HomeMy WebLinkAboutE-12 Staff Report - Authorization to Solicit RFP for Alosta Avenue Improvements - DesignCONSENT ITEM
E-12
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
VIA: STEPHAN E. HUNT, CHIEF OF POLICE/ACTING CITY MANAGER
FROM: DANIEL BOBADILLA, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
DATE: AUGUST 21, 2017
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE ALOSTA AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
SUMMARY:
The Alosta Avenue Street Improvements Project proposes to construct street improvements on Alosta
Avenue between Citrus and Barranca Avenues. This action will authorize Staff to solicit proposals from
qualified engineering firms to provide professional engineering services for the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council take the following action:
1) Authorize Staff to solicit a Request for Proposals to provide professional engineering services for
the Alosta Avenue Street Improvement Project.
DISCUSSION:
The Public Works Department was awarded $40,000 in Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL)
funding for the design of the Alosta Avenue Street Improvements Project. The proposed project will
rehabilitate pavement and make necessary sidewalk, curb ramp, and driveway approach improvements
on Alosta Avenue between Citrus and Barranca Avenues.
If approved by the City Council, Staff will solicit proposals from qualified engineering firms to provide
professional engineering services. Staff will review all proposals and request approval from the City
Council to award a Professional Services Agreement at a future City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
APPROVED
CITY COUNCIL
8/21/2017
Request for Proposals – Alosta Avenue Street Improvements Project
August 21, 2017
Page 2
Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved:
Daniel Bobadilla, P.E. Louie F. Lacasella
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Senior Management Analyst
Reviewed and Approved:
Stephan E. Hunt
Chief of Police/Acting City Manager
Attachments:
1) Request for Proposals – Alosta Avenue Street Improvements Project
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
ALOSTA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECT NO. STPL – 5112 (020)
SUBJECT TO FIFTEEN PERCENT (15%) DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
ENTERPRISES (DBE) CONSULTANT CONTRACT GOAL
FOR THE
CITY OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA
RELEASED AUGUST 22, 2017
Submit Proposals to:
City Clerk’s Office
City of Azusa
213 E Foothill Blvd
Azusa, CA 91702
Questions about this RFP shall be directed in writing, via e-mail to:
Daniel Bobadilla, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
dbobadilla@ci.azusa.ca.us
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. Introduction 3
II. Background 3
III. Federal Funding Requirements 3
IV. Disadvantage Business Enterprises (DBE) 3
V. Scope of Work 3
VI. Proposal 8
VII. General Conditions 9
VIII. Consultant Selection Process 11
IX. Proposal Submission 11
Attachment A Professional Services Agreement 13
Exhibit A Scope of Services 34
Exhibit B Schedule of Services 35
Exhibit C Compensation 36
Exhibit D Federal Requirements 37
i. Caltrans LAPM Exhibit 10-B: Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet
ii. Caltrans LAPM Exhibit 10-H: Sample Cost Proposal
iii. Caltrans LAPM Exhibit 10-I: Notice of Proposers DBE Information
iv. Caltrans LAPM Exhibit 10-O1: Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment
v. Caltrans LAPM Exhibit 10-O2: Consultant Contracts DBE Commitment
Exhibit E Vicinity Map 38
Exhibit F Structural Pavement Investigation Report 39
3
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
ALOSTA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Azusa is requesting proposals from qualified firms (Consultant) to prepare
engineering plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the Alosta Avenue street
improvement project between Citrus Avenue and Barranca Avenue.
II. BACKGROUND
The City of Azusa was incorporated in 1898. As of the 2010 Census, its population was
approximately 46,361 people, with 27,565 registered voters. Azusa is located in Los Angeles
County, and is approximately 25 miles east of Los Angeles. Since its incorporation, the City has
acquired and constructed various buildings throughout the City.
The project is a roadway rehabilitation of Alosta Avenue between Citrus Avenue and Barranca
Avenue. The project will consist of asphalt pavement reconstruction and/or rehabilitation such as
cold mill and overlay, removal and replacement of curb ramps, minor curb/gutter, sidewalk work,
striping/signage, traffic detector loops, etc. (see attached vicinity map). The City has obtained
Caltrans approval of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and E-76 for the
Preliminary Engineering (PE) / Design Services. The selected consultant will be working with
the City’s Program Management Consultant.
III. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
The design services and construction of the project will be funded with Federal Surface
Transportation Program Local (STP-L) subject to Federal STP-L funding guidelines including
DBE requirements. The City has programmed $620,000 for the construction of this federal
project. See attachments in Exhibit D of this RFP for required documents to be submitted as part
of this proposal.
IV. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (“DBE”)
This project has a specific DBE contract goal requirement of 15%. See attachments in
Exhibit D (iii, iv, and v) of this RFP for additional information.
V. SCOPE OF WORK
All services performed by the consultant or any sub-consultant shall be provided in a manner
consistent with the level of care and skill exercised by members of the consultant’s or the
4
respective sub-consultant’s profession. Such services shall be performed under the direct
supervision of qualified and experienced personnel.
The City requires services of a firm to provide engineering design and project management for
the project. These services include field investigation, utility documentation/prior rights
determination for Caltrans right-of-way certification, geotechnical investigation including
potholing, topographic survey and base mapping, detailed design – PS&E preparation including
striping plans, assistance during bid process, design support/clarification during construction, ad
finalizing as-built plans associated with the project.
The project design would prepare construction documents for the roadway rehabilitation of
Alosta Avenue between Citrus Avenue and Barranca Avenue. The project will consist of asphalt
pavement reconstruction and/or rehabilitation such as cold mill and overlay, removal and
replacement of curb ramps, minor curb/gutter, sidewalk work, striping/signage, traffic detector
loops, etc.
Such services shall include but not be limited to the following:
A. Project Management
1. Project coordination and administration. Consultant shall coordinate all activities with
the City Engineer, and/or his designee.
2. Consultant shall attend project meetings with or on behalf of City staff, such as
project kick-off meeting, progress meetings, field meetings, and pre-bid meeting.
3. Consultant shall monitor the project budget and deliverable schedules.
4. Consultant shall perform Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) activities per
standard industry practice.
Deliverables: Monthly invoices, monthly progress reports, meeting agendas and meeting
minutes.
B. Preliminary Design Engineering – Site Investigation, Data Collection, Records Research
Existing records shall be provided to selected consultant prior to the Project Kickoff Meeting.
1. Record Research
a. Consultant shall review existing records, maps, and data including but not
limited to project records, as-built drawings, studies, reports, maps and any
other documents relevant to the limits and scope of this project.
b. Consultant shall walk the entire project limits and provide a photographic
record or video recording of the existing site conditions.
2. Utility Coordination
a. Consultant shall request existing utility mapping for project limits. Consultant
shall identify and coordinate the relocation of utility poles, vaults,
appurtenances, manholes, conduits, etc., if any.
5
b. Consultant shall provide the surveying services necessary for all utility
potholing that is required during the design phase.
c. Consultant shall provide prior rights determination of utilities for Caltrans
Right-of-Way Certification.
The selected Consultant must provide the required documentation including the utility
documentations, prior rights determinations, and other required documents to the City’s Program
Management Consultant for the preparation of the Right of Way (R/W) Certification form to
obtain Caltrans’ approval of the R/W Certification.
Deliverables: Utility company Project Maps, Utility company coordination correspondence, Pre-
Design Photos
3. Project Surveying, Mapping and Control
a. Consultant shall be responsible for data collection, mapping and surveying
necessary for preliminary engineering, preparatory studies, and right of way
impacts.
b. The consultant shall conduct a detailed field survey to review and record
existing conditions in the project area to identify any unusual or special
conditions that may affect the design or construction.
i. The field survey shall include an inventory of existing facilities
included but not limited to roadways, irrigation and flood control
facilities, utilities, drainage, and ownership including right of way
boundaries. The roadway shall be surveyed at all points along the
roadway section (ie right of way, back of sidewalk, top of curb,
flowline, edge of gutter, and roadway crown) at a maximum distance
of 25’ intervals.
c. Consultant shall coordinate with staff to document any potential construction
issues.
d. Consultant shall record locations of existing traffic loops, signing, and striping
to be restored.
Deliverables: Project Base Map at a scale of 1” = 40’
C. Preparatory Studies
1. Geotechnical Report
a. Consultant shall review the Structural Pavement Investigation Report,
included as Exhibit F, and ensure that all geotechnical conditions with the
project area that may affect final design and construction are identified and
addressed in the final design of the project. These investigations should
include any design parameters, bearing capacities, anticipated settlements,
subgrade preparation, and treatment recommendations for wet, unsuitable,
and/or saturated conditions as appropriate.
i. The consultant shall perform any additional soil sampling and studies as
necessary to obtain detailed information required for final design of the
improvements. If borings are required, consultant shall provide the
6
number of necessary borings in the project area, located appropriately to
provide sufficient information to support cost-effective solutions for final
design of the proposed improvements. The proposed boring locations
(and quantity) shall be identified in the proposal. Consultant shall submit
an encroachment permit application to the City prior to performing any
borings. Coordination and approval from the City shall be required prior
to commencement of the work. The City will waive the encroachment
permit fee.
Deliverables: Geotechnical Report and/or Technical Memorandum
D. Final Design – Plans and Specifications
1. Consultant shall prepare scaled engineering drawings, technical specifications and
probable cost estimates (PS&E). Submittals shall be made at the 30%, 65% and 90%
stages for City review and approval. Final submittal shall be made after the City’s
approval of the 100% Final PS&E as specified below. It is anticipated plan sets shall
include engineering drawings, with the following elements. Title plan/cover sheet,
general notes, roadway improvement plans, signing and striping plans, storm water
pollution prevention plans, traffic control plans and construction detail sheets.
a. One reproducible set of Mylar copies of the final plans shall be provided,
along with three (3) sets of copies of the plans. Plans shall be signed and
stamped by a licensed Civil Engineer. Plans shall be in 24”x36” format, at a
scale not greater than 1 inch = 40 feet.
b. One (1) original copy of the technical specifications (bound). It should be
noted, the City will provide the Front End Specifications. It is the consultant’s
responsibility to provide the City with a bid schedule and anticipated contract
items of construction. It is the responsibility of consultant to prepare the
remainder of the Technical Specifications in compliance with Federal funding
provisions and bid schedule.
c. One (1) original of the construction cost estimate shall be provided per the CA
Business and Professions Code.
d. Electronic (Digital) versions of the plans, specifications and cost estimate
shall be provided on compact disc or electronic transmittal, in Microsoft
Word, Microsoft Excel and/or AutoCAD .dwg format (version 2010 or
higher), as appropriate.
e. Electronic (Digital) versions of the plans, specifications and cost estimate
shall be provided on compact disc or via electronic transmittal in PDF Format.
Deliverables:
Conformed Drawings:
• 11”x17” Drawings [Hard Copies (2) & Electronic PDF] for each design phase: 30%,
65%, 90% submittals
• 24”x36” Drawings [Hard Copy, Electronic PDF, and Mylar] for the 100% design
submittal.
7
Conformed Specifications:
• Construction Specifications (Front End, Bid Documents, General Conditions, Special
Provisions, Technical Specifications, etc.) in conformance with the City of Azusa and
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual at the 65%, 90%, and 100% submittals.
Cost Estimate:
• Stamped and wet signed cost estimate at each design phase: 30%, 65%, 90%, and 100%
submittals.
Digital Files:
• Microsoft Word, Excel, AutoCAD files of the plans, specifications, and cost estimates.
The City’s Program Management Consultant will incorporate the required federal provisions in
the project specifications prepared by the selected design consultant. The Program Management
Consultant will also prepare the Construction Request for Authorization (RFA) Package to obtain
Caltrans approval of the construction E-76.
E. Bid Support
1. Consultant shall assist the City with support of the bidding phase which shall include:
a. Bidding Assistance and clarifications, which may include responding to
bidder questions, attendance in a pre-bid meeting.
b. Preparation of any bid addenda.
F. Construction Support
1. During construction, the consultant shall provide the following support to City Staff
and consultant construction management team:
a. Attend as-needed progress meetings.
b. Provide as-needed design clarifications during construction and provide
written recommendations to the City.
c.
G. Project Closeout: As-Built Drawings
1. Following construction, the consultant shall prepare record drawings based on red-
lines “As-Builts” submitted by the Contractor and Resident Engineer. Record
drawings shall be submitted to the City in Mylar, Digital PDF, Full Size Hard Copy,
Half Size Hard Copy, and AutoCAD files including all images and external reference
files.
All plans and specifications shall comply with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA),
City of Azusa Standards, latest editions of the Standard Plans for Public Works Construction,
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (CAMUTCD), and Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM)
Guidelines.
The requested services shall be completed no later than December 7, 2017.
8
VI. PROPOSAL
The Proposal shall be organized in the following format and shall include the following
information:
A. Cover Letter
Provide an executive summary emphasizing the strong points of the project team, qualifications
and experience. The cover letter shall be signed by a person with the official authority to bind
the firm. The cover letter shall include the name, address, telephone number, title, and signature
of the firm’s contact person for this proposal.
B. Firm Overview and General Qualifications
Provide a summary of the firm’s qualifications demonstrating your expertise, understanding and
ability to accomplish the City’s primary objectives; general information about the firm to include
location of office(s), years in business and areas of expertise. Provide a brief description of three
(3) federally funded design projects which involved a similar scope of services.
C. Key Staff
Identify key staff and include a description of their abilities, qualifications and experience.
Attach resumes of key staff to be assigned to this project. Include a proposed project
management structure and organizational chart. Identify any portion of work that would be
subcontracted. Include firm qualifications (brief) and key personnel, telephone number and
contact person for all subcontractors. The City reserves the right to approve or reject all
consultants, internal staff performing consulting services, or sub-consultants proposed by the
Consultant.
D. Project Specific Approach and Methodology
Consultant shall more thoroughly describe its understanding of the project and describe the
proposed technical and management approach. Within this section, expand on the scope of work,
if appropriate, to accomplish the overall objective of this project, and provide suggestions which
might enhance the results or usefulness of the study. Include assumptions about the number of
meetings needed with City staff to complete the Scope of Work. Consultant shall also include a
schedule of work.
E. References
Consultant shall provide a list of references for the firm and any sub-consultants, including the
names, addresses and telephone numbers of recent clients for which Consultant has done similar
work. Include a list of specific projects associated with each reference, date work was performed,
cost and key personnel involved. Provide three (3) federally funded design projects as references.
9
F. Fee Proposal
Fee proposals shall be submitted in a separate sealed envelope clearly labeled with the firm’s
name and address in the upper left-hand corner. The envelope shall be clearly identified as “Fee
Proposal” and shall describe the consultant fees for the project as follows:
1. Method of Payment: The overall fees shall be itemized to reflect specific fees for each
Task and total price based on “Actual Cost-Plus-Fixed Fee” format per attachments
in Exhibit D (ii). All “Deliverables” / Tasks shall be considered included as
described in the “Scope of Services” of the STP-L project.
2. In addition to the breakdown of individual fees and total fees, the following proposed
fees shall be presented within a schedule of work items on a task basis with the
following detail:
a. Time estimates for principals, staff, subcontractors, etc.
b. Hourly billing rates
c. Cost for materials and incidental services
d. Total fee per Task breakdown
e. All sub-consultants’ fees
f. The fee proposal shall be an amount “Not to Exceed” “Actual Cost-Plus-Fixed
Fee” format
g. Actual cost per additional meeting / tasks (as required)
VII. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals, or any item or part
thereof, or to waive any informalities or irregularities in proposals.
2. The City reserves the right to withdraw or cancel this RFP at any time without prior
notice and the City makes no representations that any contract will be awarded to any
Consultant(s) responding to this RFP.
3. The City reserves the right to postpone proposal openings for its own convenience.
4. Proposals received by the City are public information and must be made available to any
person upon request.
5. Submitted proposals are not to be copyrighted.
6. The City reserves the right to seek clarification of information submitted in response to
this RFP.
7. The City reserves the right to modify the RFP as it deems necessary.
10
8. Any material misrepresentations made by the Consultant(s) will void the proposal
response and eliminate the Consultant(s) from further consideration.
9. Pre-Contractual Expense
The City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by
Consultant(s) in the preparation of its proposal. Consultant shall not include any such
expenses as part of its proposal.
Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by Consultant(s) include:
a. Preparing its proposal in response to this RFP;
b. Submitting that proposal to the City;
c. Negotiating with the City any matter related to this proposal; or
d. Any other expenses incurred by Consultant(s) prior to date of award, if any.
10. All materials submitted become the property of the City.
11. From the issue date of this solicitation until a Consultant is selected and the selection is
announced, the Consultant is not allowed to communicate for any reason with any City
Staff except through the person named herein for questions. For violation of this
provision, the City shall reserve the right to reject the proposal of the offending
Consultant.
12. Proposals submitted early may be withdrawn by the firm prior to the Proposal Due Date.
Following the Proposal Due Date, the Proposal constitutes a binding offer and may not be
withdrawn by the firm prior to the award.
13. The City reserves the right to: (a) waive minor irregularities or variances, non-material
bid formalities or defects in any proposal; (b) reject any and all proposals, in whole or in
part, submitted in response to this solicitation; (c) request clarifications from all
Consultants; (d) request resubmissions from all Consultants; (e) make partial, progressive
or multiple awards; and (f) take any other action as permitted by law and/or the City’s
Procurement Ordinance.
14. The selected Consultant will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement
with the City of Azusa which includes the City’s standard Terms and Conditions
including insurance requirements (Attachment A).
15. All Consultants submitting Proposals to this solicitation shall state any exceptions to or
deviations from the requirements of this RFP, segregating “technical” exceptions from
“contractual” exceptions. Where Consultant(s) wishes to propose alternative approaches
to meeting the City’s technical or contractual requirements, these should be thoroughly
explained. If not contractual exceptions are noted, Consultant(s) will be deemed to have
accepted the standard terms and conditions of the City’s Professional Services Agreement
for this federally funded project.
11
VIII. CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
Proposals will be evaluated by the City based on the criteria attached as referenced in Exhibit D
(i) “Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet”. A consultant selection committee will review and
evaluate those firms satisfactorily complying with the requirements and requested information
indicated. Each proposal will be reviewed to ensure that the firm submitted a transmittal/cover
letter, narrative proposal that is responsive to the City’s requirements as set forth herein, and a
cost proposal. Failure to meet these requirements may be cause for rejection of a proposal.
During the evaluation period, the City may interview some or all of the proposing consulting
firms. The City will establish a specific date to conduct interviews, and all prospective
Consultant(s) will be asked to keep this date available. No other interview dates will be provided,
therefore, if a Consultant(s) is unable to attend the interview on this date its proposal may be
eliminated from further discussion. At the conclusion of the evaluation process, the evaluation
committee will recommend to the City Council, the Consultant with the highest final ranking.
The City Council will review the evaluation committee’s recommendation and make the final
selection. The City will notify all Consultants that submit Proposals of the evaluation results.
IX. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
Consultants shall submit one (1) original and two (2) copies of their Proposal to the City.
Proposals shall be received no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 14, 2017 at the following
address:
City of Azusa
City Clerk’s Office
213 E. Foothill Blvd.
Azusa, CA 91702
Re: Alosta Avenue Street Improvements Project
Late submittals will be rejected and not returned.
A. Inquiries - Inquiries concerning this RFP shall be directed to:
Daniel Bobadilla, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Phone (626) 812-5264; Email: dbobadilla@ci.azusa.ca.us
B. Schedule - The anticipated schedule of activities related to this RFP is as follows:
RFP Issued August 22, 2017
Final date for inquiries September 6, 2017
Proposal Due Date September 14, 2017
Notice to Proceed October 5, 2017
12
Consultants are provided the opportunity to ask questions prior to submittal of a proposal. The
final date to submit all questions is September 6, 2017, and should be submitted in writing, via e-
mail to dbobadilla@ci.azusa.ca.us.
13
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF AZUSA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This Agreement is made and entered into this ____ day of ________________, 20___ by
and between the City of Azusa, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of
California with its principal place of business at 213 East Foothill Boulevard, Azusa, California
91702 (“City”) and [INSERT NAME OF COMPANY], a [INSERT TYPE OF BUSINESS: CORPORATION;
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; ETC.] with its principal place of business at [INSERT ADDRESS]
(“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and
collectively as “Parties.”
2. RECITALS.
2.1 Consultant.
Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain
professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing [INSERT TYPE OF SERVICES]
services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of
City.
2.2 Project.
City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the ALOSTA AVENUE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT – STPL – 5112 (020) project (“Project”) as set forth in this
Agreement.
3. TERMS.
3.1 Scope of Services and Term.
3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to
the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work
necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional [INSERT TYPE OF SERVICES] consulting
services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in
Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject
to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and
regulations.
3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from [INSERT START DATE] to
[INSERT ENDING DATE], unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete
14
the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules
and deadlines. The Parties may, by mutual written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if
necessary to complete the Services.
3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.
3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The
Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine
the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this
Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.
Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of
this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on
behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under
Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other
amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this
Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and
obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security
taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’
compensation insurance.
3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services
expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of
Services set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the
Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant’s conformance
with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant’s submittals in a timely manner. Upon
request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to
meet the Schedule of Services.
3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by
Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.
3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that
certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should
one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of
at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant
cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this
Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the
Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be
uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a
threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the
Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are
as follows: [INSERT NAMES].
3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates [INSERT NAME OR
TITLE], or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement
15
(“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the
City for all purposes under this Contract. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from
any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.
3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates [INSERT NAME
OR TITLE], or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement
(“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to
represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The
Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her best skill and
attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures
and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.
3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City
staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other
staff at all reasonable times.
3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform
all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the
standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the
State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional
calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and
subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to
them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses,
permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the
Services, including a City Business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be
maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification
provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without
reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are
caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any
employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be
uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat
to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services
in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant
and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.
3.2.9 Subcontracting.
(A) Nothing contained in this contract or otherwise, shall create any contractual relation
between City and any subconsultant(s), and no subcontract shall relieve Consultant of its
responsibilities and obligations hereunder. Consultant agrees to be as fully responsible to City
for the acts and omissions of its subconsultant(s) and of persons either directly or indirectly
employed by any of them as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by
Consultant. Consultant’s obligation to pay its subconsultant(s) is an independent obligation from
City’s obligation to make payments to the Consultant.
(B) Consultant shall perform the work contemplated with resources available within its own
organization and no portion of the work pertinent to this contract shall be subcontracted without
16
written authorization by City’s Contract Administrator, except that, which is expressly identified
in the approved Cost Proposal.
(C) Consultant shall pay its subconsultants within ten (10) calendar days from receipt of each
payment made to Consultant by City.
(D) All subcontracts entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all the provisions
stipulated in this contract to be applicable to subconsultants.
(E) Any substitution of subconsultant(s) must be approved in writing by City’s Contract
Administrator prior to the start of work by the subconsultant(s).
3.2.10 Performance Period. This contract shall go into effect on
(DATE), contingent upon approval by City, and Consultant shall commence work after
notification to proceed by City’s Contract Administrator. The contract shall end on (DATE),
unless extended by contract amendment. Consultant is advised that any recommendation for
contract award is not binding on City until the contract is fully executed and approved by City.
3.2.11 Laws and Regulations; Employee/Labor Certifications. Consultant shall
keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and
regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all
Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable
for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant
performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without
giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising
therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers,
employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this
Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply
with such laws, rules or regulations.
3.2.11.1 Employment Eligibility; Consultant. By executing this Agreement,
Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and
federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time. Such
requirements and restrictions include, but are not limited to, examination and retention of
documentation confirming the identity and immigration status of each employee of the
Consultant. Consultant also verifies that it has not committed a violation of any such law within
the five (5) years immediately preceding the date of execution of this Agreement, and shall not
violate any such law at any time during the term of the Agreement. Consultant shall avoid any
violation of any such law during the term of this Agreement by participating in an electronic
verification of work authorization program operated by the United States Department of
Homeland Security, by participating in an equivalent federal work authorization program
operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly
hired employees, or by some other legally acceptable method. Consultant shall maintain records
of each such verification, and shall make them available to the City or its representatives for
inspection and copy at any time during normal business hours. The City shall not be responsible
for any costs or expenses related to Consultant’s compliance with the requirements provided for
in Section 3.2.10 or any of its sub-sections.
17
3.2.11.2 Employment Eligibility; Subcontractors, Consultants, Sub-subcontractors
and Subconsultants. To the same extent and under the same conditions as Consultant, Consultant
shall require all of its subcontractors, consultants, sub-subcontractors and subconsultants
performing any work relating to the Project or this Agreement to make the same verifications
and comply with all requirements and restrictions provided for in Section 3.2.10.1.
3.2.11.3 Employment Eligibility; Failure to Comply. Each person executing this
Agreement on behalf of Consultant verifies that they are a duly authorized officer of Consultant,
and understands that any of the following shall be grounds for the City to terminate the
Agreement for cause: (1) failure of Consultant or its subcontractors, consultants, sub-
subcontractors or subconsultants to meet any of the requirements provided for in Sections
3.2.10.1 or 3.2.10.2; (2) any misrepresentation or material omission concerning compliance with
such requirements (including in those verifications provided to the Consultant under Section
3.2.10.2); or (3) failure to immediately remove from the Project any person found not to be in
compliance with such requirements.
3.2.11.4 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that
it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every
employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
3.2.11.5 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal
opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or
applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry,
sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to
initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff
or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority
Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines
currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.
3.2.11.6 Air Quality. To the extent applicable, Consultant must fully comply with
all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing
services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by
the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and/or California Air Resources
Board (CARB). Although the SCAQMD and CARB limits and requirements are more broad,
Consultant shall specifically be aware of their application to "portable equipment", which
definition is considered by SCAQMD and CARB to include any item of equipment with a fuel-
powered engine. Consultant shall indemnify City against any fines or penalties imposed by
SCAQMD, CARB, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable
laws, rules and/or regulations by Consultant, its subconsultants, or others for whom Consultant is
responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement.
3.2.11.7 Water Quality.
18
(A) Management and Compliance. To the extent applicable, Consultant’s
Services must account for, and fully comply with, all local, state and federal laws, rules and
regulations that may impact water quality compliance, including, without limitation, all
applicable provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §§ 1300); the
California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Cal Water Code §§ 13000-14950); laws,
rules and regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources
Control Board and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; the City’s ordinances
regulating discharges of storm water; and any and all regulations, policies, or permits issued
pursuant to any such authority regulating the discharge of pollutants, as that term is used in the
Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, to any ground or surface water in the State.
(B) Liability for Non-compliance. Failure to comply with the laws,
regulations and policies described in this Section is a violation of law that may subject
Consultant or City to penalties, fines, or additional regulatory requirements. Consultant shall
defend, indemnify and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and
agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from and
against any and all fines, penalties, claims or other regulatory requirements imposed as a result
of Consultant’s non-compliance with the laws, regulations and policies described in this Section,
unless such non-compliance is the result of the sole established negligence, willful misconduct or
active negligence of the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees or authorized volunteers.
(C) Training. In addition to any other standard of care requirements set forth
in this Agreement, Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have
sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them without impacting water
quality in violation of the laws, regulations and policies described in this Section. Consultant
further warrants that it, its employees and subcontractors will receive adequate training, as
determined by City, regarding the requirements of the laws, regulations and policies described in
this Section as they may relate to the Services provided under this Agreement. Upon request,
City will provide Consultant with a list of training programs that meet the requirements of this
paragraph.
3.2.12 Insurance.
3.2.12.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence Services under
this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all
insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor
to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that
the subcontractor has secured all insurance required under this section.
3.2.12.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and
maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or
damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the
Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance
for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum
levels of coverage:
19
(A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the
latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial
General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance
Services Office Business Auto Coverage form number CA 0001, code 1 (any auto); and (3)
Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ Compensation insurance as
required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. The policy shall not
contain any exclusion contrary to the Agreement, including but not limited to endorsements or
provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability (including but not limited to ISO CG 24
26 or 21 29); or (2) cross liability for claims or suits by one insured against another.
(B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less
than: (1) General Liability: [CONTACT RISK MANAGEMENT TO CONFIRM AMOUNT; TYPICAL
MINIMUM IS $1 MILLION, BUT AMOUNT OF INSURANCE REQUIRED DEPENDS ON NATURE OF
CONTRACT AND RISK TO CITY]$1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and
property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general
aggregate limit is used including, but not limited to, form CG 2503, either the general aggregate
limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be
twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: [CONTACT RISK MANAGEMENT TO
CONFIRM AMOUNT; TYPICAL MINIMUM IS $1 MILLION, BUT AMOUNT OF INSURANCE REQUIRED
DEPENDS ON NATURE OF CONTRACT AND RISK TO CITY]$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage; and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’
Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer’s
Liability limits of [CONTACT RISK MANAGEMENT TO CONFIRM AMOUNT; TYPICAL MINIMUM IS $1
MILLION, BUT AMOUNT OF INSURANCE REQUIRED DEPENDS ON NATURE OF CONTRACT AND RISK TO
CITY]$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. Defense costs shall be paid in
addition to the limits.
(C) Notices; Cancellation or Reduction of Coverage. At least fifteen (15) days
prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence showing that such insurance coverage has
been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or
materially reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such
cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the
required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company
or companies. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not
comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, the City has the right but not
the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by the City will be
promptly reimbursed by Consultant or the City may withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium
from Consultant payments. In the alternative, the City may suspend or terminate this
Agreement.
3.2.12.3 Professional Liability. [INCLUDE THIS SUBSECTION ONLY IF
APPLICABLE - DELETE OTHERWISE] Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its
sub-consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following completion of
the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such
insurance shall be in an amount not less than [CONTACT RISK MANAGEMENT TO CONFIRM
20
AMOUNT; TYPICAL MINIMUM IS $1 MILLION, BUT AMOUNT OF INSURANCE REQUIRED DEPENDS ON
NATURE OF CONTRACT AND RISK TO CITY] $1,000,000 per claim, and shall be endorsed to include
contractual liability. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to limits.
3.2.12.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the
following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms supplied or approved
by the City to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:
(A) General Liability. The general liability policy shall include or be endorsed
(amended) to state that: (1) using ISO CG forms 20 10 and 20 37, or endorsements providing the
exact same coverage, the City of Azusa, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and
volunteers shall be covered as additional insured with respect to the Services or ongoing and
complete operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant, including materials, parts or
equipment furnished in connection with such work; and (2) using ISO form 20 01, or
endorsements providing the exact same coverage, the insurance coverage shall be primary
insurance as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers,
or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant’s scheduled
underlying coverage. Any excess insurance shall contain a provision that such coverage shall
also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of the City, before the City’s
own primary insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its directors, officials, officers,
employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not be
called upon to contribute with it in any way. Notwithstanding the minimum limits set forth in
Section 3.2.11.2(B), any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits
of coverage shall be available to the parties required to be named as additional insureds pursuant
to this Section 3.2.11.4(A).
(B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall include or be
endorsed (amended) to state that: (1) the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents
and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation,
maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the
Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be
primary insurance as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and
volunteers, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant’s
scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its
directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s
insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. Notwithstanding the
minimum limits set forth in Section 3.2.11.2(B), any available insurance proceeds in excess of
the specified minimum limits of coverage shall be available to the parties required to be named
as additional insureds pursuant to this Section 3.2.11.4(B).
(C) Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Coverage. The insurer shall
agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its directors, officials, officers,
employees, agents and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which
arise from work performed by the Consultant.
21
(D) All Coverages. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be
endorsed to state that: (A) coverage shall not be suspended, voided, reduced or canceled except
after thirty (30) days (10 days for nonpayment of premium) prior written notice by certified mail,
return receipt requested, has been given to the City; and (B) any failure to comply with reporting
or other provisions of the policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage
provided to the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any
failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of
warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents
and volunteers, or any other additional insureds.
3.2.12.5 Separation of Insureds; No Special Limitations; Waiver of Subrogation.
All insurance required by this Section shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions.
In addition, such insurance shall not contain any special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. All
policies shall waive any right of subrogation of the insurer against the City, its officials, officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers, or any other additional insureds, or shall specifically allow
Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to
waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery
against City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, or any other additional
insureds, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its
subconsultants.
3.2.12.6 Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. Consultant shall guarantee that,
at the option of the City, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-
insured retentions as respects the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and
volunteers; or (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses.
3.2.12.7 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any
subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract relating to the work under the Agreement
until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance
required under this Section. If requested by Consultant, the City may approve different scopes or
minimum limits of insurance for particular subconsultants. The Consultant and the City shall be
named as additional insureds on all subconsultants’ policies of Commercial General Liability
using ISO form 20 38, or coverage at least as broad.
3.2.12.8 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A: VIII, licensed to do business in California, and
satisfactory to the City.
3.2.12.9 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish City with original
certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on
forms satisfactory to the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall
be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on
forms provided by the City if requested. All certificates and endorsements must be received and
22
approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete,
certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
3.2.12.10 Reporting of Claims. Consultant shall report to the City, in addition to
Consultant’s insurer, any and all insurance claims submitted by Consultant in connection with
the Services under this Agreement.
3.2.12.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to
avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant
shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and
regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate
to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety
precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection
and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all
employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges,
gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety
devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent
accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all
safety measures.
3.2.12.12 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and
accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such
records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during
normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any
other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all
work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three
(3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.
3.3.1 Fees and Payments.
3.3.1 Allowable Costs and Payment.
A. The method of payment for this contract will be based on actual cost plus a
fixed fee. City will reimburse Consultant for actual costs (including labor costs, employee
benefits, travel, equipment rental costs, overhead and other direct costs) incurred by Consultant
in performance of the work. Consultant will not be reimbursed for actual costs that exceed the
estimated wage rates, employee benefits, travel, equipment rental, overhead, and other estimated
costs set forth in the approved Consultant’s Cost Proposal, unless additional reimbursement is
provided for by contract amendment. In no event, will Consultant be reimbursed for overhead
costs at a rate that exceeds City’s approved overhead rate set forth in the Cost Proposal. In the
event, that City determines that a change to the work from that specified in the Cost Proposal and
contract is required, the contract time or actual costs reimbursable by City shall be adjusted by
contract amendment to accommodate the changed work. The maximum total cost as specified in
Paragraph “H” below shall not be exceeded, unless authorized by contract amendment.
B. In addition to the allowable incurred costs, City will pay Consultant a fixed fee
23
of $(AMOUNT). The fixed fee is nonadjustable for the term of the contract, except in the event
of a significant change in the scope of work and such adjustment is made by contract
amendment.
C. Reimbursement for transportation and subsistence costs shall not exceed the
rates specified in the approved Cost Proposal.
D. When milestone cost estimates are included in the approved Cost Proposal,
Consultant shall obtain prior written approval for a revised milestone cost estimate from the
Contract Administrator before exceeding such cost estimate.
E. Progress payments will be made monthly in arrears based on services provided
and allowable incurred costs. A pro rata portion of Consultant’s fixed fee will be included in the
monthly progress payments. If Consultant fails to submit the required deliverable items
according to the schedule set forth in the Statement of Work, City shall have the right to delay
payment or terminate this Contract in accordance with the provisions of Article VI Termination.
F. No payment will be made prior to approval of any work, nor for any work
performed prior to approval of this contract.
G. Consultant will be reimbursed, as promptly as fiscal procedures will permit
upon receipt by City’s Contract Administrator of itemized invoices in triplicate. Invoices shall
be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance of work for which Consultant
is billing. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone and each project as
applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the approved Cost Proposal and shall
reference this contract number and project title. Final invoice must contain the final cost and all
credits due City including any equipment purchased under the provisions of Section 3.3.5
Equipment Purchases of this contract. The final invoice should be submitted within 60 calendar
days after completion of Consultant’s work. Invoices shall be mailed to City’s Contract
Administrator at the following address:
City of Azusa
213 E. Foothill Blvd.
Azusa, CA 91702
Attn: Director of Public Works
H. The total amount payable by City including the fixed fee shall not exceed $
(Amount).
I. Salary increases will be reimbursable if the new salary is within the salary
range identified in the approved Cost Proposal and is approved by City’s Contract Administrator.
J. For personnel subject to prevailing wage rates as described in the California
Labor Code, all salary increases, which are the direct result of changes in the prevailing wage
rates are reimbursable.
3.3.2 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including
authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth
in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation
24
shall not exceed [INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT] ($[INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT])
without written approval of the City Manager [REPLACE ‘CITY MANAGER’ WITH ‘CITY COUNCIL’
FOR AMOUNTS OVER $10,000]. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if
authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
3.3.3 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly
itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by
Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the
initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate,
through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review
the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.
3.3.4 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any
expenses unless authorized in writing by City.
3.3.5 Equipment Purchases.
A. Prior authorization in writing, by City’s Contract Administrator shall be
required before Consultant enters into any unbudgeted purchase order, or subcontract exceeding
$5,000 for supplies, equipment, or Consultant services.
B. Consultant shall provide and evaluation of the necessity or desirability of
incurring such costs. For purchase of any item, service or consulting work not covered in
Consultant’s Cost Proposal and exceeding $5,000 prior authorization by City’s Contract
Administrator; three competitive quotations must be submitted with the request, or the absence
of bidding must be adequately justified.
C. Any equipment purchased as a result of this contract is subject to the
following: “Consultant shall maintain an inventory of all nonexpendable property.
Nonexpendable property is defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition
cost of $5,000 or more. If the purchased equipment needs replacement and is sold or traded in,
City shall receive a proper refund or credit at the conclusion of the contract, or if the contract is
terminated, Consultant may either keep the equipment and credit City in an amount equal to its
fair market value, or sell such equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale, in
accordance with established City procedures; and credit City in an amount equal to the sales
price. If Consultant elects to keep the equipment, fair market value shall be determined at
Consultant’s expense, on the basis of a competent independent appraisal of such equipment.
Appraisals shall be obtained from an appraiser mutually agreeable to by City and Consultant, if it
is determined to sell the equipment, the terms and conditions of such sale must be approved in
advance by City.” 49 CFR, Part 18 requires a credit to Federal funds when participating
equipment with a fair market value greater than $5,000 is credited to the project.
3.3.6 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may
request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work
which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which
the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.
25
Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization
from City’s Representative.
3.3.7 State Prevailing Wages.
A. Consultant shall comply with the State of California’s General Prevailing
Wage Rate requirements in accordance with California Labor Code, Section 1770, and all
Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work.
B. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract, if for more than
$25,000 for public works construction or more than $15,000 for the alteration, demolition, repair,
or maintenance of public works, shall contain all of the provisions of this Article, unless the
awarding agency has an approved labor compliance program by the Director of Industrial
Relations.
C. When prevailing wages apply to the services described in the scope of work,
transportation and subsistence costs shall be reimbursed at the minimum rates set by the
Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as outlined in the applicable Prevailing Wage
Determination. See http://www.dir.ca.gov.
3.3.8 Cost Principles and Administrative Requirements.
A. Consultant agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR,
Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., shall be used to
determine the cost allowability of individual items.
B. Consultant also agrees to comply with federal procedures in accordance with
49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements
to State and Local Governments.
C. Any costs for which payment has been made to Consultant that are determined
by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 49 CFR, Part 18 and 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition
Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., are subject to repayment by Consultant to
City.
3.4 Termination of Agreement.
3.4.1 Termination.
A. City reserves the right to terminate this contract upon thirty (30) calendar days
written notice to Consultant with the reasons for termination stated in the notice.
B. City may terminate this contract with Consultant should Consultant fail to
perform the covenants herein contained at the time and in the manner herein provided. In the
event of such termination, City may proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by
City. If City terminates this contract with Consultant, City shall pay Consultant the sum due to
Consultant under this contract prior to termination, unless the cost of completion to City exceeds
the funds remaining in the contract. In which case the overage shall be deducted from any sum
due Consultant under this contract and the balance, if any, shall be paid to Consultant upon
demand.
26
C. The maximum amount for which the City shall be liable if this contract is
terminated is _____ dollars.
3.4.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein,
City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other
information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services
under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other
information within fifteen (15) days of the request.
3.4.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or
in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may
determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.
3.5 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.
3.5.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement
creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense
any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications,
studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible
medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or
otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by
Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). All Documents & Data shall be and
remain the property of City, and shall not be used in whole or in substantial part by Consultant
on other projects without the City's express written permission. Within thirty (30) days
following the completion, suspension, abandonment or termination of this Agreement,
Consultant shall provide to City reproducible copies of all Documents & Data, in a form and
amount required by City. City reserves the right to select the method of document reproduction
and to establish where the reproduction will be accomplished. The reproduction expense shall be
borne by City at the actual cost of duplication. In the event of a dispute regarding the amount of
compensation to which the Consultant is entitled under the termination provisions of this
Agreement, Consultant shall provide all Documents & Data to City upon payment of the
undisputed amount. Consultant shall have no right to retain or fail to provide to City any such
documents pending resolution of the dispute. In addition, Consultant shall retain copies of all
Documents & Data on file for a minimum of fifteen (15) years following completion of the
Project, and shall make copies available to City upon the payment of actual reasonable
duplication costs. Before destroying the Documents & Data following this retention period,
Consultant shall make a reasonable effort to notify City and provide City with the opportunity to
obtain the documents.
3.5.2 Subcontractors. Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in
writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the
subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that
Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no
such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design
professionals other than Consultant or its subcontractors, or those provided to Consultant by the
City.
27
3.5.3 Right to Use. City shall not be limited in any way in its use or reuse of the
Documents and Data or any part of them at any time for purposes of this Project or another
project, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement or on a
project other than this Project without employing the services of Consultant shall be at City’s
sole risk. If City uses or reuses the Documents & Data on any project other than this Project, it
shall remove the Consultant’s seal from the Documents & Data and indemnify and hold harmless
Consultant and its officers, directors, agents and employees from claims arising out of the
negligent use or re-use of the Documents & Data on such other project. Consultant shall be
responsible and liable for its Documents & Data, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, only
with respect to the condition of the Documents & Data at the time they are provided to the City
upon completion, suspension, abandonment or termination. Consultant shall not be responsible
or liable for any revisions to the Documents & Data made by any party other than Consultant, a
party for whom the Consultant is legally responsible or liable, or anyone approved by the
Consultant.
3.5.4 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its
directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the
indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent,
copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or
entity in consequence of the use on the Project by City of the Documents & Data, including any
method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted.
3.5.5 Confidentiality. All Documents & Data either created by or provided to
Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by
Consultant. All Documents & Data shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used
or reproduced by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall not disclose, cause or facilitate the disclosure of the Documents & Data to any
person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing
furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has
become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use
City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or
the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other
similar medium without the prior written consent of City.
3.5.6 Retention of Records/Audit.
For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et
seq. and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when
applicable and other matters connected with the performance of the contract pursuant to
Government Code 8546.7; Consultant, subconsultants, and City shall maintain and make
available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence
pertaining to the performance of the contract, including but not limited to, the costs of
administering the contract. All parties shall make such materials available at their respective
offices at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three years from the date of final
payment under the contract. The state, State Auditor, City, FHWA, or any duly authorized
representative of the Federal Government shall have access to any books, records, and
documents of Consultant and it’s certified public accountants (CPA) work papers that are
28
pertinent to the contract and indirect cost rates (ICR) for audit, examinations, excerpts, and
transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested.
3.5.7 Audit Review Procedures.
A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post
audit of this contract that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by City’s Chief
Financial Officer.
B. Not later than 30 days after issuance of the final audit report, Consultant may
request a review by City’s Chief Financial Officer of unresolved audit issues. The request for
review will be submitted in writing.
C. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by City will excuse
Consultant from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this contract.
3.6 General Provisions.
3.6.1 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this
Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other
address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
Consultant:
[***INSERT NAME, ADDRESS & CONTACT PERSON***]
City:
City of Azusa
213 E. Foothill Blvd.
Azusa, CA 91702
Attn: Director of Public Works
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed,
forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to
the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date
actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
3.6.2 Indemnification.
3.6.2.1 Scope of Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents
free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability,
loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful
death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or
omissions of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents
in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s Services, the Project or this Agreement,
including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages, expert witness fees and
attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent
Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be
29
limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain
to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant.
3.6.2.2 Additional Indemnity Obligations. Consultant shall defend, with legal
counsel chosen by City, at Consultant’s own cost, expense and risk, any and all claims, actions or
other proceedings of every kind covered by Section 3.6.2.1 that may be brought or instituted
against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents. Consultant
shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its
directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents as party of any such claim, suit,
action or other proceeding. Consultant shall also reimburse City for the cost of any settlement
paid by City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers as part of any
such claim, suit, action or other proceeding. Such reimbursement shall include payment for
City’s attorneys’ fees and costs, including expert witness fees. Consultant shall reimburse City
and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and/or volunteers, for any and all legal
expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the
indemnity herein provided. Consultant’s obligation to indemnify shall survive expiration or
termination of this Agreement and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received
by the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
3.6.3 Governing Law; Government Code Claim Compliance. This Agreement
shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Los Angeles County.
In addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for
compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions,
Consultant must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code sections 900 et
seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the City. Such Government Code claims and any
subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters
that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, claims,
and/or changed conditions have been followed by Consultant. If no such Government Code
claim is submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as
specified herein, Consultant shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit
against the City.
3.6.4 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of
this Agreement.
3.6.5 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ
other consultants in connection with this Project.
3.6.6 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the
successors and assigns of the parties.
3.6.7 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or
transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the
prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees,
hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted
assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
30
3.6.8 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have
participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be
construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any
term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not
work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and
subcontractors of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to
City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise
specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for
convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope,
content, or intent of this Agreement.
3.6.9 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment
of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.
3.6.10 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other
default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit,
privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any
contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.
3.6.11 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Except to the extent expressly provided for
in Section 3.6.7, there are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed
by the Parties.
3.6.12 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared
invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
3.6.13 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not
employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely
for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not
paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further
agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic
Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the
Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this
Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of
City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this
Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
3.6.14 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one
another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary,
appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.
31
3.6.15 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other
party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this
Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the
losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.
3.6.16 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and
authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party
warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and
authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.
3.6.17 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of
which shall constitute an original.
3.6.18 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the
parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations,
understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by
both parties.
3.6.19 Federal Provisions. When funding for the Services is provided, in whole
or in part, by an agency of the federal government, Consultant shall also fully and adequately
comply with the provisions included in Exhibit “D” (Federal Requirements) attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference (“Federal Requirements”). With respect to any conflict
between such Federal Requirements and the terms of this Agreement and/or the provisions of
state law, the more stringent requirement shall control.
3.6.20 Conflict of Interest.
A. Consultant shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with
City that may have an impact upon the outcome of this contract, or any ensuing City construction
project. Consultant shall also list current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome
of this contract, or any ensuing City construction project, which will follow.
B. Consultant hereby certifies that it does not now have, nor shall it acquire any
financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of services under this
contract.
C. Consultant hereby certifies that neither Consultant, nor any firm affiliated with
Consultant will bid on any construction contract, or on any contract to provide construction
inspection for any construction project resulting from this contract. An affiliated firm is one,
which is subject to the control of the same persons through joint-ownership, or otherwise.
D. Except for subconsultants whose services are limited to providing surveying
or materials testing information, no subconsultant who has provided design services in
connection with this contract shall be eligible to bid on any construction contract, or on any
contract to provide construction inspection for any construction project resulting from this
contract.
3.6.21 Rebates, Kickbacks or other Unlawful Consideration. Consultant warrants
that this contract was not obtained or secured through rebates kickbacks or other unlawful
consideration, either promised or paid to any City employee. For breach or violation of this
32
warranty, City shall have the right in its discretion; to terminate the contract without liability; to
pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or to deduct from the contract price; or
otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration.
3.6.22 Statement of Compliance.
A. Consultant’s signature affixed herein, and dated, shall constitute a certification
under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that Consultant has, unless
exempt, complied with, the nondiscrimination program requirements of Government Code
Section 12990 and Title 2, California Administrative Code, Section 8103.
B. During the performance of this Contract, Consultant and its subconsultants
shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant
for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical
disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (e.g., cancer), age
(over 40), marital status, and denial of family care leave. Consultant and subconsultants shall
insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are
free from such discrimination and harassment. Consultant and subconsultants shall comply with
the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12990 (a-f) et seq.) and
the 5applicable regulations promulgated there under (California Code of Regulations, Title 2,
Section 7285 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing
Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a-f), set forth in Chapter 5 of
Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, are incorporated into this Contract by
reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Consultant and its subconsultants shall
give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they
have a collective bargaining or other Agreement.
C. The Consultant shall comply with regulations relative to Title VI
(nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs of the Department of Transportation – Title 49
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 - Effectuation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act).
Title VI provides that the recipients of federal assistance will implement and maintain a policy of
nondiscrimination in which no person in the state of California shall, on the basis of race, color,
national origin, religion, sex, age, disability, be excluded from participation in, denied the
benefits of or subject to discrimination under any program or activity by the recipients of federal
assistance or their assignees and successors in interest.
D. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it during the
Agreement shall act in accordance with Title VI. Specifically, the Consultant shall not
discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability in the
selection and retention of Subconsultants, including procurement of materials and leases of
equipment. The Consultant shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination
prohibited by Section 21.5 of the U.S. DOT’s Regulations, including employment practices
when the Agreement covers a program whose goal is employment.
3.6.23 Debarment and Suspension Certification.
A. Consultant’s signature affixed herein, shall constitute a certification
under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that Consultant has complied
with Title 2 CFR, Part 180, “OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and
Suspension (nonprocurement)”, which certifies that he/she or any person associated therewith in
33
the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, or manager, is not currently under suspension,
debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any federal agency; has not
been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded, or determined ineligible by any federal agency
within the past three (3) years; does not have a proposed debarment pending; and has not been
indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against it by a court of competent
jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official misconduct within the past three (3) years.
Any exceptions to this certification must be disclosed to City.
B. Exceptions will not necessarily result in denial of recommendation for
award, but will be considered in determining Consultant responsibility. Disclosures must
indicate to whom exceptions apply, initiating agency, and dates of action.
C. Exceptions to the Federal Government Excluded Parties List System
maintained by the General Services Administration are to be determined by the Federal highway
Administration.
[SIGNATURES]
CITY OF AZUSA [INSERT NAME OF CONSULTANT]
By: By:
Troy L. Butzlaff, ICMA-CM
City Manager
Name:
Attest:
Title:
Jeffrey L. Cornejo, Jr.
City Clerk
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND
Secretary, AND CORPORATE SEAL OF
CONTRACTOR REQUIRED]
Approved as to Form:
Best Best & Krieger LLP By:
Name:
City Attorney
Title:
34
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
[INSERT SCOPE OF SERVICES]
35
EXHIBIT “B”
SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
[INSERT SCHEDULE]
36
EXHIBIT “C”
COMPENSATION
[INSERT RATES & AUTHORIZED REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES]
37
EXHIBIT “D”
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-B
Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet
Page 1 of 1
Last Updated February 12, 2015
EXHIBIT 10-B SUGGESTED CONSULTANT EVALUATION SHEET *
CONSULTANT/FIRM NAME:
Criteria Max Points Rating
Understanding of the work to be done 25
Experience with similar kinds of work 20
Quality of staff for work to be done 15
Capability of developing innovative or
advanced techniques 10
Familiarity with state and federal procedures 10
Financial responsibility 10
Demonstrated Technical Ability 10
Total 100
Evaluator Contract Office
Print Name: Initials:
Signature: Date:
Date:
*Notes:
1.To maintain the integrity of a competitive negotiation/qualifications based selection procurement, the total of all
allowable non-qualifications based evaluation criterion (such as local presence or DBE participation) cannot
exceed ten (10) percent of the total evaluation criteria. The ten percent limitation applies only to non-
qualifications based evaluation criterion and should not be considered as a limitation for specific DBE contract
goals established by a contracting agency in accordance with its approved DBE program.
(see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/172qa_07.cfm).
2.For projects other than “Architectural & Engineering” services, as defined in Section 10.1, cost is one of the
criteria, or may be the sole criterion. DBE participation by the consultant shall not be used as one of the criteria
listed above.
3.The evaluation criteria and suggested maximum points shown above are not mandatory, but are recommended in
the interest of maintaining consistency among the hundreds of agencies utilizing federal or state funds.
4.The evaluation criteria and weighted values must be identified in the RFP. If the RFP has different evaluation criteria or
weighted values then the information above would have to be changed to match. The Contract Office is to initial and date
in the space provided to verify that the criteria and weighted values used in the evaluation sheet are appropriate and that
the sheet has been completed correctly.
5.Caltrans participation on the interview panel does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that
proper procurement procedures are followed and requirements are met.
Distribution: Local Agency Project Files
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H
Sample Cost Proposal
Page 1 of 5
LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015
EXHIBIT 10-H SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL (EXAMPLE #1) Page 1 of 2
ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS
(DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant ____________________________________ Contract No. ______________ Date _______________
DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total
_______________ ____________________________ ________ $ _____________ $ _____________
_______________ ____________________________ ________ $ _____________ $ _____________
_______________ ____________________________ ________ $ _____________ $ _____________
_______________ ____________________________ ________ $ _____________ $ _____________
_______________ ____________________________ ________ $ _____________ $ _____________
LABOR COSTS
a)Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ _______________
b)Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for sample)$ _______________
c)TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ _______________
FRINGE BENEFITS
d)Fringe Benefits (Rate: ______) e)TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS
[(c) x (d)] $ _______________
INDIRECT COSTS
f)Overhead (Rate: ______)g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ _______________
h)General and Administrative (Rate: ______) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ _______________
j)TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ _______________
FEE (Profit)
q)(Rate: ______)k)TOTAL FIXED PROFIT [(c) + (j)] x (q)]$ _______________
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC)
Description Unit(s) Unit Cost Total
l)Travel/Mileage Costs (supported by consultant
actual costs) _____ $______ $______________
m)Equipment Rental and Supplies (itemize) _____ $______ $______________
n)Permit Fees (itemize), Plan sheets (each), Test
Holes (each), etc. _____ $______ $______________
o)Subconsultant Costs (attach detailed cost proposal
in same format as prime consultant estimate for
each subconsultant) _____ $______ $______________
p)TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS [(l) + (m) + (n) + (o)] $ _______________
TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (p)] $ _______________
NOTES:
Employees subject to prevailing wage requirements to be marked with an *.
ODC items should be based on actual costs and supported by historical data and other documentation.
ODC items that would be considered “tools of the trade” are not reimbursable.
ODC items should be consistently billed directly to all clients, not just when client will pay for them as a direct cost.
ODC items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in
overhead rate.
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H
Sample Cost Proposal
Page 2 of 5
LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015
EXHIBIT 10-H SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL (EXAMPLE #1) Page 2 of 2
ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS
(SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
Consultant ____________________________________ Contract No.______________ Date _______________
1.Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours)
Direct Labor
Subtotal per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours per
Cost Proposal
Avg
Hourly
Rate
5 Year
Contract
Duration
_______________ _______________ = Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
2.Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %)
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 _______________ + _______________ = _______________ ____________________
Year 2 _______________ + _______________ = _______________ ____________________
Year 3 _______________ + _______________ = _______________ ____________________
Year 4 _______________ + _______________ = _______________ ____________________
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)
Estimated % Completed
Each Year
Total Hours per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours per
Year
Year 1 _______________ * _______________ =____________________
Year 2 _______________ * _______________=____________________
Year 3 _______________ * _______________=____________________
Year 4 _______________ * _______________=____________________
Year 5 _______________ * _______________=____________________
Total _______________ _______________=
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours)
Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
Estimated hours
(calculated above)
Cost per
Year
Year 1 _______________ * _______________ = ____________________
Year 2 _______________ * _______________ = ____________________
Year 3 _______________ * _______________ = ____________________
Year 4 _______________ * _______________ = ____________________
Year 5 _______________ * _______________ = ____________________
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary
Increase
= Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the #
of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.
An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable.
(i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)
This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H
Sample Cost Proposal
Page 3 of 5
LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015
EXHIBIT 10-H SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL (EXAMPLE #2) Page 1 of 2
SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS)
(CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant or Subconsultant ____________________________________________________ Contract No. _________________ Date _______________
Fringe Benefit + Overhead + General Administration = Combined Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)
(= 0% if Included in OH) (= 0% if Included in OH)
FEE = _____________
BILLING INFORMATION CALCULATION INFORMATION
Name/Job Title/Classification1 Hourly Billing Rates2
Straight OT(1.5x) OT(2x)
Effective date of hourly rate
From To
Actual or Avg.
hourly rate3
% or $
increase
Hourly range -
for classifications
only
1. Names and classifications of consultant (key staff) team members must be listed. Provide separate sheets for prime and all subconsultant firms.
2. Billing rate = actual hourly rate * (1+ ICR) * (1+ Fee). Agreed upon billing rates are not adjustable for the term of contract.
3. For named employees enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the Average Hourly Rate for that classification.
NOTES:
Denote all employees subject to prevailing wage with an asterisks (*)
For “Other Direct Cost” listing, see page 2 of this Exhibit
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H
Sample Cost Proposal
Page 4 of 5
LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015
EXHIBIT 10-H SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL (EXAMPLE #2) Page 2 of 2
SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON-CALL OR AS-NEEDED CONTRACTS)
(CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CONTRACTS)
Consultant or Subconsultant ____________________________________________________ Contract No. _________________ Date _______________
SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS
PRIME CONSULTANT SUBCONSULTANT #1 SUBCONSULTANT #2
DESCRIPTION OF
ITEMS
UNIT UNIT
COST
TOTAL DESCRIPTION OF
ITEMS
UNIT UNIT
COST
TOTAL DESCRIPTION OF
ITEMS
UNIT UNIT
COST
TOTAL
PRIME TOTAL ODCs = SUBCONSULTANT #1 ODCs = SUBCONSULTANT #2 ODCs =
IMPORTANT NOTES:
1.List direct cost items with estimated costs. These costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentations.
2.Proposed items should be consistently billed directly to all clients (Commercial entities, Federal Govt., State Govt., and Local Govt. Agency), and not just when the client will pay
for them as a direct cost.
3.Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in the overhead rate.
4.Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice).
5.Items listed above that would be considered "tools of the trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost.
6.Travel related costs should be pre-approved by the contracting agency.
7.If mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for company vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should be
supported by mileage logs.
8.If a consultant proposes rental costs for a vehicle, the company must demonstrate that this is their standard procedure for all of their contracts and that they do not own any vehicles
that could be used for the same purpose.
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H
Sample Cost Proposal
Page 5 of 5
LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015
EXHIBIT 10-H SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL (EXAMPLE #3)
COST PER UNIT OF WORK CONTRACTS
(GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIAL TESTING)
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant ____________________________________ Contract No.______________ Date ______________
Page ___ of ___
Unit/Item of Work:
(Example: Log of Test Boring for Soils Report, or ADL Testing for Hazardous Waste Material Study)
Include as many Items as necessary.
DIRECT LABOR Hours Hourly Total ($)
Billing
Rate ($)
Professional (Classification) _________ _________ _________
Sub-professional/Technical* _________ _________ _________
EQUIPMENT (with Operator) _________ _________ _________
OTHER DIRECT COST
Description Unit(s) Unit Cost
Mobilization/De-mobilization _____ $________ _________
Supplies/Consumables (Itemize) ______ $_________ _________
Travel/Mileage ______ $_________ _________
Report (if applicable) ______ $_________ _________
TOTAL COST PER UNIT OF WORK _________
NOTES:
Denote labor subject to prevailing wage with asterisk (*).
Hourly billing rates should include prevailing wage rates and be consistent with publicly advertised rates charged to all clients
(Commercial, Private or Public).
Hourly billing rates include hourly wage rate, net fee/profit, indirect cost rate, and actual direct equipment rate.
Mobilization/De-mobilization is based on site location and number and frequency of tests/items.
ODC items should be based on actual costs and supported by historical data and other documentation.
ODC items that would be considered “tools of the trade” are not reimbursable.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS DBE INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 10-I (NEW 01/2017)
Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Page 1 of 2
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information, call (916) 445-1233,
TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. ADA Notice
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS DBE INFORMATION
The Agency has established a DBE goal for this Contract of %
OR
The Agency has not established a goal for this Contract. However, proposers are encouraged to obtain DBE participation for this contract.
1.TERMS AS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT
• The term “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise” or “DBE” means a for-profit small business concern owned and controlled by a socially
and economically disadvantaged person(s) as defined in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 26.5.
• The term “Agreement” also means “Contract.”
•Agency also means the local entity entering into this contract with the Contractor or Consultant.
• The term “Small Business” or “SB” is as defined in 49 CFR 26.65.
2.AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
A. DBEs and other small businesses are strongly encouraged to participate in the performance of Contracts financed in whole or in part
with federal funds (See 49 CFR 26, “Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Fina ncial
Assistance Programs”). The Consultant must ensure that DBEs and other small businesses have the opportunity to participate in the
performance of the work that is the subject of this solicitation and should take all necessary and reasonable steps for this assurance.
The proposer must not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of subcontracts.
B. Proposers are encouraged to use services offered by financial institutions owned and controlled by DBEs.
3.SUBMISSION OF DBE INFORMATION
If there is a DBE goal on the contract, Exhibit 10-O1 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment must be included in the Request for Proposal.
In order for a proposer to be considered responsible and responsive, the proposer must make good faith efforts to meet the goal
established for the contract. If the goal is not met, the proposer must document adequate good faith efforts. All DBE participation will be
counted towards the contract goal; therefore, all DBE participation shall be collected and reported.
Exhibit 10-O2 Consultant Contract DBE Information must be included with the Request for Proposal. Even if no DBE participation will be
reported, the successful proposer must execute and return the form.
4.DBE PARTICIPATION GENERAL INFORMATION
It is the proposer’s responsibility to be fully informed regarding the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26, and the Department’s DBE program
developed pursuant to the regulations. Particular attention is directed to the following:
A. A DBE must be a small business firm defined pursuant to 13 CFR 121 and be certified through the California Unified
Certification Program (CUCP).
B. A certified DBE may participate as a prime consultant, subconsultant, joint venture partner, as a vendor of material or supplies, or as
a trucking company.
C. A DBE proposer not proposing as a joint venture with a non-DBE, will be required to document one or a combination of the following:
1.The proposer is a DBE and will meet the goal by performing work with its own forces.
2.The proposer will meet the goal through work performed by DBE subconsultants, suppliers or trucking companies.
3.The proposer, prior to proposing, made adequate good faith efforts to meet the goal.
D. A DBE joint venture partner must be responsible for specific contract items of work or clearly defined portions thereof. Responsibility
means actually performing, managing, and supervising the work with its own forces. The DBE joint venture partner must share in the
capital contribution, control, management, risks and profits of the joint venture commensurate with its ownership interest.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS DBE INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 10-I (NEW 01/2017)
Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Page 2 of 2
For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information, call (916) 445-1233,
TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. ADA Notice
E. A DBE must perform a commercially useful function pursuant to 49 CFR 26.55, that is, a DBE firm must be responsible for the
execution of a distinct element of the work and must carry out its responsibility by actually performing, managing and supervising the
work.
F. The proposer shall list only one subconsultant for each portion of work as defined in their proposal and all DBE subconsultants should
be listed in the bid/cost proposal list of subconsultants.
G. A prime consultant who is a certified DBE is eligible to claim all of the work in the Contract toward the DBE participation except that
portion of the work to be performed by non-DBE subconsultants.
5.RESOURCES
A. The CUCP database includes the certified DBEs from all certifying agencies participating in the CUCP. If you believe a firm is certified
that cannot be located on the database, please contact the Caltrans Office of Certification toll free number 1-866-810-6346 for
assistance.
B. Access the CUCP database from the Department of Transportation, Office of Business and Economic Opportunity Web site at:
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/bep/.
1.Click on the link titled Disadvantaged Business Enterprise;
2.Click on Search for a DBE Firm link;
3.Click on Access to the DBE Query Form located on the first line in the center of the page.
Searches can be performed by one or more criteria. Follow instructions on the screen.
6.MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES PURCHASED FROM DBES COUNT TOWARDS THE DBE GOAL UNDER THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS:
A. If the materials or supplies are obtained from a DBE manufacturer, count 100 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies. A DBE
manufacturer is a firm that operates or maintains a factory, or establishment that produces on the premises the materials, supplies,
articles, or equipment required under the Contract and of the general character described by the specifications.
B. If the materials or supplies purchased from a DBE regular dealer, count 60 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies. A DBE
regular dealer is a firm that owns, operates or maintains a store, warehouse, or other establishment in which the materials, supplies,
articles or equipment of the general character described by the specifications and required under the Contract are bought, kept in stock,
and regularly sold or leased to the public in the usual course of business. To be a DBE regular dealer, the firm must be an established,
regular business that engages, as its principal business and under its own name, in the purchase and sale or lease of the products in
question. A person may be a DBE regular dealer in such bulk items as petroleum products, steel, cement, gravel, stone or asphalt
without owning, operating or maintaining a place of business provided in this section.
C. If the person both owns and operates distribution equipment for the products, any supplementing of regular dealers’ own distr ibution
equipment shall be, by a long-term lease agreement and not an ad hoc or Agreement-by-Agreement basis. Packagers, brokers,
manufacturers’ representatives, or other persons who arrange or expedite transactions are not DBE regular dealers within the meaning
of this section.
D. Materials or supplies purchased from a DBE, which is neither a manufacturer nor a regular dealer, will be limited to the entire amount of
fees or commissions charged for assistance in the procurement of the materials and supplies, or fees or transportation charges for the
delivery of materials or supplies required on the job site, provided the fees are reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees
charged for similar services.
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O1
Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment
Page 1 of 2
July 23, 2015
EXHIBIT 10-O1 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT
1.Local Agency:2.Contract DBE Goal:
3.Project Description:
4.Project Location:
5.Consultant's Name:6.Prime Certified DBE:
7.Description of Work, Service, or Materials
Supplied
8.DBE
Certification
Number
9.DBE Contact Information 10. DBE %
Local Agency to Complete this Section
11.TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION % 17.Local Agency Contract Number:
18. Federal-Aid Project Number:
19.Proposed Contract Execution Date:
Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on
this form is complete and accurate.
IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit,
regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is
required.
20.Local Agency Representative's Signature 21.Date 12.Preparer's Signature 13.Date
22.Local Agency Representative's Name 23.Phone 14.Preparer's Name 15.Phone
24.Local Agency Representative's Title 16.Preparer's Title
DISTRIBUTION: Original – Included with consultant’s proposal to local agency.
ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-
3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O1
Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment
Page 2 of 2
July 23, 2015
INSTRUCTIONS – CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT
CONSULTANT SECTION
1.Local Agency - Enter the name of the local or regional agency that is funding the contract.
2.Contract DBE Goal - Enter the contract DBE goal percentage as it appears on the project advertisement.
3.Project Description - Enter the project description as it appears on the project advertisement (Bridge Rehab,
Seismic Rehab, Overlay, Widening, etc.).
4.Project Location - Enter the project location as it appears on the project advertisement.
5.Consultant’s Name - Enter the consultant’s firm name.
6.Prime Certified DBE - Check box if prime contractor is a certified DBE.
7.Description of Work, Services, or Materials Supplied - Enter description of work, services, or materials to be
provided. Indicate all work to be performed by DBEs including work performed by the prime consultant’s own
forces, if the prime is a DBE. If 100% of the item is not to be performed or furnished by the DBE, describe the
exact portion to be performed or furnished by the DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 to determine how to count the
participation of DBE firms.
8.DBE Certification Number - Enter the DBE’s Certification Identification Number. All DBEs must be certified
on the date bids are opened.
9.DBE Contact Information - Enter the name, address, and phone number of all DBE subcontracted consultants.
Also, enter the prime consultant’s name and phone number, if the prime is a DBE.
10.DBE % - Percent participation of work to be performed or service provided by a DBE. Include the prime
consultant if the prime is a DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 for how to count full/partial participation.
11. Total Claimed DBE Participation % - Enter the total DBE participation claimed. If the total % claimed is
less than item “Contract DBE Goal,” an adequately documented Good Faith Effort (GFE) is required (see Exhibit
15-H DBE Information - Good Faith Efforts of the LAPM).
12.Preparer’s Signature - The person completing the DBE commitment form on behalf of the consultant’s firm
must sign their name.
13.Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the consultant’s preparer.
14.Preparer’s Name - Enter the name of the person preparing and signing the consultant’s DBE commitment
form.
15.Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.
16.Preparer’s Title - Enter the position/title of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.
LOCAL AGENCY SECTION
17.Local Agency Contract Number - Enter the Local Agency contract number or identifier.
18.Federal-Aid Project Number - Enter the Federal-Aid Project Number.
19.Proposed Contract Execution Date - Enter the proposed contract execution date.
20.Local Agency Representative’s Signature - The person completing this section of the form for the Local
Agency must sign their name to certify that the information in this and the Consultant Section of this form is
complete and accurate.
21.Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the Local Agency Representative.
22.Local Agency Representative’s Name - Enter the name of the Local Agency Representative certifying the
consultant’s DBE commitment form.
23.Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.
24.Local Agency Representative Title - Enter the position/title of the Local Agency Representative certifying
the consultant’s DBE commitment form.
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O2
Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
Page 1 of 2
July 23, 2015
EXHIBIT 10-O2 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT
1.Local Agency:2.Contract DBE Goal:
3.Project Description:
4.Project Location:
5.Consultant's Name:6.Prime Certified DBE: 7. Total Contract Award Amount:
8.Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants:9.Total Number of ALL Subconsultants:
10. Description of Work, Service, or Materials
Supplied
11.DBE
Certification
Number
12.DBE Contact Information
13.DBE
Dollar
Amount
Local Agency to Complete this Section
14.TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION
$ 20.Local Agency Contract
Number:
21. Federal-Aid Project Number:% 22.Contract Execution
Date:
Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on
this form is complete and accurate.
IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit,
regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is
required.
23.Local Agency Representative's Signature 24.Date 15.Preparer's Signature 16.Date
25.Local Agency Representative's Name 26.Phone 17.Preparer's Name 18.Phone
27.Local Agency Representative's Title 19.Preparer's Title
DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original – Local Agency
2. Copy – Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract
execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract.
ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-
3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O2
Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
Page 2 of 2
July 23, 2015
INSTRUCTIONS – CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT
CONSULTANT SECTION
1.Local Agency - Enter the name of the local or regional agency that is funding the contract.
2.Contract DBE Goal - Enter the contract DBE goal percentage as it appears on the project advertisement.
3.Project Description - Enter the project description as it appears on the project advertisement (Bridge Rehab, Seismic
Rehab, Overlay, Widening, etc).
4.Project Location - Enter the project location as it appears on the project advertisement.
5.Consultant’s Name - Enter the consultant’s firm name.
6.Prime Certified DBE - Check box if prime contractor is a certified DBE.
7.Total Contract Award Amount - Enter the total contract award dollar amount for the prime consultant.
8.Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants – Enter the total dollar amount for all subcontracted consultants.
SUM = (DBEs + all Non-DBEs). Do not include the prime consultant information in this count.
9.Total number of ALL subconsultants – Enter the total number of all subcontracted consultants. SUM = (DBEs + all
Non-DBEs). Do not include the prime consultant information in this count.
10.Description of Work, Services, or Materials Supplied - Enter description of work, services, or materials to be
provided. Indicate all work to be performed by DBEs including work performed by the prime consultant’s own forces, if
the prime is a DBE. If 100% of the item is not to be performed or furnished by the DBE, describe the exact portion to be
performed or furnished by the DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 to determine how to count the participation of DBE firms.
11.DBE Certification Number - Enter the DBE’s Certification Identification Number. All DBEs must be certified on
the date bids are opened.
12.DBE Contact Information - Enter the name, address, and phone number of all DBE subcontracted consultants.
Also, enter the prime consultant’s name and phone number, if the prime is a DBE.
13.DBE Dollar Amount - Enter the subcontracted dollar amount of the work to be performed or service to be
provided. Include the prime consultant if the prime is a DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 for how to count full/partial
participation.
14.Total Claimed DBE Participation - $: Enter the total dollar amounts entered in the “DBE Dollar Amount” column.
%: Enter the total DBE participation claimed (“Total Participation Dollars Claimed” divided by item “Total Contract
Award Amount”). If the total % claimed is less than item “Contract DBE Goal,” an adequately documented Good Faith
Effort (GFE) is required (see Exhibit 15-H DBE Information - Good Faith Efforts of the LAPM).
15.Preparer’s Signature - The person completing the DBE commitment form on behalf of the consultant’s firm must
sign their name.
16.Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the consultant’s preparer.
17.Preparer’s Name - Enter the name of the person preparing and signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.
18.Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.
19.Preparer’s Title - Enter the position/title of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.
LOCAL AGENCY SECTION
20.Local Agency Contract Number - Enter the Local Agency contract number or identifier.
21.Federal-Aid Project Number - Enter the Federal-Aid Project Number.
22.Contract Execution Date - Enter the date the contract was executed.
23.Local Agency Representative’s Signature - The person completing this section of the form for the Local Agency
must sign their name to certify that the information in this and the Consultant Section of this form is complete and
accurate.
24.Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the Local Agency Representative.
25.Local Agency Representative’s Name - Enter the name of the Local Agency Representative certifying the
consultant’s DBE commitment form.
26.Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.
27.Local Agency Representative Title - Enter the position/title of the Local Agency Representative certifying the
consultant’s DBE commitment form.
Beginning of
project.
End of project. Proposed Roadway
Rehabilitation/Improvements
(e.g. Asphalt grinding, new
asphalt concrete paving,
minor concrete work and
other related improvements).
Alosta Avenue Street Improvement Project
Vicinity Map
EXHIBIT "E"
VICINITY MAP
37
STRUCTURAL PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION
REPORT
For
E Alosta Avenue
From Citrus Avenue to Barranca Avenue
Within the
City of Azusa, California
Project No. 42310
July 11, 2016
Client:
City of Azusa
C/O HR Green
1100 Town and Country | Suite 1025
Orange, CA 92868
Reviewed By:
STEVEN R. MARVIN
RCE 30659
Professional Pavement Engineering
2700 South Grand Avenue, Santa Ana, CA
714-546-3468 – labellemarvin.com
HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2
2.01 SITE INSPECTION
2.02 IN-PLACE STRENGTH TESTING
2.03 FIELD CORE SAMPLING
2.04 BULK SAMPLING OF SUBGRADE SOILS
2.05 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
2.06 REPORT PREPARATION
3.0 PROJECT DISCUSSION 5
3.01 REHABILITATION PROCEDURES
3.02 RECONSTRUCTION
3.03 ASPHALT CONCRETE OVERLAY
3.04 ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX OVERLAY
3.05 COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (CIR)
3.06 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION
3.07 PARTIAL SECTION REPLACEMENT
4.0 TRAFFIC USE ESTIMATES 12
5.0 FIELD CONDITIONS 13
6.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 14
6.01 EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE
6.02 EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE
6.02a EXISTING AGGREGATE SUB-BASE
6.03 SUBGRADE DESCRIPTION
6.04 SUBGRADE MOISTURE CONTENT
6.05 EQUILIBRIUM R-VALUE
6.06 EQUILIBRIUM MOISTURE
7.0 CONDITION AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 18
7.01 REFLECTIVE CRACK ANALYSIS
7.02 RIDE QUALITY ANALYSIS
7.03 SUBGRADE STRENGTH ANALYSIS – DEFLECTION BASED
7.04 STRUCTURAL SECTION COMPONENT ANALYSIS – LABORATORY
8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20
9.0 REPLACEMENT SECTION ALTERNATIVES 28
10.0 SUBGRADE CONDITIONS 30
10.01 CONVENTIONAL SECTION PROCEDURE
10.02 FULL DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE PROCEDURE
11.0 MATERIAL RECOMMENDATIONS 31
11.01 AGGREGATE BASE
11.02 ASPHALT CONCRETE (NEW CONSTRUCTION AC BASE COURSE)
11.03 ASPHALT CONCRETE (LEVELING COURSE AND WEARING SURFACE)
11.04 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
APPENDIX
A STREET IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATION PLANS
B DEFLECTION STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLES
C CORE LOCATION PLAN AND SAMPLE LOG
D IN-FIELD DEFLECTION TESTING DATA
E R-VALUE DETERMINATIONS (CA 301)
F GLOSSARY OF TERMS
1 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Azusa, California in conjunction with community input and the Citywide Pavement
Management Plan has identified the need for rehabilitation of E Alosta Avenue from Citrus
Avenue to Barranca Avenue. Roadway improvements may also include modification of the
existing crown, median and/or frontage improvements.
Current roadway conditions reflect the original as-built pavement sections, combined with
various asphalt concrete resurfacing projects. E Alosta Avenue within the project limits
coincides with the previous Route 66 Highway. Review of the roadway cross section, profile
and alignment suggests the roadway has been widened over time, coinciding with previous
commercial and residential development.
Continued long term improvements likely included the addition of the landscape medians and
median areas with widening of the roadway. Recent interest in the old Route 66 has resulted in
more recent development of roadside businesses. Pavement cracking is extensive with
evidence of structural fatigue, particularly within the number two lanes combined with
reflective cracking through the buildup of pavement overlays and pavement slurry seal
applications. Similar distresses are reflecting through the more recent slurry seal application
west of N Citrus Avenue.
A distinct quarter crown is evident 6’ to 9’ from the north and south sides of the roadway and is
likely the joining point between the older Route 66 Highway cross section and historical
widening, realignment and resurfacing. The variety of improvements likely coincided with
relinquishment of the highway to the City following completion of the parallel Interstate 10
Freeway. The reduced median curb face, steeper cross slopes in the number two lanes, and
relatively flat median, left turn lanes and number one lanes are all consistent with joining
previous roadside development with the addition of curb, gutter and sidewalk in conjunction
with urbanization of the region.
The bulk of the roadway is exhibiting longitudinal, transverse and block type cracking,
consistent with aged and fatigued pavements and previous roadway resurfacing. Alligator
2 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
cracking is apparent within the number two lanes and right turn lanes, generally within the
outer 8’+/- of the roadway coinciding with the right wheel path of the number two lanes.
The buildup of asphalt concrete surface materials has resulted in a relatively high roadway
crown and steep cross slopes within the outside wheel path of the outer number two lanes.
The roadway surface includes potholes and widespread patching apparently the result of
spalling or delamination of the present asphalt concrete wearing surface.
The purpose of the study is to explore the condition/strength of the roadway through a
combination of in place strength testing, pavement core sampling to document pavement
thicknesses, subsurface borings and associated laboratory testing. The various factors and
conditions documented are combined with future traffic estimates to provide
recommendations for reinforcement of the roadway where required. In place strength testing
also aids in defining the limits of reconstruction where necessary.
The investigation provides documentation and independent analysis of the present structural
conditions. The structural condition analysis is combined with field observations and
engineering judgment to define or explore various means of possible rehabilitation. The field
strength measurements and cross section structural thicknesses were compared to current and
future traffic use providing a basis for development of improvement requirements to meet
long-term City performance expectations. A challenge for rehabilitation of the roadway will be
effective control or limiting of premature reflective cracking where asphalt concrete overlay is
utilized.
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
Investigation of E Alosta Avenue, utilized the following
‐ Non-destructive strength testing to define current roadway strengths,
‐ Field core sampling to verify as-built pavement sections along the roadway
segment
‐ Laboratory subgrade testing defining design subgrade conditions and strengths
‐ Visual review of prevailing conditions and
3 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
‐ Engineering analysis
2.01 Site Inspection
Review of prevailing conditions was performed during several separate field review and
data gathering periods.
‐ Site reconnaissance to determine the general roadway layout, traffic control
requirements during testing and sampling and the variability of conditions to
define testing and sampling intervals
‐ Documentation of site conditions during field strength (deflection testing
sequence) testing
‐ Documentation of site conditions during field core sampling
‐ Verification and correlation of field conditions during engineering review of
conditions
2.02 In-Place Strength Testing
Pavement strength (FWD) testing was performed in accordance with California Test
Method 356 to determine the current load carrying capacity of the roadway and
ultimately develop rehabilitation/resurfacing potential. Pavement response to the
Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) was obtained at each test site including
‐ Deflection at the loading point
‐ Correlating deflection at nine (9) additional locations spaced 6” to 12” on center
at each test site defining the pavement deflection basin under loading
‐ Distance Measuring Instrument (DMI) project limits and cross street locations
‐ DMI curb and or gutter locations
‐ Median type and DMI location
‐ Visible changes in pavement conditions or types
‐ DMI longitudinal test location
‐ GPS spatial test location
‐ Pavement surface temperature
2.03 Field Core Sampling
4 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
Core sampling of the existing pavement was performed to document the thicknesses of
the various pavement structural layers along the roadway. The cores obtained during
this investigation provide an understanding of the roadway history and present a clearer
picture of as-built thickness variations.
Pavement core sampling included:
‐ DMI longitudinal and transverse location
‐ Asphalt concrete total thickness and individual layer thickness
‐ Presence of pavement reinforcing fabric (if any)
‐ Portland Cement Concrete layer thickness (if any or where encountered)
‐ Aggregate base layer thickness and condition (if any)
2.04 Bulk Sampling of Subgrade Soils
Bulk samples of the underlying subgrade soils are obtained at each field core location.
Bulk soil samples combined with field thickness measurements provide a basis for
analyzing the cause or causes of conditions encountered during the investigation. Data
included
‐ Subgrade identification
‐ In-situ subgrade moisture determination
‐ Subgrade R-Value strength determination
2.05 Engineering Analysis
The Engineering analysis combines the various data with field observations and
engineering judgment, providing a basis for structural evaluation of the pavement
section
‐ Component Analysis combining laboratory strength measurements and field
thicknesses
‐ Site Condition Assessment comparing prevailing visual conditions, ride qualities,
drainage patterns, etc. with documented information
‐ In place strength analysis of the current roadway behavior under loading
5 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
2.06 Report Preparation
The final report utilizes all information developed during the investigation, combined
with engineering judgment and ongoing developments in pavement design and
engineering, yielding recommendations for rehabilitation and/or reconstruction.
3.0 PROJECT DISCUSSION
The investigation performed utilizes a full range of measuring techniques to assess the present
structural condition of the roadway within the study area. The study utilizes close interval in
place strength testing to define the impact of previous traffic use, the environmental effects
such as seasonal rainfall, subsurface moisture changes and extended drought periods on the
current roadway. Pavement core sampling defines the existing section thicknesses and
documents subgrade soil conditions. The combination of data is used to determine the
combined effects of subgrade strength variations, historical traffic use, previous maintenance,
and resurfacing.
The various methodologies employed provide exploration of rehabilitation alternatives, and
provide a cross check for full understanding of the roadway history contributing to present
conditions. The specific ‘hard’ data is combined with visual examination of the roadway during
development of testing protocol, field core sampling and during engineering review of
conditions prior to development of final recommendations for maintenance, rehabilitation or
reconstruction.
The variables associated with pavement performance and pavement rehabilitation present
challenges which are addressed during design including current grades, crown heights and cross
slopes, at grade PCC bus pads, curb and gutter and median curb heights. The impact on surface
grades and elevations for each of the rehabilitation or maintenance alternatives is evaluated to
explore short and long term performance with related initial and projected long term costs.
Balancing the costs and benefits requires consideration of numerous alternative methods of
construction, which along with the costs and benefits include certain risks.
6 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
Pavement reconstruction provides the greatest product uniformity generally at the highest
initial cost. Reconstruction includes the potential of encountering undefined subsurface
conditions, utility conflicts, weather delays, and increased costs related to change orders.
Reconstruction also includes obvious disruption to residential and business life, and may be
hampered with delays where subsurface conditions require design or construction changes.
The specter of maintaining emergency access to businesses and residents impacted by the
construction project are always most severe during roadway reconstruction projects.
Resurfacing of the existing roadway typically includes the least initial cost balancing
performance risks with construction and personal cost savings, constructability, and the impact
on future maintenance choices with the type of resurfacing procedure chosen. Pavement
resurfacing must also address street variability, changes in past and future traffic patterns, such
as the advent of street side recycling of green waste, bottles and cans, and collection of normal
household and business refuse and the impact on adjacent residents and businesses. The least
cost alternative available may therefore not always be the most cost effective alternative over
time.
Evaluation of the roadway system, and ultimately selection of an appropriate course of
corrective action must consider each of these objective issues, and combine these impacts with
subjective values of the community such as appearance, curing periods, actual apparent work
performed versus the total area within the City improved, i.e., the perceived value of work
performed. Inherent in each of the construction procedures, including reconstruction, is the
potential for unknown conditions, change orders, quality control and quality assurance
procedures, the risks and implications of material variability and, in the case of resurfacing,
grade impacts, grade restrictions along the roadway edges due to the presence or absence of
curb or curb and gutter, prior construction history, the potential for reflection of existing
cracking through the new wearing surface, etc.
7 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
3.01 Rehabilitation Procedures
The majority of resurfacing systems are designed to address these variables, simply and
effectively utilizing cold milling along pavement edges, aggressive crack filling, and
where cracking is extensive, use of materials or layers resistant to premature reflective
cracking. A key element in each of the resurfacing procedures is a comparison of both
structural and aesthetic need, combined with the foreseeable risk, long and short
performance benefits of the procedure and a comparison of resurfacing costs with the
large expense of complete reconstruction.
3.02 Reconstruction
Reconstruction almost generally provides the least long term performance risk at the
highest cost of construction. Typical reconstruction costs range from 3 to 10 times more
than each of the resurfacing alternatives and is therefore selected only when all other
alternatives are exhausted. Reconstruction involves complete removal of the existing
pavement section and any underlying aggregate base layers, typically along with a
defined amount of underlying subgrade soils. Where utility conflicts exist, such as
shallow telecommunications lines or utilities which were previously installed within the
upper few feet of the pavement surface due to other depth restrictions or prior
regulations, such utilities are then either relocated or somehow protected in place.
Subgrade conditions may also dictate changes in construction scheduling, such as where
subgrade is wet and will not support conventional construction equipment, areas where
high ground water tables prevent ready drying of materials, or where adjacent
conditions such as lakes, landscape slopes, etc. provide continual infiltration of water
into the excavation. Prevailing weather conditions, such as persistent fog, unforeseen
rainfall, etc. will also adversely impact reconstruction activities. Reconstruction does
however present certain advantages such as future uniformity of construction, greater
opportunities for quality control, correction of past problematic conditions, etc.
8 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
Specific replacement section alternatives are provided within this report, utilizing both
conventional asphalt concrete over aggregate base sections and full depth asphalt
concrete sections constructed directly over the prepared subgrade soils. The
replacement sections are location and street specific, based on variations in subgrade
strengths determined during laboratory testing, and projected future traffic use.
Replacement section alternatives are designed using methods outlined in the Flexible
Pavement Structural Section Design Guide for California Cities and Counties, Third
Edition, and the Caltrans Highway Design Manual current edition.
3.03 Asphalt Concrete Overlay
Asphalt concrete overlay provides improvement of the roadway, utilizing the existing
layers of asphalt concrete and aggregate base as support for a new wearing surface.
Addition of a defined thickness of asphalt concrete provides structural reinforcement of
the roadway, permitting the designer to address changes in traffic use, increases in
traffic volumes and weights, correct riding qualities, and effectively extends the
structural performance of the roadway for ten or even twenty years.
Placement of asphalt concrete overlays results in an increase in crown height and of
course roadway cross slope. As such, repeated placement of asphalt concrete overlays
ultimately becomes unacceptable, resulting in either full street cold milling or possibly
reconstruction. Pavement grinding is used for most overlays to provide a transition
along the edges of the roadway, adjoining curb or gutter, at cross streets, at the
termination point of overlays and at transitions to other fixed elevations such as railroad
crossings, large utility vaults, etc. Remaining fixed elevation improvements such as
manhole covers, valve covers, etc. are typically adjusted to the new finished elevation
through use of risers or reconstruction of the item.
A significant consideration during design and ultimately construction of overlays is the
potential for existing pavement cracking of differing severity to reflect through the new
wearing surface, with obvious aesthetic impacts. The reflected cracks also eventually
9 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
become future maintenance issues, and in severe cases, provide an avenue of water
damage from the surface, through to the underlying base and subgrade layers. Asphalt
concrete overlays must weigh the risks of limited crack reflection versus the obvious
cost and construction benefits of roadway reuse and extension of the useful life through
cost effective overlay.
Asphalt concrete overlays are seldom placed over roadways that are completely free of
cracks of some type or description. Reflection crack control systems have therefore
been developed and include use of simple or involved crack filling, use of pavement
reinforcing fabric and pavement grids, use of asphalt rubber aggregate membranes, etc.
Each of these methods results in controlling a percentage of the reflective cracks, at
varying costs. None of the systems are intended to address every type of crack, with the
most aggressive systems achieving an 80% or greater reduction in premature reflective
cracking. Since even new pavements following construction or reconstruction are
subject to cracking over time, reasonable control of reflective cracking for a 10 year
period is considered acceptable.
Placement of asphalt concrete overlays are limited by surrounding elevations such as
existing curb and gutter, existing medians, the crown height or roadway elevation, and
the cross slope resulting from placement of overlays. The overlay limit will vary,
depending upon the specific roadway width and previous overlay history, etc. In
general, a 4” thick maximum overlay thickness is considered for preparation of the
materials report. Where the required overlay exceeds the limits imposed,
reconstruction becomes necessary. Design elements during design such as widening,
construction of new curbs and gutter, etc., will impact the potential for overlay
placement.
3.04 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Overlay
Asphalt rubber hot mix overlay should be considered a hybrid of the asphalt concrete
overlay pavement restoration procedure. Asphalt rubber binders, and more recently
10 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
polymer-modified binders, have been developed to provide additional flexibility of the
pavement layer, thereby providing further resistance to reflective cracking. The
increased flexibility provides a greater tolerance for excessive deflection, and as such,
although not providing inch per inch similar structural reinforcement of the existing
pavement structure, provides comparable long-term performance characteristics.
Similar to asphalt concrete overlays addition of a defined thickness of asphalt rubber
hot mix provides structural reinforcement of the roadway, permitting the designer to
address changes in traffic use, increases in traffic volumes and weights, correct riding
qualities, and effectively extend the structural performance of the roadway for 10 or
more years.
Placement of asphalt rubber hot mix overlays also results in an increase in crown height
and of course roadway cross slope. As such, repeated placement of asphalt concrete or
asphalt rubber hot mix overlays ultimately becomes unacceptable, resulting in either full
street cold milling or possibly reconstruction. Pavement grinding is used for most
overlays to provide a transition along the edges of the roadway, adjoining curb or
gutter, at cross streets, at the termination point of overlays and at transitions to other
fixed elevations such as railroad crossings, large utility vaults, etc. Remaining fixed
elevation improvements such as manhole covers, valve covers, etc. are typically
adjusted to the new finished elevation through use of risers or reconstruction of the
item.
Asphalt rubber hot mix overlays are seldom placed over roadways that are completely
free of cracks of some type or description and are not used for new construction. Since
even new pavements following construction or reconstruction are subject to cracking
over time, reasonable control of reflective cracking for a 10 year period is considered
acceptable.
11 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
3.05 Cold In-Place Recycling (CIR)
Developments in recycling combined with recognition of the economic and
environmental benefits of recycling have contributed to a resurgence in interest in reuse
or recycling of all or most of the asphalt concrete layer in conjunction with resurfacing
or rehabilitation projects. Cold in place recycling incorporates specially formulated or
engineered emulsions with in place pavement milling/pulverization. The final process
may include supplemental aggregate where laboratory mix designs identify the need for
the types of emulsified binders and aggregate gradations.
The cold recycled layer limits the quantity of materials exported to landfills and
imported from commercial material suppliers, reducing the environmental footprint of
the process. Balancing the benefits of cold in place recycling including but not limited to
material reuse, reduction of reflection crack potential, structural improvement, etc, are
roadway construction history, structural improvement requirements, construction
logistics, grade limitations, and the need for a wearing surface, independent of the CIR
layer.
The clear benefits of CIR have to be compared to the identified roadway requirements.
Placement of a new wearing surface in addition to the CIR process is required. The
critical factors therefore include the design thickness of the wearing surface, and where
grades so dictate, the thickness of materials which must be removed prior to or in
concert with the process.
3.06 Full Depth Reclamation
Full depth reclamation (FDR) encompasses in place pulverization of all or a defined
portion of the existing asphalt concrete layer and all or part of the underlying aggregate
base layer with inclusion of Portland cement to provide a stabilized and structurally
improved layer foundation for the final roadway layer. The most cost effective FDR
projects include a measure of aggregate base and asphalt concrete for reclamation in
excess of 10” and preferably 14” thick, thereby avoiding inclusion of the subgrade soils
12 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
and achieving the greatest layer improvement with the least amount of Portland
cement. The reduced Portland cement content also reduces future volume change risks
which are sometimes associated with cement stabilized layers.
The potential for block type cracking within the stabilized layer may lead to use of
micro-cracking, use of pavement reinforcing fabric and/or use of asphalt rubber hot mix
wearing surfaces. Consideration of FDR within this investigation compares structural
needs with measured subgrade strengths, layer thicknesses and construction logistics.
3.07 Partial Section Replacement
Historical increases in traffic weights and volumes often results in distress of the asphalt
concrete layer due to the initially limited layer thickness. Where possible, removal of
the asphalt concrete layer and some limited portion of the aggregate base, thereby
increasing the asphalt concrete thickness and providing substantial roadway strength
implements within the existing roadway prism.
Partial section replacement also provides an opportunity to remove aged or unstable
layers of asphalt concrete, replacing same with new, crack and rut resistant materials.
Partial section replacement may include replacing only part of the existing asphalt
concrete, or where additional structural capacity is required, replacing some portion of
the aggregate base layer with asphalt concrete. Increased asphalt concrete thicknesses
also provide a method for the structural section to keep pace with traffic increases and
changes in design standards.
4.0 TRAFFIC USE ESTIMATES
The Traffic Index includes future traffic estimates and is a critical component of the analysis,
providing a basis for developing probable future load associated impacts on the roadway.
A range of probable Traffic Indices (TI) information was provided for development of design
alternatives. The range of TI values based on ADT was also compared to the scheduled transit
13 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
bus service along the roadway. Scheduled transit use along East Alosta Avenue includes
Foothill Transit Route 187, 284 and 488. The current generation of transit buses exceeds legal
truck axle loads and as such should be treated as a separate loading category. Future all
electric buses are similarly laden. The provided Traffic Index range likely includes estimates of
current and future automobile, bus and truck use. The impact of bus weights on roadways is
presently being recognized, and the disparity between the 2 axle truck/bus classifications
debated.
The scheduled Transit Bus service alone would equate to a 20 year traffic index of 9.5 to 10.0,
depending on actual ridership. Assuming all buses travel empty equates to a TI of 9.5 while all
busses full equates to a TI of 10.0. These equivalent Traffic Index values do not include the
addition of automobiles, routine truck traffic, school buses, etc.
A range of Traffic Indices from the 9.0 to 10.0 were utilized to explore the various alternatives
available for consideration. Recommendations for improvement were based on the traffic
information provided.
Where review of traffic studies indicate actual truck weights or both current and future bus use
differ from the traffic projections represented by the Traffic Indices used, revision of these
findings may be necessary.
5.0 FIELD CONDITIONS
A distinct quarter crown is evident 6’ to 9’ from the gutter along the north and south sides of
the roadway. The median areas and number one lanes are relatively flat, transitioning to a
steep cross slope within the number two lanes, joining at the existing curb and gutter.
The present wearing surface includes a worn slurry seal likely 8 or more years old. Pavement
cracking is widespread, including extensive alligator cracking within the outer portions of the
number two lanes transitioning to block type cracking in all other areas. Spalling of the
pavement within crack zones is evident.
14 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
The roadway to the west of Citrus Avenue, beyond the limits of this project, includes a more
recent slurry seal application. While the more recent slurry seal west of Citrus Avenue provides
an initially better impression, similar distresses as are found within the project limits also
prevail in this area.
The present median and striping configuration places the right wheel path of the number two
lane adjacent to the existing gutter, particularly for large vehicles such as trucks or buses. No
parking lane is provided.
E Alosta Avenue is a primary east/west roadway through the City of Azusa. The resurgence of
interest in the old Route 66 has contributed to revitalization of commercial and retail
businesses along the roadway. The roadway serves as an arterial/collector roadway for housing
and businesses including a number of restaurants requiring regular and frequent food and
liquor truck deliveries and refuse collection. Directions of travel are separated by a either
striped or raised, landscaped median areas within the project limits. The flat cross slopes in the
median area suggests the original Route 66 was generally aligned along the current roadway
centerline.
Frontage improvements include curb and gutter along both sides of the roadway for the length
of the project. Portland cement concrete bus landing or parking areas are provided at a limited
number of bus stop locations. Patching in the bus stop areas is also evident.
Visual inspection of the roadway reveals extensive transverse, longitudinal and block cracking
throughout the length of the project limits. Alligator cracking was noted along the roadway,
generally within the right wheel path of the number two lanes. Previous patches and repairs,
apparent construction joints, etc are visible along the roadway.
6.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
Pavement core sampling was performed at 8 specific and distinct locations, 2 each in each of
the four travel lanes, distributed along the length of the proposed project. Core samples were
15 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
obtained to provide information relative to existing pavement sections, pavement layers,
presence or absence of aggregate base, underlying Portland Cement Concrete (if encountered),
etc. Access through the pavement layers was provided through 6” diameter core holes, cut
through the surface utilizing portable coring equipment.
Examination of the core cross section aids in identifying the numbers and thicknesses of
pavement layers, and documents previous use of fabric and/or asphalt rubber hot mix overlay.
The core locations provide access to the aggregate base layer, where present, and permit
sampling of the subgrade soils. Subgrade soil samples are used to determine prevailing
subgrade moistures and R-value strengths.
Prior to field core sampling, proposed test sites were identified and marked in the field. Where
selected locations coincided with marked buried utilities, core sites were relocated. Work was
coordinated with the City to reduce impacts on the travelling public.
The roadway reflects a variety of changes over time. The roadway sections within the number
one lanes, and likely the existing median/left turn areas are typically thicker than that
encountered at or near the right wheel path of the number two lanes. The steep cross slopes in
the outer 8’ +/- of the number two lanes suggests the number one lanes have been built up
over time, with the outer 8’ +/- of the roadway used to transition to the existing curb and
gutter. ,The steep cross slopes in the outer portion of the number two lanes may initially date
to prior widening as the old Highway Route 66 transitioned from State to local control and the
region was developed to a more urban profile. Regardless of the history, the outer portions of
the number two lanes includes a significantly steep cross slope which will likely be corrected at
the time of roadway rehabilitation.
Pavement sections vary markedly from location to location. Exceptionally thick, 12 ½” to 13”
thick pavements were encountered in the westbound number one lane. The thick pavements
in this lane may correspond to previous overlays to establish or modify the crown location and
effective cross slope. The remaining core locations included from 6 3/8” to 8 ½” asphalt
16 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
concrete over subgrade in the certain areas of the number two lanes, transitioning to sections
of the number two lanes which included 5 ½” to 7 ¾” asphalt concrete over 7 ½” to 10 ¾”
aggregate base. No specific pattern could be established relative to the use or lack of use of
aggregate base and the specific reasons for pavement sections ranging from 5 ½” to 13” thick.
Where the specific transition areas and limits of varying thickness are critical to exploration of
design alternatives, use of Ground Penetrating Radar the supplement to cores to date may be
beneficial.
The pavements outside of the quarter crown hinge point, approximately 8’ +/’- from the gutter
lip are in poor condition. These distressed locations generally correspond to the thinner
pavement core locations. The hinge point likely represents the joint line for prior widening.
Previous pavement resurfacing has included use of a compliment of thin asphalt concrete
overlays. The present wearing surface representing the most recent asphalt concrete overlay
ranges from ¾” to 2 ¼” thick, within typical thicknesses ranging from 1 ¼” to 1 ½” thick. No
specific signs of prior crack mitigating measures such as pavement reinforcing fabric, hot in
place recycling, etc were identified. The various pavement layers are separating or
delaminating at 6 of the 8 locations investigated. Two of the six locations separated at more
than one asphalt concrete layer interface. Typical separation was either between the present
wearing surface and the layer immediately below or between the 2nd and 3rd layer below the
pavement surface. The lack of bond between layers will be an issue during alternative
resurfacing designs.
The subgrade moistures were generally drier than predicted equilibrium conditions. Notable
exceptions include two locations, one near Citrus Avenue and one near Barranca Avenue where
subgrade moistures are wetter than predicted during laboratory testing. Neither of these
locations are near any obvious median water source. The subgrade, if exposed, should
generally support construction equipment. A contingency should however be provided for
possible subgrade processing, particularly near each end of the project limits.
17 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
FIELD SAMPLING SUMMARY
Subgrade soil samples provide a basis for design of new replacement sections through R-value
testing and document prevailing moisture conditions. The in situ moisture conditions reflect
the impacts of seasonal rainfall, extended drought periods, and/or subsurface water sources
such as regional water migration or drainage.
Subgrade soils along the length of the roadway were generally identified as silty sands with a
single location of coarse sand. The subgrade soils will lose support for construction equipment
if wetted more than 2% above optimum conditions. The soils should also respond well to
scarification and air drying should the need arise.
Representative subgrade samples were tested for R-Value strength. Individual core thickness
information, test locations, subgrade soil identification and in-situ moisture conditions will be
provided within the Coring Results Table contained in Appendix C. Subgrade R-Value strength
data is provided in Appendix E. A summary of test findings is provided herein for reference.
6.01 Existing Asphalt Concrete
Number Locations AC Thickness
8 5 ½” to 13”
6.02 Existing Aggregate Base – where encountered
Number of Locations AB Measured Thickness
3 7 ¼” to 10 ¾”
6.03 Subgrade Description
Number of Samples Subgrade Description
10 Brn Silty Fine Sand; Brn Coarse Sand
6.04 Subgrade Moisture Content
Number of Samples Measured Moisture Content
10 2.6% to 13.5%
18 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
6.05 Equilibrium R-Value (CA 301)
Tests Performed R-Values
2 47 to 69
6.06 Equilibrium Moisture
Tests Performed Predicted Field Moisture Conditions
2 10% to 12 ½%
7.0 CONDITION AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Evaluation of pavement conditions and structural needs along E Alosta Avenue includes analysis
of the measured pavement strength, documented existing pavement sections, visual pavement
conditions, ride qualities, grade and cross slope issues. The various measurements are
compared to the impacts from traffic as represented over time by the Traffic Index.
7.01 Reflective Crack Analysis
Pavement Distress along E Alosta Avenue includes developing block and transverse
cracking combined with areas of alligator cracking. The pavement cracking includes a
varied and undocumented history, utility cuts and patches, and apparent structural
failure within the right wheel path of the number two lanes. The number two lane
includes concentrated truck and transit bus use exceeding the structural capacity along
reaches of the roadway. The specific width and severity of this cracking zone is
dependent upon the current striping and roadway alignment.
The aging pavement surface combined with measured structural deficiencies and
delamination between pavement layers is contributing to development of pavement
failures, potholes and loss of the present wearing surface. The combined crack
pavement sections will require an aggressive crack mitigation approach, particularly
based on the probable limitations relating to raising crown heights significantly above
present elevations. Where resurfacing is selected, milling of the roadway to remove the
19 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
built up asphalt concrete overlays, and supplemental, loose pavement layers will be
required. The depth of milling may also need to be increased to permit preparation of
the pavement surface and aid in moderating grade issues.
7.02 Ride Quality Analysis
Ride qualities are impacted by the cracking and distress along E Alosta Avenue. The
alternative resurfacing strategy of streetwide cold milling and resurfacing in the number
one lanes and likely reconstruction in extensive portions of the number two lanes will
improve the ride qualities.
7.03 Subgrade Strength Analysis – Deflection Based
Pavement design and performance is a function of traffic use, subgrade strengths layer
qualities and thicknesses, and environmental impacts. The pavement analysis
performed utilizes several methodologies for determining the most probable current
and projected subgrade strengths. Conventional procedures utilize laboratory predicted
conditions and corresponding strengths, commonly referred to as the R-value.
Given the additional in-place measured strength information generated during this
study, subgrade strengths may be estimated based on in-situ subgrade moisture
conditions combined with laboratory strengths over a range of moistures, and through
use of back calculated support characteristics utilizing in-place strength data, layer
thicknesses and traffic use estimates.
Based on the in-place strength measurements typical subgrade modulus values of
10,000 to 20,000 pounds per cubic inch were documented. The 10,000 to 20,000
modulus value corresponds to an in place R-value of 15 to 30, typically less than
predicted strengths based on laboratory R-value testing.
The design of roadway improvements along the bulk of the roadway may be based on a
47 R-value. The subgrade, if exposed, should support construction equipment in most
locations.
20 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
7.04 Structural Section Component Analysis – Laboratory Based
Component analysis utilizing the measured structural section thicknesses is performed
at both laboratory equilibrium conditions and corresponding to actual in-place field
moistures determined during this investigation. Comparison of replacement section
thickness requirements with current thicknesses provides an initial basis for
development of probable structural deficiencies. Subgrade strengths vary with changes
in subgrade moisture.
The existing pavement sections documented in the number one lanes through thickness
comparisons at equilibrium moistures ranges and field moisture conditions are
theoretically adequate for the design parameters. The pavement sections within the
number two lanes are inadequate. The inadequacy appears to coincide with the area of
previous roadway widening or transitions to join existing curb and gutter. The
deficiency within the number two lanes will likely contribute to extensive
reconstruction.
8.0 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusion
The current number one lanes potentially coincide with the previous alignment of Route 66 and
generally include thick asphalt concrete (9 ½” to 13” thick) constructed directly over the
subgrade soils. A single location within the eastbound number one lane included 8 3/4'”
asphalt concrete pavement over 7 ¼” aggregate base.
The pavements coinciding with the outer roadway, generally the outer 8’ +/- of the number two
lanes or right turn lanes included variable sections of 6 3/8” to 8 ½” asphalt concrete over
prevailing subgrade soils or 5 ½” to 7 ¾” asphalt concrete over 7 ½” to 10 ¾” aggregate base.
No specific patterns or rational for the differing sections was definable.
21 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
An issue of concern is the delamination of the multiple asphalt concrete layers along the
roadway. Placing a new wearing surface to a ¾” to 1 ½” thick unbonded and deteriorated
asphalt concrete surface is not advisable. Some amount of cold milling will be required to
remove one or more of the asphalt concrete layers along the roadway.
Focusing on in place strength data, the majority of the number one lanes require reinforcement
equivalent to 2” asphalt concrete or less. The notable exception is the eastbound number one
lane approaching Barranca Avenue. The nearly 4” overlay requirement in this 350’ length of the
roadway will likely dictate reconstruction of this limited section.
In place strength testing verified the deteriorated structural conditions along the number two
lanes. Typical asphalt concrete overlays of 3” to 6” are required to meet long term needs.
Unless widening of the roadway or construction of new frontage improvements to substantially
higher elevations is anticipated, reconstruction of the number two lanes is required.
Rehabilitation through overlay within the number one lanes is complicated by the delaminated
pavement layers. Milling to a minimum 2 ½” and preferably 3” depth to remove one or more of
the loose pavement layers should be performed in preparation for asphalt concrete leveling
course and wearing surface layers. Pavement milling also provides the City an opportunity to
lessen the impact of resurfacing on crown height and cross slope. Careful grade design
combined with milling depth control may be considered to enhance surface slopes and grades.
Areas where reinforcement requirements exceed the allowable surface elevations and crown
height may also require reconstruction.
Recommendations
Multiple methods of rehabilitation have been explored as part of this study. The roadway
improvements directed at providing necessary reinforcement of the roadway while moderating
or mitigating future reflective cracking. Each of the alternatives has been designed to address
the structural and reflective crack issues associated with roadway improvement.
22 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
Alternative recommendations have been developed for a design Traffic Indices of 9.0 and 10.0.
Placement of necessary reinforcement overlays may result in a reduced median curb height.
Removal of the entire number two lane width has been recommended to move the quarter
crown hinge point further from the edge of pavement, lessening the cross slope through the
entire number two lane.
The alternatives are based on 1) Maintaining finish elevations at or near current elevations and
2) Raising centerline elevations 2” or less above current elevation. Construction of new bus
pads with suitable dimensions for one or more current and next generation buses should be
considered as part of the project scope.
The design team may also consider additional items such as possible planned widening or
restriping, construction schedule, utility depths, City policies, etc. The apparent order of the
alternatives presented may therefore change during the final design.
Separate alternatives are provided for Traffic Indices of 10.0 and 9.0. The 9.0 TI does not
apparently address the transit bus use along Alosta Avenue and should be considered for short
term improvement only.
TRAFFIC INDEX 10.0
ALTERNATIVE 1 | No Grade Impact
Conventional Asphalt Concrete Inlay/Overlay with Pavement Reinforcing Fabric and
Conventional Asphalt Concrete Wearing Surface
Alternative One utilizes streetwide cold milling to remove one or more layers of previous
asphalt concrete overlays followed by placement of an asphalt concrete level course, pavement
reinforcing fabric and a new asphalt concrete hot mix wearing surface.
‐ Design new finish elevations at or near existing grades
‐ Reconstruct eastbound number one lane from 650’ west of Barranca Avenue to
Barranca Avenue
‐ Reconstruct westbound number one lane from Barranca Avenue to 650’ westerly
23 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
‐ Reconstruct the eastbound number two lane including right turn lanes
‐ Reconstruct the westbound number two lanes including right turn lanes
‐ Cold mill remainder of number one lanes 4” below present elevations
‐ Clean and fill cracking wider than ¼”
‐ Construct minimum 1 ½” thick asphalt concrete level course
‐ Install pavement reinforcing fabric using 0.20 gallons per square yard PG 70-10
asphalt binder
‐ Construct minimum 2 ½” thick conventional asphalt concrete overlay wearing
surface
Note: Where the City prefers omission of the pavement reinforcing fabric, increase the milling
depth in the number one lanes and median areas to 6” followed by construction of a new 6”
thick conventional asphalt concrete pavement. Continuity of construction would suggest use of
a pavement section in the number one lane using 6” of asphalt concrete.
ALTERNATIVE 2 | No Grade Impact
Conventional Asphalt Concrete Inlay/Overlay with Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Wearing Surface
Alternative Two utilizes streetwide cold milling to remove one or more layers of previous
asphalt concrete overlays followed by placement of an asphalt concrete level course and a new
asphalt rubber hot mix wearing surface. The asphalt rubber hot mix materials are being utilized
to moderate future premature reflective cracking. ARHM may exhibit a lesser resistance to
repetitive power steering movements associated with vehicle parking.
‐ Design new finish elevations at or near existing grades
‐ Reconstruct eastbound number one lane from 650’ west of Barranca Avenue to
Barranca Avenue
‐ Reconstruct westbound number one lane from Barranca Avenue to 650’ westerly
‐ Reconstruct the eastbound number two lane including right turn lanes
‐ Reconstruct the westbound number two lanes including right turn lanes
24 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
‐ Cold mill remainder of number one lanes 4” below present elevations
‐ Clean and fill cracking wider than ¼”
‐ Construct minimum 2” thick asphalt concrete level course
‐ Construct minimum 2” thick asphalt rubber hot mix overlay wearing surface
ALTERNATIVE 3 | Raise Crown 2” above present elevations
Conventional Asphalt Concrete Inlay/Overlay with Pavement Reinforcing Fabric
Alternative Three utilizes streetwide cold milling to remove one or more layers of previous
asphalt concrete overlays followed by placement of an asphalt concrete level course, pavement
reinforcing fabric and a new asphalt concrete hot mix wearing surface. Raising grades permits
salvaging of additional portions of the number one lanes.
‐ Design new finish elevations 2” above existing grades
‐ Reconstruct eastbound number one lane from 350’ west of Barranca Avenue to
Barranca Avenue
‐ Reconstruct the eastbound number two lane including right turn lanes
‐ Reconstruct the westbound number two lanes including right turn lanes
‐ Cold mill remainder of number one lanes 2” below present elevations
‐ Clean and fill cracking wider than ¼”
‐ Construct minimum 1 ½” thick asphalt concrete level course
‐ Install pavement reinforcing fabric using 0.20 gallons per square yard PG 70-10
asphalt binder
‐ Construct minimum 2 ½” thick conventional asphalt concrete overlay wearing
surface
25 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
ALTERNATIVE 4 | Raise Crown ~2” above present elevations
Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (RHMA) Overlay
Alternative Four utilizes streetwide cold milling to remove one or more layers of previous
asphalt concrete overlays followed by placement of an asphalt concrete level course and a new
asphalt rubber hot mix wearing surface. The asphalt rubber hot mix materials are being utilized
to moderate future premature reflective cracking. ARHM may exhibit a lesser resistance to
repetitive power steering movements associated with vehicle parking.
‐ Design new finish elevations 2” above existing grades
‐ Reconstruct eastbound number one lane from 350’ west of Barranca Avenue to
Barranca Avenue
‐ Reconstruct the eastbound number two lane including right turn lanes
‐ Reconstruct the westbound number two lanes including right turn lanes
‐ Cold mill remainder of number one lanes 2” below present elevations
‐ Clean and fill cracking wider than ¼”
‐ Construct minimum 2” thick asphalt concrete level course
‐ Construct minimum 2” thick asphalt rubber hot mix overlay wearing surface
TRAFFIC INDEX 9.0
ALTERNATIVE 1 | No Grade Impact
Conventional Asphalt Concrete Inlay/Overlay with Pavement Reinforcing Fabric and
Conventional Asphalt Concrete Wearing Surface
Alternative One utilizes streetwide cold milling to remove one or more layers of previous
asphalt concrete overlays followed by placement of an asphalt concrete level course, pavement
reinforcing fabric and a new asphalt concrete hot mix wearing surface.
‐ Design new finish elevations at or near existing grades
26 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
‐ Reconstruct eastbound number one lane from 350’ west of Barranca Avenue to
Barranca Avenue
‐ Reconstruct westbound number one lane from Barranca Avenue to 650’ westerly
‐ Reconstruct the eastbound number two lane including right turn lanes
‐ Reconstruct the westbound number two lanes including right turn lanes
‐ Cold mill remainder of number one lanes 4” below present elevations
‐ Clean and fill cracking wider than ¼”
‐ Construct minimum 1 ½” thick asphalt concrete level course
‐ Install pavement reinforcing fabric using 0.20 gallons per square yard PG 70-10
asphalt binder
‐ Construct minimum 2 ½” thick conventional asphalt concrete overlay wearing
surface
Note: Where the City prefers omission of the pavement reinforcing fabric, increase the milling
depth in the number one lanes and median areas to 6” followed by construction of a new 6”
thick conventional asphalt concrete pavement. Continuity of construction would suggest use of
a pavement section in the number one lane using 6” of asphalt concrete.
ALTERNATIVE 2 | No Grade Impact
Conventional Asphalt Concrete Inlay/Overlay with Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Wearing Surface
Alternative Two utilizes streetwide cold milling to remove one or more layers of previous
asphalt concrete overlays followed by placement of an asphalt concrete level course and a new
asphalt rubber hot mix wearing surface. The asphalt rubber hot mix materials are being utilized
to moderate future premature reflective cracking. ARHM may exhibit a lesser resistance to
repetitive power steering movements associated with vehicle parking.
‐ Design new finish elevations at or near existing grades
‐ Reconstruct eastbound number one lane from 350’ west of Barranca Avenue to
Barranca Avenue
27 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
‐ Reconstruct westbound number one lane from Barranca Avenue to 650’ westerly
‐ Reconstruct the eastbound number two lane including right turn lanes
‐ Reconstruct the westbound number two lanes including right turn lanes
‐ Cold mill remainder of number one lanes 4” below present elevations
‐ Clean and fill cracking wider than ¼”
‐ Construct minimum 2” thick asphalt concrete level course
‐ Construct minimum 2” thick asphalt rubber hot mix overlay wearing surface
ALTERNATIVE 3 | Raise Crown 2” above present elevations
Conventional Asphalt Concrete Inlay/Overlay with Pavement Reinforcing Fabric
Alternative Three utilizes streetwide cold milling to remove one or more layers of previous
asphalt concrete overlays followed by placement of an asphalt concrete level course, pavement
reinforcing fabric and a new asphalt concrete hot mix wearing surface. Raising grades permits
salvaging of additional portions of the number one lanes.
‐ Design new finish elevations 2” above existing grades
‐ Reconstruct eastbound number one lane from 350’ west of Barranca Avenue to
Barranca Avenue
‐ Reconstruct the eastbound number two lane including right turn lanes
‐ Reconstruct the westbound number two lanes including right turn lanes
‐ Cold mill remainder of number one lanes 2” below present elevations
‐ Clean and fill cracking wider than ¼”
‐ Construct minimum 1 ½” thick asphalt concrete level course
‐ Install pavement reinforcing fabric using 0.20 gallons per square yard PG 70-10
asphalt binder
‐ Construct minimum 2 ½” thick conventional asphalt concrete overlay wearing
surface
28 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
ALTERNATIVE 4 | Raise Crown ~2” above present elevations
Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (RHMA) Overlay
Alternative Four utilizes streetwide cold milling to remove one or more layers of previous
asphalt concrete overlays followed by placement of an asphalt concrete level course and a new
asphalt rubber hot mix wearing surface. The asphalt rubber hot mix materials are being utilized
to moderate future premature reflective cracking. ARHM may exhibit a lesser resistance to
repetitive power steering movements associated with vehicle parking.
‐ Design new finish elevations 2” above existing grades
‐ Reconstruct eastbound number one lane from 350’ west of Barranca Avenue to
Barranca Avenue
‐ Reconstruct the eastbound number two lane including right turn lanes
‐ Reconstruct the westbound number two lanes including right turn lanes
‐ Cold mill remainder of number one lanes 2” below present elevations
‐ Clean and fill cracking wider than ¼”
‐ Construct minimum 2” thick asphalt concrete level course
‐ Construct minimum 2” thick asphalt rubber hot mix overlay wearing surface
9.0 REPLACEMENT SECTION ALTERNATIVES
Structural deficiencies along E Alosta Avenue are generally limited to the number two lanes
generally coinciding with the right wheel path or outer ½ of the travel lane. Replacement
sections are provided for reference use within the reconstruction areas based on the provided
Traffic Index. Replacement section alternatives have been developed based on the subgrade R-
Value strengths determined during laboratory testing.
The prevailing back calculated R-value strengths based on in place strength testing range from
less than 15 to 30. The lesser field values may be the result of the many separating layers of
asphalt concrete encountered during field coring activities. R-value strengths determined
during laboratory testing range from 47 to 69. Combining these criteria, and based on current
29 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
practice within the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, a 47 subgrade R-value should be utilized
for design.
Traffic Index: 10.0
Asphalt Concrete
Aggregate Base
95% Min.
90% Min.
n/a
95% Min.
6"
8"
7"
6"
Subgrade Compaction
Requirement (Upper 6")
Aggregate Base Compaction
Requirement
ASPHALT CONCRETE REPLACEMENT SECTIONS
Type
DESIGN R-VALUE: 47
ALT. A ALT. B ALT. C
T.I. 10.0 T.I. 10.0 T.I. 10.0
10 1/2"
n/a
95% Min.
90% Min.
Traffic Index: 9.0
Asphalt Concrete
Aggregate Base
95% Min.
90% Min.
n/a
95% Min.
5 1/2"
7 1/2"
6"
6 1/2"
Subgrade Compaction
Requirement (Upper 6")
Aggregate Base Compaction
Requirement
ASPHALT CONCRETE REPLACEMENT SECTIONS
Type
DESIGN R-VALUE: 47
ALT. A ALT. B ALT. C
T.I. 9.0 T.I. 9.0 T.I. 9.0
10"
n/a
95% Min.
90% Min.
30 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
10.0 SUBGRADE CONDITIONS
Soft or wet subgrade conditions are not anticipated to be prevalent along the length of the
project. Where wet grade is encountered during reconstruction or new construction, additional
time should be provided within the construction schedule to permit drying, processing, and
recompaction of the subgrade prior to placement of the structural section. Where time
constraints do not permit suitable drying, or where perimeter conditions include uncontrollable
water sources, additional measures may be necessary.
10.01 Conventional Section Procedure
The exposed subgrade should be inspected during excavation and prior to placement of
aggregate base. Where conditions are not firm and unyielding, use of a Geotextile
should be considered. The excavation should be extended to provide for construction
of a minimum 12” thick aggregate base section or aggregate base section consistent
with the design replacement section, whichever is greater. Where subgrade conditions
prohibit accurate grading, the subgrade should be excavated an additional 4” for a total
of 16” or the design aggregate base section plus 4”, whichever is greater.
Geotextile should then be placed over the prepared grade. The type of Geotextile and
width of overlap will be a function of conditions encountered at the time of
construction. Aggregate base should then be end dumped and spread in minimum 12”
lifts. No equipment should be permitted to operate on the exposed fabric or on top of
the aggregate base where the thickness is less than 12”. Where rut depths exceed 4”, a
qualified pavement engineer should be contacted to review conditions and provide
specific recommendations.
10.02 Full Depth Asphalt Concrete Procedure
The exposed subgrade should be inspected during excavation. Where conditions are
not firm and unyielding the exposed subgrade should be over excavated equivalent to
the approximate depth of rutting left by trucks and equipment during excavation, to a
4” maximum additional depth. Where rut depths exceed 4”, a qualified pavement
31 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
engineer should be contacted to review conditions and provide specific
recommendations.
A single 6” to 8” thick (Type B PG 70-10) asphalt concrete layer should be end dumped
and spread with suitable equipment. The asphalt concrete shall then be lightly rolled
for grade control purposes only. Relative compaction requirement should be waived for
the initial pavement layer.
The completed layer should be permitted to cool for a minimum of 15 hours prior to
placement of subsequent layers. No trucks should be permitted to operate on the
exposed subgrade or on the asphalt concrete layer until a suitable cooling period has
expired.
All subsequent layers should be placed in accordance with requirements of the SSPWC
for grade control, layer thickness and compaction.
11.0 MATERIAL RECOMMENDATIONS
11.01 Aggregate Base
Aggregate base sections may utilize Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB) or Crushed
Miscellaneous Base (CMB) complying with applicable sections of the Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction, latest edition.
11.02 Asphalt Concrete – New Construction Asphalt Concrete Base Course
Asphalt concrete shall be Type B PG 64-10 complying with Section 203-6 ASPHALT
CONCRETE of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, latest edition.
11.03 Materials – Asphalt Concrete – Leveling Course and Wearing Surface
Asphalt concrete shall be Type C PG 64-10 complying with Section 203-6 ASPHALT
CONCRETE of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, latest edition.
32 HR Green/City of Azusa E. Alosta Avenue| June 2017 Project No. 42310
11.04 - Geotextile
Geotextile Fabric shall be Nonwoven Fabric conforming to the minimum requirements
as set forth in Section 213 Engineering Fabrics Type 180N as defined in the Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction, latest edition.
11.05 – Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix
Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) shall be Type ARHM-GG-C complying with Section 203-
11 ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (ARHM)
APPENDIX A
STREET IMPROVEMENT
RECOMMENDATION PLANS
APPENDIX B
DEFLECTION STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
SUMMARY TABLES
Structural Analysis Summary Table
Date: 2017-06-08 08:12:53
Client:
Location: Azusa Project #: 42310
E Alosta Avenue
Location: Azusa Citrus Avenue to Barrance Avenue Date: 2017-06-08 08:12:53
Project: 42310
Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Limits FWD80th TD80th 'T' T.I. TDallow % Red. GE AC NSL
00+00 to 03+17 11.38 13.66 0.50 9.0 14 0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 5 0.02 0.01 15
10.0 12 12 0.05 0.02 10
03+17 to 13+30 8.28 9.93 0.50 9.0 14 0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 0 0.00 0.00 20
10.0 12 0 0.00 0.00 20
13+30 to 15+03 11.01 13.21 0.50 9.0 14 0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 2 0.01 0.00 19
10.0 12 9 0.03 0.01 12
15+03 to 18+01 8.38 10.05 0.50 9.0 14 0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 0 0.00 0.00 20
10.0 12 0 0.00 0.00 20
18+01 to 20+05 11.66 14.00 0.50 9.0 14 -0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 7 0.02 0.01 13
10.0 12 14 0.06 0.03 9
20+05 to 23+02 15.00 18.00 0.50 9.0 14 22 0.14 0.07 5
9.5 13 28 0.21 0.11 3
10.0 12 33 0.29 0.15 2
23+02 to 26+66 22.15 26.58 0.50 9.0 14 47 0.57 0.30 0
9.5 13 51 0.66 0.35 0
10.0 12 55 0.74 0.39 0
Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Limits FWD80th TD80th 'T' T.I. TDallow % Red. GE AC NSL
00+00 to 06+54 15.31 18.37 0.50 9.0 14 24 0.16 0.09 4
9.5 13 29 0.23 0.12 3
10.0 12 35 0.33 0.17 2
06+54 to 09+51 12.14 14.57 0.50 9.0 14 4 0.01 0.01 16
9.5 13 11 0.04 0.02 10
10.0 12 18 0.09 0.05 7
09+51 to 12+01 9.21 11.06 0.50 9.0 14 0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 0 0.00 0.00 20
10.0 12 0 0.00 0.00 20
12+01 to 14+53 13.76 16.51 0.50 9.0 14 15 0.07 0.04 8
9.5 13 21 0.12 0.06 5
Page 1 of 2LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
7/10/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
10.0 12 27 0.20 0.11 3
14+53 to 26+59 11.35 13.62 0.50 9.0 14 0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 5 0.02 0.01 15
10.0 12 12 0.05 0.02 10
Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Limits FWD80th TD80th 'T' T.I. TDallow % Red. GE AC NSL
00+00 to 05+52 10.49 12.59 0.50 9.0 14 0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 0 0.00 0.00 20
10.0 12 5 0.02 0.01 16
05+52 to 09+52 26.19 31.42 0.50 9.0 14 55 0.74 0.39 0
9.5 13 59 0.83 0.44 0
10.0 12 62 0.89 0.47 0
09+52 to 19+55 16.30 19.55 0.50 9.0 14 28 0.21 0.11 3
9.5 13 34 0.31 0.16 2
10.0 12 39 0.40 0.21 1
19+55 to 26+77 22.21 26.65 0.50 9.0 14 47 0.57 0.30 0
9.5 13 51 0.66 0.35 0
10.0 12 55 0.74 0.39 0
Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Limits FWD80th TD80th 'T' T.I. TDallow % Red. GE AC NSL
00+00 to 06+00 29.95 35.94 0.50 9.0 14 61 0.87 0.46 0
9.5 13 64 0.94 0.49 0
10.0 12 67 1.00 0.53 0
06+00 to 08+25 19.11 22.93 0.50 9.0 14 39 0.40 0.21 1
9.5 13 43 0.48 0.25 1
10.0 12 48 0.59 0.31 0
08+25 to 16+01 26.04 31.25 0.50 9.0 14 55 0.74 0.39 0
9.5 13 58 0.81 0.42 0
10.0 12 62 0.89 0.47 0
16+01 to 19+88 14.06 16.87 0.50 9.0 14 17 0.09 0.05 7
9.5 13 23 0.15 0.08 4
10.0 12 29 0.23 0.12 3
19+88 to 22+02 11.23 13.48 0.50 9.0 14 0 0.00 0.00 20
9.5 13 4 0.01 0.01 16
10.0 12 11 0.04 0.02 11
22+02 to 26+79 17.73 21.28 0.50 9.0 14 34 0.31 0.16 2
9.5 13 39 0.40 0.21 1
10.0 12 44 0.51 0.27 1
Page 2 of 2LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
7/10/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
APPENDIX C
CORE LOCATION PLAN
AND CORE SAMPLE LOG
CORING RESULTS
Cores Obtained: June 2017 Technician(s): KH/DL/PTC
Core Lane Dir.
Total
Pavement
Cross-
Section Type Aggregate
Base (AB)Type Moisture
Content
6/1 1 E 8 1/4"
3/4''AC 7 1/4''AB 2.6%
Lateral and Longitudinal Position 1 3/4''AC
600' E N. Citrus Avenue 1 5/8''AC
20' N 1 5/8''AC
Field Notes:2 1/2''AC
Longitudinal and Lateral Cracking; Core Separated Between 2nd & 3 Lift
6/2 2 E 6 3/8"
1 1/4''AC none AB 8.4%
Lateral and Longitudinal Position 1 1/8''AC
1200' E N. Citrus Avenue 1 1/8''AC
5' N 1 7/8''AC
Field Notes:
Longitudinal and Lateral Cracking
6/3 1 E 9 1/2"
1 3/8''AC none AB 6.3%
Lateral and Longitudinal Position 2''AC
1700' E N. Citrus Avenue 1 5/8''AC
20' N 1 1/4''AC
Field Notes:3 1/4''AC
Longitudinal and Lateral Cracking; Core Separated Between 1st and 2nd Lift
6/4 2 E 7 3/4"
1 1/2''AC 10 3/4''AB 11.9%
Lateral and Longitudinal Position 3/4''AC
2305' E N. Citrus Avenue 2 3/4''AC
8' N 2 3/4''AC
Field Notes:
Alligator Cracking; Core Separated Between 3rd and 4th Lift
East Alosta Avenue Brown Silty
Fine Sand
Curb Face
Silty Sand
Curb Face
East Alosta Avenue Brown Gravelly
Silty Fine Sand
Curb Face
East Alosta Avenue Brown Coarse Sand
Curb Face
East Alosta Avenue Brown Gravelly
Project No. 42310
East Alosta Avenue - Azusa, California
Client: HR Green Incorporated
PAVEMENT CORING DATA SOIL BORING DATA
Location Soil Type (Maximum 3'
depth)
CORING RESULTS
Cores Obtained: June 2017 Technician(s): KH/DL/PTC
Core Lane Dir.
Total
Pavement
Cross-
Section Type Aggregate
Base (AB)Type Moisture
Content
6/5 2 W 5 1/2"
3/4''AC 7 1/2''AB 9.5%
Lateral and Longitudinal Position 2''AC
600' W Barranca Avenue 2 3/4''AC
8' S
Field Notes:
Alligator Cracking
6/6 1 W 12 1/2"
1 1/2''AC none AB 7.8%
Lateral and Longitudinal Position 1 1/2''AC
1125' W Barranca Avenue 1 1/4''AC
20' S 3/8''AC
1 5/8''AC
2 1/4''AC
Field Notes:4''AC
Longitudinal and Lateral Cracking; Core Separated Between 1st and 2nd Lift
6/7 2 W 8 1/2"
1 1/2''AC none AB 8.2%
Lateral and Longitudinal Position 1 3/4''AC
1730' W Barranca Avenue 1 1/2''AC
10' S 3 3/4''AC
Field Notes:
Alligator Cracking; Core Separated Between 1st and 2nd and 2nd and 3rd Lifts
6/8 1 W 13"
2 1/4''AC none AB 13.5%
Lateral and Longitudinal Position 2''AC
2400' W Barranca Avenue 2 1/8''AC
23' S 2 5/8''AC
Field Notes:4''AC
Longitudinal and Lateral Cracking; Core Separated between 1st and 2nd and 4th and 5th Lifts; Bottom Lift Broke Apart
Project No. 42310
East Alosta Avenue - Azusa, California
Client: HR Green Incorporated
PAVEMENT CORING DATA SOIL BORING DATA
Location Soil Type (Maximum 3'
depth)
East Alosta Avenue Brown Silty
Fine Sand
Curb Face
East Alosta Avenue Brown Silty
Fine Sand
Curb Face
East Alosta Avenue Brown Silty
Fine Sand
Curb Face
East Alosta Avenue Brown Silty
Fine Sand
Curb Face
APPENDIX D
IN-FIELD DEFLECTION TESTING DATA
E Alosta Avenue
Location: Azusa Citrus Avenue to Barrance Avenue Date: 2017-06-08 08:12:53
Project: 42310
Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
00+00 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Begin Testing E Alosta Avenue; Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane
1; CL of Citrus Avenue
Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 0.00000° Lat, 0.00000° Lon
Limit NIS
00+39 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Median, Painted Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 0.00000° Lat, 0.00000° Lon
Limit NIS
01+05 (test 1)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 8.51333 GPS: 34.12871° Lat, -117.88974° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.59 8.2 6.85 6.3 5.52 4.84 3.71 2.81 10.61 6.89 7.75
8.69 8.98 6.78 6.21 5.46 4.78 3.68 2.77 6.26 6.81 7.61
8.67 8.36 6.75 6.22 5.46 4.79 3.65 2.76 9.96 6.78 7.62
01+99 (test 2)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 11.53 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88944° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.94 11.96 9.45 8.78 7.86 6.53 4.75 3.21 2.4 9.99 10.62
8.72 11.29 9.14 8.52 7.65 6.35 4.62 3.12 2.35 9.62 10.24
8.76 11.34 9.12 8.48 7.62 6.32 4.6 3.16 2.38 9.57 10.2
03+17 (test 3)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.29 GPS: 34.12868° Lat, -117.88905° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.23 10.39 7.54 6.62 5.43 4.25 2.93 2.04 1.47 7.96 9.07
9.25 10.29 7.47 6.53 5.36 4.24 2.92 2.03 1.5 7.83 8.99
9.23 10.19 7.44 6.53 5.37 4.18 2.89 2 1.44 7.77 8.94
04+05 (test 4)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Page 1 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 5.69333 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88876° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.4 5.76 4.7 4.33 3.75 3.08 2.21 1.58 1.16 4.69 5.04
9.28 5.68 4.63 4.26 3.7 3.06 2.18 1.57 1.16 4.55 4.93
9.28 5.64 4.58 4.23 3.66 3.02 2.16 1.56 1.13 4.51 4.94
04+96 (test 5)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 5.50667 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88847° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.13 5.59 4.03 3.62 3.07 2.54 1.89 1.44 1.1 4.12 4.9
9.01 5.47 3.97 3.56 3.04 2.46 1.84 1.41 1.11 4.04 4.8
8.98 5.46 3.95 3.53 3 2.43 1.83 1.39 1.09 4.07 4.72
06+01 (test 6)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 4.52 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88812° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.13 4.56 3.42 3.1 2.65 2.2 1.69 1.27 1.19 3.12 3.82
9.11 4.5 3.36 3.07 2.65 2.24 1.69 1.28 1.14 3.08 3.7
9.01 4.5 3.36 3.05 2.64 2.24 1.69 1.26 1.2 3.03 3.67
06+94 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: CL of Powell Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88812° Lon
Limit NIS
07+02 (test 7)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 8.54667 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88779° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.86 8.61 6.49 6 5.37 4.56 3.49 2.61 2.1 6.41 7.44
8.76 8.45 6.36 5.9 5.26 4.47 3.45 2.53 2.07 6.27 7.28
8.96 8.58 6.47 5.96 5.35 4.54 3.51 2.62 2.19 6.33 7.36
08+01 (test 8)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 7.79 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88747° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.13 7.9 6.83 6.38 5.66 4.79 3.67 2.81 2.08 6.55 7.32
9.03 7.73 6.69 6.24 5.55 4.73 3.61 2.77 2.06 6.44 7.15
9.06 7.74 6.71 6.26 5.61 4.73 3.62 2.79 2.08 6.44 7.15
09+01 (test 9)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 8.99333 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88714° Lon
Limit NIS
Page 2 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.01 9.12 7.6 7.05 6.21 5.31 4.03 2.99 2.3 7.54 8.28
8.91 8.94 7.44 6.88 6.09 5.18 3.95 2.97 2.27 7.43 8.11
8.89 8.92 7.41 6.87 6.07 5.18 3.93 2.95 2.26 7.37 8.04
09+49 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Median, Raised/Planted Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88714° Lon
Limit NIS
10+11 (test 10)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 7.49333 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88678° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.96 7.61 5.88 5.29 4.54 3.75 2.78 2 1.34 6.28 7.11
8.91 7.45 5.76 5.21 4.46 3.71 2.74 1.95 1.35 6.12 6.99
9.01 7.42 5.75 5.15 4.42 3.69 2.72 1.97 1.35 6.04 6.88
11+10 (test 11)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 8.20333 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88645° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.01 8.37 6.88 6.45 4.49 3.84 2.91 2.24 1.69 6.68 7.49
8.89 8.16 6.72 6.31 4.43 3.77 2.87 2.16 1.64 6.51 7.29
8.94 8.08 6.65 6.25 4.37 3.77 2.86 2.17 1.64 6.45 7.26
12+01 (test 12)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 5.54333 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88616° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.35 5.62 3.63 3.14 2.53 2 1.35 0.95 0.77 2.98 4.6
9.23 5.54 3.65 3.14 2.57 2.02 1.4 1.04 0.83 3.06 4.53
9.5 5.47 3.86 3.33 2.69 2.2 1.48 1.08 0.9 2.79 4.1
13+30 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: CL of Calera Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88616° Lon
Limit NIS
14+03 (test 13)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.9533 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88550° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.96 11.04 7.84 7.31 6.69 5.77 3.9 2.75 2.06 8.43 9.5
8.86 10.89 7.74 7.23 6.63 5.71 3.86 2.73 2.02 8.26 9.36
8.84 10.93 7.82 7.3 6.67 5.74 3.87 2.77 2.1 8.36 9.36
Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Page 3 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
15+03 (test 14)
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.3733 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88517° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.76 10.49 5.87 5.04 4.13 3.21 2.34 1.68 1.32 6.93 8.61
8.74 10.33 5.83 5 4.11 3.22 2.34 1.72 1.35 6.82 8.45
8.67 10.3 5.84 5.04 4.14 3.26 2.35 1.7 1.36 6.8 8.41
16+03 (test 15)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 6.92 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88484° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.96 7.03 5.12 4.56 3.76 2.13 1.7 1.35 1.16 5.29 6.36
8.89 6.85 5.01 4.46 3.67 2.14 1.68 1.34 1.11 5.16 6.14
8.96 6.88 5.06 4.5 3.73 2.13 1.68 1.35 1.11 5.19 6.14
17+01 (test 16)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 8.25333 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88455° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.79 8.34 6.93 6.48 5.82 4.89 3.79 2.73 2.03 6.75 7.74
8.76 8.21 6.83 6.39 5.76 4.86 3.78 2.7 1.96 6.64 7.6
8.74 8.21 6.81 6.39 5.73 4.82 3.75 2.7 1.95 6.59 7.55
17+99 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Trench Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88455° Lon
Limit NIS
18+01 (test 17)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Test Taken on Trench Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 3.90333 GPS: 34.12870° Lat, -117.88419° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.33 3.96 2.77 2.51 2.2 1.93 1.47 1.28 1.05 2.93 3.46
9.08 3.89 2.75 2.47 2.19 1.89 1.46 1.28 1.08 2.88 3.35
9.01 3.86 2.71 2.46 2.16 1.89 1.45 1.25 1.03 2.87 3.34
19+10 (test 18)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 11.0667 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88383° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.81 11.13 7.7 6.84 5.92 4.95 3.72 2.76 2.06 8.3 9.56
8.76 10.97 7.57 6.74 5.82 4.87 3.66 2.69 2.01 8.18 9.35
8.86 11.1 7.66 6.82 5.89 4.9 3.72 2.74 2.07 8.15 9.42
20+05 (test 19)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 11.6133 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88352° Lon
Page 4 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.11 11.73 9.09 7.94 6.38 5.15 3.22 2.09 1.05 9.01 10.06
9.33 11.66 9.11 7.96 6.46 5.22 3.27 2.11 1.11 9.1 10.04
9.16 11.45 8.94 7.84 6.37 5.1 3.19 2.09 1.09 8.97 9.91
21+02 (test 20)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.7067 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88320° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.94 14.92 11.63 10.81 9.57 8.01 6.07 4.57 3.36 11.68 13.04
8.79 14.55 11.41 10.61 9.42 7.84 5.96 4.49 3.34 11.35 12.7
8.94 14.65 11.51 10.68 9.52 7.97 6.02 4.54 3.33 11.51 12.8
22+04 (test 21)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 15.0633 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88286° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.98 15.3 12.76 10.96 8.22 6.83 4.92 3.47 2.61 12.04 13.47
8.91 14.93 12.56 10.76 8.08 6.72 4.87 3.49 3.27 11.77 13.16
8.91 14.96 12.55 10.76 8.08 6.7 4.84 3.45 2.55 11.8 13.1
22+66 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: LTP Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88286° Lon
Limit NIS
23+02 (test 22)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.38 GPS: 34.12869° Lat, -117.88254° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.84 14.73 11.41 10.27 8.87 5.78 4 2.67 2.02 11.66 13.77
8.69 14.37 11.22 10.1 8.8 5.69 3.96 2.67 2.01 11.4 13.42
8.57 14.04 10.96 9.96 8.65 5.6 3.91 2.63 1.91 11.15 13.09
24+02 (test 23)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 18.1567 GPS: 34.12868° Lat, -117.88222° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.91 18.44 15.08 13.36 11.05 8.88 5.6 3.82 2.79 15.98 17.06
8.96 18.09 14.85 13.18 10.91 8.74 5.51 3.8 2.59 15.72 16.76
8.79 17.94 14.72 13.09 10.84 8.72 5.48 3.79 2.59 15.57 16.61
25+04 (test 24)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 22.6767 GPS: 34.12868° Lat, -117.88189° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.81 22.97 17.31 15.55 12.94 10.49 6.49 3.95 3.23 15.81 17.93
Page 5 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
8.64 22.56 17.06 15.32 12.8 10.31 6.43 3.86 3.17 15.48 17.58
8.69 22.5 17.01 15.29 12.73 10.27 6.41 3.86 3.16 15.46 17.47
26+00 (test 25)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 11.6367 GPS: 34.12868° Lat, -117.88157° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.03 11.83 9.54 8.68 7.45 6.24 4.41 3.18 2.54 9.59 10.57
8.84 11.63 9.33 8.54 7.33 6.09 4.31 3.18 2.49 9.41 10.34
8.76 11.45 9.25 8.44 7.27 6.04 4.34 3.19 2.5 9.3 10.23
26+66 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 1
Notes: CL of Barrance Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12868° Lat, -117.88157° Lon
Limit NIS
Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
00+00 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1; CL of Barranca Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12868° Lat, -117.88157° Lon
Limit NIS
00+41 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Median, Raised Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12868° Lat, -117.88157° Lon
Limit NIS
00+69 (test 26)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 12.5033 GPS: 34.12876° Lat, -117.88161° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.13 12.62 10.44 9.6 8.34 7.12 5.16 3.8 2.79 11.8 12.24
9.11 12.44 10.34 9.5 8.29 7.03 5.13 3.79 2.79 11.61 11.99
9.2 12.45 10.33 9.52 8.31 7.05 5.15 3.81 2.77 11.64 12.03
01+53 (test 27)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 15.6133 GPS: 34.12876° Lat, -117.88188° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.98 15.88 13.18 12.26 10.76 8.82 6.03 4.33 2.99 14.3 15.07
8.96 15.6 12.94 12.08 10.64 8.74 5.99 4.29 2.99 13.98 14.71
8.91 15.36 12.81 11.93 10.47 8.59 5.91 4.19 2.94 13.8 14.56
02+55 (test 28)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Page 6 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
Avg FWD1: 15.5 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88221° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.98 15.84 12.13 11.11 9.6 7.97 5.29 4.02 2.97 12.05 13.59
8.81 15.34 11.72 10.77 9.31 7.72 5.14 3.88 2.93 11.7 13.14
8.84 15.32 11.72 10.76 9.33 7.74 5.15 3.89 2.93 11.68 13.09
03+13 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Median, Raised/Planted Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88221° Lon
Limit NIS
03+52 (test 29)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.1767 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88253° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.74 14.4 11.65 10.64 9.22 6.6 4.5 3.23 2.45 12.92 13.93
8.67 14.08 11.38 10.47 9.08 6.36 4.44 3.22 2.44 12.67 13.64
8.79 14.05 11.43 10.48 9.12 6.4 4.51 3.25 2.46 12.63 13.57
04+50 (test 30)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.9 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88286° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.76 11 8.09 7.26 6.17 5.08 3.58 2.42 1.75 8.28 9.56
8.72 10.92 8.07 7.22 6.14 5.06 3.58 2.44 1.79 8.22 9.46
8.74 10.78 7.97 7.16 6.07 4.99 3.5 2.39 1.75 8.11 9.34
05+53 (test 31)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.0733 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88320° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.64 14.34 11.7 10.47 9.12 7.53 5.12 3.52 2.48 11.27 12.4
8.52 13.92 11.42 10.22 8.9 7.35 4.98 3.43 2.36 10.97 12.03
8.59 13.96 11.48 10.25 8.93 7.38 5.03 3.45 2.39 10.98 12.02
06+54 (test 32)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.5133 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88352° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.84 14.66 14.08 12.88 10.98 8.46 5.94 4.02 2.69 14.55 16.06
8.67 14.42 13.79 12.69 10.89 8.31 5.86 3.94 2.59 14.17 15.64
8.69 14.46 13.78 12.6 10.78 8.29 5.84 3.96 2.67 14.15 15.57
07+52 (test 33)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.9067 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88384° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
Page 7 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
8.67 11.02 8.9 8.09 6.98 5.84 3.98 2.61 1.81 8.57 9.94
8.72 10.87 8.75 7.93 6.87 5.73 3.89 2.51 1.8 8.41 9.72
8.67 10.83 8.77 7.96 6.89 5.74 3.92 2.6 1.85 8.37 9.67
08+59 (test 34)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks; Lateral Trench Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.1733 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88420° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.94 10.35 8.1 7.5 6.56 5.18 3.74 2.79 2.16 8.66 9.39
8.76 10.07 7.91 7.32 6.42 5.07 3.66 2.74 2.03 8.46 9.2
8.86 10.1 7.91 7.32 6.39 5.04 3.65 2.75 2.07 8.45 9.18
09+51 (test 35)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 12.4333 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88450° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.86 12.62 10.49 9.83 8.91 7.71 4.6 3.54 2.69 10.02 11.12
8.74 12.36 10.27 9.65 8.72 7.55 4.8 3.47 2.59 9.82 10.85
8.81 12.32 10.28 9.67 8.73 7.58 4.61 3.44 2.59 9.77 10.83
10+35 (test 36)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 5.8 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88478° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.03 5.89 4.35 3.95 3.37 2.81 1.71 1.28 1.11 4.07 4.7
8.91 5.77 4.29 3.87 3.32 2.76 1.7 1.28 1.13 3.93 4.61
8.84 5.74 4.22 3.85 3.31 2.75 1.7 1.26 1.02 3.98 4.57
11+50 (test 37)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 8.92 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88515° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.74 9.02 6.67 5.95 5.07 4.15 2.96 2.09 1.55 7.08 8.53
8.67 8.94 6.57 5.89 5.02 4.1 2.85 2.09 1.59 7.03 8.36
8.74 8.8 6.52 5.88 5.01 4.08 2.81 2.07 1.56 6.85 8.24
12+01 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: LTP Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88515° Lon
Limit NIS
12+59 (test 38)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 13.59 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88550° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.96 13.89 10.81 9.72 8.23 6.81 4.71 3.07 2.07 11.66 12.56
8.81 13.51 10.53 9.49 7.98 6.6 4.58 2.98 1.99 11.49 12.27
8.72 13.37 10.44 9.41 7.97 6.57 4.6 3.05 2.08 11.45 12.16
Page 8 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
13+39 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: CL of Calera Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88550° Lon
Limit NIS
14+53 (test 39)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 11.78 GPS: 34.12878° Lat, -117.88616° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.79 11.95 9.15 8.31 7.2 6.09 4.33 2.63 2.15 10.02 11.18
8.76 11.73 8.99 8.18 7.08 6.01 4.27 2.6 2.1 9.78 10.94
8.76 11.66 8.93 8.12 7.06 6 4.24 2.55 2.06 9.71 10.82
14+83 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: LTP Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12878° Lat, -117.88616° Lon
Limit NIS
15+55 (test 40)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.17 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88650° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.96 10.36 8.02 7.14 6.04 4.89 3.34 2.29 1.63 8.29 9.44
8.76 10.11 7.81 6.96 5.88 4.77 3.26 2.24 1.59 8.05 9.21
8.79 10.04 7.81 6.95 5.85 4.75 3.26 2.23 1.58 8.02 9.16
16+51 (test 41)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 6.51667 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88679° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.94 6.59 4.92 4.36 3.62 2.89 1.64 1.25 1.09 4.88 5.7
8.96 6.48 4.86 4.26 3.58 2.86 1.6 1.26 1.07 4.88 5.62
8.96 6.48 4.88 4.32 3.61 2.9 1.63 1.28 1.08 4.88 5.62
17+51 (test 42)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.6933 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88712° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.96 10.93 7.98 7.02 5.84 4.53 2.91 1.89 1.33 7.96 9.76
8.84 10.59 7.77 6.88 5.69 4.43 2.84 1.89 1.35 7.73 9.41
8.84 10.56 7.73 6.83 5.67 4.45 2.86 1.88 1.33 7.67 9.35
18+54 (test 43)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 9.21333 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88746° Lon
Limit NIS
Page 9 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.94 9.35 7.68 7.03 6.12 5.09 3.7 2.66 1.97 7.54 8.32
8.91 9.23 7.58 6.93 6.04 5.04 3.68 2.62 1.92 7.41 8.2
8.76 9.06 7.43 6.82 5.96 4.96 3.63 2.62 1.9 7.29 8.09
19+51 (test 44)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 9.73667 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88777° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.86 9.83 7.75 7 5.97 4.88 3.47 2.43 1.72 8.27 9.22
8.67 9.69 7.58 6.86 5.85 4.79 3.35 2.39 1.69 8.09 9.01
8.72 9.69 7.61 6.9 5.91 4.82 3.39 2.4 1.74 8.19 9.06
19+73 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: CL of Powell Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88777° Lon
Limit NIS
20+52 (test 45)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 5.66 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88812° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.13 5.74 4.41 3.97 3.12 2.57 1.81 1.3 1.07 4.25 4.94
8.96 5.64 4.32 3.88 3.06 2.5 1.77 1.3 1.06 4.08 4.83
8.96 5.6 4.31 3.86 3.04 2.46 1.78 1.31 1.06 4.07 4.78
21+60 (test 46)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 5.85667 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88846° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.23 6 3.77 3.24 2.67 2.09 1.52 1.12 0.89 3.86 4.77
9.01 5.81 3.7 3.17 2.61 2.07 1.49 1.09 0.9 3.77 4.62
9.13 5.76 3.66 3.17 2.62 2.05 1.49 1.1 0.88 3.75 4.53
22+45 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Median, Painted Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88846° Lon
Limit NIS
22+45 (test 47)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.58 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88875° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.96 10.73 8.43 7.68 6.72 5.58 4.03 2.86 2.05 8.37 9.31
8.86 10.49 8.26 7.53 6.59 5.52 3.98 2.84 2 8.22 9.15
8.94 10.52 8.28 7.55 6.58 5.52 3.97 2.83 2 8.21 9.14
Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Page 10 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
23+05
Notes: LTP Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88875° Lon
Limit NIS
23+50 (test 48)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Near Traffic Sensors Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 6.82333 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88910° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
9.2 6.94 4.95 4.35 3.73 3.08 2.27 1.7 1.34 5.17 5.77
9.03 6.85 4.95 4.3 3.7 3.06 2.25 1.66 1.29 5.03 5.68
8.96 6.68 4.87 4.23 3.61 3.01 2.22 1.65 1.3 4.91 5.55
24+60 (test 49)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 9.63667 GPS: 34.12877° Lat, -117.88945° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.69 9.7 7.96 7.42 6.65 5.68 4.11 3.04 2.09 8.14 8.92
8.67 9.62 7.91 7.36 6.59 5.65 4.1 3.04 2.06 8.03 8.83
8.72 9.59 7.89 7.36 6.57 5.67 4.11 3.02 2.11 8.03 8.79
25+60 (test 50)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.8533 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88979° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.52 15.02 11.08 9.8 8.05 6.45 4.41 3.13 2.29 11.53 13.45
8.57 14.8 10.94 9.69 7.98 6.41 4.39 3.14 2.32 11.3 13.09
8.59 14.74 10.93 9.67 7.95 6.39 4.41 3.15 2.32 11.23 12.98
26+59 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 1
Notes: CL of Citrus Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88979° Lon
Limit NIS
Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
00+00 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2; CL of Citrus Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88979° Lon
Limit NIS
00+50 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Begin Curb and Gutter Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88979° Lon
Limit NIS
Page 11 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
00+83 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88979° Lon
Limit NIS
00+88 (test 51)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 9.8 GPS: 34.12868° Lat, -117.88981° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.59 9.93 8.48 7.76 6.74 5.67 4.12 2.71 2.11 8.35 9.3
8.5 9.76 8.33 7.67 6.67 5.64 4.15 2.76 2.12 8.19 9.13
8.54 9.71 8.29 7.63 6.64 5.61 4.12 2.78 2.13 8.21 9.07
01+60 (test 52)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.35 GPS: 34.12866° Lat, -117.88957° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.57 10.6 8.23 7.12 5.62 4.02 2.18 1.6 1.24 8.6 9.82
8.4 10.25 7.95 6.91 5.46 3.99 2.11 1.56 1.28 8.24 9.47
8.52 10.2 7.9 6.9 5.43 3.96 2.12 1.52 1.29 8.24 9.38
02+62 (test 53)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 17.9733 GPS: 34.12866° Lat, -117.88925° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.62 18.49 13.36 11.41 8.81 5.1 3.38 2.27 1.7 13.12 15.58
8.54 17.77 12.87 11.07 8.59 4.96 3.29 2.24 1.69 12.63 15
8.57 17.66 12.87 11.07 8.61 5 3.29 2.2 1.66 12.52 14.92
03+53 (test 54)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 7.68 GPS: 34.12866° Lat, -117.88896° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.84 7.78 5.27 4.44 3.45 2.61 1.63 1.14 0.99 6.09 7.36
8.91 7.65 5.22 4.39 3.43 2.6 1.63 1.14 1.02 6.02 7.2
8.86 7.61 5.19 4.37 3.41 2.59 1.63 1.14 0.96 5.96 7.14
04+52 (test 55)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 7.61667 GPS: 34.12866° Lat, -117.88863° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.91 7.76 5.04 4 2.71 1.98 1.34 1.08 0.88 4.51 5.81
8.86 7.61 4.94 3.95 2.69 2 1.34 1.07 0.87 4.43 5.69
8.84 7.48 4.88 3.91 2.64 1.94 1.28 1.01 0.86 4.37 5.64
05+52 (test 56)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Page 12 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
Avg FWD1: 10.7567 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88829° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.98 10.97 7.77 6.76 5.38 4.1 2.44 1.62 1.23 7.47 8.8
8.94 10.71 7.66 6.65 5.3 4.07 2.42 1.6 1.21 7.33 8.63
8.91 10.59 7.57 6.61 5.25 3.99 2.38 1.62 1.22 7.27 8.55
06+51 (test 57)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 23.9267 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88797° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.54 24.64 18.47 16.33 11.88 7.48 3.92 2.23 1.58 17.18 20.58
8.42 23.68 17.89 15.98 11.64 7.31 3.83 2.2 1.58 16.65 19.75
8.45 23.46 17.85 15.94 11.59 7.26 3.84 2.22 1.58 16.48 19.56
06+96 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: CL of Powell Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88797° Lon
Limit NIS
07+50 (test 58)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 26.2967 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88765° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.3 26.64 21.23 18.05 14.33 10.59 5.34 1.8 2.36 21.39 24.28
8.35 26.23 21.03 17.94 14.27 10.54 5.34 1.89 2.33 21.12 23.91
8.3 26.02 20.91 17.82 14.17 10.5 5.26 1.8 2.29 20.87 23.7
08+52 (test 59)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 25.27 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88731° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.52 25.68 18.88 16.48 13.29 10.1 5.65 2.75 2.01 19.99 22.55
8.64 25.32 18.68 16.31 13.17 10.02 5.63 2.75 2.04 19.67 22.16
8.54 24.81 18.36 16.04 12.96 9.93 5.55 2.75 2 19.33 21.8
09+52 (test 60)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 20.0267 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88699° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.25 20.31 14.67 12.63 9.77 7.05 4.38 2.89 2.09 16.06 18.38
8.28 19.95 14.42 12.44 9.68 7.01 4.4 2.92 2.08 15.68 18.06
8.28 19.82 14.38 12.42 9.65 6.99 4.35 2.87 2.08 15.58 17.91
10+54 (test 61)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 4.90667 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88666° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
Page 13 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
8.98 4.99 3.57 3.05 2.39 1.95 1.42 1.11 0.93 3.22 3.98
8.91 4.82 3.45 2.94 2.3 1.85 1.35 1.11 0.98 3.02 3.89
8.96 4.91 3.54 3.01 2.35 1.91 1.4 1.13 0.95 3.1 3.93
11+52 (test 62)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.9267 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88633° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.81 11.09 9.41 7.91 6.08 4.46 2.72 1.79 1.28 7.34 9.12
8.89 10.87 9.34 7.9 6.01 4.42 2.69 1.72 1.22 7.17 8.81
8.81 10.82 9.31 7.84 5.98 4.41 2.71 1.77 1.27 7.15 8.71
12+56 (test 63)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 16.1533 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88599° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.76 16.49 12.22 10.53 7.87 6.1 3.89 2.58 1.8 12.61 14.3
8.67 16.09 11.99 10.35 7.74 6.02 3.79 2.5 1.79 12.27 13.89
8.59 15.88 11.86 10.25 7.65 5.94 3.74 2.48 1.74 12.04 13.61
13+30 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: CL of Calera Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88599° Lon
Limit NIS
14+53 (test 64)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 19.66 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88535° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.74 20.16 15 13.37 10.87 8.34 5.11 3.52 2.66 14.99 17.21
8.57 19.51 14.55 13.02 10.63 8.14 4.98 3.45 2.61 14.55 16.74
8.54 19.31 14.51 12.96 10.61 8.14 4.97 3.42 2.57 14.43 16.57
15+56 (test 65)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.1633 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88502° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.52 14.48 10.67 9.03 6.79 5.34 3.29 2.13 1.78 10.46 13.21
8.54 14.06 10.44 8.85 6.65 5.22 3.29 2.11 1.72 10.22 12.9
8.45 13.95 10.38 8.79 6.63 5.22 3.23 2.08 1.76 10.09 12.76
16+57 (test 66)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 11.5833 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88471° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.81 11.72 8.06 7.04 5.8 4.56 2.98 2.09 1.45 8.99 9.98
8.81 11.55 7.98 7 5.73 4.53 3 2.07 1.52 8.87 9.79
8.84 11.48 7.95 6.96 5.7 4.49 2.99 2.07 1.45 8.94 9.79
Page 14 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
17+57 (test 67)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 16.86 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88438° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.11 17.08 13.01 11.25 8.46 6.68 4.36 2.62 2.07 13.8 15.94
7.96 16.81 12.88 11.17 8.42 6.6 4.32 2.6 2.07 13.56 15.62
8.11 16.69 12.84 11.13 8.36 6.57 4.31 2.61 2.07 13.46 15.47
18+07 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Trench Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88438° Lon
Limit NIS
18+54 (test 68)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.4533 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88406° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.52 14.81 11.01 9.57 7.36 5.56 3.54 2.53 1.79 11.48 13.07
8.42 14.29 10.64 9.3 7.18 5.39 3.45 2.46 1.76 11.09 12.6
8.57 14.26 10.64 9.28 7.17 5.36 3.46 2.45 1.72 11.09 12.51
19+55 (test 69)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 16.2367 GPS: 34.12867° Lat, -117.88373° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.59 16.48 12.74 11.4 9.59 7.77 5.21 3.42 2.18 11.97 13.51
8.57 16.13 12.38 11.15 9.35 7.6 5.09 3.35 2.16 11.7 13.33
8.52 16.1 12.36 11.12 9.34 7.58 5.12 3.37 2.2 11.72 13.35
20+58 (test 70)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 20.6567 GPS: 34.12866° Lat, -117.88338° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.59 21.01 17.09 15.49 13.19 8.91 5.97 4.05 2.86 17.8 19.8
8.67 20.66 16.84 15.31 13.03 8.86 5.92 4.02 2.77 17.54 19.46
8.52 20.3 16.56 15.07 12.85 8.75 5.88 4.01 2.74 17.25 19.14
21+54 (test 71)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 22 GPS: 34.12866° Lat, -117.88306° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.59 22.36 18.35 16.9 14.63 12.22 7.87 4.62 3.29 18.26 20.1
8.57 21.9 18.01 16.6 14.34 12.02 7.76 4.57 3.24 17.94 19.73
8.5 21.74 17.92 16.51 14.27 12 7.73 4.58 3.23 17.84 19.59
22+59 (test 72)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Page 15 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
Avg FWD1: 22.7467 GPS: 34.12866° Lat, -117.88272° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.3 23.03 19.39 17.46 14.41 11.4 6.78 3.9 2.79 17.73 19.98
8.3 22.67 19.18 17.31 14.24 11.2 6.73 3.86 2.73 17.54 19.73
8.28 22.54 19.09 17.21 14.16 11.17 6.74 3.88 2.73 17.45 19.6
23+61 (test 73)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 21.95 GPS: 34.12866° Lat, -117.88239° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.11 21.95 17.5 14.53 12.08 9.55 6.08 3.57 2.82 18.65 20.54
8.18 21.94 17.34 14.43 12 9.52 6.08 3.58 2.8 18.5 20.27
8.13 21.96 17.2 14.35 11.92 9.45 6.05 3.55 2.74 18.3 20.07
24+52 (test 74)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 20.39 GPS: 34.12865° Lat, -117.88210° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.4 20.69 16.99 15.75 12.6 9.97 6.14 3.73 2.85 17.53 18.95
8.25 20.25 16.66 15.44 12.38 9.78 6.01 3.65 2.71 17.22 18.56
8.37 20.23 16.7 15.48 12.39 9.87 6.08 3.71 2.88 17.2 18.5
25+55 (test 75)Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 19.8967 GPS: 34.12865° Lat, -117.88176° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.4 20.31 15.21 13.17 10.42 7.64 4.42 2.68 1.88 14.49 17.07
8.35 19.7 14.86 12.92 10.24 7.53 4.36 2.62 1.83 14.04 16.53
8.4 19.68 14.94 13 10.31 7.57 4.4 2.66 1.85 14.01 16.46
26+77 Begin E Alosta Avenue Eastbound Lane 2
Notes: CL of Barranca Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12865° Lat, -117.88176° Lon
Limit NIS
Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
00+00 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2; CL of Barranca Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12865° Lat, -117.88176° Lon
Limit NIS
00+49 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Begin Curb and Gutter Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12865° Lat, -117.88176° Lon
Limit NIS
Page 16 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
01+12 (test 76)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 27.3533 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88175° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.42 27.83 23.68 22.33 18.69 15 9.18 4.81 3.17 23.21 25.28
8.4 27.23 23.28 21.98 18.43 14.75 9.05 4.75 3.11 22.73 24.69
8.37 27 23.09 21.83 18.33 14.71 9.1 4.81 3.21 22.53 24.5
02+27 (test 77)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 18.2367 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88213° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.5 18.51 16.05 14.01 10.58 7.65 4.9 3.12 2.13 15.57 17.16
8.35 18.04 15.69 13.69 10.34 7.41 4.79 3.03 2.05 15.2 16.68
8.52 18.16 15.86 13.81 10.44 7.53 4.87 3.11 2.13 15.26 16.74
03+19 (test 78)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 28.23 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88243° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.42 28.74 23.99 21.85 17.55 13.42 6.99 3.61 2.35 23.75 26.34
8.45 28.12 23.62 21.5 17.3 13.29 6.92 3.58 2.34 23.32 25.74
8.42 27.83 23.4 21.32 17.14 13.21 6.9 3.59 2.41 23.08 25.48
04+02 (test 79)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 30 GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88271° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.25 30.39 24.03 22.15 17.68 13.35 7.77 4.47 2.78 25.2 27.1
8.25 29.91 23.7 21.76 17.46 13.23 7.65 4.45 2.81 24.93 26.64
8.28 29.7 23.66 21.79 17.49 13.18 7.69 4.48 2.87 24.79 26.45
05+01 (test 80)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 20.5967 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88302° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.47 20.98 16.88 14.93 12.6 10.08 6.41 3.83 2.53 19.41 21.21
8.42 20.48 16.52 14.62 12.35 9.91 6.27 3.76 2.47 18.95 20.78
8.42 20.33 16.44 14.54 12.29 9.87 6.27 3.76 2.51 18.98 20.67
06+00 (test 81)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 29.8767 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88335° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.18 30.24 25.78 23.2 19.65 14.78 8.32 4.45 3.26 25.51 28.04
8.25 29.77 25.45 22.98 19.45 14.58 8.22 4.4 3.2 25.21 27.5
8.23 29.62 25.39 22.93 19.43 14.62 8.23 4.42 3.18 24.78 27.37
Page 17 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
07+10 (test 82)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 15.71 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88370° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.76 16.1 11.79 10.45 5.89 4.59 3 1.92 1.57 10.75 12.8
8.72 15.67 11.55 10.26 5.8 4.53 2.94 1.9 1.57 10.52 12.51
8.72 15.36 11.34 10.14 5.72 4.44 2.92 1.87 1.51 10.33 12.25
08+25 (test 83)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 18.82 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88408° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.62 19.2 15.16 13.53 11.44 6.71 4.62 3.02 1.99 11.99 15.8
8.45 18.57 14.71 13.12 11.07 6.5 4.43 2.94 1.91 11.67 15.42
8.54 18.69 14.81 13.24 11.21 6.59 4.51 3 1.93 11.84 15.48
09+09 (test 84)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 25.42 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88436° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.69 25.84 19.98 19.2 14.56 11.35 6.7 4.26 2.77 20.12 22.4
8.64 25.19 19.73 18.81 14.27 11.13 6.56 4.17 2.67 19.74 21.83
8.69 25.23 20.03 18.9 14.31 11.2 6.58 4.18 2.74 19.87 21.88
10+11 (test 85)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 17.43 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88469° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.74 17.75 14.5 13.36 9.06 6.51 4.23 2.77 1.99 14.25 15.82
8.74 17.41 14.31 13.26 9.01 6.47 4.18 2.74 1.97 13.93 15.51
8.74 17.13 14.14 13.09 8.88 6.39 4.12 2.69 1.95 13.76 15.26
11+03 (test 86)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 8.46667 GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88499° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.86 8.65 5.86 5.03 4.03 3.13 1.98 1.36 1.26 5.17 7.06
8.67 8.39 5.74 4.88 3.96 3.05 1.96 1.35 1.14 5.12 6.9
8.72 8.36 5.71 4.89 3.94 3.03 1.93 1.33 1.19 5.12 6.9
12+20 (test 87)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 28.44 GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88538° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.54 28.99 24.78 22.94 17.68 14.01 8.65 4.12 2.98 22.81 25.2
8.37 28.18 24.18 22.37 17.28 13.69 8.51 4.13 2.95 22.29 24.58
8.5 28.15 24.24 22.36 17.32 13.69 8.54 4.11 2.97 22.29 24.59
Page 18 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
12+95 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Begin PCC, Bus Stop Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88538° Lon
Limit NIS
13+41 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: CL of Calera Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88538° Lon
Limit NIS
14+25 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: End PCC, Bus Stop Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88538° Lon
Limit NIS
14+41 (test 88)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Alligator Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 15.6133 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88610° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.94 15.95 11.84 10.4 8.49 6.81 4.24 2.61 1.7 11.09 12.9
8.89 15.48 11.58 10.1 8.22 6.57 4.07 2.46 1.56 10.79 12.57
8.89 15.41 11.52 10.08 8.19 6.51 4.04 2.47 1.58 10.76 12.51
15+50 (test 89)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 21.3233 GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88644° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.2 21.67 15.62 13.68 10.58 7.9 3.87 2.05 1.52 18.98 20.98
8.13 21.08 15.26 13.35 10.35 7.7 3.82 2 1.48 18.56 20.44
8.23 21.22 15.32 13.37 10.39 7.77 3.89 2.05 1.52 18.61 20.53
16+01 (test 90)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 23.58 GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88661° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.45 23.96 18.56 16.79 13.96 10.67 5.51 2.92 2.01 18.28 21.01
8.4 23.39 18.19 16.51 13.81 10.41 5.39 2.94 1.99 17.87 20.51
8.4 23.39 18.2 16.54 13.86 10.4 5.45 2.93 1.99 17.82 20.5
17+09 (test 91)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 11.7933 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88696° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.67 12.05 8.51 7.02 5.28 3.82 2.51 1.66 1.32 8.39 10.08
8.64 11.68 8.26 6.86 5.14 3.7 2.42 1.61 1.26 8.2 9.82
8.59 11.65 8.25 6.83 5.16 3.71 2.41 1.58 1.28 8.2 9.78
Page 19 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
18+09 (test 92)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 12.4533 GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88729° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.76 12.64 10.02 9.12 7.8 6.28 4.23 2.92 2.2 10.31 11.35
8.76 12.42 9.84 8.95 7.65 6.19 4.13 2.87 2.07 10.12 11.11
8.81 12.3 9.78 8.91 7.64 6.18 4.13 2.88 2.2 10.04 11
19+02 (test 93)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 14.45 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88757° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.64 14.73 11.57 10.58 9 7.23 4.37 3.01 2.42 13.99 14.57
8.59 14.42 11.35 10.35 8.83 7.18 4.33 3 2.4 13.69 14.23
8.5 14.2 11.25 10.24 8.72 7.12 4.29 2.98 2.4 13.52 14
19+88 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: CL of Powell Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88757° Lon
Limit NIS
20+08 (test 94)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.79 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88792° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.81 11.06 8.4 7.62 6.4 5.14 3.43 2.37 1.57 9.35 10.51
8.76 10.72 8.21 7.43 6.25 5.02 3.38 2.33 1.53 9.13 10.21
8.72 10.59 8.12 7.33 6.17 4.96 3.34 2.27 1.56 9.03 10.08
21+16 (test 95)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 6.33 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88826° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.81 6.43 4.65 4 3.27 2.67 1.92 1.44 1.23 4.3 5.26
8.67 6.29 4.6 3.93 3.23 2.63 1.95 1.48 1.25 4.25 5.19
8.74 6.27 4.58 3.9 3.23 2.65 1.95 1.49 1.27 4.25 5.19
22+02 (test 96)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 10.37 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88854° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.62 10.49 7.3 6.38 5.26 4.15 2.91 2.08 1.46 7.4 8.71
8.52 10.29 7.18 6.31 5.22 4.08 2.89 2.08 1.49 7.19 8.28
8.67 10.33 7.2 6.34 5.23 4.12 2.93 2.12 1.56 7.24 8.2
23+03 (test 97)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Page 20 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
Avg FWD1: 15.4933 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88887° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.79 15.69 12.46 11.14 9.41 7.74 5.32 3.79 2.64 12.36 13.81
8.76 15.45 12.32 11.03 9.32 7.66 5.28 3.76 2.66 12.21 13.63
8.72 15.34 12.24 10.94 9.27 7.61 5.26 3.8 2.67 12.18 13.54
24+07 (test 98)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 17.6067 GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88921° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.74 17.97 15.05 13.37 10.53 8.69 5.85 3.46 1.73 14.37 15.79
8.57 17.55 14.77 13.1 10.39 8.52 5.79 3.45 1.72 14.01 15.43
8.45 17.3 14.61 12.95 10.28 8.47 5.71 3.4 1.7 13.84 15.22
24+89 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: RTP Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12880° Lat, -117.88921° Lon
Limit NIS
25+05 (test 99)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 17.25 GPS: 34.12881° Lat, -117.88953° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.4 17.64 13.82 12.37 10.22 8.1 5.23 3.45 2.68 15.25 16.6
8.33 17.08 13.42 11.98 9.88 7.9 5.06 3.3 2.59 14.76 16.09
8.4 17.03 13.47 12.05 9.97 7.95 5.11 3.33 2.61 14.67 16.03
26+06 (test 100)Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: Lateral Cracks, Longitudinal Cracks, Near Traffic Sensors Pvt Temp: 81.7° F
Avg FWD1: 6.22667 GPS: 34.12884° Lat, -117.88985° Lon
Limit NIS
Force FWD1 FWD2 FWD3 FWD4 FWD5 FWD6 FWD7 FWD8 FWD9 FWD10
8.52 6.34 4.59 4.23 3.75 3.29 2.45 1.93 1.6 3.8 4.79
8.5 6.15 4.47 4.12 3.66 3.21 2.41 1.86 1.58 3.7 4.65
8.52 6.19 4.44 4.16 3.71 3.23 2.39 1.87 1.62 3.66 4.6
26+79 Begin E Alosta Avenue Westbound Lane 2
Notes: CL of Citrus Avenue Pvt Temp: 0° F
GPS: 34.12884° Lat, -117.88985° Lon
Limit NIS
Page 21 of 21LaBelle - Marvin: FWD Reports
6/29/2017http://www.labellemarvin.com/fwd/fwdlive/report.php
APPENDIX E
R-VALUE DETERMINATIONS (CA 301)
APPENDIX F
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Glossary of Terms
Deflection Testing, CA Test Method 356, is a structural analysis of measured deflection values obtained
during our field testing operations, utilizing our non-destructive JILS Falling Weight Deflectometer
equipment. Data accumulated on the deflection values, thickness of AC pavement with aggregate base,
subjected to various traffic loadings along with the tolerable deflection criteria, provides the basis of
needed overlay and/or structural reinforcement. The Falling Weight Deflectometer, F.W.D., provides a
tabulation of all test data, distance measurements DMI, field observations, in-situ pavement temperatures,
global position GPS data, and permanent landmarks such as cross streets, patches, utility trenches, etc.
taken in the field. The Individual deflection test data, provided with this report, was reviewed and
grouped according to data trends and engineering judgment.
Sensors: FWD 1, FWD 2, FWD 3, FWD 4, FWD 5, FWD 6, FWD 7, FWD 8, FWD 9, FWD 10.
These are the 10 separate deflection readings in 10-3 inches. FWD 1 represents the
deflection directly beneath the load input.
Force: Standard Dynamic Loading measured.
GPR: Ground Penetrating Radar of in-situ pavement thicknesses. (optional)
GPS: The North American Datum (NAD 83).
NIS: Not included in sums.
Limits The station limits represent areas of like deflection determined during the engineering
review of deflection data and field conditions. Limits are represented by local stationing
gathered in the field per street, and is taken in each direction and lane.
FWD80th The 80th percentile deflection value representing the strength under loading of the
section/group being evaluated, reported in inches times 10-3.
TD80th The 80th percentile deflection value converted to an equivalent Traveling Deflectometer
unit, reported in inches times 10-3.
T The represented thickness (T) of existing pavement structure. This value is taken from
our pavement coring data obtained in the field.
T.I. The Traffic Index (TI) used for the evaluation of the specific test loading. The traffic
index represents the anticipated accumulation of equivalent axle loads with design period.
TDallow The maximum permissible deflection value where no reinforcement is necessary based
upon asphalt concrete thickness and traffic index by Caltrans Test Method 356.
%Red. The percent reduction in measured deflection to match tolerable or allowable deflection
levels, based upon Traveling Deflectometer conversions.
GE The equivalent thickness, in feet, of rock base required to effect the specified deflection
reduction.
AC The equivalent thickness, in feet, of asphalt concrete thickness required to effect the
specified deflection reduction.
NSL LaBelle Marvin, Inc.’s calculated Nominal Service Life of the existing pavement.