Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - July 22,2013 - UB 4 r�, Lirr 1.I0EIT RAZL1S.WATER AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF AZUSA UTILITY BOARD AZUSA LIGHT&WATER JULY 22,2013 729 N. AZUSA AVENUE 6:30 P.M. AZUSA, CA 91702 AZUSA UTILITY BOARD URIEL E. MACIAS CHAIRPERSON ROBERT GONZALES JOSEPH R. ROCHA VICE CHAIRPERSON BOARD MEMBER EDWARD J.ALVAREZ ANGEL CARRILLO BOARD MEMBER BOARD MEMBER 1 6:30 P.M. Convene to Regular Meeting of the Azusa Utility Board • Call to Order • Pledge to the Flag • Roll Call A. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1. (Person/Group shall be allowed to speak without interruption up to five(5) minutes maximum time, subject to compliance with applicable meeting rules. Questions to the speaker or responses to the speaker's questions or comments shall be handled after the speaker has completed his/her comments. Public Participation will be limited to sixty (60) minutes time.) B. UTILITIES DIRECTOR COMMENTS C. UTILITY BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS 1 D. CONSENT CALENDAR The Consent Calendar adopting the printed recommended action will be enacted with one vote. If Staff or Councilmembers wish to address any item on the Consent Calendar individually, it will be considered under SPECIAL CALL ITEMS. 1. Minutes. Recommendation: Approve minutes of regular meeting on June 24, 2013 as written. E. SCHEDULED ITEMS 1. Approval of Annual Water Rights Leasing Transactions. Recommendation: Ratify the execution of water rights lease agreements with California Domestic Water Company, Sunny Slope Water Company, and MillerCoors. 2. Approval of Participation in the California Home Energy Renovation Opportunity (HERO) Program. Recommendation: Adopt the following resolution approving an amendment to the WRCOG Joint Powers Agreement to add the City of Azusa as an Associate Member in order to authorize the City's participation in the California HERO Program. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO THE INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN THE CALIFORNIA HERO PROGRAM TO FINANCE DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE AND APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO A CERTAIN JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT RELATED THERETO. 3. Approval of "Ice Energy" Thermal Cooling for the Azusa City Library. Recommendation: Approve (i) the installation of an Ice Thermal Energy Storage Cooling system for the Azusa City Library; and (ii) an amendment of the FY 2013-14 electric fund budget in amount not-to-exceed $150,000 to pay for this proposed capital improvement project. 4. August 26, 2013 Utility Board Agenda Schedule (Verbal) F. STAFF REPORTS/COMMUNICATIONS 1. Solar Partnership Program Update 2. Water Supply Update 3. Update on Azusa Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) 4. Update on San Juan Divestiture Project 2 G. ADJOURNMENT 1. Adjournment. "In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a city meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 626-812-5229. Notification three (3) working days prior to the meeting or time when special services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide access to the meeting." "In compliance with Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials are available for inspection by members of the public at the following locations: Azusa City Clerk's Office - 213 E. Foothill Boulevard, Azusa City Library- 729 N. Dalton Avenue, and Azusa Light& Water-729 N.Azusa Avenue,Azusa CA." 3 APPROVED 8 }� Date i/ /Xi ' v41L • -/Ire-' AZUSA .1041 d WATER SCHEDULED ITEM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF TH USA UTILITY BOARD FROM: GEORGE MORROW, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: JULY 22, 2013 SUBJECT: ANNUAL WATER RIGHTS LEASING TRANSACTIONS CONDUCTED BY WATER DIVISION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Utility Board ratify the execution of water rights lease agreements with California Domestic Water Company, Sunny Slope Water Company, and MillerCoors. BACKGROUND The City of Azusa produces water from the Main San Gabriel Basin which is controlled by a Judgment, entered into the Court records January 4, 1973, and which has been periodically amended thereafter. The Judgment requirements are enforced by the Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster office, with Court oversight. In 1993, the City of Azusa purchased the Azusa Valley Water Company along with the substantial water rights owned and controlled by Azusa Valley. Furthermore, the City of Azusa ("City") has obtained additional water rights from the dissolution of the Azusa Agricultural Irrigating Company ("Azusa Ag.") and by contract with the Miller-Coors Brewing Company, the City controls those water rights belonging to MillerCoors that equal MillerCoor's demand on the City's water system. The City is the owner of record and otherwise beneficially controls, or is the duly authorized and acting agent for, the ownership of 6.91287 percent of the Prescriptive Production Rights (not including Miller-Coors) in the Main San Gabriel Basin as adjudicated in the case of"Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District vs. City of Alhambra et al." In order to keep the Basin replenished under the Judgment, each year in May the Watermaster Board sets the Safe Yield for the following year and also sets the prices and assessments to be applied to the water produced in the current year. This year the price of Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District 007 Water Lease Ratifications July 22,2013 Page 2 (USGVMWD) replenishment water was set at $673/Acre-foot and the price of San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District(SGVMWD)replenishment water was set at $130/Acre-foot. The amount of water rights in terms of acre feet (AF) that Azusa, Azusa Valley, and MillerCoors possess varies with the Safe Yield for the Basin. For Fiscal Year 2012-2013, the Basin Safe Yield was set at 200,000 AF. The City of Azusa has water rights to produce 6.91287 percent of 200,000 AF (13,825.7AF) plus 3,785 AF in Diversion Rights. Including Miller-Coors' water rights this year, 1,535 AF, the City has approximately 19,145.7 AF of water rights. Next Fiscal Year, 2013-2014, the Basin Safe Yield has been set at 180,000 AF, lowering Azusa's water production right for next year by approximately 10%. The Watermaster stipulation each year is that all temporary assignments or leases of water rights forms (attached) be finalized and notarized by the end of day, June 30, and filed with Watermaster by July 15. The Water Division was successful leasing 2,000 AF of water rights to California Domestic Water Company and 160 AF to Sunny Slope Water Company for a total of $1,191,682 or an average price of about $552 per acre foot. Also, the water rights transferred to Azusa Valley Water Company by MillerCoors for their water demand this year totaled 1,535 AF. While the temporary water rights lease agreements with California Domestic Water Company, and Sunny Slope Water Company were entered into by staff to effect the transaction by the required deadline this year, the Utility Board's/City Council's ratification of this action, as allowed by Resolution 09-C69 passed by the Utility Board at their July 27, 2009 meeting, is desired at this time to fully authorize the agreements and Temporary Assignment filings with Watermaster. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of ratifying the water rights leases with California Domestic Water Company and Sunny Slope water Company is a receipt of$1,191,682, and 1,535 AF of water rights from MillerCoors. Including last month's leases, Azusa Valley has received a total of$2,128,498 for leases in fiscal year 2012-2013. Prepared by: Chet F. Anderson P.E., Assistant Director-Water Operations 008 Information Item Presented 'I F... f AZ LI SA ONT 6 'M ;f tl. INFORMATION ITEM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD FROM: GEORGE F. MORROW, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIE DATE: JULY 22, 2013 SUBJECT: SOLAR PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM UPDATE In 2006, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) was enacted by then Governor Schwarzenegger as the Million Solar Roofs Initiative. The bill was later expanded to the California Solar Initiative (CSI) and has since been modified to become the current Energy Commission's New Solar Homes Partnership (NSHP). SBI mandated all electric utilities in California to make available up to $3.5 billion dollars in rebates over a 10-year period to fund distributed solar power installations in California. It was envisioned that this funding would spur technology innovations in the solar power industry and ultimately would enable solar power to be cost competitive with conventional sources of electricity. SB1 specifies that municipal utilities in aggregate shall be responsible for $750 Million in funding and was allocated among the municipal utilities proportionally to retail electricity sales. Azusa Light and Water's budget allocation is about $3.2 Million by the end of 2017, or $327,100 per year for the ten year period. Since inception of the Solar Partnership Program, Azusa Light and Water customers have installed approximately 458 kW of solar photo voltaic (PV) systems and in turn received about $1.3 Million in rebates. From 2006 through the end of fiscal year 2011-2012, only 103 kW were installed and $273,000 of corresponding rebates were paid. Within the first five months of fiscal year 2012-2013 over 314 kW and $769,000 were installed or committed. Due to the overwhelming success and unprecedented response to the Azusa's Solar Partnership Program, the entire SB 1 budget allocation through fiscal year 2013-2014 has been committed and a waiting list was formed on November 14, 2012. By being on the waiting list, the 30 applicants are eligible for the rebate amount that was in place at the time their rebate application was submitted and they will continue to move up the list in the order their applications were received as projects ahead of theirs progress or are removed from the list. 021 Solar Partnership Program Update July 22, 2013 Page 2 It should also be noted that the program will be modified before "reopening" to incorporate system electricity production efficiencies. This will ensure cost effectiveness of the rebates and safeguard the customers from oversized system designs, due in part to east facing panels. Several systems to date have been designed with east facing panels that produce far less electricity during the winter months than the optimally situated south facing panels. Prepared by: Paul Reid, Business Development/Public Benefit Programs Coordinator 022 Information Item Presented -7/ .-/ P-42,• AZUSA 1111111 _CMT 4'w47Ek INFORMATION ITEM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD FROM: GEORGE F. MORROW, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: JULY 22, 2013 SUBJECT: AZUSA WATER SUPPLY UPDATE The Baldwin Park Key Well, a key indicator of the groundwater supply in the Main San Gabriel Water Basin, is currently at elevation 201.5 feet. The historic low at the Key Well was 189.2 feet on December 3, 2009. The elevation of the Key Well is decreasing at about 0.6 feet per week. It is predicted that the Key Well may be as low as 190 feet by November 1 if no rain occurs prior to that date. Watermaster deliveries from USG-3 beginning in October will slow the decline of the Key Well, but rain is necessary for full recovery of the Key Well. (Rainfall to date is 10.76 inches, 48% of average.) The Canyon Groundwater Basin, from which the City of Azusa draws the bulk of its water supply, is holding steady at 2 feet below overflow at the North Pond and 41 feet below overflow at the South Pond, and dropping. San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District (SGVMWD) has been delivering water to the North Pond at 40 cfs (17,592 gpm) since March, but the deliveries will end August 1. Three Valleys Municipal Water District is scheduled to begin delivering water to the Canyon Basin in the months of October,November and December. The Watermaster River Connection, USG-3, is not yet on. Upper District deliveries for Watermaster to the River will most likely begin in October, with some water being diverted to the Canyon Basin and most of the water going to the Main Basin. River inflow is currently 3.6 cfs and is expected to drop to 1 to 2 cfs in September. The River is approaching its lowest flow since the 1890's. LA County Public Works is releasing water from Morris Reservoir to the River which the Committee of Nine is diverting to the Canal. The Pasadena Conduit from San Gabriel Reservoir is currently off for repairs but may be back in service in 3-4 weeks. The Conduit will provide water from San Gabriel Reservoir to the Committee of Nine Canal for the treatment plants (Azusa and Covina Irrigating)thus minimizing river losses. The water behind Morris Dam is below minimum pool, and the water behind San Gabriel Dam is low but not yet at minimum pool. Cogswell Dam could run dry by the end of summer. The maximum capacity of all three reservoirs is 83,478 AF; the current combined storage is 14,968 AF, 18 percent of capacity, including minimum pool. Usable storage above minimum pool is 3,100 AF. 023 Water Supply Update July 22,2013 Page 2 River water is currently being diverted to the treatment plants (Azusa and Covina Irrigating) at 12 cfs. The Azusa Treatment Plant is delivering approximately 3 million gallons per day (MGD) to the system. Current Azusa system demand is 21.3 MGD to 23.3 MGD which is being met by the wells and the treatment plant. The Canyon Basin is holding up with replenishment by SGVMWD, but Canyon Basin water levels will decrease once San Gabriel Valley MWD deliveries cease, and will continue to decrease until water is again being delivered to the Basins. Continued water conservation will be necessary to reduce demand on what will be very limited water supply availability this summer. Prepared by: Chet F. Anderson P.E., Assistant Director- Water Operations 024 Information Item Presented 1/01-a-/9191 • AZUSA LIGHT 8 WATII INFORMATION ITEM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF THE AZUSA UTILITY BOARD FROM: GEORGE F. MORROW, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES DATE: JULY 22, 2013 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON AZUSA'S RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO PROGRAM On June 12, 2013, the California Energy Commission (CEC) adopted the Enforcement Procedures for the Renewables Portfolio Standard for Local Publicly Owned Electric Utilities ("POU Enforcement Program"). It is anticipated that the procedures will become effective in October 2013 after the CEC prepares and files the Final State of Reasons (FSOR) for review and approval with Office of Administrative Law and subsequently files the procedures with the Secretary of State. Renewable Portfolio Standard(RPS) or SBX12 became law in 2011. SBX 1 2 mandates that all electric utilities and entities serving electric load in California produce and/or procure specific volumes of renewable energy products, as measured by percentage of retail electricity sales. Procurement(s) of renewable energy products must be made during three specific compliance periods beginning on January 1, 2011. The law further stipulates the minimum volume of renewable energy has to be derived from resources interconnected within, or scheduled directly, into California. The remaining portion of the SBX 1 2 required procurements may be satisfied by a combination of imported renewable energy and/or by "unbundled" renewable energy credits ("RECs"). At the time the Board approved the SBX 1 2 required Azusa RPS Enforcement Program (2011) and Azusa RPS Procurement Plan (2012), there were still uncertainties about the details of the RPS program. Now with the CEC's RPS Enforcement procedures finalized many, but not all, uncertainties affecting Azusa were clarified. The following are the clarified provisions of the CEC's POU Enforcement Program affecting Azusa: 1. Energy derived from Azusa's share of Hoover repowering project will not count toward RPS compliance. 2. Azusa's "grandfathered" contracts - Garnet wind, Solano wind, MWD small hydro, San Dimas small hydro will only "count in full". "Count in full" means that the "Bucket 1" 025 RPS Update July 22,2013 Page 2 attributes (the most desirable and expensive RPS attributes) that would have been otherwise associated with the above contracts will not count because contracts with the above facilities were signed before June 1, 2010. 3. The new Historic Carryover (HCO) provision of the POU Enforcement Program will allow Azusa to take partial credit for the generation from grandfathered contracts that occurred during the 2004 — 2010 period and apply it toward any RPS compliance year or period. 4. The issue of"unmet long-term generation needs" still remains unresolved. Just to recap, SBX1 2 requires the publicly owned utilities (POUs) to procure specific volumes of the renewable energy products only to the extent that "unmet long-term generation resource needs" exist [PUC Section 399.30 (a)]. The CEC, however, continues ignoring what appears to be a very clear provision. The meaning of this particular section of the statute is that if a utility does not have any long-term generation needs the utility need not buy bundled RPS products (energy plus associated environmental attributes). It should be noted that in the Board approved Azusa RPS procurement Plan, Azusa determined that until at least year 2015 Azusa will not have any unmet generation needs. This determination would entail NOT procuring any bundled (energy + associated renewable attributes). Staff would like to take this opportunity to recap our current RPS contract status and plans. Azusa current grandfathered contracts (all CEC compliant but"count in full") 1. Garnet Wind - 6.5 MW capacity 2. Solano County Wind - 6.0 MW capacity 3. Small hydro with Metropolitan Water District - 3.72 MW capacity 4. Small hydro with San Gabriel Valley MWD - 1.05 MW capacity Azusa Recently executed contracts through (all Bucket 1) Last January Azusa executed (through SCPPA) two 3.5 MW contracts for solar energy with Martifer/Silverado. Deliveries are scheduled to commence in 2015. Expected annual production—8000 MWh, each. Prospective new RPS contracts Azusa has indicated interest in: 1. 3 MW contract with NorthStar in a PV facility ("Cherry Valley") to be constructed east of the City of Colton in San Bernardino County (through 026 RPS Update July 22, 2013 Page 3 SCPPA). Target Commercial Operation Date - end of CY 2015. Expected annual production—7000 MWh. 2. 3 MW contract with an existing solar-thermal facility located by Adelanto in San Bernardino County (through SCPPA). Target Commercial Operation Date — January 2017. Expected annual production—6000 MWh. 3. Azusa is in talks to contract for renewable energy from a small hydro facility planned by the San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District (approximately 1.00 MW with potential annual delivery of 4000 MWh). Prepared by: Yarek Lehr, P.E., Assistant Director of Resource Management • 027 Information Item Presented -1 ?.a-( -o • r AZUSA LIGHT 6 WATER INFORMATION ITEM TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND MEMBERS OF E AZUSA UTILITY BOARD FROM: GEORGE MORROW, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIE DATE: JULY 22, 2013 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON SAN JUAN DIVESTITURE PROJECT As you know, Azusa Light& Water initiated activities several years ago to divest itself of its 30 MW interest in San Juan Unit 3. The basis for this strategic objective included poor plant performance, high project costs, complexities and liabilities related to coal supply, the implementation of Green House Gas regulation in California, exposure to Federal environmental regulations including the BART NOx mandates, difficulties with transmitting San Juan power to California, the utility's excess capacity position, compliance with the investment restriction in SB 138 (the anti-coal bill) and the new need add resources to comply with California's newly adopted Renewable Portfolio Standards. One of the outcomes of this process was the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Utah Association of Municipal Power Systems (UAMPS) for the layoff and sale of Azusa's San Juan interests following negotiation of a definitive agreement. Significant progress was made toward a definitive agreement, but this activity stalled due to the uncertainty associated with the EPA order requiring the installation of a $1 billion of NOx controls by 2016 and with the San Juan coal mine fire. Following protracted negotiations with many entities including EPA, the Governor of New Mexico, the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board and various environmental justice organizations, an agreement was reached allowing the San Juan participants to shut down Units 2 and 3 by no later than December 31, 2017 in return for installing much less costly (— 1/5th the cost) NOx controls on the remaining two San Juan units. The process for finalizing this deal involves regulatory proceedings in New Mexico and at EPA with an expected final EPA order as "early" as November 2014. One of the unfortunate results of this environmental compliance plan is that Azusa no longer has a marketable commodity given the fact that Unit 3 is proposed to be shut down by 2018. 028 San Juan Divestiture Update July 22,2013 Page 2 Currently, the San Juan participants are engaged in a very difficult negotiation to define the business and operational terms related to operating the generating station both pre and post closure of Units 2 and 3. For information, all California participants (including two in Unit 4 which is continuing beyond 2018), and one Colorado participant, plan to leave the project. Some of the more significant issues under negotiation include: • How to minimize/share capital and operating costs of units being retired pre- 2108? • How to socialize the costs/benefits of Units 3 and 4 for departing participants pre- 2018? • What are the departing participants' obligations for the eventual cost of unit decommissioning? • How are pre-2018 environmental liabilities shared between those participants departing and remaining? • How should remaining coal inventory be handled and priced? • How will departing participants be compensated for common plant facilities that will continue to benefit remaining participants? • What is the value of the retired units to the participants remaining? • Since the coal contract expires at the end of 2017, how are costs to negotiate a new deal and to develop alternative supplies handled pre-2018? • The negotiated arrangement for NOx control requires expenditures prior to 2018. How is this handled from a cash flow and perhaps reimbursement standpoint? • Which participant(s) will agree to pick up the surplus capacity in Unit 4 due to the desired departure of the California agencies owning a piece of that unit? From a financial standpoint, the debt service for San Juan bonds in due to be paid off by 2020. In anticipation of shutting down Unit 3 by 2018, Azusa and the other SCPPA participants in San Juan plan to escrow sufficient funds prior to 2018 to pay off any residual debt service. Azusa's plan for replacing this resource includes power from the Lodi Energy Center supplemented by the acquisition of additional renewable energy which will also enable Azusa to comply with RPS requirements and with state GHG goals. Please let me know if any clarification or further information is desired. Prepared by: George F. Morrow, Director of Utilities 029