HomeMy WebLinkAboutE-05 Legislative ReportCONSENT ITEM
E-5
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
VIA: TROY L. BUTZLAFF, ICMA-CM, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LOUIE F. LACASELLA, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
DATE: JUNE 20, 2016
SUBJECT: QUARTERLY LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
SUMMARY:
On March 7, 2016, the City Council adopted a Legislative Platform and 2016 State and Federal
Legislative Priorities. Over the past several months, Staff has submitted position letters on various
legislative proposals that would have a direct impact to the City and its residents. This report
summarizes the position letters submitted and the current status of the legislative proposals. The report
also highlights some additional proposals that Staff is observing that the City Council might want to take
action on in the near future.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:
1) Receive and file the Quarterly Legislative Update.
DISCUSSION:
Every year members of the California State Assembly and Senate introduce hundreds of bills. In
addition, other government agencies or elected boards introduce policy issues of regional significance
that may impact the City. On occasion, the City is requested to comment upon or indicate a position on
a particular bill or policy issue. With the adoption of the Legislative Platform, Staff has submitted
position letters on eight (8) legislative proposals.
APPROVED
COUNCIL MEETING
6/20/2016
Quarterly Legislative Update
June 20, 2016
Page 2
The following, summaries position letters submitted to date and the current status of the legislative
proposals:
LEGISLATION POSITION STATUS
AB 1707
(Linder)
Public Records Act
Oppose
Bill died
SB 876
(Liu)
Enforcement of Local Ordinances
Oppose
Bill died
Los Angeles County’s
Pharmaceuticals and Sharps
Collection and Disposal
Stewardship Ordinance
Support
Vote to postpone
SB 1199
(Hall)
Advertising Displays for RDA
Project Areas Support
This bill has passed out of the Senate and will now go
to the Assembly Committee’s for hearings. The bill is
double referred to both the Assembly Governmental
Organization Committee and the Assembly local
Government Committee. The bill has not been set for
a hearing date yet
AB 806
(Dodd and Frazier)
Economic Development
Support
The bill passed out of the Assembly and will be heard
next in the Senate Governance and Finance
Committee scheduled for June 15, 2016
HR 4954
(DeFazio)
Water Quality Protection and Job
Creation Act of 2016
Support
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources
and Environment
SB 415
(Hueso)
Voter Participation Oppose/Petition
The bill was signed by the Governor on September 1,
2015 and the statue will take effect January 1, 2018
AB 2339
(Irwin and Low)
Net Energy Metering
Oppose
The bill was held on the Assembly Appropriations
Committee suspense file due to state costs
SB 415 FORCED ELECTION CONSOLIDATION
To date the City has been successful in all position taken except in one occurrence, SB 415, regarding
forced election consolidation with the County. SB 415 was signed by the Governor and will go in effect
January 1, 2018 (Attachment 9). As a result, the City will be forced to consolidate with County
elections. On February 1, 2016, the City Council, City Clerk and Treasurer signed a petition in support
of an alternate solution to increase voter participation and to allow the continuance of stand-alone
elections (Attachment 7). To date there are no new developments regarding SB 415 alternatives.
Quarterly Legislative Update
June 20, 2016
Page 3
LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS MONITORING
In an effort to keep the City Council apprised of significant State legislation, via the Legislative
Platform, Staff monitors and reviews legislative advocacy efforts being undertaken by the League of
California Cities (League). The League actively engages in legislative lobbying efforts at the State level
on behalf of local municipalities. Additionally, City Staff works closely with the League’s Public Affairs
Staff on advocacy efforts.
Staff also receives weekly legislative reports from the City’s lobbyist Joe A. Gonsalves & Son. The
following is a list of legislative proposals Staff is currently monitoring:
LEGISLATION SUMMARY STATUS
AB 2586
(Gatto)
Parking
AB 2586 seeks to place restrictions on the
ability of local government to regulate its own
parking needs. If approved, the measure would
limit the ability of a municipality to regulate
street sweeping parking, business district
parking, and other parking related matters. The
League recommends opposing this bill.
The bill has passed out of the
Assembly and will now be heard in
the Senate. It has not been referred to
any Committee yet.
AB 2220
(Cooper)
Elections in Cities: By
or From District
Allows cities to switch to district based
elections by ordinance, regardless of
population size. This tool serves as a cost
saving measure to cities that face possible
litigation under the California Voting Rights
Act (CVRA) allowing them to settle with the
plaintiffs and convert to by district election
system quicker than by placing the question on
the ballot for voter approval. Furthermore, this
allows cities to be proactive and quickly switch
to district before a lawsuit is brought. The
League recommends supporting this bill.
The bill is in the Senate.
AB 2501
(Bloom)
Housing: Density
Bonuses
In addition to imposing unrealistic timelines,
AB 2501 contains provisions that would limit
the ability of a city to interpret its own
development standards and diminish the role of
planning commissions; limit a city’s ability to
reduce development standards without waiving
them; prohibits cities from providing public
notice or hold a public hearing on density
bonus applications, which are normally made
in conjunction with land-use applications that
do require public hearings; and allow
developers determine whether a project
modifications result in costs reductions, rather
than the city. The League recommends
opposing this bill.
The bill is in the Senate.
Quarterly Legislative Update
June 20, 2016
Page 4
AB 2614
(Bonta)
Medical Cannabis: Out-
of-State Convictions
AB 2614 would prohibit the denial of a state
license for commercial cannabis activity if the
denial is based solely on an out-of-state felony
conviction that did not include a period of
incarceration, so long as a local jurisdiction is
aware of the conviction and is nonetheless
willing to issue a local permit or other
authorization. The League recommends
opposing this bill.
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
Governor’s “By Right”
Proposal in the Budget
A proposal by the Governor to pre-empt local
discretionary land use approvals of specified
housing developments by having all such
approvals be considered “ministerial” actions,
meaning eliminating opportunities for public
review, project-level environmental review and
restricting design review. The League of
California Cities recommends opposing this
bill.
The Governor, Senate Pro-Tem and
Assembly Speaker have agreed to
continue this issue and it will not be
considered as part of the State
Budget on Wednesday, June 15.
AB 2403
(Bloom)
Alcohol and Drug
Abuse Recovery or
Treatment Facilities
AB 2403 (Bloom) would help maintain
residential neighborhoods as a therapeutic
environment for the social integration of high
functioning disabled persons, including
recovering alcoholics and addicts. The League
recommends supporting this bill.
In committee: Held under
submission.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.
Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved:
Louie F. Lacasella Troy L. Butzlaff, ICMA-CM
Management Analyst City Manager
Attachments:
1) AB 1707 Letter of Opposition
2) SB 876 Letter of Opposition
3) Pharmaceuticals and Sharps Collection Letter of Support
4) SB 1199 Letter of Support
5) AB 806 Letter of Support
6) HR 4954 Letter of Support
7) SB 415 Petition
8) AB 2339 Letter of Opposition
9) SB 415 Bill
ATTACHMENT 1
Senate Bill No. 415
CHAPTER 235
An act to add Chapter 1.7 (commencing with Section 14050) to Division
14 of the Elections Code, relating to elections.
[Approved by Governor September 1, 2015. Filed with
Secretary of State September 1, 2015.]
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 415, Hueso. Voter participation.
Existing law generally requires all state, county, municipal, district, and
school district elections be held on an established election date. Existing
law also establishes certain dates for statewide elections. Existing law
requires any state, county, municipal, district, and school district election
held on a statewide election date to be consolidated with a statewide election,
except as provided.
This bill, commencing January 1, 2018, would prohibit a political
subdivision, as defined, from holding an election other than on a statewide
election date if holding an election on a nonconcurrent date has previously
resulted in voter turnout for a regularly scheduled election in that political
subdivision being at least 25% less than the average voter turnout within
the political subdivision for the previous 4 statewide general elections,
except as specified.
This bill would require a court to implement appropriate remedies upon
a violation of this prohibition. The bill would authorize a voter who resides
in a political subdivision where a violation is alleged to file an action in
superior court to enforce this prohibition, and it would allow a prevailing
plaintiff other than the state or political subdivision to collect a reasonable
attorney’s fee and litigation expenses, as provided.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 1.7 (commencing with Section 14050) is added
to Division 14 of the Elections Code, to read:
Chapter 1.7. Voter Participation
14050. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the California
Voter Participation Rights Act.
14051. As used in this chapter:
(a) “Political subdivision” means a geographic area of representation
created for the provision of government services, including, but not limited
93
to, a city, a school district, a community college district, or other district
organized pursuant to state law.
(b) “Significant decrease in voter turnout” means the voter turnout for a
regularly scheduled election in a political subdivision is at least 25 percent
less than the average voter turnout within that political subdivision for the
previous four statewide general elections.
(c) “Voter turnout” means the percentage of voters who are eligible to
cast ballots within a given political subdivision who voted.
14052. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), a political subdivision
shall not hold an election other than on a statewide election date if holding
an election on a nonconcurrent date has previously resulted in a significant
decrease in voter turnout.
(b) A political subdivision may hold an election other than on a statewide
election date if, by January 1, 2018, the political subdivision has adopted a
plan to consolidate a future election with a statewide election not later than
the November 8, 2022, statewide general election.
14053. Upon a finding of a violation of subdivision (a) of Section 14052,
the court shall implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition
of concurrent election dates for future elections and the upgrade of voting
equipment or systems to do so. In imposing remedies pursuant to this section,
a court may also require a county board of supervisors to approve
consolidation pursuant to Section 10402.5.
14054. In an action to enforce subdivision (a) of Section 14052, the
court shall allow the prevailing plaintiff other than the state or political
subdivision of the state, a reasonable attorney’s fee consistent with the
standards established in Serrano v. Priest (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25, 48-49, and
litigation expenses including, but not limited to, expert witness fees and
expenses as part of the costs. A prevailing defendant shall not recover any
costs, unless the court finds the action to be frivolous, unreasonable, or
without foundation.
14055. A voter who resides in a political subdivision where a violation
of subdivision (a) of Section 14052 is alleged may file an action pursuant
to that section in the superior court of the county in which the political
subdivision is located.
14056. This chapter does not apply to special elections.
14057. This chapter shall become operative on January 1, 2018.
O
93
— 2 —Ch. 235