HomeMy WebLinkAboutE-09 Grant CA Office of Traffic Safety 2016CONSENT ITEM
E-9
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
VIA: TROY L. BUTZLAFF, ICMA-CM, CITY MANAGER
FROM: STEVE HUNT, ACTING CHIEF OF POLICE
DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2016
SUBJECT: ACCEPT GRANT FROM CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY FOR
THE “SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM” (STEP) 2016-
2017.
SUMMARY:
Through a competitive process, the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) provides grant
funding to selected police departments to assist in reducing the number of persons killed and
injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary collision factors. Based on OTS’
evaluation of the City of Azusa’s traffic data, the City has been awarded $100,000.00 of grant
funding to continue traffic safety efforts. This action accepts the Grant funding from OTS.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1) Approve Resolution No. 2016-C57 accepting the Grant agreement from the California
Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) awarding the City of Azusa up to $100,000.00 for hourly
wages at an overtime rate to conduct the outlined enforcement activity, purchase
specified equipment, and attend approved training.
2) Authorize the City Manager to execute, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, all
documents necessary to effectuate the receipt of the grant.
Approved
Council Meeting
9/19/2016
California Office of Traffic Safety Grant
September 19, 2016
Page 2
DISCUSSION:
The Azusa Police Department Traffic Division has applied for and was awarded a grant from the
California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). The Project title is “Selective Traffic Enforcement
Program” (STEP) and the Grant number is PT1703. The Grant obligates the Police Department
to conduct the following traffic enforcement activities: nine (9) DUI Saturation Patrols; two (2)
DUI/DL Checkpoints; two (2) Warrant Sweeps; five (5) Traffic Enforcement Operations; two (2)
Distracted Driving enforcement operations; four (4) Bicycle and Pedestrian Operations and four
(4) Traffic Safety educational presentations. The pro-active enforcement efforts will be staffed
by Azusa Police Officers on an overtime basis. The Grant period will run from October 1, 2016
to September 30, 2017.
The Grant also includes funding for the purchase of one fully equipped Police Motorcycle.
$3,000.00 has been awarded for officer training in support of successfully satisfying the Grant
objectives. The cumulative total of the Grant award is up to $100,000.00.
The goal of the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program is to reduce the number of persons killed
and injured in crashes involving alcohol, speed, red light running and other primary collision
factors in the City of Azusa. This will be accomplished through a combination of enforcement
and educational efforts. The Grant is worth up to $100,000.00 and reimburses the City for
overtime salary and benefits for officers working the Grant details. The Grant also provides
funding for specified equipment as well as specified training to be completed by Azusa Police
Officers in furtherance of the Grant objectives.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a reimbursement grant in the amount of $100,000.00 from the California Office of Traffic
Safety. Quarterly returns will be administered and filed by the Police Department on a schedule
set by OTS.
Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved:
Rick Hayden Steve Hunt
Lieutenant Acting Chief of Police
Reviewed and Approved: Reviewed and Approved:
Louie F. Lacasella Troy L. Butzlaff, ICMA-CM
Management Analyst City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant Agreement
2) Resolution of the City Council Approving a Grant Agreement with the California Office
of Traffic Safety (OTS)
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
GRANT AGREEMENT - Page 1
OTS-38 (Rev. 4/16)
GRANT NUMBER
PT1703
1. GRANT TITLE
SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP)
2. NAME OF AGENCY 4. GRANT PERIOD CITY OF AZUSA
3. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT From: 10/1/16
AZUSA POLICE DEPARTMENT To: 9/30/17
5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in traffic collisions
involving impairment and other primary collision factors. The funded strategies may include enforcement
operations focusing on impaired driving, distracted driving, nighttime seat belt use, motorcycle safety, and
pedestrian and bicycle safety. Operations are conducted in areas with disproportionate numbers of traffic
collisions. Other funded strategies may include public awareness, educational programs and training for law
enforcement.
6. FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED: $ 100,000.00
7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this
reference made a part of the Agreement:
• Schedule A (OTS-38b) – Problem Statement, Goals and
Objectives and Method of Procedure
• Schedule B (OTS-38d) – Detailed Budget Estimate and
Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable)
• Schedule B-1 (OTS-38f) – Budget Narrative and Sub-
Budget Narrative (if applicable)
• Exhibit A –Certifications and Assurances
• Exhibit B* - OTS Grant Program Manual
*Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto.
These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.
We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly
authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.
8. APPROVAL SIGNATURES
A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF AGENCY
NAME: Rick Hayden PHONE: (626) 812-3215 NAME: Steve Hunt PHONE: (626) 812-3250
TITLE: Lientenant FAX: TITLE: Acting Chief FAX:
ADDRESS: 725 North Alameda Avenue
Azusa, CA 91702
ADDRESS: 725 North Alameda Avenue
Azusa, CA 91702
E-MAIL: rhayden@ci.azusa.ca.us E-MAIL: shunt@ci.azusa.ca.us
(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
C. FISCAL OR ACCOUNTING OFFICIAL D. OFFICE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE PAYMENTS
NAME: Talika Johnson PHONE: (626) 812-5202 NAME: City of Azusa, Finance Department
TITLE: Finance Director FAX: ADDRESS: 213 East Foothill Blvd
Azusa, CA 91702 ADDRESS: 213 East Foothill Blvd
Azusa, CA 91702
9. DUNS NUMBER
E-MAIL: tjohnson@ci.azusa.ca.us DUNS #: 040371361
REGISTERED
ADDRESS &
ZIP:
213 East Foothill Blvd
Azusa, CA 91702-2514
(Signature) (Date)
10. Fin Action No.Date:12. TYPE OF AGREEMENT Initial X Revision Cont.
Revision No.Date:
11. Action Taken
Obligated This Action
Previously Obligated
Total Amount Obligated
TOTAL FUNDS PROGRAMMED
14. FUNDING DETAIL - FISCAL YEAR GRANT PERIOD ENDING:
NAME:NAME:
TITLE:TITLE:
PHONE:
E-MAIL:
Office of Traffic Safety Office of Traffic Safety
2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758 Elk Grove, CA 95758
Signature Signature
OTS-38a* (Rev. 01/16)
PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
21,000.00$
39,000.00$
14,000.00$
26,000.00$
-$
-$
-$
-$
STATUTE
2015
2015
2016
-
20.608
100,000.00
164AL
402PT
164AL
402PT
-
Page 2 (Office of Traffic Safety Use Only)
FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y.CHAPTER
9/30/2017
TASK NO.F.F.Y.
Amount
PROGRAM INCOMEPAID MEDIA
2016-17
2015-16
2
PT1703
2016
0521-0890-101 (10/15)
0521-0890-101 (10/15)
0521-0890-101 (23/16)
0521-0890-101 (23/16)
-
10/15
10/15
--
23/16
23/16
2015
2015
2016
2016
20.600
20.608
20.600
-
-
100,000.00$ TOTAL FEDERAL FUNDS:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT:10/1/2016 GRANTEE CITY OF AZUSA
1 8/4/2016
GRANT NO.
(916) 509-3016
2017
100,000.00
Fiscal Year
2014-15
100,000.00
whitney.braziel@ots.ca.gov
WHITNEY BRAZIEL
Director
13. FUNDING DISPOSITION & STATUS
A. APPROVAL RECOMMENDED BY B. AGREEMENT & FUNDING AUTHORIZED BY
15. GRANT APPROVAL & AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND OBLIGATED FUNDS
Program Coordinator
Total
2013-14
RHONDA L. CRAFT
Initial approval of 2017 HSP funds obligated.
100,000.00
100,000.00
0.00
GRANTS MADE EASY - STEP
SCHEDULE A
GRANT DESCRIPTION
GRANT NO. PT1703
PAGE 1
OTS-38b (Rev. 4/16)
1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The city of Azusa has an estimated population of 48,799 (U.S. Census Bureau: 2014 estimate).
Within the last year, Azusa has increased its population due to the near completion of a new 1,250
home community in the northern part of the city. The Rosedale community expanded the city’s
residential district which has added substantial traffic to our roadways. These changes in the city have
created problems for the residents due to the high increase of vehicles on our roadways. This brings
forth significant traffic safety concerns for the residents of this community because it is filled with
numerous parks, hiking trails, and mountain views which overlook our city and attract a high number
of hikers and bicyclists. Residents have complained about the increase in traffic on Sierra Madre
Avenue which bisects the community. Sierra Madre Avenue is being used by residents of the
Rosedale community as well as residents of the City of Glendora as a means to by-pass the heavy
traffic on the 210 freeway during peak commute hours. On each end of the Rosedale community,
Sierra Madre Avenue has a “round-about” intersection, constructed for purposes of “traffic calming,”
controlled by yield signs. During those commute hours, drivers rarely yield the right-of-way to those
entering the round-about from the intersecting streets, creating concerns for safety near those
intersections. Approximately half way between the round-abouts, a stop sign was erected at a four-
way intersection to assist in regulating traffic. Commuters traveling east/west on Sierra Madre
Avenue seemingly view the stop sign as an inconvenience, and either fail to stop as required, or speed
up to well above the 35 mph posted speed limit to the next round-about.
In addition to the increased commuter traffic along Sierra Madre Avenue near the Rosedale
community, commuters are discovering that this residential neighborhood also provides for
“shortcuts” south to Foothill Boulevard. Stealth Stat surveys have been conducted in the community
and the complaint of speeding commuters has been confirmed.
Another new addition to the city is the Metro Gold Line railway extension. The extension from the
city of Pasadena to the city of Azusa has been completed and became operational in March 2016.
With the implementation of the new railway, there is a high risk potential for pedestrians and drivers
alike. The residents of Azusa are not accustomed to having an active Metro railway route in the city
and the hazards associated with grade crossings. It is anticipated that a rise in injury collisions
associated with the train may occur.
In 2015, the Azusa Police Department investigated 30 DUI related traffic collisions. In 2014 the
number was 26 and 2013 it was 31. During those years, with the assistance of OTS, we were able to
conduct multiple DUI checkpoints and traffic enforcement details.
GRANTS MADE EASY - STEP
SCHEDULE A
GRANT DESCRIPTION
GRANT NO. PT1703
PAGE 2
OTS-38b (Rev. 4/16)
A. Traffic Data Summary:
Collision
Type
2013 2014 2015
Collisions Victims Collisions Victims Collisions Victims
Fatal 3 3 3 3 1 2
Injury 197 271 166 245 233 319
Fatal Injury Killed Injured Fatal Injury Killed Injured Fatal Injury Killed Injured
Alcohol -
Involved
1 10 1 17 0 5 0 7 1 6 2 10
Hit & Run 0 16 0 17 0 11 0 13 0 14 0 22
Nighttime
(2100-0259 hours)
0 16 0 23 0 19 0 24 0 30 0 43
Top 3 Primary Collision Factors Fatal Injury Killed Injured
#1 - Unsafe Speed 0 55 0 74
#2 - Improper Turning Movement 0 27 0 35
#3 - Right-of-Way 0 19 0 27
2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:
1) Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic collisions.
2) Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic collisions.
3) Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved collisions.
4) Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved collisions.
5) Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved collisions.
6) Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved collisions.
7) Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved collisions.
8) Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved collisions.
9) Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic collisions.
10) Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic collisions.
11) Reduce hit & run fatal collisions.
GRANTS MADE EASY - STEP
SCHEDULE A
GRANT DESCRIPTION
GRANT NO. PT1703
PAGE 3
OTS-38b (Rev. 4/16)
12) Reduce hit & run injury collisions.
13) Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal collisions.
14) Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury collisions.
15) Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic collisions.
16) Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic collisions.
17) Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic collisions.
18) Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic collisions.
B. Objectives:
1) Issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15. The kick-off press
releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information
Officer at pio@ots.ca.gov, and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the
issuance date of the release.
2) Participate in the following campaigns:
• National Walk to School Day – October 5, 2016
• National Teen Driver Safety Week – October 16-22, 2016
• NHTSA Winter Mobilization – December 16, 2016 to January 1, 2017
• National Distracted Driving Awareness Month – April 2017
• National Bicycle Safety Month – May 2017
• National Motorcycle Safety Month – May 2017
• National Click It or Ticket Mobilization – May 17 -20, 2017
• NHTSA Summer Mobilization – August 19, 2017 to September 6, 2017
• National Child Passenger Safety Week – September 17-23, 2017
• California’s Pedestrian Safety Month – September 2017
3) Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “HOT Sheet” program to notify patrol and traffic
officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license
as a result of DUI convictions. Updated HOT sheets should be distributed to patrol and traffic
officers monthly.
4) Send 1 law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST)
(minimum 16 hour) POST-certified training.
5) Send 1 law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving
Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training.
GRANTS MADE EASY - STEP
SCHEDULE A
GRANT DESCRIPTION
GRANT NO. PT1703
PAGE 4
OTS-38b (Rev. 4/16)
6) Send 1 law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training.
7) Send 1 law enforcement personnel to the DRE Recertification training.
8) Conduct 2 DUI/DL Checkpoints. Note: A minimum of 1 checkpoint should be conducted during the
NHTSA Winter Mobilization and 1 during the NHTSA Summer Mobilization. To enhance the overall
deterrent effect and promote high visibility, it is recommended the grantee issue an advance press
release and conduct social media activity for each checkpoint operation. For combination DUI/DL
checkpoints, departments should issue press releases that mention DL’s will be checked at the
DUI/DL checkpoint. Signs for DUI/DL checkpoint operations should read “DUI/Driver’s License
Checkpoint Ahead.” OTS does not fund or support independent DL checkpoints. Only on an
exception basis and with OTS pre-approval will OTS fund checkpoint operations that begin prior to
1800 hours.
9) Conduct 9 DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s).
10) Conduct 2 Warrant Service operation(s) targeting multiple DUI offenders who fail to appear in
court.
11) Conduct 5 Traffic enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary collision factor
violations.
12) Conduct 2 Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones
and texting.
13) Conduct 4 highly publicized Pedestrian and Bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas of or during
events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle collisions resulting from violations made by
pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. Note: It is recommended the grantee issue an advance press
release and conduct social media activity prior to each operation to publicize and raise awareness
about pedestrian and bicycle safety issues.
14) Conduct 4 Traffic Safety educational presentations with an effort to reach 1,500 community
members. Note: Presentations may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed,
pedestrian and bicycle safety, seatbelts and child passenger safety.
NOTE: Nothing in this “agreement” shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a
particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance
of the goals and objectives hereunder.
GRANTS MADE EASY - STEP
SCHEDULE A
GRANT DESCRIPTION
GRANT NO. PT1703
PAGE 5
OTS-38b (Rev. 4/16)
3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
A. Phase 1 - Program Preparation, Training and Implementation (1st Quarter of Grant Year)
• The department should develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined
in the objectives section.
• All training should be conducted this quarter.
• All grant-related purchases should be made this quarter.
• In order to develop/maintain the “HOT Sheets,” research will be conducted to identify the “worst-of-
the-worst” repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions.
The HOT Sheets may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current
license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. HOT Sheets should be
updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly.
• Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high
collision locations.
B. Phase 2 - Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year)
• The department will work to create media opportunities throughout the grant period to call attention
to the innovative program strategies and outcomes.
Media Requirements
• Submit all grant-related activity press releases, media advisories, alerts and general public materials
to the OTS Public Information Officer (PIO) at pio@ots.ca.gov, with a copy to your OTS
Coordinator.
a) If an OTS template-based press release is used, the OTS PIO and Coordinator should be copied
when the release is distributed to the press. If an OTS template is not used, or is substantially
changed, a draft press release shall be sent to the OTS PIO for approval. Optimum lead time
would be 10-20 days prior to the release date to ensure adequate turn-around time.
b) Press releases reporting the results of grant activities such as enforcement operations are exempt
from the recommended advance approval process, but still should be copied to the OTS PIO and
Coordinator when the release is distributed to the press.
c) Activities such as warrant service operations and court stings that could be compromised by
advanced publicity are exempt from pre-publicity, but are encouraged to offer embargoed media
coverage and to report the results.
GRANTS MADE EASY - STEP
SCHEDULE A
GRANT DESCRIPTION
GRANT NO. PT1703
PAGE 6
OTS-38b (Rev. 4/16)
• Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials: Funding for this
program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
• Email the OTS PIO at pio@ots.ca.gov and copy your OTS Coordinator at least 30 days in advance, a
short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program so OTS has sufficient
notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.
• Submit a draft or rough-cut of all printed or recorded material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork,
trailer graphics, etc.) to the OTS PIO at pio@ots.ca.gov and copy your OTS Coordinator for approval
14 days prior to the production or duplication.
• Include the OTS logo, space permitting, on grant-funded print materials; consult your OTS
Coordinator for specifics.
C. Phase 3 – Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year)
• Agencies are required to collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of
goals and objectives.
• Statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives will be collected, analyzed, and incorporated
in Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs). QPRs for the quarter ending September 30 will include
year-to-date comparisons of goals and objectives. If required, a separate quarterly data reporting
form will be completed each quarter and submitted as part of the QPR.
• Reports will compare actual grant accomplishments with the planned accomplishments. They will
include information concerning changes made by the Grant Director in planning and guiding the
grant efforts.
• Reports shall be completed and submitted in accordance with OTS requirements as specified in the
Grant Program Manual.
4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in
the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary
of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include
whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full support of the city of Azusa. Every effort will be made to continue the activities after
the grant conclusion.
SCHEDULE B
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE
GRANT NO. PT1703
OTS-38d (Rev. 4/16) Page 1 of 1
TOTAL
AMOUNT
$ 35,000.00
$ 65,000.00
CFDA FY-1
20.608 20,570.00$ 20,570.00$
20.608 10,399.00$ 10,399.00$
20.608 2,190.00$ 2,190.00$
Benefits @ 5.550%20.608 1,841.00$ 1,841.00$
20.600 5,510.00$ 5,510.00$
20.600 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$
20.600 10,970.00$ 10,970.00$
20.600 5,100.00$ 5,100.00$
Benefits @ 5.550%20.600 1,420.00$ 1,420.00$
62,000.00$ 62,000.00$
20.600 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$
3,000.00$ 3,000.00$
20.600 27,000.00$ 27,000.00$
27,000.00$ 27,000.00$
20.600 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
20.600 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$
8,000.00$ 8,000.00$
100,000.00$ 100,000.00$
FUND DESCRIPTION
FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES
10/1/16 thru 9/30/17
In-State
Category Sub-Total
B. TRAVEL EXPENSE
Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement
Traffic Safety Educational Presentations
Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders For
Driving While Intoxicated
State and Community Highway Safety
Warrant Service
Traffic Enforcement
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Positions and Salaries
FUND NUMBER
164AL
402PT
CATALOG
NUMBER (CFDA)
20.608
20.600
TOTAL COST
TO GRANT
Overtime
Distracted Driving
COST CATEGORY
DUI/DL Checkpoints
DUI Saturation Patrols
GRANT TOTAL
Category Sub-Total
Category Sub-Total
Category Sub-Total
F. INDIRECT COSTS
Radar Device
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
None
Category Sub-Total
D. EQUIPMENT
None
Category Sub-Total
Police Motorcycle
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Video Equipment
SCHEDULE B-1
GRANT NO. PT1703
BUDGET NARRATIVE Page 1
OTS-38f (Rev. 4/16)
PERSONNEL COSTS
Overtime
Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations may be conducted by personnel such as a Lieutenant,
Sergeant, Corporal, Deputy, Officer, Reserve Officer, Community Services Officer, Dispatcher, etc.,
depending on the titles used by the agency and the grantees overtime policy. Personnel will be deployed as
needed to accomplish the grant goals and objectives.
Costs are estimated based on an overtime hourly rate range of $45.64/hour to $113.11/hour.
Overtime reimbursement will reflect actual costs of the personnel conducting the appropriate operation up to
the maximum range specified.
Overtime Benefit Rates
Unemployment Insurance 0.10%
Workers Compensation 4.00%
Medicare 1.45%
TOTAL BENEFIT RATE 5.55%
TRAVEL EXPENSE
In State
Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals
and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. Anticipated
travel may include costs to send 1 person to the Social Media Marketing World conference in San Diego. All
conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Schedule B-1 (Budget Narrative) must be
approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for
meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
None
EQUIPMENT
1 Police Motorcycle(s) - fully equipped motorcycle(s) to be used for grant purposes. Costs may include
communication equipment, emergency equipment package, safety bars and modifications and accessories.
SCHEDULE B-1
GRANT NO. PT1703
BUDGET NARRATIVE Page 2
OTS-38f (Rev. 4/16)
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
2 Radar Device(s) - to measure the speed of motor vehicles for speed enforcement.
Video Equipment – for use in producing traffic safety educational presentations/videos. Costs may include
software, backgrounds, background stand, light panels, and boom microphone kit
INDIRECT COSTS
None
PROGRAM INCOME
There will be no program income generated from this grant.
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
Certifications and Assurances (Rev. 5/16)
Page 1
Failure to comply with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives may subject Grantee Agenc y
officials to civil or criminal penalties and/or place the State in a high risk grantee status in accordance with 49
CFR §18.12.
The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page,
that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State
rules, guidelines, policies and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding.
Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:
• 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4—Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended
• 49 CFR Part 18—Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to
State and Local Governments
• 23 CFR Part 1200—Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs
NONDISCRIMINATION
The Grantee Agency will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to
nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-
352), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin (and 49 CFR Part 21); (b)
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686), which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29
U.S.C. 794), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-336), as amended (42 U.S.C. 12101,
et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disabilities (and 49 CFR Part 27); (d) the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
age; (e) the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (Pub. L. 100-259), which requires Federal-aid recipients and
all sub-recipients to prevent discrimination and ensure nondiscrimination in all of their programs and activities;
(f) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-255), as amended, relating to
nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (g) the comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-616), as amended, relating to
nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (h) Sections 523 and 527 of the Public Health
Service Act of 1912, as amended (42 U.S.C. 290dd-3 and 290ee-3), relating to confidentiality of alcohol and
drug abuse patient records; (i) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.),
relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (j) any other nondiscrimination
provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and (k) the
requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
Certifications and Assurances (Rev. 5/16)
BUY AMERICA ACT
Page 2
The Grantee Agency will comply with the provisions of the Buy America Act (49 U.S.C. 5323(j)), which
contains the following requirements:
Only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States may be purchased with Federal funds
unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestic purchases would be inconsistent with the
public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of
domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. Clear
justification for the purchase of non-domestic items must be in the form of a waiver request submitted to and
approved by the Secretary of Transportation.
POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
The Grantee Agency will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508) which limits the
political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with
Federal funds.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with
the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the
entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an
officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-
LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions.
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for
all sub-award at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub-grants, and contracts under grant, loans, and
cooperative agreements) and that all sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
Certifications and Assurances (Rev. 5/16)
RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
Page 3
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a
State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any
State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying
activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA
funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with
customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption
of a specific pending legislative proposal.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Instructions for Primary Certification
1. By signing and submitting this grant agreement, the Grantee Agency Official is providing the certification
set out below.
2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of
participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it
cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in
connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However,
failure of the Grantee Agency Official to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such
person from participation in this transaction.
3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the
department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the Grantee
Agency Official knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to
the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default.
4. The Grant Agency Official shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this
grant agreement is submitted if at any time the Grantee Agency Official learns its certification was
erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
5. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant,
person, primary covered transaction, principal, grant agreement, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this
clause, have the meaning set out in the Definitions and coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may
contact the department or agency to which this grant agreement is being submitted for assistance in
obtaining a copy of those regulations.
6. The Grantee Agency Official agrees by submitting this grant agreement that, should the proposed covered
transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person
who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible,
or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department
or agency entering into this transaction.
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
Certifications and Assurances (Rev. 5/16)
Page 4
7. The Grantee Agency Official further agrees by submitting this grant agreement that it will include the clause
titled “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier
Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without
modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.
8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower
tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred,
suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the
certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the
eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the list of Parties Excluded
from Federal Procurement and Non-procurement Programs.
9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in
order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a
participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary
course of business dealings.
10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered
transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for
debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from
participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the
department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default.
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered
Transactions
(1) The Grantee Agency Official certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that its principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
by any Federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this grant agreement been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public
transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery,
bribery, falsification or destruction of record, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal,
State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/grant agreement had one or more public
transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.
(2) Where the Grantee Agency Official is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such
prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this grant agreement.
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
Certifications and Assurances (Rev. 5/16)
Page 5
Instructions for Lower Tier Certification
1. By signing and submitting this grant agreement, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the
certification set out below.
2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingl y
rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the
department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including
suspension and/or debarment.
3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this
grant agreement is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification
was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
4. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant,
person, primary covered transaction, principal, grant agreement, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this
clause, have the meanings set out in the Definition and Coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may
contact the person to whom this grant agreement is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those
regulations.
5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this grant agreement that, should the proposed
covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with
a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the
department or agency with which this transaction originated.
6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this grant agreement that it will include
the clause titled “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—
Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all
solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. (See below)
7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower
tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred,
suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the
certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the
eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the List of Parties Excluded
from Federal Procurement and Non-procurement Programs.
8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in
order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a
participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary
course of business dealings.
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
Certifications and Assurances (Rev. 5/16)
Page 6
9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered
transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for
debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from
participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the
department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including
suspension and/or debarment.
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier
Covered Transactions:
1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this grant agreement, that neither it nor its
principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency.
2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this grant agreement.
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-C57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE
CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) FOR THE
“SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP)” 2016-
2017 GRANT NO. PT1703.
WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have agreed to
reimbursement up to $100,000.00 for the program shown above; and
WHEREAS, the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has been delegated the
responsibility for the administration of this grant Program, establishing necessary procedures;
and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Office of Traffic Safety
(OTS) require the Applicant to certify the approval of Application(s) by the Applicant’s
governing body; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into an Agreement with the State of California to
carry out the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Azusa
does hereby:
1. Accept the Grant agreement from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to
cover the hourly wages at overtime rate for police officers and regular rate for
reserve officers. Officers will conduct at least nine (9) DUI Saturation Patrols;
four (4) Traffic Safety Educational Presentations; two (2) DUI/DL Checkpoints;
two (2) Warrant Sweep operations; four (5) Traffic Enforcement Operations; two
(2) Distracted Driving enforcement operations and four (4) Bicycle and Pedestrian
Operations in a 12 month period starting October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017.
2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and
maintain the Project; and
3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed and understands the provisions
contained in the California Traffic Grant Program Manuals; and
4. Appoints the City Manager as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and
submit all documents including, but not limited to Applications, Agreements,
payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the
aforementioned Project.
The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND PASSED this 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016.
______________________________
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly passed by the City Council
of the City Azusa at a regular meeting thereof held on the ____ day of ________, 2016.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
Marco Martinez
City Attorney of The City of Azusa