI H 3 1 V AA 18 1H51� vSf-IZv uoissn3sia suoilsono