Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutD-4 Staff Report - Serrano ENASCHEDULED ITEM D-4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL VIA: TROY L. BUTZLAFF, ICMA-CM, CITY MANAGER FROM: KURT CHRISTIANSEN, FAICP, ECONOMIC & COMMUNUTY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JULY 18, 2016 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT WITH SERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP (DBA AZUSA BLOCK 36, LLC.), FOR A MULTI-STORY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AZUSA AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. SUMMARY: The City is the owner of several parcels located at the southeast corner of Azusa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard commonly known as Block 36. On November 16, 2015, the City Council authorized Staff to release a Request for Proposals (RFP) for development of a mixed-use project on Block 36. On June 6, 2016, the City Council selected Serrano Development Group (dba Azusa Block 36, LLC) as the developers of Block 36 and directed Staff to prepare and an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) for City Council approval. Staff is recommending that the City Council consider entering into an ENA with Azusa Block 36, LLC to allow the parties to establish the negotiating parameters, terms and conditions for the development of a multi-story mixed-use development on the property. This action approves an ENA with Azusa Block 36, LLC. for a period of one hundred and eighty days (180) days with the ability to extend the term, administratively, for two additional ninety (90) day periods if needed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1) Approve an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Azusa Block 36, LLC, which allows for a period of exclusive negotiations between the City and Azusa Block 36, LLC, for the purpose of preparing major elements of the proposed development including, but not limited to: a site plan; design schematics; technical and economic studies; and, the pre-development obligations of all parties. 2)Authorize the Mayor to execute the ENA, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, on behalf of the City. APPROVED COUNCIL MEETING 7/18/2016 Consideration of an ENA with Serrano Development Group (dba Azusa Block 36, LLC) July 18, 2016 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The City is owner of a 2.24-acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Azusa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard commonly known as Block 36. On June 6, 2016, the City Council directed Staff to prepare ENA with Serrano Development (Azusa Block 36, LLC as the developers of Block 36. Azusa Block 36, LLC is proposing a 4 story mixed-use project consisting of the following:  A 10,000 square foot Laemmle Theatre;  33,000 square feet of ground floor retail and restaurants; and  108 residential units on levels 2-4. The proposed ENA with Azusa Block 36, LLC provides a process for the parties to negotiate a possible disposition and development agreement (DDA) for, among other things, the possible conveyance to and development by Azusa Block 36, LLC. of the proposed project site. It should be noted that the ENA does not commit the City to such conveyance or development, nor does it commit Azusa Block 36, LLC. to develop the project. The ENA only commits the parties to negotiate in good faith to attempt to reach an agreement over the next 180 days. The ENA can be extended, administratively, for two additional 90 day periods. The general terms of the ENA are as follows: General ENA Terms  Azusa Block 36, LLC to purchase the parcels for $2,734,000.  Azusa Block 36, LLC to prepare a conceptual development plan for the project that describes and depicts: (1) the location and placement of proposed buildings and (2) the architecture and elevations of the proposed building.  Terms of any potential Disposition and Development Agreement between the City and Azusa Block 36, LLC for the development of the project are to be negotiated during the exclusive negotiating period.  Azusa Block 36, LLC is required to provide a $20,000 non-refundable deposit which will be used to reimburse the City for certain costs related to the ENA and the evaluation of the development of the project. At the termination of this agreement, any remaining funds will be applied to the purchase price or refunded to the developer.  Azusa Block 36, LLC shall support the creation of a Community Facilities District.  Azusa Block 36, LLC to enter into a lease agreement with Laemmle Theatre for a period of not less than ten (10) years from the issuance of certificate of occupancy. Said lease shall contain a covenant from Laemmle Theatre to continuously operate the theater for not less than five (5) years, even if the theater is not profitable.  Azusa Block 36, LLC agrees to work with the City in drafting a covenant regarding the types of films to be exhibited at the theater. The ENA shall terminate for the following reasons: if the agreement expires; in the event of material default by either party; failure to make substantial progress per the proposed schedule set forth in the ENA; failure of the parties to reach agreement on a potential Development Agreement; and if either party is determined to not be negotiating in good faith. Consideration of an ENA with Serrano Development Group (dba Azusa Block 36, LLC) July 18, 2016 Page 3 Staff believes that it would be appropriate for the City Council to approve the proposed ENA with Azusa Block 36. LLC in order to provide both parties the necessary time to prepare additional information about the proposed project, including a more detailed site plan, a fiscal impact analysis and financing plan. Ultimately, this information will help determine the viability and economic benefits of the project so the City Council can decide whether to enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement with the developer to develop the project. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended actions. Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved Kurt E. Christiansen, FAICP Louie F. Lacasella Economic and Community Development Director Management Analyst Reviewed and Approved: Troy L. Butzlaff, ICMA-CM City Manager Attachments: 1) Draft ENA 45635.01000\29018359.6 THE CITY OF AZUSA EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT (Azusa Block 36, LLC) THIS EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is dated as of _______, 2016, for reference purposes only, and is entered into by and between the City of Azusa, a public body corporate and politic (“City”) and Azusa Block 36, LLC, (“Developer”), to provide a specified period of time to negotiate a disposition and development agreement. The City and the Developer are sometimes referred to in this Agreement individually, as a “Party” and, collectively, as the “Parties.” This Agreement is entered into by the Parties with reference to the following recited facts (each, a “Recital”): RECITALS A. The City is the owner of that certain real property located at ___ E. Foothill Blvd, Azusa (APN 8611-003-921) and more specifically described in Exhibit A (“Property”); and B. Developer is a California limited liability company comprised of representatives or affiliates of Serrano Development Group, Inc., Laemmle Theatres, LLC, and Pacific Coast Housing Development, LLC; and C. The Developer has proposed the development of the Property with a four (4) story mixed use projecting consisting of a 5-screen, approximately 10,000 foot movie theatre, approximately 33,000 square feet of ground floor retail and restaurant, approximately one-hundred eight (108) residential units on levels two through four of the development, incorporation of a Bank of America if available at commercially reasonable terms, and a public plaza on the corner of Azusa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, as generally depicted in the conceptual site plan attached to this Agreement as Exhibit “B” and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference (“Project”); and D. The intent of both the City and the Developer in entering into this Agreement is to establish a specific, limited period of time to negotiate an agreement between them governing the potential acquisition of the Property and development of the Project on the Property, all subject to mutually agreeable terms, conditions, covenants, restrictions and agreements to be negotiated and documented a future disposition and development agreement (“DDA”). E. Developer desires to determine the feasibility and terms under which it could develop the Project on the Property and to negotiate with the City the potential terms of a DDA for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CIT Y RELATING TO THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY AND THE PROMISES OF THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER AGREE, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals of fact set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement, in their entirety, by this reference. 2. Deposits. (a) Concurrent with the Developer’s execution of this Agreement, the Developer shall provide to the City a deposit in the amount of Thirty Thousand Dollars 45635.01000\29018359.6 ($30,000) in immediately available funds (“Initial Deposit”) to ensure that the Developer will proceed diligently and in good faith to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement during the Negotiation Period (as defined in Section 3(a)), as part of the consideration for the City’s agreement not to negotiate with other persons during the Negotiation Period, and to defray certain costs of the City in pursuing the contemplated negotiations with the Developer during the Negotiation Period, pursuant to this Agreement. The City shall charge all costs (including staff time, consultant fees and attorney fees associated with review and implementation of this Agreement or preparing the DDA) against the Initial Deposit (and Extension Deposit pursuant to Section 2(b) below, as applicable). At the termination of this Agreement without an agreed upon DDA, any remaining funds shall, at the Developer’s option, either be applied to the purchase price or be returned to the Developer. Developer acknowledges that the Initial Deposit (and any Extension Deposit, pursuant to Section 2(b) below) shall be in addition to those fees and expenses required by the City for any permit, other required entitlement or Project processing. A portion of the Initial Deposit in an amount equal to One Hundred Dollars ($100) shall immediately become non-refundable upon Developer’s transfer of the Initial Deposit to the City under this Agreement as consideration for the City’s agreement not to negotiate with other persons during the Negotiation Period. (b) Upon each extension of the Negotiation Period occurring pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b), if any, the Developer shall provide to the City an additional deposit of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) in immediately available funds on the first day of any extension of the Negotiation Period occurring pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) (each, an “Extension Deposit”). Each Extension Deposit is intended to ensure that the Developer will proceed diligently and in good faith to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement during any extension of the Negotiation Period, as part of the consideration for the City’s agreement not to negotiate with other persons during any such extension of the Negotiation Period, and to defray certain costs of the City in pursuing the contemplated negotiations with the Developer during any such extension of the Negotiation Period, pursuant to this Agreement. At the termination of this Agreement, any remaining funds from an Extension Deposit shall be refundable to the Developer as provided in Section 2(a), above.. 3. Term of Agreement. (a) The rights and duties of the City and the Developer established by this Agreement shall commence on the first date on which all of the following have occurred (the “Effective Date”): (1) execution of this Agreement by the authorized representative(s) of the Developer and delivery of such executed Agreement to the City, (2) payment of the Initial Deposit to the City by the Developer, in accordance with Section 2(a), (3) approval of this Agreement by the City governing body and execution of this Agreement by the authorized representative(s) of the City and (4) delivery of such fully executed Agreement to the Developer, the exact date of which shall be mutually agreed to by the Parties promptly after Developer’s receipt of the fully executed Agreement from the City as evidenced in writing signed by their respective authorized representatives. The City shall deliver a fully executed counterpart original of this Agreement to the Developer, within ten (10) calendar days following the City governing body’s approval of this Agreement, if approved, and the execution of this Agreement by the authorized representative(s) of the City. This Agreement shall continue in effect for the period of one hundred eighty (180) consecutive calendar days immediately following the Effective Date (“Negotiation Period”), subject to the limitations of Sections 3(b). (b) The Negotiation Period may be extended upon the mutual written agreement of the City’s City Manager and the Developer for no more than two (2) additional consecutive ninety (90) 45635.01000\29018359.6 calendar day periods. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence or any other part of this Agreement, in no event shall the Negotiation Period exceed three hundred sixty (360) consecutive calendar days from the Effective Date. (c) This Agreement shall automatically expire and be of no further force or effect at the end of the Negotiation Period, unless, prior to that time, both the City and the Developer approve and execute a DDA acceptable to both the City and the Developer, in their respective sole and absolute discretion, in which case this Agreement will terminate on the effective date of such DDA. 4. Obligations of Developer. During the Negotiation Period, the Developer shall proceed diligently and in good faith to develop and present to City staff and, subsequently, to the City governing body, for review, all of the following: (a) A proposed complete conceptual development plan for the Project on the Property that describes and depicts: (1) the location and placement of proposed buildings and (2) the architecture and elevations of the proposed buildings; (b) Proposed zoning change or changes to the City’s General Plan, if any, necessary to accommodate the Project on the Property; (c) A list of potential users or tenants and anticipated lease rates for the Property, as developed with the Project; (d) A proposed time schedule and cost estimates for the development of the Project on the Property; (e) A proposed financing plan identifying financing sources for all private and public improvements proposed to be constructed by the Developer for the Project; and (f) A preliminary financial analysis demonstrating the costs of the Project and benefits to the City including, but not limited to, financials, operating proformas market feasibility studies, and, if reasonably available, proformas showing the construction and any new public revenues anticipated to be generated by the Project. Negotiation of DDA. (g) During the Negotiation Period, the City and the Developer shall proceed diligently and in good faith to negotiate a DDA between them. The City and the Developer shall generally cooperate with each other and supply such available documents and information as may be reasonably requested by the other to facilitate the conduct of the negotiations. Both the City and the Developer shall exercise commercially reasonable efforts to complete discussions relating to the terms and conditions of a DDA and such other matters, as may be mutually acceptable to both the City and the Developer, in their respective sole discretion. The exact terms and conditions of a DDA, if any, shall be determined during the course of these negotiations. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed to be a representation or agreement by either the City or the Developer that a mutually acceptable DDA will be produced from negotiations under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall impose any obligation on either Party to agree to a definitive DDA in the future. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed to be a guaranty, warranty or representation that any proposed DDA that may be negotiated by City staff and the Developer will be approved by the City governing body. The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the City’s consideration of any DDA is subject to 45635.01000\29018359.6 the sole and absolute discretion of the City governing body and all legally required public hearings, public meetings, notices, factual findings and other determinations required by law. (h) Based upon Developer’s proposal and preliminary negotiations the Parties have come to a tentative agreement on the following terms, subject to future negotiation during the Negotiation Period: (i) Price: Two Million Seven Hundred Thirty-four Thousand Dollars ($2,734,000). The purchase price is based upon the approximate Property size of 97,574 square feet at Twenty-eight Dollars and two cents ($28.02) per square foot; (ii) Deposit at opening of escrow: Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000). The Deposit shall be non-refundable at the end of the Due Diligence Period; (iii) Developer acknowledges that the City is considering the creation of a Community Facilities District which may result in an assessment against residential properties if adopted by the City Council following all legally required proceedings. Developer shall support the creation of a Community Facilities District, at no cost to Developer, following the preparation of an Engineer’s Report and negotiation of the terms of the assesment. (v) Covenants and Conditions: (a) Developer covenants to enter into a lease with Laemmle Theatre for a period of not less than ten (10) years from issuance of certificate of occupancy. Said lease shall contain a covenant from Laemmle Theatre to continuously operate the theater for not less than five (5) years, even if the theater is not profitable. The lease shall also contain certain covenants regarding the types of films to be exhibited at the theater. It is understood that this covenant will allow Laemmle to show the types of art, foreign and independent films which are synomous with the Lammle brand. (b) The Developer and the City shall jointly identify mutually agreed upon inappropriate tenants for the commercial portion of the project for inclusion into the DDA (c) Construction of the Project shall be completed as defined in the Schedule of Performance in the DDA, presently estimated to be approximately 31 months. 5. Restrictions Against Change in Ownership, Management and Control of Developer and Assignment of Agreement. (a) The qualifications and identity of the Developer and its principals are of particular concern to the City. It is because of these qualifications and identity that the City has entered into this Agreement with the Developer. During the Negotiation Period, no voluntary or involuntary successor-in-interest of the Developer shall acquire any rights or powers under this Agreement, except as provided in Section 6(c). 45635.01000\29018359.6 (b) During the Negotiation Period, the Developer shall promptly notify the City in writing of any and all changes whatsoever in the identity of the business entities or individuals either comprising or in Control (as defined in Section 6(d)) of the Developer, as well as any and all changes in the interest or the degree of Control of the Developer by any such person, of which information the Developer or any of its shareholders, partners, members, directors, managers or officers are notified or may otherwise have knowledge or information. Upon the occurrence of any significant or material change, whether voluntary or involuntary, in ownership, management or Control of the Developer (other than such changes occasioned by the death or incapacity of any individual) that has not been approved by the City, prior to the time of such change, the City may terminate this Agreement, without liability to the Developer or any other person and refund any remaining deposit funds provided by the Developer to the pursuant to Section 2(a), above, by sending written notice of termination to the Developer, referencing this Section 6(b). (c) The Developer may assign its rights under this Agreement to an Affiliate (as defined in Section 6(d)), on the condition that such Affiliate expressly assumes all of the obligations of the Developer under this Agreement in a writing reasonably satisfactory to the City, and further provided that Azusa Block 36, LLC shall, at all times, control any such Affiliate and be responsible and obligated directly to the City for performance of the Developer’s obligations under this Agreement. (d) For the purposes of this Agreement, the term “Affiliate” means any person, directly or indirectly, controlling or controlled by or under common control with the Developer, whether by direct or indirect ownership of equity interests, by contract, or otherwise. For the purposes of this agreement, “Control” means possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of an entity, whether by ownership of equity interests, by contract, or otherwise. 6. Obligations to Review Draft Agreements and Attend Meetings. (a) During the Negotiation Period, each Party shall diligently review and comment on draft versions of a DDA provided by the other Party and, if the terms and conditions of such a DDA are agreed upon between City staff and the Developer, the Developer shall submit the DDA fully executed by the authorized representative(s) of the Developer to the City Manager for submission to the City governing body for review and approval or disapproval. Any future DDA shall consist of terms and conditions acceptable to both the Developer and the City governing body, in their respective sole and absolute discretion. (b) During the Negotiation Period, the Developer shall also keep City staff advised on the progress of the Developer in performing its obligations under this Agreement, on a regular basis or as requested by City staff, including, without limitation, having one or more of the Developer’s employees or consultants who are knowledgeable regarding this Agreement, the design and planning of the Project and the progress of negotiation of a DDA, such that such person(s) can meaningfully respond to City and/or City staff questions regarding the progress of the design and planning of the Project or the negotiation of a DDA, attend both: (1) periodic meetings with City staff, as reasonably scheduled and requested by City staff during the Negotiation Period, and (2) meetings of the City governing body, when reasonably requested to do so by City staff. 7. Developer to Pay All Costs and Expenses. All fees or expenses of engineers, architects, financial consultants, legal, planning or other consultants or contractors, retained by the Developer for any study, analysis, evaluation, report, schedule, estimate, environmental review, planning and/or design 45635.01000\29018359.6 activities, drawings, specifications or other activity or matter relating to the Property or the Project or negotiation of a DDA that may be undertaken by the Developer during the Negotiation Period, pursuant to or in reliance upon this Agreement or in the Developer's discretion, regarding any matter relating to a DDA, the Property or the Project, shall be the sole responsibility of and undertaken at the sole cost and expense of the Developer and no such activity or matter shall be deemed to be undertaken for the benefit of, at the expense of or in reliance upon the City. The Developer shall also pay all fees, charges and costs, make all deposits and provide all bonds or other security associated with the submission to and processing by the City and/or the City of any and all applications and other documents and information to be submitted to the City and/or the City by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise associated with the Project. The City shall not be obligated to pay or reimburse any expenses, fees, charges or costs incurred by the Developer in pursuit of any study, analysis, evaluation, report, schedule, estimate, environmental review, planning and/or design activities, drawings, specifications or other activity or matter relating to the Property or the Project or negotiation of a DDA that may be undertaken by the Developer during the Negotiation Period, whether or not this Agreement is, eventually, terminated or extended or a DDA is entered into between the City and the Developer, in the future. 8. City Not To Negotiate With Others. During the Negotiation Period, the City and City staff shall not negotiate with any other person regarding the sale or development of the Property. The term “negotiate,” as used in this Agreement, means and refers to engaging in any discussions with a person other than the Developer, regardless of how initiated, with respect to the availability of the Property or that person’s development of the Property, without the Developer’s prior written consent. Developer acknowledges that City may receive and retain unsolicited offers regarding development of the Property, but shall not entertain any offer or negotiate with the proponent of any such offer during the Negotiation Period; provided, however, that the City may notify such proponent that it is a party to this Agreement . Developer acknowledges that the City is a public agency and subject to the provisions of the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6254, et. seq. (the “Act”). The City shall use its best efforts to inform Developer of any request for information received pursuant to the Act. If Developer believes the information requested is confidential, Developer may pursuant a court order preventing the release of the requested information. 9. Acknowledgments and Reservations. (a) The City and the Developer agree that, if this Agreement expires or is terminated for any reason, or a future DDA is not approved and executed by both the City and the Developer, for any reason, neither the City nor the Developer shall be under any obligation, nor have any liability to each other or any other person regarding the sale or other disposition of the Property or the development of the Project or the Property; provided, however, that in the event this Agreement terminates, the City shall return to the Developer within ten (10) business days of such termination any and all deposits due to be refunded pursuant to Section 2(a) of this Agreement. (b) The Developer acknowledges and agrees that no provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to be an offer by the City, nor an acceptance by the City of any offer or proposal from the Developer for the City to convey any estate or interest in the Property to the Developer or for the City to provide any financial or other assistance to the Developer for development of the Project or the Property. (c) The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Developer has not acquired, nor will acquire, by virtue of the terms of this Agreement, any legal or equitable interest in real or personal property from the City. (d) It is understood and agreed between the City and the Developer that the Project and the development of the Property must conform to all City, City and other applicable governmental 45635.01000\29018359.6 development, land use and architectural regulations and standards. Drawings, plans and specifications for the Project shall be subject to the approval of the City through the standard development application process for projects of this nature. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered approval of any plans or specifications for the Project or of the Project itself by the City. (e) Developer agrees to submit such documentation as is reasonably required by the City to assist in the Parties’ negotiation process. Such documentation shall include, at a minimum, financials, operating proformas and market feasibility studies. The proforma shall include costs of all elements of the project, including development costs and sources of financing. 10. Nondiscrimination. The Developer shall not discriminate against nor segregate any person, or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, handicap, national origin or ancestry in undertaking its obligations under this Agreement. 11. Limitation on Damages and Remedies. (a) THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT AND IMPRACTICAL TO ASCERTAIN THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES THAT WOULD BE SUFFERED BY THE DEVELOPER UPON THE BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CITY. HAVING MADE DILIGENT BUT UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS TO ASCERTAIN THE ACTUAL DAMAGES THE DEVELOPER WOULD SUFFER UPON THE BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CITY, THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITY AGREE THAT A REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF THE DEVELOPER’S DAMAGES IN SUCH EVENT IS TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000) (THE “LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AMOUNT”). THEREFORE, UPON THE BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CITY, THE CITY SHALL PAY THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AMOUNT TO THE DEVELOPER AND THIS AGREEMENT SHALL TERMINATE. RECEIPT OF THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AMOUNT SHALL BE THE DEVELOPER’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY ARISING FROM ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CITY. ____________________ Initials of Authorized Representative of City ____________________ Initials of Authorized Representative of Developer (b) THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER EACH ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THE CITY WOULD NOT HAVE ENTERED INTO THIS AGREEMENT, IF IT WERE TO BE LIABLE TO THE DEVELOPER FOR ANY MONETARY DAMAGES, MONETARY RECOVERY OR ANY REMEDY OTHER THAN TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT AND PAYMENT OF THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AMOUNT. ACCORDINGLY, THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER AGREE THAT THE DEVELOPER’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE RIGHT AND REMEDY UPON THE BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE CITY IS TO TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT AND RECEIVE THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AMOUNT. (c) THE DEVELOPER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS AWARE OF THE MEANING AND LEGAL EFFECT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542, WHICH PROVIDES: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH 45635.01000\29018359.6 THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. (d) CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542 NOTWITHSTANDING, IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE DEVELOPER TO BE BOUND BY THE LIMITATION ON DAMAGES, RECOVERY AND REMEDIES SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 12, AND THE DEVELOPER HEREBY RELEASES ANY AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY FOR MONETARY DAMAGES, MONETARY RECOVERY OR OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE RELIEF RELATED TO ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT, EXCEPT RECEIPT OF THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AMOUNT, WHETHER OR NOT ANY SUCH RELEASED CLAIMS WERE KNOWN OR UNKNOWN TO THE DEVELOPER AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE DEVELOPER SPECIFICALLY WAIVES THE BENEFITS OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542 AND ALL OTHER STATUTES AND JUDICIAL DECISIONS (WHETHER STATE OR FEDERAL) OF SIMILAR EFFECT WITH REGARD TO THE LIMITATIONS ON DAMAGES AND REMEDIES AND WAIVERS OF ANY SUCH DAMAGES AND REMEDIES CONTAINED IN THIS SECTION 12. ____________________ Initials of Authorized Representative of City ____________________ Initials of Authorized Representative of Developer 12. Default. (a) Failure or delay by either Party to perform any material term or provision of this Agreement shall constitute a default under this Agreement. If the Party who is receives notice of a default from the other Party cures, corrects or remedies the alleged default within fifteen (15) calendar days after receipt of written notice or commences the cure within fifteen (15) days of written notice if the cure will reasonably require more than fifteen (15) days, by the other Party specifying such default, such Party shall not be in default under this Agreement. The notice and cure period provided in the immediately preceding sentence shall not, under any circumstances, extend the Negotiation Period. If there are less than fifteen (15) days remaining in the Negotiation Period, the cure period allowed pursuant to this Section 13(a) shall be automatically reduced to the number of days remaining in the Negotiation Period. (b) The Party claiming that a default has occurred shall give written notice of default to the Party claimed to be in default, specifying the alleged default. Delay in giving such notice shall not constitute a waiver of any default nor shall it change the time of default. However, the injured Party shall have no right to exercise any remedy for a default under this Agreement, without first delivering written notice of the default and allowing the applicable period to cure any such default as set forth in Section 13(a). (c) Any failure or delay by a Party in asserting any of its rights or remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any rights or remedies associated with a default. (d) If a default of either Party remains uncured for more than fifteen (15) calendar days following receipt of written notice of such default, a “breach” of this Agreement by the defaulting Party shall be deemed to have occurred. In the event of a breach of this Agreement, the sole and exclusive remedy of the Party who is not in default shall be to terminate this Agreement by serving written notice of 45635.01000\29018359.6 termination on the Party in breach and, in the case of a breach by the City, the Developer shall also be entitled to receive the Liquidated Damages Amount. 13. Compliance with Law. The Developer acknowledges that any future DDA, if approved by the governing body of the City, will require the Developer (among other things) to carry out the development of the Project in conformity with all applicable laws, including all applicable building, planning and zoning laws, environmental laws, safety laws and federal and state labor and wage laws. 14. Press Releases. The Developer agrees to obtain the approval of the City Manager or his or her designee or successor in function of any press releases Developer may propose relating to the lease or redevelopment of the Property or negotiation of a DDA with the City, prior to publication. The rights and obligations in this provision shall not apply to leasing and marketing brochures and/or information distributed by email or placed online on a brokerage website or real estate website such as LoopNet.com. 15. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall be presented in person, by nationally recognized overnight delivery service or by facsimile and confirmed by first class certified or registered United States Mail, with return receipt requested, to the address and/or fax number for the Party set forth in this Section 16. Notice shall be deemed confirmed by United States Mail effective the third (3rd) business day after deposit with the United States Postal Service. Notice by personal service or nationally recognized overnight delivery service shall be effective upon delivery. Either Party may change its address for receipt of notices by notifying the other Party in writing. Delivery of notices to courtesy copy recipients shall not be required for valid notice to a Party TO DEVELOPER: Azusa Block 36, LLC c/o Serrano Development Group 500 N. Brand Boulevard, #2120 Glendale, CA 91203 Attn: Jason Tolleson T: (818) 396-8880 COPY TO: Pacific Coast Housing Development 24233 Creekside Road Valencia, CA 91355 Attn: Jeffrey Paul T: (661) 255-3448 45635.01000\29018359.6 TO CITY: COPY TO: The City of Azusa 213 East Foothill Boulevard Azusa, California 91702 Attention: City Manager T: (626) 812-5238 F: (626) 334-6358 Best Best & Krieger, LLP 18101 Von Karman Ave, Suite 1000 Irvine, CA 92614 Attention: City Attorney T: (949)-263-2600 F: (949)-260-0972 16. Warranty Against Payment of Consideration for Agreement. The Developer warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. Third parties, for the purposes of this Section 17, shall not include persons to whom fees are paid for professional services, if rendered by attorneys, financial consultants, accountants, engineers, architects, brokers and other consultants, when such fees are considered necessary by the Developer. 17. Acceptance of Agreement by Developer. The Developer shall acknowledge its acceptance of this Agreement by delivering to the City three (3) original counterpart executed copies of this Agreement signed by the authorized representative(s) of the Developer. 18. Counterpart Originals. This Agreement may be executed by the City and the Developer in multiple counterpart originals, all of which together shall constitute a single agreement. 19. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to benefit any person or entity other than the City or the Developer. 20. Governing Law. The City and the Developer acknowledge and agree that this Agreement was negotiated, entered into and is to be fully performed in the City of Azusa, California. The City and the Developer agree that this Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without application of such laws’ conflicts of laws principles. 21. Waivers. No waiver of any breach of any term or condition contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach of such term or condition, or of any other term or condition contained in this Agreement. No extension of the time for performance of any obligation or act, no waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement, nor any modification of this Agreement shall be enforceable against the City or the Developer, unless made in writing and executed by both the City and the Developer. 22. Construction. Headings at the beginning of each section and sub-section of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of reference of the City and the Developer and are not a part of this Agreement. Whenever required by the context of this Agreement, the singular shall include the plural and the masculine shall include the feminine and vice versa. This Agreement shall not be construed as if it had been prepared by one or the other of the City or the Developer, but rather as if both the City and the Developer prepared this Agreement. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to sections are to this 45635.01000\29018359.6 Agreement. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are attached to this Agreement and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. If the date on which the City or the Developer is required to take any action pursuant to the terms of this Agreement is not a business day of the City, the action shall be taken on the next succeeding business day of the City. 24. Attorneys’ Fees. If either Party hereto files any action or brings any action or proceeding against the other arising out of this Agreement, then the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover as an element of its costs of suit, and not as damages, its reasonable attorneys’ fees as fixed by the court, in such action or proceeding or in a separate action or proceeding brought to recover such attorneys’ fees. For the purposes hereof the words “reasonable attorneys’ fees” mean and include, in the case of either Party, salaries and expenses of the lawyers working for or employed by such Party (allocated on an hourly basis) to the extent they provide legal services to such Party in connection with the representation of that Party in any such matter. [Signatures on following page] 45635.01000\29018359.6 THE CITY OF AZUSA EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT (Azusa Block 36, LLC) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have executed this Negotiation Agreement on the dates indicated next to each of the signatures of their authorized representatives, as appear below. Dated: Dated: DEVELOPER: Azusa Block 36, LLC, a limited liability company By: Jeffrey Paul, Manager By: Jason Tolleson, COO Dated: CITY: THE CITY OF AZUSA By: ATTEST: By: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BEST BEST & KRIEGER, LLP By: City Attorney EXHIBIT A 45635.01000\29018359.6 EXHIBIT “A” TO NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT Property Legal Description 45635.01000\29018359.6 EXHIBIT “B” TO NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT Project Description [To Be Attached Behind This Cover Page] 45635.01000\29018359.6