Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutF-1 Staff Report - TOD Specific Plan Part 1City of Azusa AZUSA TOD SPECIFIC PLAN Adopted November 16, 2015 Amended June 19, 2017 Amended Month Date XX, 2018 City of Azusa TOD Specific Plan Adopted by: Ordinance No. 2015-011 Amended by: Ordinance No. 2017-06 Ordinance No. 2018-XX Prepared for: City of Azusa 213 East Foothill Boulevard Azusa, CA 91702 Funded by: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: RRM Design Group Planning and Urban Design In collaboration with: Fehr & Peers Transportation Planning The Natelson Dale Group Economic, Financial and Market Analysis CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS City Council Joseph R. Rocha, Mayor Edward J. Alvarez, Mayor Pro Tem Uriel E. Macias, Council Member Angel A. Carrillo, Council Member Robert Gonzales, Council Member Planning Commission Robert Donnelson Jack Lee Jesse R. Avila, Jr. Anthony Contreras Suzanne Avila City Staff Kurt Christiansen, AICP, Director of Economic and Community Development Edson Ibanez, Assistant Planner Daniel Bobadilla, Interim Public Works Director Collette Morse, AICP, Morse Planning Group, Consulting Staff CONTENTS CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................1-1 1.2 Specific Plan Area ..................................................................1-2 1.3 What is a Specific Plan ...........................................................1-3 1.4 Document Organization ........................................................1-4 1.5 Relationship to Other Planning Documents ........................1-5 1.6 Outreach Process ...................................................................1-6 1.7 Vision and Guiding Principles ..............................................1-12 2.0 LAND USE AND URBAN FORM ............................................2-1 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................2-1 2.2 District-Based Approach ........................................................2-3 2.3 Gold Line District ...................................................................2-12 2.4 Downtown District .................................................................2-22 2.5 Downtown Expansion District ..............................................2-36 2.6 Route 66 District ....................................................................2-48 2.7 Transition District ....................................................................2-62 2.8 Civic District ...........................................................................2-73 3.0 MOBILITY, COMPLETE STREETS, AND STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................3-1 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................3-1 3.2 Pedestrian Access and Improvements ................................3-4 3.3 Circulation and Street Improvements ................................3-10 3.4 Bicycle Access and Improvements ....................................3-27 3.5 Public/Private Transit ............................................................3-30 3.6 Streetscape Furnishings ........................................................3-32 3.7 Gateways and Signage ......................................................3-39 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES ............................4-1 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................4-1 4.2 Potable Water .........................................................................4-1 4.3 Sanitary Sewer .........................................................................4-1 4.4 Storm Drainage .......................................................................4-2 4.5 Dry Utilities ................................................................................4-3 4.6 Community Services ...............................................................4-3 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AND FINANCING .............5-1 5.1 Introduction .............................................................................5-1 5.2 How the Specific Plan Can Attract Private Investment and Provide Public Benefits ...................................................5-1SECTIONS CONTENTS CONTENTS CONT. 5.3 Economic Conditions Influencing Development Potentials in the Specific Plan Area ......................................5-2 5.4 Summary of New Development Potentials .........................5-4 5.5 Financial Analysis of Alternative Development Projects at Azusa Opportunity Sites .....................................................5-5 5.6 Creating the Conditions for Attracting Private Investment - City’s Role and Tools ........................................5-6 5.7 Potential Funding Sources and Financing Mechanisms ....5-8 5.8 Implementation Action Plan ...............................................5-12 6.0 ADMINISTRATION ................................................................6-1 6.1 Introduction .............................................................................6-1 6.2 Specific Plan Authority and Adoption .................................6-1 6.3 Specific Plan Amendments ...................................................6-1 6.4 Specific Plan Administration ..................................................6-3 A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................ A-1 B AZUSA OPPORTUNITY SITES ................................................B-1 C FINANCING .........................................................................C-1SECTIONS APPENDICES SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Document Purpose and Organization INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1 CONTENTS 1.1 PURPOSE ..............................................................................1-1 1.2 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA ..........................................................1-2 1.2.1 Context ....................................................................................1-2 1.2.2 City-Owned Property .............................................................1-2 1.3 WHAT IS A SPECIFIC PLAN ..................................................1-3 1.4 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION .............................................1-4 1.5 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNING DOCUMENTS ..........1-5 1.5.1 City of Azusa General Plan ....................................................1-5 1.5.2 City of Azusa Development Code .......................................1-5 1.5.3 Azusa Pacific University Specific Plan ...................................1-5 1.6 OUTREACH PROCESS ..........................................................1-6 1.6.1 Community Outreach ............................................................1-6 1.6.2 Opportunities and Constraints .............................................1-7 1.7 VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES ..................................1-12 1.7.1 Vision ......................................................................................1-12 1.7.2 Guiding Principles .................................................................1-12 1.7.3 Transit-Oriented Development ............................................1-14 1.7.4 Sustainability ..........................................................................1-15 1.7.5 Healthy Communities ...........................................................1-20 1.7.6 Crime Prevention Through Env. Design ..............................1-22 1-1 Specific Plan Area Location Map .....................................1-2 1-2 Specific Plan Area Opportunities and Constraints ........1-10 FIGURESSUBSECTIONS INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-1 May 2018 1.1 PURPOSE The Azusa Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan (herein referred to as the Azusa TOD Specific Plan, or, simply Specific Plan) is a comprehensive document that will implement the vision for the Specific Plan Area as established by the City of Azusa planning process. A Specific Plan is a regulatory tool that local governments use to implement the General Plan and to guide development in a localized area. While the City of Azusa General Plan is the primary guide for growth and development in the community, the Specific Plan is able to focus on the unique characteristics of a specialized area. This Azusa TOD Specific Plan was prepared pursuant to Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code. City of Azusa seal at Azusa Avenue and the 210 freeway. INTRODUCTION1 1-2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 1.2.1 Context The Specific Plan Area includes two future transit stations. Future development at the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station (at Alameda Avenue) and the APU/Citrus College Gold Line Station (at Citrus Avenue) is the impetus for this Specific Plan planning process. The Specific Plan Area encompasses approximately 1/4-mile radius from each of these future stations and is bounded by 10th Street to the north, Angeleno Avenue to the west, 5th and 6th Streets to the south, and Citrus Avenue to the east (Figure 1-1). The Specific Plan establishes land use regulations and development guidelines for a total of 350 acres of land that comprise the Specific Plan Area. A central focus of this Specific Plan is the 1.2 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Azusa Downtown, an area located directly to the south of the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station between Dalton Avenue and San Gabriel Avenue to the east and west, and 9th Street and Foothill Boulevard to the north and south. 1.2.2 City-Owned Property The Specific Plan Area encompasses several City-owned properties which are designated as Key Opportunity Sites. Economic feasibility of potential development and “highest and best use” for several of the sites are presented in greater detail within Section 5, Implementation Strategies and Financing. Goldline & BNSF Railway 8th St AT & SF Rail w a y Alameda AveDalton AveSoldano AvePasadena Ave10th St Foothill Blvd Foothill BlvdAzusa AveSan Gabriel Ave10th St Angeleno AveSunset AveOrange AveEnid Ave9th St Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel AveAzusa Ave6th St Soldano AvePasadena AveCerritosAveAl o s t a A v e 5th St Citrus AveFoothill Blvd AzusaPacificUniversity CitrusCollege Azusa DowntownStation THE PROMENADE Foothill Vista Mobile Home Park Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Lindley-ScottHouse Target Park Palm StAPUHousing PublicLibrary SeniorCenter CitrusCrossing Citrus AveAlameda AveDalton AvePackingHouse 9th St ToCanyonFromCanyon &&&&McKeever AveCrescent Dr 5th St Azusa Veterans WyFoothill Blvd AREAOF NOCHANGE AtlantisGardens Azusa PacificUniversity RosedaleSpecific Plan Area St Francis ofRome School Veteran'sFreedomPark CityHall SlausonPark LeeElementary SlausonMiddleSchool DaltonElementary APU/Citrus College Station SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Specific Plan Area 0 500 1,000250Feet µ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 City-Owned Opportunity SitesFigure 1-1: Specific Plan Area Location Map City-Owned Opportunity Sites NGold Line Stations INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-3 May 2018 1.3 WHAT IS A SPECIFIC PLAN? A specific plan is a document designed to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. A specific plan contains detailed development standards and regulations, distribution of land uses, infrastructure requirements, and implementation measures for the development within a designated area. A specific plan is similar in nature to the a development zoning code because it deals with implementation through the use of development regulations. Unlike the Azusa Development Code, specific plans are targeted to specific planning areas. This allows for both greater flexibility and more specificity to focus regulations and standards to achieve specific strategies. These provisions also provide a greater level of assurance to prospective developers and the development community relative to the City’s long-term goals for a specific geographic area. It is important to note that a specific plan only establishes land use zones and development standards. Actual development proposals, building placement, and design of individual projects will come through private investment following the adoption of a specific plan. As required by Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code, this Specific Plan is organized into six separate sections. Organization of the Specific Plan into sections not only details the intent and purpose of each section but also provides clarity for the end user. New courtyard housing development within the Specific Plan Area. Downtown Azusa looking north on Azusa Avenue. INTRODUCTION1 1-4 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Section 1: Introduction The introduction discusses the purpose and organization of this document and the Specific Plan Area boundary. This section describes the community’s vision for the Specific Plan Area, as a result of public outreach and hearings. In addition, the Azusa TOD Specific Plan’s relationship to the City’s Development Code and other pertinent City documents and policies are discussed in this section. Section 2: Land Use and Urban Form This section sets forth general provisions for development within the Specific Plan Area and details the permitted land uses and development standards for each district. Section 3: Mobility, Complete Streets, and Streetscape Improvements This section provides direction for public improvements for the entire Specific Plan Area. Topics include: public plazas and parks, recommended street trees, lighting, street furnishings, crosswalks, public art, public right-of-way landscaping, and gateway design treatments. This section focuses on pedestrian and vehicular circulation and contains recommendations for the street environment and transit mobility. Section 4: Infrastructure and Public Utilities This section addresses essential infrastructure requirements for future development within the Specific Plan Area, including water, sewer, stormwater, solid waste, schools, police, fire, parks, and library services. 1.4 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION Section 5: Implementation Strategies and Financing This section provides implementation strategies and direction for achieving the goals set forth within the Azusa TOD Specific Plan. It also examines City-owned key opportunity sites within the Specific Plan Area and provides recommendations for these properties. Section 6: Administration This section describes the authority of the Azusa TOD Specific Plan, project review procedures, and the administrative procedures required for amendments and/or modifications to the Azusa TOD Specific Plan. INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-5 May 2018 1.5.1 City of Azusa General Plan The General Plan is the City’s governance document for guiding decision making and outlines the City’s visions and policies. The Azusa TOD Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and provides for more precise implementation of goals, objectives, and policies outlined within the General Plan. 1.5.2 City of Azusa Development Code The City of Azusa Development Code is the primary regulatory document that implements the General Plan. It provides specific goals, policies, programs, and development regulations that are applicable to individual neighborhoods, districts, and corridors that are consistent with the General Plan. This Specific Plan is also a regulatory document which supersedes the Development Code within the Specific Plan boundary. In cases where the Specific Plan conflicts with the Development Code, the Specific Plan will take precedence. Where the Specific Plan is silent on a topic(s), the Development Code will remain in effect. 1.5 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNING DOCUMENTS 1.5.3 Azusa Pacific University Specific Plan The Azusa Pacific University (APU) Specific Plan is a comprehensive guide to defining the future physical development and character of the main campus of APU. The APU Specific Plan incorporates comprehensive development plans, development standards, and design guidelines that set forth appropriate uses and provides for aesthetic, cohesive, and quality of future APU campus development. This document will remain the guiding document for the geographic area that falls within its boundary. While portions of the APU West Campus lie within and adjacent to the Azusa TOD Specific Plan Area, the Specific Plan does not impact the plans, standards, and guidelines set forth in the APU Specific Plan. As noted within this Specific Plan, the APU West Campus areas have been designated as ‘Areas of No Change’. City of Azusa General Plan Azusa Pacific University Specific Plan INTRODUCTION1 1-6 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 1.6 OUTREACH PROCESS 1.6.1 Community Outreach On May 21, 2014, the City of Azusa and RRM Design Group (consultant) hosted a public workshop to solicit community participation, design ideas, and project input regarding the Azusa TOD Specific Plan project. Different segments of the community were represented by residents, business owners, decision makers, and city staff. Project goals and objectives were presented with community members providing input and opinions regarding Azusa’s town character and ideas for potential future projects and development. These ideas were listed on large banners and participants were then given the opportunity to vote up to four times on the ideas most important to them. The “Ideas for the Future” that received the most votes were: • Three-story mixed-use • Outdoor Dining • Remove Landscape Medians – Add Bike Lanes (Foothill Boulevard, Alosta, and Citrus Avenues) • Brand Name Hotel/Conference Facilities • Amphitheater at Veteran’s Park (music) • Healthy Eating Choices • More Decorative Street Lights – More Places • Major Grocery Store • Bicycle Routes • Visitor Center with Historic Emphasis • Historic/Artistic/Entertainment Destination Trail (like Freedom Trail) Maps of the Specific Plan Area with potential opportunities were then laid out on several large tables. Groups of community members were encouraged to gather around and list their ideas or issues concerning the future planning of Azusa in relation to the Specific Plan Area. This collaborative effort was a success and much information was collected. These ideas became the foundation for many of the recommendations contained within this Specific Plan. Participants present their ideas. Overall project presentation to the public. Participants engage in mapping exercise. Issue identification and prioritization exercise. INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-7 May 2018 1.6.2 Opportunities and Constraints Opportunities The Azusa TOD Specific Plan Area contains many opportunities for reinvestment and improvement of the City’s existing urban framework. Opportunities include: • The extension of the Gold Line rail line to the Azusa Downtown and APU/Citrus College stations has been anticipated for a number of years. Targeted improvements and enhancements to complement these new regional transit connections have been gathered through community discussion and public outreach. These efforts were used as a starting point for developing this Specific Plan. • Azusa Avenue (State Route 39) and Foothill Boulevard (Route 66) traverse through, and intersect within, the Specific Plan Area. Both roads provide ease of access for the greater Azusa community to the Specific Plan Area. Azusa Avenue’s connection to Azusa Canyon, Angeles National Forest, and the recently designated San Gabriel Mountains National Monument will continue to draw people into the City. Foothill Boulevard’s historic past and regional connections will also continue to draw a wide customer base to the Specific Plan Area. • Located within the Specific Plan Area, Azusa Pacific University contains a population of approximately 11,000 students. Directly to the east, Citrus College contains a population of approximately 12,000 students. Students attending these nearby colleges represent a large population of potential transit Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station signage - new transit stations will provide improvements and enhancements for the community. Azusa Avenue (State Route 39) is the primary Downtown street and the gateway to the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument. Local college students proximity to the Azusa Downtown Station represents potential for increased business patronage and transit ridership. INTRODUCTION1 1-8 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Small and privately owned parcels pose potential difficulties in implementing the overall vision and improvements for the Specific Plan Area. riders and provide a large customer base for local restaurant, retail, and commercial businesses within the Specific Plan Area. • A number of vacant parcels within the Specific Plan Area are owned by the City of Azusa. This Specific Plan has identified these parcels as key opportunity sites for redevelopment around the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station and Downtown Azusa. • Existing streetscape beautification amenities along Azusa Avenue provide the framework for an enhanced and safer pedestrian experience and will complement future development. This Specific Plan identifies areas where additional streetscape improvement efforts will build upon and improve the existing streetscape environment. Constraints While there are many opportunities present within the Specific Plan Area, there are also a number of constraints that will require sensitivity regarding future design and implementation. Constraints include: • The lack of buildable area around the APU/Citrus College Station will focus new development in and around the Azusa Downtown Station. This increase in development intensity will need to take into consideration adjacency to existing land uses while at the same time remaining complementary to, and representative of, the identity of Azusa. City-owned opportunity sites directly east of Target represent new development possibility for the Specific Plan Area. Lack of buildable parcels near the APU/Citrus College Station will focus new development intensity around the Azusa Downtown Station. INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-9 May 2018 San Gabriel Avenue north of Foothill Boulevard. Azusa Avenue looking south adjacent to the CVS building. San Gabriel Avenue looking north-current configuration limits pedestrian activity and lacks a Downtown character. • Throughout the Specific Plan Area, there are a number of individually owned private parcels with different owners. This fragmentation of properties and ownership may present difficulties for concurrent development and lot consolidation. • Single-family residential development is located within, and adjacent to, the Specific Plan Area in many locations. As new development occurs, sensitivity to existing residential uses will be essential. This Specific Plan recommends good neighbor policies, such as setbacks, landscaping, and screening requirements, to minimize nuisances imposed on residential areas. • The existing Azusa Light and Power and CVS buildings occupy a prominent block within the Specific Plan Area and limit pedestrian connectivity and an active street environment. Future development within the Specific Plan Area is required to be oriented toward and engage the primary street frontage. • Street width, speed, and orientation provide a number of pedestrian constraints along San Gabriel Avenue. These constraints have prohibited integration of this corridor into the downtown framework. Proposed improvements to create a safe and welcoming pedestrian atmosphere may prove difficult without affecting the general function of this arterial road. INTRODUCTION1 1-10 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Æb Æb ÉÖGoldline & BNSF Railway 8th Ave AT & SF Rail w a y Alameda AveDalton AveSoldano AvePasadena Ave10th St Foothill Blvd Foothill BlvdAzusaAveSan GabrielAve10th St Angeleno AveSunset AveOrange AveEnid AveMcKeever Ave9th St Crescent D r Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel AveAzusa Ave6th StSoldano AvePasadena AveCerritosAveAl o s t a A v e 5th St Citrus AveFoothill Blvd AzusaPacificUniversity CitrusCollege SlausonMiddleSchool Veteran'sFreedomPark THE PROMENADEAzusa VeteraFoothill Vista Mobile Home Park CityHall Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Lindley-ScottHouse Target Park Palm StAPUHousing A3 A2 37 36 DALTONPublicLibrary SeniorCenter CitrusCrossing Citrus Ave¯°±²¯°³´Alameda AveDalton AveHistoricResource SlausonPark LeeElementary AtlantisGardens PackingHouse STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATIONSTREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION9th St Azusa PacificUniversity DaltonElementary Temp StreetClosurePaseo Opportunity RosedaleSpecific Plan Area Potential Trail Opportunity ToCanyonFromCanyon &&&&St Francisof Rome School HistoricResource STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION kjPlannedParkingStructure HistoricDepotã ] )ROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBããElevated Access ããSLOWã\SLOWStreetClosure Azusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station ) ) ROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBDate: 6/18/2015 DowntownOpportunities Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES 0 510 1,020255Feet TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan μ Parcel Boundary CITY OF AZUSA Historic Resource Potential Paseo Streetscape Beautification Opportunity Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary 0.25 Mile Radius From Station Transit SiteÆb TOD Opportunity Sites (City-owned property) TOD Opportunity Sites Rosedale Specific Plan Area University/School Areas University/School Areas Outside Specific Plan Area Ampitheater] Gateway#ÉÖFuture Traffic Control Potential Street Closure Potential Plaza Opportunities) Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Image from Azusa Metrolink PF - Choate Parking Consultants, Inc. (CPC) 02.22.13Downtown Parking Structure Downtown Transit Plaza Station Plaza Figure 1-2: Specific Plan Area Opportunities and Constraints INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-11 May 2018 Æb ÆbÉÖ Goldline & BNSF Railway 8th Ave AT & SF Rail w a yAlameda AveDalton AveSoldano AvePasadena Ave10th St Foothill Blvd Foothill BlvdAzusaAveSan GabrielAve10th St Angeleno AveSunset AveOrange AveEnid AveMcKeever Ave9th St Crescent D r Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel AveAzusa Ave6th StSoldano AvePasadena AveCerritosAveAl o s t a A v e 5th St Citrus AveFoothill Blvd AzusaPacificUniversity CitrusCollege SlausonMiddleSchool Veteran'sFreedomPark THE PROMENADEAzusa VeteraFoothill Vista Mobile Home Park CityHall Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Lindley-ScottHouse Target Park Palm StAPUHousing A3 A2 37 36DALTONPublicLibrary SeniorCenter CitrusCrossing Citrus Ave¯°±²¯°³´Alameda AveDalton AveHistoricResource SlausonPark LeeElementary AtlantisGardens PackingHouse STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATIONSTREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION9th St Azusa PacificUniversity DaltonElementary Temp StreetClosurePaseo Opportunity RosedaleSpecific Plan Area Potential Trail Opportunity ToCanyonFromCanyon &&&&St Francisof Rome School HistoricResource STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION kjPlannedParkingStructure HistoricDepotã ] )ROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBROUTE 66 THEMEÅB ÅBããElevated Access ããSLOWã\SLOWStreetClosure Azusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station ) ) ROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBDate: 6/18/2015 DowntownOpportunities Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES 0 510 1,020255Feet TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan μ Parcel Boundary CITY OF AZUSA Historic Resource Potential Paseo Streetscape Beautification Opportunity Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary 0.25 Mile Radius From Station Transit SiteÆb TOD Opportunity Sites (City-owned property) TOD Opportunity Sites Rosedale Specific Plan Area University/School Areas University/School Areas Outside Specific Plan Area Ampitheater] Gateway#ÉÖFuture Traffic Control Potential Street Closure Potential Plaza Opportunities) Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Image from Azusa Metrolink PF - Choate Parking Consultants, Inc. (CPC) 02.22.13Downtown Parking Structure Downtown Transit Plaza Station Plaza Æb Æb ÉÖGoldline & BNSF Railway 8th Ave AT & SF Rail w a y Alameda AveDalton AveSoldano AvePasadena Ave10th St Foothill Blvd Foothill BlvdAzusaAveSan GabrielAve10th St Angeleno AveSunset AveOrange AveEnid AveMcKeever Ave9th St Crescent D r Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel AveAzusa Ave6th StSoldano AvePasadena AveCerritosAveAl o s t a A v e 5th St Citrus AveFoothill Blvd AzusaPacificUniversity CitrusCollege SlausonMiddleSchool Veteran'sFreedomPark THE PROMENADEAzusa VeteraFoothill Vista Mobile Home Park CityHall Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Lindley-ScottHouse Target Park Palm StAPUHousing A3 A2 37 36 DALTONPublicLibrary SeniorCenter CitrusCrossing Citrus Ave¯°±²¯°³´Alameda AveDalton AveHistoricResource SlausonPark LeeElementary AtlantisGardens PackingHouse STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATIONSTREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION9th St Azusa PacificUniversity DaltonElementary Temp StreetClosurePaseo Opportunity RosedaleSpecific Plan Area Potential Trail Opportunity ToCanyonFromCanyon &&&&St Francisof Rome School HistoricResource STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION kjPlannedParkingStructure HistoricDepotã ] )ROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBããElevated Access ããSLOWã\SLOWStreetClosure Azusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station ) ) ROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBDate: 6/18/2015 DowntownOpportunities Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES 0 510 1,020255Feet TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan μ Parcel Boundary CITY OF AZUSA Historic Resource Potential Paseo Streetscape Beautification Opportunity Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary 0.25 Mile Radius From Station Transit SiteÆb TOD Opportunity Sites (City-owned property) TOD Opportunity Sites Rosedale Specific Plan Area University/School Areas University/School Areas Outside Specific Plan Area Ampitheater] Gateway#ÉÖFuture Traffic Control Potential Street Closure Potential Plaza Opportunities) Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Image from Azusa Metrolink PF - Choate Parking Consultants, Inc. (CPC) 02.22.13Downtown Parking Structure Downtown Transit Plaza Station Plaza Æb Æb ÉÖGoldline & BNSF Railway 8th Ave AT & SF R ail w a y Alameda AveDalton AveSoldano AvePasadena Ave10th St Foothill Blvd Foothill BlvdAzusa AveSan Gabriel Ave10th St Angeleno AveSunset AveOrange AveEnid Ave11th St 11th St Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel AveAzusa Ave6th St Soldano AvePasadena AveCerritosAveAl o s t a A v e 5th St Citrus AveFoothill Blvd AzusaPacificUniversity CitrusCollege SlausonMiddleSchool Veteran'sFreedomPark Alameda AveStation Citrus Ave Stationand Parking THE PROMENADEAzusa Veterans WyFoothill Vista Mobile Home Park CityHall Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Lindley-ScottHouse Target Park Palm StAPUHousing A3 A2 37 36 DALTONPublicLibrary SeniorCenter CitrusCrossing Citrus Ave¯°±²¯°³´Alameda AveDalton AveSlausonPark LeeElementary AtlantisGardens PackingHouse STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATIONSTREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION9th St Azusa PacificUniversity DaltonElementary RosedaleSpecific Plan Area Potential Trail Opportunity ToCanyonFromCanyon &&&&St Francisof Rome School STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION PotentialConnection &&&&kjPlannedParkingStructure kj StationParking ROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBããElevated Access ããããHistoricDepot ] Potential Dog Parkã ã^) 9th St Crescent D rMcKeever Ave9th St SLOWSLOWNotes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan TOD Opportunity Sites (City-owned property) CITY OF AZUSA # Opportunities 0 500 1,000250Feet μ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Image from Azusa Metrolink PF - Choate Parking Consultants, Inc. (CPC) 02.22.13 Rosedale Specific Plan Area Route 66 Historic Monument/Intersection Improvements^) Ampitheater] University/School Areas University/School Areas Outside Specific Plan Area Streetscape Beautification Opportunity Site Within 1/4 Mile of Station Gateway ÉÖFuture Traffic Control Transit SiteÆb TOD Opportunity Sites Parcel Boundary Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary 0.25 Mile Radius From Station Date: 12/1/2014 Æb Æb ÉÖGoldline & BNSF Railway 8th Ave AT & SF R ail w a y Alameda AveDalton AveSoldano AvePasadena Ave10th St Foothill Blvd Foothill BlvdAzusa AveSan Gabriel Ave10th St Angeleno AveSunset AveOrange AveEnid Ave11th St 11th St Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel AveAzusa Ave6th St Soldano AvePasadena AveCerritosAveAl o s t a A v e 5th St Citrus AveFoothill Blvd AzusaPacificUniversity CitrusCollege SlausonMiddleSchool Veteran'sFreedomPark Alameda AveStation Citrus Ave Stationand Parking THE PROMENADEAzusa Veterans WyFoothill Vista Mobile Home Park CityHall Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Lindley-ScottHouse Target Park Palm StAPUHousing A3 A2 37 36 DALTONPublicLibrary SeniorCenter CitrusCrossing Citrus Ave¯°±²¯°³´Alameda AveDalton AveSlausonPark LeeElementary AtlantisGardens PackingHouse STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATIONSTREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION9th St Azusa PacificUniversity DaltonElementary RosedaleSpecific Plan Area Potential Trail Opportunity ToCanyonFromCanyon &&&&St Francisof Rome School STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION PotentialConnection &&&&kjPlannedParkingStructure kj StationParking ROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBROUTE 66 THEME ÅB ÅBããElevated Access ããããHistoricDepot ] Potential Dog Parkã ã^) 9th St Crescent D rMcKeever Ave9th St SLOWSLOWNotes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan TOD Opportunity Sites (City-owned property) CITY OF AZUSA # Opportunities 0 500 1,000250Feet μ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Image from Azusa Metrolink PF - Choate Parking Consultants, Inc. (CPC) 02.22.13 Rosedale Specific Plan Area Route 66 Historic Monument/Intersection Improvements^) Ampitheater] University/School Areas University/School Areas Outside Specific Plan Area Streetscape Beautification Opportunity Site Within 1/4 Mile of Station Gateway ÉÖFuture Traffic Control Transit SiteÆb TOD Opportunity Sites Parcel Boundary Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary 0.25 Mile Radius From Station Date: 12/1/2014 INTRODUCTION1 1-12 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 1.7.1 Vision The overall Azusa TOD Specific Plan vision, as formulated through this Specific Plan effort, establishes a renewed focus on the future Gold Line light rail transit stations, Azusa’s Downtown, and adjacent residential neighborhoods. An expanded mix of commercial, residential, and entertainment related land uses will assist in creating a vibrant energy and bring a sense of unity to the City of Azusa. Emphasis of this Specific Plan has been placed on the importance of mixed-use and pedestrian-oriented development within the Gold Line Station’s and Azusa’s Downtown areas in order to build upon the existing sense of place that residents, visitors, and workers alike find visually attractive, friendly and safe, and representative of the overall values of the City of Azusa. This Specific Plan envisions the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station as a gateway destination stop that exudes and exemplifies the physical, historical, and natural characteristics that embody the City of Azusa. Transit-oriented development consisting of a healthy mix of housing, shops, restaurants, offices, and open spaces will provide a pedestrian-friendly environment that supports both the character of the City and transit ridership. 1.7 VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1.7.2 Guiding Principles It will take coordinated actions at all levels to create the regulatory and funding framework to allow high-performing and successful transit- oriented development to emerge within the Specific Plan Area. Understanding and support of these guiding principles by a broad array of interests, including real estate developers, neighbors, businesses, planning staff, elected officials, and the local community, is also essential for successful plan implementation. Cooperation among regional partners, in addition to local governmental departments, will help promote a consistent policy direction and present a message of certainty to the private development community. This agency cooperation and policy certainty will aid in lowering investment risk and increasing opportunities for private development. The TOD strategies, development standards, and guidelines contained within this Specific Plan provide ample opportunity to accommodate projected population and employment growth in a manner that will support transit use and walkability. They also encourage economic development and social equity, promote a healthful urban environment, and reduce the environmental impacts of growth. Supporting businesses and amenities within and adjacent to 1/4-mile of the station areas, while not detracting from existing businesses, is key to continued economic viability and potential growth. This Specific Plan lays out the following Guiding Principles for Azusa policy makers to consider and use during plan preparation, project review, and implementation. INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-13 May 2018 GUIDING PRINCIPLES Transit-Oriented Development (refer to Section 1.7.3) TO-1 Provide zoning and land use regulations focused on the TOD opportunities provided by the future Azusa Downtown and APU/Citrus College Gold Line Stations. TO-2 Prioritize TOD opportunities presented by City-owned properties adjacent to the future Azusa Downtown and APU/Citrus College Gold Line Stations. TO-3 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that support and encourage TOD and increase safe, direct, and convenient pedestrian access to transit facilities. TO-4 Increase development potential within the Gold Line District to sufficiently support high frequency, rapid transit service, and to provide a base for a variety of housing, employment, local services, and amenities that support a vibrant station area community. TO-5 Ensure that land uses within the Gold Line District are transit-supportive and provide a mixed-use activity node for visitors and the local community. TO-6 Establish pedestrian linkages to and from the future Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station to support a walkable station area that functions as a community gateway to Downtown Azusa. Economic Development ED-1 Provide zoning and land use regulations to support future market-driven revitalization and investment. ED-2 Articulate strategies for forming public-private partnerships with business and community stakeholders to attract private investment, enhance local equity, and promote reinvestment. ED-3 Provide increased uses, services, and transportation options to support and benefit the local community. ED-4 Provide a range of supporting benefits for the local community, including a variety of housing, a more walkable environment, and community amenities. Sustainability (refer to Section 1.7.4) S-1 Maintain and enhance structures identified as having historic value to retain and support the existing historic character of Azusa. S-2 Integrate sustainable, healthy living practices to benefit visitors and the local community through sustainability and healthy community guidelines. Healthy Communities (refer to Section 1.7.5) HC-1 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that enhance architectural quality, improve the overall identity of the Specific Plan Area, and enrich the quality of life through the built environment. HC-2 Encourage grocery, outdoor dining, and other healthy food related land uses that are easily accessible to the community. HC-3 Emphasize streetscape and landscaping enhancements to improve walking, bicycling, and transit use options. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (refer to Section 1.7.6) CP-1 Incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies that contribute to the safety and vitality of residents and visitors of Azusa. INTRODUCTION1 1-14 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 1.7.3 Transit-Oriented Development Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) has been defined as a land use strategy intended to promote efficient use of land and transportation infrastructure. TOD strategies promote places of relatively higher development intensity, pedestrian-friendly development, and a mix of land uses located within walking distance of a bus or light rail transit center. In addition to pedestrian and commuter benefits, TOD strategies also represent a planning and real estate development concept that addresses sprawl, environmental issues, and traffic congestion. There are a multitude of community, economic, and environmental goals and benefits related to TOD development strategies. The following goals and benefits should be considered when designing a project within the Specific Plan Area: A. Support transportation alternatives including transit accessibility by bicycles and pedestrians B. Increase transit ridership, supporting broader transportation network efficiencies, and reducing congestion C. Meet increased mobility, environmental, and energy demands placed upon an area’s local transit system D. Reduce automobile ownership, vehicular traffic, and associated parking requirements E. Promote community safety, transit access, and local economic objectives F. Increase walking activity by shifting transit station mode of access from park-and-ride to walking G. Support land use and environmental conservation efforts by minimizing air and water quality impacts H. Enhance the environment through reduced energy consumption and encouraging environmentally friendly travel modes I. Enhance accessibility to jobs and housing for all residents J. Create interesting, vibrant gathering places for residents and visitors alike TOD’s can incorporate a mixed-use or live/work component that increases residential development intensity. Environmental benefits of TOD developments can include reduced energy consumption and minimized air and water quality impacts . INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-15 May 2018 1.7.4 Sustainability Sustainable design refers to design, construction, operation, and maintenance practices that aim to holistically reduce energy use and/or minimize or eliminate the negative impacts of development on the environment and its inhabitants. A sustainable design approach can be defined by a variety of green building processes and practices, the reduction of automobile trips, and the availability of pedestrian-oriented amenities. The primary components that create successful sustainable developments have been identified by the US Green Building Council (USGBC) through their Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) programs. The USGBC works to promote buildings and communities that are environmentally responsible, profitable, and healthy places to live, work, and play. While the USGBC LEED Rating System is a more prominent option for residential and non-residential projects, there are many other programs that promote and certify buildings for energy and environmental efficiency. Infill development and locating new development projects adjacent to public transit conserves land, water, energy, and other community resources. Comfortable, well-designed street environments encourage pedestrian activity and the ‘park once’ mentality. LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND), integrates principles of smart growth, urbanism, and green building for overall neighborhood design. Projects within the Azusa TOD Specific Plan Area will be evaluated based upon the following design criteria as developed for the USGBC LEED-ND process: A. Encourage development within and near existing neighborhoods or public transportation infrastructure to reduce vehicle trips and induce pedestrian activity; B. Promote neighborhoods that are physically connected to each other to foster community and connectedness beyond one individual project; C. Preserve community livability, transportation efficiency, and walkability; D. Design parking to increase the pedestrian orientation of projects and minimize the adverse environmental effects of parking lots by locating parking lots at the side or rear of buildings and leaving building frontages and streetscapes free of parking lots; INTRODUCTION1 1-16 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 E. Promote appealing and comfortable pedestrian street environments in order to encourage pedestrian activity; F. Encourage the design of projects that incorporate high levels of internal connectivity and the location of projects in existing communities in order to conserve land, promote multi-modal transportation, and promote public health through increased physical activity; G. Provide direct and safe connections, for pedestrians and bicyclists as well as drivers, to local destinations and neighborhood centers. Promote public health by facilitating walking and bicycling; H. Encourage the design and construction of buildings that utilize green building practices; and I. Encourage the design and construction of energy efficient buildings to reduce air, water, land pollution, and environmental impacts from energy production and consumption. J. Incorporate the latest sustainable design features, such as the following where feasible: Solar Panels Solar panels utilize energy harvested from the sun to provide consistent, low maintenance electricity to power buildings and homes. The incorporation of solar panels into a building or parking structure design can significantly reduce overall electricity costs while reducing electricity use generated from non-renewable sources such as coal and natural gas. Typical areas for solar panel placement include roof areas, the top level of parking structures, and carport areas. Consideration should be given to require new buildings proposed within the Specific Plan Area to be solar ready, even if solar panels are not included within a development proposal. Parking lot solar panels provide renewable energy generation while also shading vehicles from the sun. Utilizing green design and building practices before, during, and after construction minimizes environmental impacts and creates safe, healthy living environments for residents in the community. Incorporating bicycle lanes encourages non-motorized transit and promotes public health through increased physical activity options. INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-17 May 2018 Solar Orientation Buildings should address their unique site location and look for opportunities to harness the sun’s energy while reducing direct heat gains. North building faces provide for ample natural light, making the ideal building placement on an east to west axis. Southern sun exposure should be controlled through the use of overhangs, awnings, recessed windows, and trellises. Easterly and westerly sun exposure is typically harder to control and buildings should be appropriately sited to avoid excessive exposure from these directions. Design elements such as massing variation, recessed windows as part of covered balconies or patios, vertical shading devices, awning and/or canopies, clear UV window film, and landscaping should be utilized to control excessive east and west sun exposure. Building Materials With a wide variety of building materials available on the market today, choosing and utilizing sustainable building materials in the construction of new, repurposed, or rehabilitated buildings should play a prominent role in the design and construction process. In choosing sustainable building materials, considerations should be given as to whether the materials are durable, how and from where they are sourced, the ability to provide insulation, embodied energy, and level of toxicity should inform the ultimate material selection palette. Permeable Paving Permeable pavers refer to porous concrete, pavers, and in some cases pathway materials that allow for storm water infiltration to occur to assist in reducing impervious surface runoff. Potential locations within the Specific Plan Area for permeable paving include sidewalks, plazas, pedestrian paseos, parking spaces, and driveways. Permeable paving utilized within the Specific Plan Area should consist of materials Permeable pavement reduces the urban heat island effect while allowing for water to infiltrate into underground aquifers. Orienting buildings appropriately provides ample natural lighting for interior spaces while also reducing heating and cooling costs. Utilizing sustainable building materials such as bamboo for trusses reduces the overall impact of buildings while creating healthy, enjoyable environment for people. INTRODUCTION1 1-18 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 that are compatible with the historical character and general context of the Azusa area in order to accentuate community buildings, landscapes, and public spaces. Urban Bioswales Urban bioswales represent an evolution in the conventional civil engineering solutions addressing stormwater runoff. Bioswales redesign traditional curbs and gutters to redirect stormwater runoff into planter strips rather than capturing and draining runoff through a series of pipes and diverting it to a remote location. These low impact techniques not only maximize landscape irrigation efficiency but also filter stormwater runoff and enable infiltration and replenishment of groundwater basins. Bioswales should be incorporated into projects within the Specific Plan Area where appropriate. Water Efficient Irrigation Installing water efficient irrigation is an effective way to reduce and conserve water within the Specific Plan Area. Properly designed drip irrigation systems should be utilized to water trees, shrub beds, and areas of groundcover to reduce water evaporation rates. Plants should be properly grouped into separate zones of similar water requirements that are in turn matched with appropriate drip heads and emitters. Automatic system controllers should be incorporated that allow adjustable water scheduling and moisture sensors to account for seasonal variation in weather patterns. Watering schedules should be adjusted to nighttime irrigation periods to reduce evaporation and wind drift rates. Employing efficient irrigation techniques will significantly reduce overall water use for landscaping within the Specific Plan Area. All projects within the Specific Plan Area shall be consistent with the water efficient landscaping requirements of Chapter 88.34 - Landscaping Standards of the Development Code. Drip irrigation systems directly water the base of plants and minimize overall water evapotranspiration rates. Urban bioswales capture and filter runoff from impermeable surfaces before being allowed to flow into sewers. INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-19 May 2018 Integrating electric vehicle charging stations into site planning can aid in reducing reliance on conventional vehicles. Once established, drought tolerant landscaping requires minimal watering and can accentuate unique qualities of a place. Drought Tolerant Landscaping Drought tolerant landscaping includes trees, shrubs, bushes, and other vegetation that require minimal watering and are able to survive through periods of reduced water availability. Incorporating drought tolerant landscaping, especially local plant varietals, can act to accentuate the unique qualities of place and provide people with a greater connection to the natural environment of Azusa. Trees especially are an effective means to provide shade that keep streets, parking areas, and building surfaces cooler thus reducing the effects of the urban heat island effect. In addition, trees intercept and absorb rainwater through their leaves and roots, reducing the volume of stormwater runoff within a localized area. All projects within the Specific Plan Area shall be consistent with the landscape design requirements of Chapter 88.34 - Landscaping Standards of the Development Code. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Electric vehicle charging stations provide convenient access for residents, businesses, and visitors to plug-in and charge their electric vehicles. Acknowledging that not all daily trips can be made through walking, bicycling, or transit, encouraging use of electric vehicles can assist in reducing the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions produced by conventional vehicle trips. Moreover, electric vehicle use can also eliminate toxic air pollutants coming from conventional vehicle tailpipes and improve upon existing air quality conditions. Incorporation of electric vehicle charging stations should be made available within carports, parking garages, and other parking areas within the Specific Plan Area in easily accessible and identifiable locations. INTRODUCTION1 1-20 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 1.7.5 Healthy Communities This Healthy Communities section addresses the importance of promoting the health and well- being of individuals and families within the City of Azusa through design and development of the built environment within the Specific Plan Area. Healthy Community strategies seek to address the negative impacts of past suburban sprawl, auto dependence, and the disconnected fragmentation of communities by reversing course and embracing ideas that promote both the physical and mental well-being of the community. Providing for the inclusion of health and well-being metrics within this Specific Plan document will allow for members of the community and those who visit the City to enjoy a variety health-related benefits that improve the community overall while at the same time furthering goals addressed within the City’s General Plan. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) defines a healthy place as one that is ‘designed, built, and programmed to support the physical, mental, and social well-being of the people who live, work, learn, and visit there.’ In order to transform a community into a healthy place, proposed designs and developments within the Specific Plan Area should: A. Offer healthy and affordable housing options, and a variety of safe, comfortable, and convenient transportation choices; B. Provide access to healthy foods, the natural environment, and other amenities that allow people to reach their full potential; C. Be designed thoughtfully, with an eye to making the healthy choice the easy choice, and are built using health-promoting materials; and Local produce vendors and farmers markets adjacent to housing makes eating healthy the easy choice. Community gardens provide residents the opportunity to grow their own foods and increases outdoor, physical activity. Easily accessible public transit facilities located near housing encourages walking and other forms of physical activity while reducing dependence on automobiles. INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-21 May 2018 D. Address unique community issues with innovative and sustainable solutions E. Provide opportunities for public plazas and outdoor spaces to allow for personal interaction and physical activity to occur A major component of the incorporation of Healthy Community strategies into this Specific Plan is related to land use development patterns. Healthy land use patterns have been identified as those that encourage infill development, provide ease of access to goods and services, and encourage compact developments that promote walking, bicycling, and transit use. Moreover, the inclusion of these strategies seeks to protect the City’s environmental resources, promote greater livability through the life-cycle community concept, and improve the overall economic returns of the City. This Specific Plan has embraced the Healthy Communities and the ULI healthy place concepts and promoted the physical, mental, and social well-being of individuals and families through: • Establishing a transit-oriented gateway environment that is pedestrian-friendly and entices transit use; • Promoting a healthy mix of market-rate and affordable housing in vertical mixed- use and stand-alone formats; • Identifying sustainable strategies that encourage the use of health-promoting building materials and creative site planning techniques; • Establishing innovative solutions to address land use compatibility issues; • Encouraging grocery, outdoor dining, and other healthy food related land uses that are easily accessible to the community; and • Emphasizing streetscape and landscaping enhancements to improve walking, bicycling, and transit use options. Emphasizing streetscape enhancements that incorporate on- and off-street bicycle lanes promotes physical activity and increases community mobility. Public plazas and outdoor spaces encourage informal interaction and provide opportunities for physical activity. INTRODUCTION1 1-22 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 1.7.6 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design The way in which a community is developed, maintained, and managed ultimately contributes to the safety and vitality of its built environment. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) is a collaborative design process that employs strategies relying upon the ability to influence offender decisions that precede criminal acts. Incorporating CPTED strategies into the design and development of a community is intended to encourage positive social interactions and deter potential criminal behavior. While there are a number of CPTED strategies, the four most common strategies applicable to the Specific Plan Area are: • Natural Surveillance • Natural Access Control • Natural Territorial Reinforcement • Maintenance All new development and/or redevelopment within the Specific Plan Area should incorporate the following CPTED strategies: Natural Surveillance Natural surveillance decreases the threat of potential apprehension by taking steps to increase the perception that people can be seen. This occurs by designing the placement of physical features, activities, and people in a way that maximizes visibility and fosters positive social interaction among users of private and public spaces. Project designs should incorporate the following criteria: A. Place windows overlooking sidewalks, recreational spaces, and parking lots. B. Use the shortest, least sight-limiting fence appropriate for the situation. C. Use transparent weather vestibules at building entrances. D. When establishing lighting locations, avoid poorly placed lights that create blind spots for potential observers and miss critical areas. Ensure potential problem areas are well-lit: pathways, stairs, entrances/exits, parking areas, ATM’s, mailboxes, bus stops, children’s play areas, recreation areas, pools, laundry rooms, storage areas, dumpster and recycling areas, etc. E. Avoid security lighting that is too-bright and creates blinding glare and/or deep shadows, thus hindering the view for potential observers. Using lower intensity lights often requires additional lighting fixtures for adequate coverage. F. Use shielded or cut-off luminaries to control excessive glare. G. Place lighting along pathways and other pedestrian-use areas at proper heights for lighting the faces of people within the space. Natural Access Control Natural access control limits the opportunity for crime by taking steps to clearly differentiate between public space and private space. By selectively placing entrances and exits, fencing, lighting, and landscape to limit access or control flow, natural access control occurs. The following natural access control measures should be incorporated into the project design: A. Use a single, clearly identifiable, point of entry. B. Use structures to divert persons to reception areas. C. Incorporate maze entrances in public restrooms. This avoids the isolation that is produced by an entry room or double door entry system. INTRODUCTION 1 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 1-23 May 2018 D. Use low, thorny bushes beneath ground level windows. E. Eliminate design features that provide access to roofs or upper levels. F. In the front yard, use waist-level, picket-type fencing along residential property lines to control access and encourage surveillance. G. Use a locking gate between front and backyards. H. Use shoulder-level, open-type fencing along lateral residential property lines between side yards and extending to between back yards. They should be sufficiently unencumbered with landscaping to promote social interaction between neighbors. I. Use substantial, high, closed fencing (for example, masonry) between a backyard and a public alley. Natural Territorial Reinforcement Territorial reinforcement promotes social control through increased sense of ownership and definition of space. An environment designed to clearly delineate private space does two things. First, it creates a sense of ownership. Owners have a vested interest and are more likely to challenge intruders or report them to the police. Second, the sense of owned space creates an environment where “strangers” or “intruders” stand out and are more easily identified. By using buildings, fences, pavement, signs, lighting and landscape to express ownership and define public, semi-public and private space, natural territorial reinforcement occurs. A. Maintain premises and landscaping such that it communicates an alert and active presence occupying the space. B. Provide trees in residential areas. Research results indicate that outdoor residential spaces with more trees are seen as significantly more attractive, safer, and more likely to be used than similar spaces without trees. C. Encourage private activities within defined private areas. D. Display security system signage at access points. E. Avoid cyclone fencing and razor-wire fence topping, as it communicates the absence of a physical presence and a reduced risk of being detected. F. Place amenities such as seating in common areas to attract larger numbers of desired users. G. Schedule activities in common areas to increase use, attract people, and increase the perception that areas are controlled. Maintenance Maintenance is an expression of pride and ownership of a property. Deterioration indicates less control by the intended users of a site and indicates a greater tolerance of disorder. The Broken Windows Theory is a valuable tool in understanding the importance of maintenance in deterring crime. Broken Windows Theory proponents support a zero tolerance approach to property maintenance, observing that the presence of a broken window will entice vandals to break more windows in the vicinity. The sooner broken windows are fixed, the less likely it is that such vandalism will occur in the future. INTRODUCTION1 1-24 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK SECTION 2 LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 Development Provisions, Standards, and Guidelines LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 2.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Using this Section ....................................................................2-1 2.2 DISTRICT-BASED APPROACH ..............................................2-3 2.2.1 Introduction .............................................................................2-3 2.2.2 Specific Plan Districts ..............................................................2-4 2.2.3 Areas of No Change ..............................................................2-6 2.2.4 Dwelling Unit Minimum Floor Area.........................................2-6 2.2.5 Mixed-Use Development and Good Neighbor/ Buffer Standards .....................................................................2-7 2.2.6 Parking Management Strategies and Standards ...............2-8 2.3 GOLD LINE DISTRICT .........................................................2-12 2.3.1 District Character .................................................................2-12 2.3.2 Land Use ................................................................................2-14 2.3.3 Development Standards .....................................................2-17 2.4 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT ......................................................2-22 2.4.1 District Character .................................................................2-22 2.4.2 Land Use ................................................................................2-24 2.4.3 Development Standards .....................................................2-27 2.4.4 Design Guidelines .................................................................2-33 2.5 DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT .................................2-36 2.5.1 District Character .................................................................2-36 2.5.2 Land Use ................................................................................2-38 2.5.3 Development Standards .....................................................2-41 2.5.4 Design Guidelines .................................................................2-46 2.6 ROUTE 66 DISTRICT ............................................................2-48 2.6.1 District Character .................................................................2-48 2.6.2 Land Use ................................................................................2-49 2.6.3 Development Standards .....................................................2-53 2.6.4 Design Guidelines .................................................................2-60 2.7 TRANSITION DISTRICT ........................................................2-62 2.7.1 District Character .................................................................2-62 2.7.2 Land Use ................................................................................2-63 2.7.3 Development Standards .....................................................2-67 2.7.4 Design Guidelines .................................................................2-72 2.8 CIVIC DISTRICT ..................................................................2-73 2.8.1 District Character .................................................................2-73 2.8.2 Land Use ................................................................................2-74 2.8.3 Development Standards .....................................................2-78 SECTION 2 CONTENTS SUBSECTIONS LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-1 Specific Plan Area District Boundaries ..............................2-3 2-2 Gold Line District ................................................................2-15 2-3 Downtown District .............................................................2-25 2-4 Downtown Expansion District ...........................................2-39 2-5 Route 66 District .................................................................2-51 2-6 Transition District ................................................................2-65 2-7 Civic District ........................................................................2-76 2-1 Gold Line District Allowable Uses .....................................2-16 2-2 Downtown District Allowable Uses ..................................2-26 2-3 Downtown Expansion District Allowable Uses ................2-40 2-4 Route 66 District Allowable Uses ......................................2-52 2-5 Transition District Allowable Uses .....................................2-66 2-6 Civic District Allowable Uses .............................................2-77FIGURESTABLES LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-1 May 2018 2.1 INTRODUCTION Section Two provides direction for development within the Specific Plan Area to shape the design character and built environment. It sets forth general provisions for development within the Specific Plan Area and details permitted land uses, development standards, and design guidelines for each of the Specific Plan districts. This was accomplished by combining community outreach input with the provision of regulatory development standards and discretionary design guidelines. These standards, guidelines, and uses are organized by district and are all designed to reinforce the individual district’s desired development pattern, character, and image. These tools will help achieve the overall Azusa TOD Specific Plan vision, and more specifically, provide refined direction for the types of uses that should occur and how these uses are allowed to develop in each district within the Specific Plan Area. 2.1.1 Using this Section In order to ensure the ease of use of this document, this section details the general provisions for development within the Specific Plan Area while also cross referencing additional sections applicable to individual properties. Each Specific Plan District contains common headings including: • District Character - Outlines the overall vision and identity of a specific district. • Land Use - Touches upon prominent land uses envisioned for a district. • Development Standards - Details standards for development that have been tailored to reflect the desired character of a district. SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICTS • Gold Line • Downtown • Downtown Expansion • Route 66 • Transition • Civic Historic structures provide a sense of place and contribute to the architectural quality of the built environment. Character and identity of Azusa expressed through public art. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 o Site Planning - Promotes an active street environment through standards and regulations that affect the planning of a site. o Building Placement and Orientation - Considers the physical siting of a structure within a district while promoting appropriate connections between a building and the street. o Building Form and Massing - Outlines general building shapes and configuration requirements to foster strong connections between a building and its environment. • District Design Guidelines - In some cases, individual districts have additional guidelines that more specifically direct design of buildings in order to more effectively guide the character and vision for that district. In addition, each Specific Plan District subsection also includes an Allowable Uses table designating the permitted and conditionally permitted uses for each district along with a list of prohibited uses. As outlined above, in addition to regulating the type of land uses allowed, development is further regulated by Development Standards that are critical to the performance of each use, i.e., building height, massing, setback, build-to lines and relationship to street and sidewalk, parking ratios, etc. The development standards guide new development as well as the re-use of existing buildings. The provisions of this section apply to building additions, exterior remodels, relocations, or new construction requiring a building permit within the Specific Plan Area. In addition to the common headings outlined for individual districts, property owners, applicants, and developers should refer to the following sections of this Specific Plan for additional policies and standards that apply to their individual properties. • Section 1.7: Vision and Guiding Principles • Section 1.8: Transit-Oriented Development • Section 1.9: Sustainability • Section 1.10: Healthy Communities • Section 1.11: Crime Prevention through Environmental Design • Section 2.2.6: Parking Management Strategies and Standards • Section 3: Mobility, Complete Streets, and Streetscape Improvements These sections contain guidelines, requirements, and policies that inform the development or redevelopment of a project. As stated in Section One, this Specific Plan supersedes the Development Code within the Specific Plan boundary. Where the Specific Plan is silent on a topic(s), the Development Code will remain in force. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-3 May 2018 2.2.1 Introduction This Specific Plan presents a district-based zoning approach to accommodate future growth and development intensity adjacent to Azusa’s two new Gold Line transit stations. In a district-based zoning approach, each district has a unique vision and a tailored range of allowable uses and development standards that support the desired future condition. The district-based approach is by nature a “mixed-use” zoning approach where the desired activities and building forms dictate what is conditionally allowed and what is not allowed. This hybrid approach to zoning combines form-based development standards 2.2 DISTRICT-BASED APPROACH with a selection of compatible uses that have been tailored for each Specific Plan District. The development standards constitute the constraints for a project’s building envelope in which new construction or a structural remodel is permitted. In addition, design guidelines are provided in key areas to ensure high-quality design that reflects the district’s character. The intent of this district-based approach for the Specific Plan Area is to establish a regulating document that: • Improves the quality of life through the built environment; Figure 2-1: Specific Plan Area District Boundaries (Enlarged exhibits provided within each District of Sections 2.3-2.8). Goldline & BNSF Railway 8th St AT & SF R ail w a y Alameda AveDalton AveSoldano AvePasadena Ave10th St Foothill Blvd Foothill BlvdAzusa AveSan Gabriel Ave10th St Angeleno AveSunset AveOrange AveEnid Ave9th St Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel AveAzusa Ave6th St Soldano AvePasadena AveCerritosAveAl o s t a A v e 5th St Citrus AveFoothill Blvd AzusaPacificUniversity CitrusCollege THE PROMENADE Foothill Vista Mobile Home Park Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Lindley-ScottHouse Target Park Palm StAPUHousing PublicLibrary SeniorCenter CitrusCrossing Citrus AveAlameda AveDalton AvePackingHouse 9th St ToCanyonFromCanyon &&&&McKeever AveCrescent Dr 5th St Azusa Veterans WyFoothill Blvd AREA OFNO CHANGE AREA OFNO CHANGE AREA OFNO CHANGE AtlantisGardens AREA OFNO CHANGEAzusa PacificUniversity RosedaleSpecific Plan Area St Francis ofRome School Veteran'sFreedomPark CityHall SlausonPark LeeElementary SlausonMiddleSchool DaltonElementary Azusa DowntownStation APU/Citrus College Station SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Specific Plan Districts 0 500 1,000250Feet µ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Gold Line District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1)Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2)Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3)Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 No ChangeRoute 66 District Transition District Civic District LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-4 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 • Sets the stage for market-driven revitalization; • Creates an efficient mobility network; • Integrates sustainable and healthy living practices; • Protects historic structures; • Increases pedestrian mobility; • Enhances architectural quality; • Improves the overall identity of the Specific Plan Area; and • Maintains the character and identity of each unique area of Azusa. 2.2.2 Specific Plan Districts Building upon the Azusa General Plan, this Specific Plan focuses in greater detail on the Specific Plan Area by organizing land use and zoning regulations into six (6) unique Specific Plan districts. District boundaries are based upon existing and expected future development and shared characteristics including land use commonalities and proximity to community-wide destinations. The district boundaries are shown in Figure 2-1, Azusa TOD Specific Plan Area District Map. The geographic arrangement of the districts reflect their relationship to the two new Gold Line transit stations, Downtown Azusa, the City’s civic core, and the Foothill Boulevard corridor. Gold Line District The Gold Line District is the new gateway destination to the City of Azusa providing residents, students, and visitors with a lively day and nighttime environment. Inviting plaza spaces and colorful wayfinding signage encourage exploration through the Specific Plan Area. The Gold Line District provides increased density housing opportunities in close proximity to the transit station. The existing Target location adjacent to the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. The Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station provides new opportunities within Azusa for residents, businesses, and visitors. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-5 May 2018 Existing buildings and successful businesses within Downtown provide a foundation for future development opportunities. Vintage signage provides the framework for enhancing the Route 66 environment. Existing commercial along San Gabriel Avenue. Downtown District The Downtown District encompasses the historic heart of the City of Azusa and is envisioned as a lively, walkable, and attractive town center area. The Downtown District’s character and charm are highlighted through new three- and four-story mixed-use buildings that remain appropriately scaled to preserve the historic character of Azusa’s downtown. The Downtown District focuses on the pedestrian experience by providing outdoor dining, retail shops, and community serving businesses located at street- level. Public realm amenities such as benches and pedestrian lighting are incorporated throughout the District enlivening the overall pedestrian experience. Downtown Expansion District The Downtown Expansion District provides an extension of, and is complementary to, the adjacent Downtown District. New stand- alone residential and office uses provide opportunities to live and work within walking distance of downtown shops, restaurants, and transit. Buildings located at the street edge and enhanced streetscape furnishings and design extend the Downtown pedestrian environment into this expansion area. Route 66 District The Route 66 District encompasses a large portion of Foothill Boulevard and offers a modern interpretation of the historic and iconic Route 66. Themed, 1950s styled diners, retail shops, and new hospitality uses create a vibrant, all ages atmosphere along Route 66. New development is oriented onto Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue creating a continuation of the street edge. Unique, customized business signage and original public art pieces contribute to the District’s lively and historic character. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-6 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Stand-alone residential uses allowed on non- street fronting parcels along Foothill Boulevard provide appropriate buffering for existing single- family neighborhoods. Transition District The Transition District provides a buffering between commercial-oriented districts and established single-family neighborhoods. Existing single-family development within the District may be repurposed into professional office and art studios. A unique and specific overlay within the District allows for a neighborhood specialty market and food hall at the historic Packing House providing fresh produce to the Azusa community. Streetscape improvements along 9th Street enhance pedestrian and bicycle connections to the transit station. Civic District The Civic District is maintained as a central focus of the City, with prominent public buildings and open spaces reinforcing the community identity of Azusa. Any new development remains physically and visually complementary to the existing civic buildings. Enhancement of pedestrian connections within the District provide ease of access to the new Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station and enrich the character, community, and sense of place of “The Canyon City.” 2.2.3 Areas of No Change In some instances, only beautification and street improvements to the corridors are proposed. In these instances, the street right-of-way will be subject to the streetscape improvement standards identified in Section 3 - Mobility, Complete Streets, and Streetscape Improvements and zoning and land use will be guided by existing underlying zoning criteria. Refer to Figure 2-1 for locations of Areas of No Change. City Hall and the auditorium represent Azusa’s character. The historic packing house provides a unique opportunity to enhance the health of the community. 2.2.4 Dwelling Unit Minimum Floor Area The following dwelling unit minimum floor area shall apply to mixed-use projects within the Specific Plan Area. Studio 500 sf 1‐Bedroom 600 sf 2‐Bedroom 725 sf > 3‐Bedroom 875 sf Mixed‐Use Projects Dwelling Unit Minimum Floor Area LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-7 May 2018 2.2.5 Mixed-Use Development and Good Neighbor/Buffer Standards The Specific Plan Area contains many existing tightly clustered stores, housing, and civic uses all within close proximity of public transit. As new development occurs within the Specific Plan Area, the need to reduce potential impacts on the existing community will be necessary in order to preserve the quality of life that residents have come to enjoy. All new mixed-use development projects shall be required to meet the following standards. In addition, all projects located adjacent to existing low and medium density residential zones will be required to meet the Good Neighbor/Buffer Standards. MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Buildings shall be sited to reduce odor, noise, light, glare, shadowing, privacy, visual, and other conflicts between commercial and residential uses. B. Landscaping shall be used in addition to other design features to reduce light, privacy, and glare conflicts. C. Loading and service areas for commercial uses shall be properly designated, not located within residential parking areas, and shall not block access ways to residential areas. D. Noise-generating equipment, including but not limited to refrigeration units, air conditioning, and exhaust fans, shall be located away from residential uses and include noise-reducing screens or insulation. E. Parking for residential tenants shall be properly designated and separate from commercial use spaces. F. Commercial uses with residential units either above or attached shall provide ventilation systems to prevent odors from adversely affecting residential units. PARCELS ADJACENT TO LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY ZONES A. Projects located adjacent to a Low or Medium Density (residential) zone shall be setback 10’ minimum from the residential property line. Those portions of a structure over 35’ tall shall be setback a minimum of 20’ from all abutting Low or Medium Density property lines. B. Loading docks, service areas, repair yards, noise and odor generating operations, and ground-mounted mechanical equipment abutting Low or Medium Density zoned properties are not permitted within 10’ of that property line. In addition, any use described above shall provide an 8’ masonry sound wall and a minimum 5’ landscaped setback along the abutting property lines. C. HVAC systems shall be selected based on noise rating or designed with features to reduce noise, such as parapet walls, equipment enclosures, and/or placement of equipment. D. All exterior lighting shall be focused internally within the property to decrease light pollution onto abutting residential properties. Outdoor lighting shall be shielded in a manner that prevents a direct line between its luminary and any property zoned Low or Medium Density. GOOD NEIGHBOR/BUFFER STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Good Neighbor/Buffer 20’ min. 45’ max.10’ min. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-8 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2.2.6 Parking Management Strategies and Standards As part of this Specific Plan effort, a comprehensive Parking Management Plan was prepared to address current and future parking conditions within the Gold Line, Downtown, Downtown Expansion, and Civic Districts. This technical document assessed the existing on- and off-street parking conditions within the Specific Plan Area while at the same time recommending appropriate parking strategies for potential future conditions based on proposed land uses. The complete version of the Parking Management Plan, including an additional parking strategies matrix, can be found within Appendix A of this document. On-Street Parking Strategies • Time Limits & Restrictions: Time limits are perhaps the simplest way to control the uses of on-street parking. Time-based parking restrictions prohibit parking for certain periods to preserve roadway capacity during peak commuting periods and to save parking resources for particular user groups. In commercial areas, parking time limits are used to discourage long-term parking by employees of the businesses so that the desirable parking spaces are available for customer, allowing a more efficient use and higher turnover rate for desired spaces. Opportunities for application of strategy: Time restrictions are currently in place on San Gabriel Avenue and Azusa Avenue and have promoted parking turnover at on- street parking spaces that are desirable and provide good access to adjacent businesses. Since this strategy is in place at some of the most desirable on-street spaces on San Gabriel Avenue and Azusa Avenue, future application of this strategy should focus on street frontages in which new land uses and businesses are added in Downtown Azusa. Potential focus areas to employ this strategy may include 9th Street, Foothill Boulevard, or 6th Street. • Urban Design/Signage/Traffic Calming: Urban design features can make more distant and likely less desired on-street parking spaces known to commuters and enhance pedestrian connections to those spaces. Good signage can direct parkers quickly and efficiently to available spaces. Sometimes, the solution is as simple as providing information about space location and availability. Supplemental traffic calming strategies that moderate traffic speeds in order to improve the pedestrian environment, can also support parking management strategies. Opportunities for application of strategy: This strategy has been employed on Azusa Avenue where the City has implemented curb extensions, wide sidewalks, diagonal parking, landscaping, lighting, and several pedestrian crossings. Making the environment safer and more inviting for pedestrians can encourage people to walk to destinations within Downtown instead of driving to each Urban design and traffic calming strategies employed along Azusa Avenue. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-9 May 2018 location. There are several opportunities adjacent to Downtown Azusa to expand upon this strategy. These opportunities include San Gabriel Avenue, Santa Fe Avenue, and the existing paseos or pathways that can be integrated within the Specific Plan Area to better connect streets and activity nodes separated by large parcels or parking areas. In addition to replicating the treatments on Azusa Avenue, other potential measures include providing wayfinding to key assets (parking and transit) and destinations (Civic uses, retail areas), and modifications to the roadway cross-section that slow traffic or make crossing the street easier (i.e., lane reductions, conversion to two-way travel). • Assignment of Parking Location: This strategy involves assigning particular parking users to specific locations to increase the efficiency with which spaces are used. An employer policy could require all-day employees to park in remote facilities to free up close-in on-street parking. Alternatively, the most convenient spaces could be devoted to pick- up and drop off functions. Opportunities for application of strategy: Within Downtown Azusa potential applications include creating a pick-up/drop- off area for popular destinations or assigning parking locations to employees who might otherwise occupy non-time restricted spaces within close proximity to their place of employment. While this is listed as an on- street parking strategy, it can also be used in off-street parking, such as the Target parking lot, to prevent employees from occupying the most desirable parking spaces. Off-Street Parking Strategies • Access Control: Strategies to control access to off-street parking include signage that limits who can use parking facilities and for what purposes; chaining off parking entrances until stores open later in the morning can prevent transit commuters from poaching parking; use of gate arm access controls to prevent non- shoppers from using the facility. Opportunities for application of strategy: This parking management strategy is currently applied at the Azusa Police Department where only police vehicles can access the parking area. This strategy may be a appropriate to employ at the new Metro Gold Line parking structure within the Gold Line District. This strategy may also be applied at City-owned parking lots where the City off-street parking spaces must be retained. In an effort to make this parking available to the public patronizing the Downtown area, the City could implement access control strategies, complemented with a nominal parking fee, that could allow for parking validation by local businesses to ensure usage by business patrons. • On-Site Enforcement: On-site enforcement strategies can include security personnel giving warnings, post notices, and if necessary, arrange for towing. Simple information and enforcement programs can be very effective in preventing parking poaching. Opportunities for application of strategy: Parking enforcement is an important strategy to consider, particularly if there is a lack of turnover at time restricted parking spaces or if parking is beginning to encroach into areas not intended for parking. While the parking utilization data described within Appendix A does not indicate this is currently a significant LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-10 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 issue, there may be events or periods when there is a particularly high demand for parking at certain locations with time restrictions. If parking locations are difficult to access or if it is hard to find a parking space, people searching for parking may elect to park in residential areas or risk exceeding time limits to ensure convenient parking. Additionally, with the arrival of the Gold Line, some private and public land uses with a large number of off-street parking (i.e., Target, CVS, City Hall) may experience parking poaching by transit patrons that can be addressed through additional enforcement. • Time Limits & Restrictions: Time limits for spaces can be adjusted to reflect the specific purpose for the parking. The limits can be established on a differential basis to direct all day parkers to underutilized spaces. Time- based restrictions can prohibit parking for certain periods to reserve parking resources for a particular user group. Opportunities for application of strategy: Opportunities for application of this strategy exist in the large parking lots at locations such as Target and the future Metro Gold Line Station parking structure. Azusa may consider providing short-term and long-term parking spaces at the most appropriate locations based on where patrons may ultimately be destined. • Signage/ITS/Design: Signage is key to efficient and effective use of available parking resources. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) can help guide drivers to available parking. ITS has been effectively used both district wide and in large parking structures to provide “live” information about available spaces at each level and in different public parking facilities throughout a district. Opportunities for application of strategy: As the construction of new parking structures within Downtown Azusa occurs, requiring this strategy to be incorporated will ensure accurate and effective parking information is available to users. This real time information can include signs indicating the number of spaces available on each level of a parking structure, and may also include lights that can be used to display whether a parking space is available or occupied. As previously discussed, wayfinding signage should also be considered in conjunction with this strategy to communicate to transit users or business patrons the locations of designated parking and popular destinations. • Shared Parking: Shared parking is the use of a parking space to serve two or more individual land uses without conflict or encroachment. The ability to share parking spaces is the result of two conditions: Variations in the accumulation of vehicles by hour, by day, or by season at the individual land uses; and City-owned parking lot along San Gabriel Avenue provides an opportunity to incorporate shared parking strategies for current and future land uses. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-11 May 2018 PARKING RATIOS Non-Residential-Residential A. Retail: 1.5 spaces/1,000 sf B. Restaurant: 1.5 spaces/1,000 sf Outdoor Dining: 0 spaces required for up to 12 seats C. Office: 2 spaces/1,000 sf D. Bank: 1 space/1,000 sf E. Theater: 1 space/200 sf in a mixed-use project; may require a parking analysis to determine total spaces needed by use. Residential*A. Studio/1 Bedroom: 1 space/unit B. 2/2+ Bedrooms: 1.5 spaces/unit *Projects with only residential uses are required to provide 1 guest parking space for every 6 residential units. Mixed-use projects containing residential uses are not required to provide guest parking spaces. Parking Ratios for land uses not specifically identified, handicapped space requirements, and space dimensions shall be required to meet the parking standards of Chapter 88.36 - Parking and Loading of the Development Code. Where a mixed-use project is proposed in any District, minimum parking stall dimensions shall be 9’ x 18’. Parking Standards for the Specific Plan Area PARKING RATIOS A. Refer to Chapter 88.36 - Parking and Loading of the Development Code for land use specific parking standards. Gold Line, Downtown, Downtown Expansion, and Civic Districts Route 66 and Transition Districts relationships among the land uses that result in visiting multiple land uses on the same auto trip. Opportunities for application of strategy: With the relatively low parking utilization currently experienced in the Downtown area, shared parking presents an opportunity to increase effective parking supply without needing to construct additional parking or increase specific land use parking requirements. Areas where this strategy could be employed include the Target parking lot and the block bounded by Foothill Boulevard, 6th Street, San Gabriel Avenue, and Azusa Avenue. Target experiences relatively low parking utilization (approximately 25% utilized at peak hour) and may be willing to allow the use of a portion of their parking lot by other uses that have different peak parking time periods. For example, if a land use adjacent to Target, such as a coffee shop, wanted to open but couldn’t provide enough parking on-site, they could enter into an agreement with Target to utilize some portion their parking until a select closing time, so that Target could maintain a lower parking supply during off- peak hours (early in the day) and offer a larger parking supply during their peak utilization period. The other location mentioned above contains a variety of land uses and has a number of city-owned off-street spaces available to patrons. Provided the mix of uses is reviewed to ensure that different land uses have adequate amounts of parking and different peak parking utilization rates, a lower number of parking spaces could be provided by future land uses when proposed. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM GOLD LINE DISTRICT2 2-12 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2.3.1 District Character The Gold Line District is envisioned as the new community gateway to the City of Azusa, catering to residents and visitors commuting to and from work and families visiting Azusa for the weekend. An influx of daily transit users entering and exiting the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station 2.3 GOLD LINE DISTRICT will be greeted by an inviting welcome plaza and colorful wayfinding signage, encouraging exploration into the surrounding Specific Plan districts. New, mixed-use developments reflecting the character of Azusa will cater to the pedestrian by incorporating an active and articulated front facade and increased intensity, Potential Welcome Plaza adjacent to the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. Plazas adjacent to transit stops provide enjoyable spaces to wait for your connecting route or for a traveling friend. Outdoor dining opportunities provide an active public realm and areas for people watching. GOLD LINE DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-13 May 2018 SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES - Related to the Gold Line District TO-4 Increase development potential within the Gold Line District to sufficiently support high frequency, rapid transit service, and to provide a base for a variety of housing, employment, local services, and amenities that support a vibrant station area community. A. Emphasize mixed-use buildings around the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station to increase the amount and variety of housing choices within the City. B. Enhance transit options and connectivity to regional job centers in the greater Los Angeles area. TO-5 Ensure that land uses within the Gold Line District are transit-supportive and provide a mixed-use activity node for visitors and the local community. A. Create a transit-oriented destination that caters to commuter, resident, student, and visitor needs in the morning and evening. TO-6 Establish pedestrian linkages to and from the future Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station to support a walkable station area that functions as a community gateway to Downtown Azusa. A. Establish a new community gateway to the City of Azusa from the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. B. Incorporate a welcome plaza and gathering space adjacent to the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station (refer to Section 3.7). C. Improve walkability, pedestrian access, and bicycling opportunities through the incorporation of native landscaping, plazas, and streetscape designs. ED-4 Provide a range of supporting benefits for the local community, including a variety of housing, a more walkable environment, and community amenities. A Increase opportunities for the inclusion of public plazas, courtyards, and outdoor dining through tailored development standards. S-2 Maintain and enhance structures identified as having historic value to retain and support the existing historic character of Azusa. A. Maintain historic architectural character of structures located at 700 Azusa Avenue and 130 Santa Fe Avenue as shown in Figure 2-2. CP-1 Incorporate Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies that contribute to the safety and vitality of residents and visitors of Azusa. A. Encourage positive social interactions and deter potential criminal behavior through the design and development of both public and private spaces (refer to Section 1.7.6). while allowing for the greatest building heights within the Specific Plan Area. Coffeehouses, retail shops, and cafés with outdoor dining will be located at street-level along Azusa Avenue, enlivening the district environment and providing commuters and residents access to early morning coffee and after work dining opportunities. Structured parking, located above ground and hidden from public view, will provide commuters a safe place to park their vehicles and will provide convenient access to the nearby Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM GOLD LINE DISTRICT2 2-14 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Walkable and pedestrian-friendly streets contribute to a lively public realm. Mixed-use development with residential units located above restaurants and retail provide a 24/7 downtown environment. 2.3.2 Land Use City-owned opportunity sites (see Figure 2-2) within the Gold Line District provide the underlying framework for creating a vibrant and attractive transit-oriented experience focused on the pedestrian. Vertical mixed-use development incorporating new housing options within the City are focused on both the north and south side of the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station along Azusa Avenue and Alameda Avenue. Buildings, up to 60 feet in height, engage the street with appropriate frontages emphasizing and framing the public realm. While zero-foot setbacks are encouraged for new development, setbacks up to a maximum of 15 feet are allowed, provided plaza, courtyard, outdoor dining, and/or enhanced pedestrian connections are incorporated within the setback area. A wide variety of allowed land uses within the District include grocery, restaurant, retail, and recreation. Financial, professional, and general office uses offer expanded business opportunities in Azusa within close proximity to public transit. Streetscape improvements along Utilizing setback areas as functional space contributes to an active, pedestrian-friendly street scene. GOLD LINE DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-15 May 2018 Figure 2-2: Gold Line District Æb 8th St Foothill Blvd Azusa DowntownStation Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy Target PublicLibrary SeniorCenter 9th St St Francis ofRome SchoolDalton AveAlameda AveSan Gabriel AveVeteran'sMemorialPark CityHallAzusa AveSoldano AvePasadena AvePackingHouse HistoricResource HistoricDepot SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Æb Specific Plan Districts 0 150 30075Feet μCivic District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District Transition District Corridor District Gold Line District Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 No Change City-Owned Opportunity Site City-Owned Opportunity Site N Foothill Blvd Azusa AveAzusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA District Key Map 0 500 1,000250Feet μ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 Gold Line District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District No ChangeRoute 66 District Transition District Civic District Gold Line District Key Map N 9th Street aid in appropriately transitioning nearby residential neighborhoods into the Gold Line District and provide improved access and safety for walking, running, and bicycling into and through adjacent districts. As a component of the new transit station, a multi-story parking structure will be constructed. This structure will be screened on the Azusa Avenue streetfront with shops and restaurants. The amount of parking to be provided will support parking strategies such as shared parking agreements or parking reductions as outlined in Section 2.2.6. City-Owned Opportunity Sites Historic Resources LAND USE AND URBAN FORM GOLD LINE DISTRICT2 2-16 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 LAND USE REGULATION LAND USE REGULATION RECREATION, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC ASSEMBLY SERVICES ‐ BUSINESS, FINANCIAL, AND PROFESSIONAL Conference/Convention Facility P ATM P Health/Fitness Facility P Banks, Financial Services P Live Entertainment UP Business Support Services P School ‐ Specialized Training UP Medical Office/Service P1 Studio‐Art, Dance, Martial Arts, Music, Etc.P Office P2 RESIDENTIAL SERVICES ‐ GENERAL Caretaker/Manager Unit P Day Care Center ‐ Child or Adult MUP Home Occupation P Lodging ‐ Bed & Breakfast Inn (B&B)P Live/Work Unit MUP Lodging ‐ Hotel or Motel P Multifamily P Personal Services P Residential Accessory Use or Structure P TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE Residential Care (seven or more clients)MUP Parking Facility, Public or Commercial MUP Senior Citizen Apartment P Telecommunications Facility S RETAIL SALES Transit Station or Terminal P Bar/Tavern UP Utility Facilty P Farmers Markets MUP Furniture, Furnishings and Appliance Store P General Retail P     Alcoholic Beverage Sales UP     Floor Area Under 20,000 sf P     Floor Area Over 20,000 sf UP     Operating between 9:00 pm and 7:00 am MUP Groceries, Specialty Foods P Neighborhood Market P Night Club UP Outdoor Displays and Sales MUP Restaurant, Café, Coffee Shop P ALLOWABLE USES: Gold Line District P             Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required Refer to Chapter 88.70 of the Development Code for Definitions               uses permitted on a second or upper floor.               permitted on a second or upper floor. 1             Only Medical Services ‐ Doctor Office use 2             Only Office‐Processing and Office‐Professional      MUP      Minor Use Permit required UP          Use Permit required S             Permit requirement set by Specific Use Regulations Table 2-1: Gold Line District Allowable Uses A. Commercial Recreation Facility-Indoor B. Organizational House C. Residential Care (six or fewer clients) D. Auto and Vehicle Sales/Rental E. Building and Landscape Materials Sales BUILDING USE Ground Floor Uses A. Ground floor uses fronting Azusa Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, or Alameda Avenue shall be non-residential except for lobby, gym, and other pedestrian-oriented uses. F. Drive-Through Retail or Service G. Mortuary, Funeral Home H. Repair Service I. Vehicle Services Note: A combination of any of the permitted uses may be provided within a horizontal or vertical mixed-use project provided the Ground Floor Use Standard (provided below) and Mixed-Use Standards provided on Page 2-7 are adhered to. PROHIBITED USES STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Building Use Retail & Restaurant Residential & Commercial Public S t r e e t GOLD LINE DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-17 May 2018 COVERAGE Lot Coverage A. 100% maximum. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Lot Coverage 100% Lot Coverage 2.3.3 Development Standards The following development standards are specific to the Gold Line District. These standards have been tailored to reflect the desired character and implement the vision of the Gold Line District. They provide the framework for the creation of a safe, vibrant, and pedestrian-friendly environment in and around the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. In addition to the development standards located on the following pages, projects will be evaluated on their adherence to standards provided in Section 2.2.5, Section 3, and the design guidelines and strategies located in Sections 1.7 and 2.2.6. A. SITE PLANNING Site planning and design is key to quality development. The following standards promote orienting buildings toward the street, to promote an active street environment and regulations that minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts. Residential Open Space (Single Use) 25 sf/unit min. of Common Open Space 100 sf/unit min. of Private Open Space RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE Residential Private Open Space A. Private open space for single use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 100 sf per unit with a minimum dimension of 6’ in any direction. B. Private open space for mixed-use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 60 sf per unit with a minimum dimension of 6’ in any direction. Residential Common Open Space A. Common open space for single use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 25 sf per unit with a minimum of 10’ in any direction. B. Common open space for mixed-use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 65 sf per unit with a minimum of 10’ in any direction. C. Common open space shall be purposefully designed as active or passive recreational facilities. D. Rooftop open space may satisfy this requirement, provided it is available for use by all residents. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM GOLD LINE DISTRICT2 2-18 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 SERVICE AND DELIVERY AREAS Loading and Service Areas A. Loading docks and service bays shall be located a minimum of 20’ from any public street. B. Trash and recycling enclosures shall not be located adjacent to a public street. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Service and Delivery Areas Service Loading 20’ min.Parking Public Stre e t Reciprocal Access Building Building 7’-6” min.7’-6” min.7’-6” min.Azusa Avenue Line of Sight RECIPROCAL ACCESS Ingress and Egress A. Reciprocal ingress and egress access with adjacent properties shall be provided for parcels fronting Azusa Avenue and Alameda Avenue. This requirement may be waived with City approval due to the following circumstances: • The location of existing structures or infrastructure • Lack of agreement between adjacent owners • Other extreme hardship VEHICULAR LINE OF SIGHT Clear Zones A. The clear zone shall consist of an isosceles right triangle with 7’6” sides on the driveway and street. B. The clear zone shall not be occupied by a ground floor building footprint, site features, or landscaping that is taller than 3’. GOLD LINE DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-19 May 2018 B. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION Building placement refers to the physical siting of a structure on a parcel with considerations being given to building orientation, setbacks, and parking. The following standards promote building placement that creates an active public realm, creates a strong continuity of frontages, and contributes to greater utilization of parcels within the Gold Line District. 10’ m i n 15 ’ m a x 0’ Rear Setback 0’ Side Setback 0’ Street Setback BUILDING SETBACKS Street A. 0’ minimum. B. 15’ maximum to building. Setback area shall include plaza, courtyard, outdoor dining, or enhanced pedestrian connection. C. 10’ minimum landscape setback where surface parking areas are located adjacent to a public street. Side A. 0’ minimum. Rear A. 0’ minimum. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Dining Setbacks Parking Setbacks Public StreetPublic StreetParki n g BUILDING LOCATION Placement A. Parcels fronting a public street shall orient buildings toward the street. Building Placement Public Street LAND USE AND URBAN FORM GOLD LINE DISTRICT2 2-20 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Primary Entrances Public Str e etBuilding E ntr a n c e s BUILDING ENTRANCES Primary Entrances A. Buildings shall have a primary entrance door facing Azusa Avenue, Alameda Avenue, and San Gabriel Avenue. Entrances at building corners may be used to satisfy this requirement. BUILDING HEIGHT Minimum Height A. 25’ minimum. BUILDING Maximum Height A. 60’ maximum. Building Height 60’ max25’ minC. BUILDING FORM AND MASSING Building form refers to the shape, configuration, and relationship of a building to its environment. A number of details must be considered when designing a building’s form including building height, plate height, configuration, roof form, facades, articulation, entrances, and window glazing. Building forms should encourage a pedestrian- friendly environment by including amenities, facade articulation, and street level building openings. Building Plate Height 14’ min.Floor StructureT.O.P. BUILDING ARTICULATION Plate Height A. Ground floor plate height shall be a minimum of 14’ along all streets. Historic Resources A. Buildings identified as having historical significance (Refer to Figure 2-2), shall retain their original character and building articulation. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Architectural projections/features may exceed the height limits of this District up to 10 feet, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. Projections/features should be architecturally compatible and aesthetically pleasing or be screened from view. Neon signage, historic graphics, and/or other non-business or project specific related screening methods may be considered appropriate, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. GOLD LINE DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-21 May 2018 STANDARDS INTERPRETATION BUILDING MASSING Maximum Wall Plane A. No building façade visible from any public street shall extend more than 50’ in length without a 5’ minimum variation in the wall plane. Side and Rear Wall Planes A. Side and rear wall planes shall address site context through continuation of architectural features, fenestration, and/or building materials. Roofline Variation A. Building rooflines shall vary in height every 50’ in wall plane length. 50’ ma x . 50’ max.50’ max.50’ max. 5’ min. Maximum Wall Plane Roofline Variation Public Street Public Street 45% min. for retail 30% min. for office Window Glazing Public Street WINDOW GLAZING Solid-to-Void Ratio A. 45% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for retail uses adjacent to a public street. B. 30% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for office uses adjacent to a public street. C. Transparent or translucent glazing is required on the first floor facade of a commercial or retail use facing a public street. D. Opaque, reflective, or dark tinted glass is not permitted. E. Window stickers or exterior window treatments that obstruct interior building views at the street level are prohibited. F. The bottom of any window or product display window shall not be more than three and one- half feet above the adjacent sidewalk. G. Product display windows shall have a minimum height of four feet and be internally lit. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN DISTRICT2 2-22 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2.4.1 District Character Azusa’s Downtown District is the historic “Main Street” of the City, providing an attractive and inviting destination for friends, students, and families to gather. Capitalizing on the expanded pedestrian activity from the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station, new outdoor dining, retail, and 2.4 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT Potential Downtown District plaza at the Southeast Corner of Azusa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. commercial businesses will be juxtaposed next to wide, pedestrian-friendly sidewalks, enlivening the pedestrian environment and supporting day and nighttime activity within the district. Unique, historic qualities of the Downtown will be complemented by new, mixed-use developments that remain appropriately scaled Paseos provide internal connections between blocks and allow for outdoor dining and other pedestrian-friendly activities to occur. Continuous arcades and retail frontages engaging the sidewalk and enliven and contribute to the overall pedestrian experience. DOWNTOWN DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-23 May 2018 SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES - Related to the Downtown District TO-3 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that support and encourage TOD and increase safe, direct, and convenient pedestrian access to transit facilities. A. Create an active and vibrant street scene along Azusa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard to welcome visitors and enhance pedestrian connections to the adjacent Gold Line District and Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. TO-6 Establish pedestrian linkages to and from the future Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station to support a walkable station area that functions as a community gateway to Downtown Azusa. A. Emphasize pedestrian mobility through the incorporation of public realm improvements, including landscaping, street furnishings, and wayfinding signage (refer to Section 3.6). ED-4 Provide a range of supporting benefits for the local community, including a variety of housing, a more walkable environment, and community amenities. A. Provide opportunities for a variety of new housing types within walking distance of the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. S-1 Maintain and enhance structures identified as having historic value to retain and support the existing historic character of Azusa. A. Maintain historic architectural character of structure located at 250 Foothill Boulevard as shown in Figure 2-3. HC-1 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that enhance architectural quality, improve the overall identity of the Specific Plan Area, and enrich the quality of life through the built environment. A. Encourage buildings to be built to the back of sidewalks and engage the public realm. B. Require ground floor retail/commercial uses that are oriented toward Azusa Avenue and San Gabriel Avenue. C. Permit residential and office uses above and behind ground floor commercial (mixed-use) to promote a live, work, play environment. D. Encourage family-oriented activities and services through allowable, district specific land uses. CP-1 Incorporate Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies that contribute to the safety and vitality of residents and visitors of Azusa. A. Encourage positive social interactions and deter potential criminal behavior through the design and development of both public and private spaces (refer to Section 1.7.6). to accentuate the quaint nature of downtown through second and third-story setbacks. Public realm amenities incorporated throughout the district, such as plazas and paseos, will contribute to and enhance the overall active and walkable environment of the Downtown District. The close proximity of the district to the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station will provide visitors and residents of nearby communities with ease of access to downtown shops and services without the need for an automobile. While the Downtown District provides opportunities for new growth and development within the Downtown, these developments will be reflective of the character and identity of “The Canyon City.” LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN DISTRICT2 2-24 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Mixed-use developments provide opportunities for residents to live, work, and play within their neighborhood. Wide, pedestrian-friendly sidewalks activate the public realm by providing spaces for outdoor dining and informal gathering. Continuous building wall planes provide visual intrigue and entice exploration increasing overall walkability. 2.4.2 Land Use Incorporating new mixed-use developments up to 50 feet in height within the Downtown District strengthens and supports new and existing retail, office, and residential land uses within short walking distance of nearby residential neighborhoods and the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. Maximum building setbacks of 15 feet along Azusa Avenue promotes space dedicated to outdoor dining at cafes and restaurants and expanded sidewalks. Indoor commercial recreation facilities offer family- oriented entertainment activities while art, dance, and music studios provide residents multiple platforms for creative and cultural expression. Professional and medical offices support new job growth and career opportunities within the City while at the same time create a baseline of pedestrian activity throughout the Downtown District. Specific development opportunities within the District lie to the east and west of the Foothill Boulevard and Azusa Avenue intersection. This portion of the District sees high vehicular traffic DOWNTOWN DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-25 May 2018 Foothill Blvd Azusa AveAzusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA District Key Map 0 500 1,000250Feet μ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 Gold Line District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District No ChangeRoute 66 District Transition District Civic District Figure 2-3: Downtown District Foothill Blvd Angeleno AveSan Gabriel Ave6th St Pasadena Ave5th St CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Park Alameda AveDalton AveSlausonParkSoldano AveAzusa AveCityHall HistoricResource SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Æb Specific Plan Districts 0 150 30075Feet μCivic District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District Transition District Corridor District Gold Line District Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 No Change City-Owned Opportunity Site Downtown District Key Map N on a daily basis and presents a dynamic palette for streetscape and pedestrian circulation improvements, including a new plaza at the southeast corner of the intersection (refer to Section 3.2). City-owned parcels located at the southeast corner of the intersection are viewed as essential to creating and implementing the desired land use mix for the Downtown District while at the same time strengthening the visual and physical connections to adjoining Specific Plan districts. In addition, building articulation standards and guidelines reinforce the historic character of the downtown. City-Owned Opportunity Sites Historic Resources LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN DISTRICT2 2-26 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Table 2-2: Downtown District Allowable Uses BUILDING USE Ground Floor Uses A. Ground floor uses fronting Azusa Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and Alameda Avenue shall be non-residential except for lobby, gym, and other pedestrian oriented uses. STANDARDS PROHIBITED USES INTERPRETATION Building Use Retail & Restaurant Residential & Commercial Public S t r e e t Note: A combination of any of the permitted uses may be provided within a horizontal or vertical mixed-use project provided the Ground Floor Use Standard (provided below) and Mixed-Use Standards provided on Page 2-7 are adhered to. A. Auto Vehicle Sales and Rental B. Building and Landscape Materials Sales C. Drive-Through Facility D. Public Safety Facility E. Mortuary, Funeral Home F. Repair Service G. Vehicle Service H. Utility Facility P             Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required Refer to Chapter 88.70 of the Development Code for Definitions               uses permitted on a second or upper floor.               permitted on a second or upper floor. 1             Only Medical Services ‐ Doctor Office use 2             Only Office‐Processing and Office‐Professional      MUP      Minor Use Permit required UP          Use Permit required S             Permit requirement set by Specific Use Regulations LAND USE REGULATION LAND USE REGULATION RECREATION, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC ASSEMBLY RETAIL SALES CONT. Commercial Recreation Facility‐Indoor MUP Groceries, Specialty Foods P Conference/Convention Facility UP Neighborhood Market P Health/Fitness Facility P Night Club MUP Live Entertainment MUP Outdoor Displays and Sales MUP Park, Playground P Restaurant, Café, Coffee Shop P School‐Specialized Education/Training UP SERVICES ‐ BUSINESS, FINANCIAL, AND PROFESSIONAL Studio‐Art, Dance, Martial Arts, Music, Etc.P ATM P Theater MUP Banks, Financial Services P RESIDENTIAL Business Support Services P Caretaker/Manager Unit P Medical Office/Service P1 Courtyard Housing P Office P2 Duplex/Triplex/Fourplex P SERVICES ‐ GENERAL Home Occupation P Day Care Center ‐ Child or Adult MUP Live/Work Unit MUP Lodging ‐ Bed & Breakfast Inn (B&B)P Multifamily P Lodging ‐ Hotel or Motel P Organizational House P Personal Services P Residential Care (seven or more clients)P TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE Senior Citizen Apartment P Broadcasting Studio P RETAIL SALES Parking Facility, Public or Commercial MUP Bar/Tavern UP Telecommunications Facility S Farmers Markets MUP Furniture, Furnishings and Appliance store P General Retail P     Alcoholic Beverage Sales UP     Floor Area Under 20,000 sf P     Floor Area Over 20,000 sf UP     Operating between 9:00 pm and 7:00 am MUP ALLOWABLE USES: Downtown District DOWNTOWN DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-27 May 2018 COVERAGE Lot Coverage A. 100% maximum. Landscaping Standards A. Refer to Chapter 88.34 - Landscaping Standards of the Development Code for specific requirements. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION 2.4.3 Development Standards The following development standards are specific to the Downtown District. These standards have been tailored to reflect the desired character and implement the vision of the Downtown District. They provide the framework for the creation of a safe, vibrant, and pedestrian-friendly downtown environment. In addition to the development standards located on the following pages, projects will be evaluated on their adherence to standards provided in Section 2.2.5, Section 3, and the design guidelines and strategies located in Sections 1.7, 2.2.6, and 2.4.4. A. SITE PLANNING Site planning and design is key to quality development. The following standards promote orienting buildings toward the street, to promote an active street environment and regulations that minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts. RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE Residential Private Open Space A. Private open space for single use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 100 sf per unit with a minimum dimension of 6’ in any direction. B. Private open space for mixed-use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 60 sf per unit with a minimum dimension of 6’ in any direction. Residential Common Open Space A. Common open space for single use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 25 sf per unit with a minimum of 10’ in any direction. B. Common open space for mixed-use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 65 sf per unit with a minimum of 10’ in any direction. Lot Coverage 100% Lot Coverage Residential Open Space (Single Use) 25 sf/unit min. of Common Open Space 100 sf/unit min. of Private Open Space C. Common open space shall be purposefully designed as active or passive recreational facilities. D. Rooftop open space may satisfy this requirement, provided it is available for use by all residents. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN DISTRICT2 2-28 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 SERVICE AND DELIVERY AREAS Loading and Service Areas A. Loading docks and service bays shall be located a minimum of 20’ from any public street. B. Trash and recycling enclosures shall not be located adjacent to a public street. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Service and Delivery Areas Service Loading 20’ min.Parking Public Stre e t Reciprocal Access Building Building 7’-6” min.7’-6” min.7’-6” min.Azusa Avenue Line of Sight RECIPROCAL ACCESS Ingress and Egress A. Reciprocal ingress and egress access with adjacent properties shall be provided for parcels fronting Azusa Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. This requirement may be waived with City approval due to the following circumstances: • The location of existing structures or infrastructure • Lack of agreement between adjacent owners • Other extreme hardship VEHICULAR LINE OF SIGHT Clear Zones A. The clear zone shall consist of an isosceles right triangle with 7’6” sides on the driveway and street. B. The clear zone shall not be occupied by a ground floor building footprint, site features, or landscaping that is taller than 3’. DOWNTOWN DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-29 May 2018 B. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION Building placement refers to the physical siting of a structure on a parcel with considerations being given to building articulation, setbacks, and parking. The following standards promote building placement that creates an active public realm, creates a strong continuity of frontages, and contributes to greater utilization of parcels within the Downtown District. 15 ’ m a x 0’ Rear Setback 0’ Side Setback 0’ Street Setback BUILDING SETBACKS Ground-Level A. 0’ minimum to street, side, and rear. B. 15’ maximum to building. Setback area shall include plaza, courtyard, outdoor dining, or enhanced pedestrian connection. Upper Floors A. 8’ minimum setback required for those portions of a building exceeding three stories. Parking A. 10’ minimum landscape setback where surface parking areas are located adjacent to a public street. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Ground-Level Setbacks Upper Floors Setback Public Street10’ m i n Parking Setbacks Public StreetParki n g 8’ min Upper Floor Public Street LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN DISTRICT2 2-30 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 BUILDING LOCATION Placement A. Parcels fronting a public street shall orient buildings toward the street. B. Parking is not permitted adjacent to Azusa Avenue or Foothill Boulevard. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Building Placement Primary Entrances Azusa A v e n u eBuilding E ntr a n c e s Azusa Avenue BUILDING ENTRANCES Primary Entrances A. Buildings shall have a primary entrance door facing Azusa Avenue. Entrances at building corners may be used to satisfy this requirement. BUILDING HEIGHT Minimum Height A. 25’ minimum. Maximum Height A. 50’ maximum. Building Height 50’ max25’ minC. BUILDING FORM AND MASSING Building form refers to the shape, configuration, and relationship of a building to its environment. A number of details must be considered when designing a building’s form including building height, plate height, configuration, roof form, facades, articulation, entrances, and window glazing. Building forms should encourage a pedestrian- friendly environment by including amenities, facade articulation, and street level building openings. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Architectural projections/features may exceed the height limits of this District up to 10 feet, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. Projections/features should be architecturally compatible and aesthetically pleasing or be screened from view. Neon signage, historic graphics, and/or other non-business or project specific related screening methods may be considered appropriate, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. DOWNTOWN DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-31 May 2018 STANDARDS INTERPRETATION BUILDING ARTICULATION Plate Height A. Ground floor plate height shall be a minimum of 14’ along all streets. Historic Resources A. Buildings identified as having historical significance (Refer to Figure 2-3), shall retain their original character and building articulation. BUILDING MASSING Maximum Wall Plane A. No building façade visible from any public street shall extend more than 50’ in length without a 5’ minimum variation in the wall plane. Side and Rear Wall Planes A. Side and rear wall planes shall address site context through continuation of architectural features, fenestration, and/or building materials. Roofline Variation A. Building rooflines shall vary in height every 50’ in wall plane length.50’ max.50’ max.50’ max. Roofline Variation Public Street Building Plate Height 14’ min.Floor StructureT.O.P. 50’ ma x . 5’ min. Maximum Wall Plane Public Street LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-32 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 WINDOW GLAZING Solid-to-Void Ratio A. 45% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for retail uses adjacent to Azusa Avenue. B. 30% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for office uses adjacent to Azusa Avenue. C. Transparent or translucent glazing is required on the first floor facade of a commercial or retail use facing a public street. D. Opaque, reflective, or dark tinted glass is not permitted. E. Window stickers or exterior window treatments that obstruct interior building views at the street level are prohibited. F. The bottom of any window or product display window shall not be more than three and one- half feet above the adjacent sidewalk. G. Product display windows shall have a minimum height of four feet and be internally lit. 45% min. for retail 30% min. for office Window Glazing Public Street STANDARDS INTERPRETATION 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-33 May 2018 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2.4.4 Downtown District Design Guidelines 1. Architectural character of a building should build upon and maintain the traditional downtown image with an emphasis on historic architectural styles, building types, materials, and details. 2. Downtown streets should support an active and engaging pedestrian environment. Human scale should be created through the use of building articulation including elements such as awnings, arches, trellises, arbors, pergolas, and other architectural elements. These elements should be integrated into the building design to avoid the look of “tacked on” architectural features. 3. Existing historic or older structures with architectural details or ornamentation should be retained, restored, or replicated whenever possible. 4. Building entrances and storefronts should be incorporated with one of more of the following design elements: Ê A change in wall/window plane Ê Wall articulation around the door and projecting beyond the door Ê Placement of art or decorative detailing at the entry Ê A projecting element above the entrance 5. Clear glass is required on the street level to create interesting interior shop views for pedestrians. Heat gain can be limited by incorporating awnings, recessed storefronts, or user controlled interior shading device. 6. Locate windows and entrances adjacent to street and public spaces to improve public safety and security and provide “eyes on the street”. 7. Awnings should not be wrapped around buildings in continuous bands. Awnings should only be placed on top of doors, on top of windows, or within vertical elements when the façade of a building is divided into distinct structural bays. Emphasizing historic architectural styles of a place can maintain and build upon the existing community character. Clear storefront glass at street level creates visual interest for the pedestrian. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN DISTRICT2 2-34 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 8. Property owners should not propose installing awnings unless they are prepared to maintain and regularly replace the awnings every eight to ten years. 9. Building materials and finishes should be true to the structure’s architectural style. 10. Material changes should occur at intersecting planes to appear substantial and integral to the façade. Material or color changes at the outside corners of structures give an impression of thinness and artificiality and should be avoided. 11. Parapets should have sufficient articulation of detail, such as precast treatments, continuous banding, or projecting cornices, lentils, caps, corner details, or variety in pitch (sculpted). 12. Parapets should not appear “tacked on” and should convey a sense of permanence. If the interior side of a parapet is visible from pedestrian view, it should be finished with the same materials and a similar level of detail as the front façade. 13. Traditional building widths generally do not exceed 25 feet wide to 30 feet wide at the ground level, irrespective of a building’s total width. Continuation of this familiar, human-scaled rhythm is encouraged in new construction. Infill buildings that are much wider than the existing facades should be broken down into a series of appropriately proportioned structural bays or components. Commercial street façade rhythm helps to visually tie the Downtown streets together. 14. A 360-degree architectural design philosophy, the full articulation of all building facades, should be incorporated into all new buildings and remodels. This includes variation in massing, roof forms, and wall planes, as well as surface articulation. Acknowledging sensitivity to budget, it is expected that the highest level of articulation will occur on the front facade and facades visible from public streets. However, similar and complementary massing, materials, and details should be incorporated into side and rear facades. Architectural elements should be continued to address the side and rear of buildings, where appropriate. Large building massings should be broken up through facade articulation and material changes. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-35 May 2018 Landscape trellises soften vertical wall planes and provide visual interest to side and rear of buildings. Plazas and pocket parks incorporating fountains, art, and seating add to the pedestrian experience of a place. 15. Blank walls shall be avoided. Architectural elements such as windows, overhangs, trellises, arcades, projections, awnings, insets, materials, textures, and colors should be incorporated into every building facade. 16. Murals, espaliers/trellises, and/or vines may be placed on portions of large expanses of rear and side building walls to soften the wall and create interest. 17. Plazas, courtyards, pocket parks, and outdoor cafes should be designed in an inviting manner that encourages pedestrian use through the incorporation of trellises, fountains, art, seating, and shade trees. 18. Focal points should be created and incorporated into sites to establish a sense of place and orientation. Fountains, plazas, and artwork can be used to create focal points. 19. Public art is encouraged as an on-site amenity for all projects. 20. Buildings in highly visible locations, such as the intersection of Azusa and San Gabriel Avenues and Foothill Boulevard should incorporate architectural elements such as a small plaza, clock tower, varying roof lines, fountain, and/or public art. 21. Signs integrated into the building design provide a personal quality that contributes to the ambiance of the commercial complex or streetscape, especially the more unique signs. The following guidelines should be considered when developing private signage. Ê Signs that reflect the type of business through design, shape, or graphic form are encouraged. Ê The method of attaching the sign to the building should be integrated into the overall sign design. Ê Signs should not cover up windows or important architectural features. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT2 2-36 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2.5.1 District Character The Downtown Expansion District will extend and complement the adjacent Downtown District environment by including new residential, retail, and office land uses, while transitioning new development to enhance inter-district connectivity to the Route 66 and Civic Districts. Two and three-story, mixed-use buildings 2.5 DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT City-owned opportunity sites east of Dalton Avenue. Wide sidewalks with parkway landscaping create a pleasant and safe environment for pedestrians. Neighborhood services at street level allow for convenient access for residents living in, and adjacent to, mixed-use developments. along Alameda Avenue, Dalton Avenue, and San Gabriel Avenue will afford residents the opportunity to live within short walking distances of coffeehouses, restaurants, shops, and the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. Local, neighborhood-serving businesses within the Downtown Expansion District will cater to the everyday needs of residents, with office spaces DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-37 May 2018 SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES - Related to the Downtown Expansion District TO-3 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that support and encourage TOD and increase safe, direct, and convenient pedestrian access to transit facilities. A. Enhance connection to the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station and adjacent districts through the incorporation of development standards and streetscape improvements that improve pedestrian safety and accessibility. ED-3 Provide increased uses, services, and transportation options to support and benefit the local community. A. Incorporate a wide variety of land uses, including retail, office, and residential. ED-4 Provide a range of supporting benefits for the local community including a variety of housing, a more walkable environment, and community amenities. A. Promote a variety of new housing options to benefit the community, including mixed-use and stand- alone residential. B. Encourage a more walkable environment through development standards that are meant to enhance the pedestrian experience. HC-1 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that enhance architectural quality, improve the overall identity of the Specific Plan Area, and enrich the quality of life through the built environment. A. Enhance architectural quality through building placement, orientation, and guidelines. HC-3 Emphasize streetscape and landscaping enhancements to improve walking, bicycling, and transit use options. A. Improve pedestrian connectivity to the Downtown, Civic, and Route 66 Districts through the continuation of landscaping, streetscape, and sidewalk improvements. CP-1 Incorporate Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies that contribute to the safety and vitality of residents and visitors of Azusa. A. Encourage positive social interactions and deter potential criminal behavior through the design and development of both public and private spaces (refer to Section 1.7.6). expanding future business and job opportunities for Azusa residents. While similar to the Downtown District in character, the Downtown Expansion District will alternatively, allow for stand-alone residential and appropriately scaled live-work and mixed-use developments that will be oriented to provide local, neighborhood services, and convenient access to the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. Extension of the Downtown District landscaping, streetscape amenities, and wide sidewalks along San Gabriel Avenue and Alameda Avenue will provide additional layers of visual and physical linkages and provide opportunities to expand the Downtown Area. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT2 2-38 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Height transitioning and good-neighbor setback policies minimize shadowing, privacy issues, and other nuisances on existing residential uses. Pedestrian-oriented streets provide an attractive environment for walking, bicycling, and other non-motorized mobility methods. 2.5.2 Land Use A complementary mix of retail, office, and residential uses are envisioned within the Downtown Expansion District to provide easily accessible neighborhood-oriented services for the Azusa community. Stand-alone residential uses, such as duplexes and townhomes, provide additional housing opportunities within close walking and bicycling proximity to Downtown and the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. A major focus of this District is enhancing overall walkability. Pedestrian enhancements and streetscape beautification have been emphasized in order to entice non-motorized mobility through and into adjacent districts (refer to Section 3.2). Front setback development standards allow for a maximum of up to 15 feet. This encourages new development to incorporate plaza and/or outdoor dining spaces to create a social, visually attractive, and pedestrian-oriented public realm within the Downtown Expansion District. New residential housing expand options for existing and future residents of Azusa. DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-39 May 2018 Figure 2-4: Downtown Expansion District Foothill Blvd Azusa AveAzusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA District Key Map 0 500 1,000250Feet μ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 Gold Line District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District No ChangeRoute 66 District Transition District Civic District way Foothill Blvd Sunset AveAngeleno AveSan Gabriel Ave6th St Pasadena AveAzusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Park PublicLibrary SeniorCenter Alameda AveDalton AveSt Francis ofRome School SlausonParkSoldano AveAzusa AveCityHall Soldano AvePasadena AveSOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Æb Specific Plan Districts 0 160 32080Feet μCivic District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District Transition District Corridor District Gold Line District Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 No Change City-Owned Opportunity Site City-Owned Opportunity Site Downtown Expansion District Key Map N City-owned properties along Dalton Avenue and San Gabriel Avenue provide opportunities for mixed-use development and will encourage additional private investment throughout the Downtown Expansion District. Land uses, building heights, and development intensities are intended to complement, not detract from, uses within adjacent districts through scaled height transitioning. Development standards outline the framework for focusing new development along street frontages with up to 100% lot coverage allowed. Maximum building heights for this District are allowed up to 45 feet and incorporate specific good-neighbor policies to minimize potential impacts on existing single-family residences. City-Owned Opportunity Sites LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT2 2-40 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 LAND USE REGULATION LAND USE REGULATION RECREATION, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC ASSEMBLY RETAIL SALES CONT. Commercial Recreation Facility‐Indoor MUP Neighborhood Market P Conference/Convention Facility UP Night Club UP Health/Fitness Facility P Outdoor Displays and Sales MUP Live Entertainment MUP Restaurant, Café, Coffee Shop P Park, Playground P SERVICES ‐ BUSINESS, FINANCIAL, AND PROFESSIONAL School‐Specialized Education/Training UP ATM P Studio‐Art, Dance, Martial Arts, Music, Etc.P Banks, Financial Services P RESIDENTIAL Business Support Services P Caretaker/Manager Unit P Medical Office/Service P1 Courtyard Housing P Office P2 Duplex/Triplex/Fourplex P SERVICES ‐ GENERAL Home Occupation P Day Care Center ‐ Child or Adult MUP Live/Work Unit MUP Lodging ‐ Bed & Breakfast Inn (B&B)P Multifamily P Lodging ‐ Hotel or Motel P Organizational House P Massage Parlor SP* Residential Care (seven or more clients)P Personal Services P Senior Citizen Apartment P TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE Townhouse, Rowhouse P Parking Facility, Public or Commercial MUP RETAIL SALES Public Facilities UP Bar/Tavern UP Telecommunications Facility S Farmers Markets MUP Furniture, Furnishings and Appliance Store P General Retail P     Alcoholic Beverage Sales UP     Floor Area Under 20,000 sf MUP     Floor Area Over 20,000 sf UP     Operating between 9:00 pm and 7:00 am MUP     Groceries, Specialty Foods P ALLOWABLE USES: Downtown Expansion District Table 2-3: Downtown Expansion District Allowable Uses BUILDING USE Ground Floor Uses A. Ground floor uses fronting Foothill Boulevard or San Gabriel Avenue shall be non-residential except for lobby, gym, and other pedestrian oriented uses. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION E. Public Safety Facility F. Mortuary, Funeral Home G. Repair Service H. Vehicle Service I. Utility Facility Building Use Commercial Residential & Commercial Public S t r e e t                Municipal Code. P             Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required Refer to Chapter 88.70 of the Development Code for Definitions               uses permitted on a second or upper floor.               permitted on a second or upper floor. 1             Only Medical Services ‐ Doctor Office use 2             Only Office‐Processing and Office‐Professional      MUP      Minor Use Permit required SP*         Special Permit required ‐ see Chapter 88.48 of City  UP          Use Permit required S             Permit requirement set by Specific Use Regulations Note: A combination of any of the permitted uses may be provided within a horizontal or vertical mixed-use project provided the Ground Floor Use Standard (provided below) and Mixed-Use Standards provided on Page 2-7 are adhered to. PROHIBITED USES A. Residential Care (six or fewer clients) B. Auto Vehicle Sales and Rental C. Building and Landscape Materials Sales D. Drive-Through Facility DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-41 May 2018 COVERAGE Lot Coverage A. 100% maximum. Landscaping Standards A. Refer to Chapter 88.34 - Landscaping Standards of the Development Code for specific requirements. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION 2.5.3 Development Standards The following development standards are specific to the Downtown Expansion District. These standards have been tailored to reflect the desired character and implement the vision of the Downtown Expansion District. They provide the framework for the creation of a safe, vibrant, and pedestrian-friendly environment that enhances inter-district connectivity within the Specific Plan Area. In addition to the development standards located on the following pages, projects will be evaluated on their adherence to standards provided in Section 2.2.5, Section 3, and the design guidelines and strategies located in Sections 1.7, 2.2.6, and 2.5.4. A. SITE PLANNING Site planning and design is key to quality development. The following standards promote orienting buildings toward the street to promote an active street environment and regulations that minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts. RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE Residential Private Open Space A. Private open space for single use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 125 sf per unit with a minimum dimension of 6’ in any direction. B. Private open space for mixed-use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 60 sf per unit with a minimum dimension of 6’ in any direction. Residential Common Open Space A. Common open space for single use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 25 sf per unit with a minimum of 10’ in any direction. B. Common open space for mixed-use projects shall be provided at a minimum of 90 sf per unit with a minimum of 10’ in any direction. Lot Coverage 100% Lot Coverage Residential Open Space (Single Use) 25 sf/unit min. of Common Open Space 125 sf/unit min. of Private Open Space C. Common open space shall be purposefully designed as active or passive recreational facilities. D. Rooftop open space may satisfy this requirement, provided it is available for use by all residents. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT2 2-42 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 SERVICE AND DELIVERY AREAS Loading and Service Areas A. Loading docks and service bays shall be located a minimum of 20’ from San Gabriel Avenue, Alameda Avenue, and Dalton Avenue. B. Trash and recycling enclosures shall not be located adjacent to a public street. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Service and Delivery Areas Service Loading 20’ min.Parking Public Stre e t 7’-6” min.7’-6” min.7’-6” min.Public Street Line of SightVEHICULAR LINE OF SIGHT Clear Zones A. The clear zone shall consist of an isosceles right triangle with 7’6” sides on the driveway and street. B. The clear zone shall not be occupied by a ground floor building footprint, site features, or landscaping that is taller than 3’. DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-43 May 2018 10’ m i n 15 ’ m a x 0’ Rear Setback 0’ Side Setback 0’ Street Setback BUILDING SETBACKS Street A. 0’ minimum. B. 15’ maximum to building. Setback area shall include plaza, courtyard, outdoor dining, or enhanced pedestrian connection. C. 10’ minimum landscape setback where surface parking areas are located adjacent to a public street. Side A. 0’ minimum. Rear A. 0’ minimum. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Dining Setbacks Parking Setbacks Public StreetPublic StreetParki n g B. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION Building placement refers to the physical siting of a structure on a parcel with considerations being given to building orientation, setbacks, and parking. The following standards promote building placement that creates an active public realm, creates a strong continuity of frontages, and contributes to greater utilization of parcels within the Downtown Expansion District. BUILDING LOCATION Placement A. Parcels fronting a San Gabriel Avenue, Alameda Avenue, and Dalton Avenue shall orient buildings toward the street. B. Parking is not permitted adjacent to Foothill Boulevard, San Gabriel Avenue, Alameda Avenue, and Dalton Avenue. Building Placement Public Street LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT2 2-44 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 BUILDING ARTICULATION Plate Height A. Ground floor plate height shall be a minimum of 14’. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Primary Entrances Public Str e etBuilding E ntr a n c e s BUILDING ENTRANCES Primary Entrances A. Buildings shall have a primary entrance door facing San Gabriel Avenue, Alameda Avenue, and Dalton Avenue. Entrances at building corners may be used to satisfy this requirement. BUILDING HEIGHT Minimum Height A. 25’ minimum. Maximum Height A. 45’ maximum. Building Height 45’ max25’ minC. BUILDING FORM AND MASSING Building form refers to the shape, configuration, and relationship of a building to its environment. A number of details must be considered when designing a building’s form including building height, plate height, configuration, roof form, facades, articulation, entrances, and window glazing. Building forms should encourage a pedestrian- friendly environment by including amenities, facade articulation, and street level building openings. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Building Plate Height 14’ min.Floor StructureT.O.P. Architectural projections/features may exceed the height limits of this District up to 10 feet, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. Projections/features should be architecturally compatible and aesthetically pleasing or be screened from view. Neon signage, historic graphics, and/or other non-business or project specific related screening methods may be considered appropriate, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-45 May 2018 STANDARDS INTERPRETATION BUILDING MASSING Maximum Wall Plane A. No building façade visible from any public street shall extend more than 50’ in length without a 5’ minimum variation in the wall plane. Roofline Variation B. Building rooflines shall vary in height every 50’ in wall plane length. Maximum Wall Plane WINDOW GLAZING Solid-to-Void Ratio A. 45% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for retail uses adjacent to a public street. B. 30% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for office uses adjacent to a public street. C. Transparent or translucent glazing is required on the first floor facade of a commercial or retail use facing a public street. D. Opaque, reflective, or dark tinted glass is not permitted. E. Window stickers or exterior window treatments that obstruct interior building views at the street level are prohibited. F. The bottom of any window or product display window shall not be more than three and one- half feet above the adjacent sidewalk. 50’ max.50’ max.50’ max. Roofline Variation Public Street 50’ max . 5’ min. Public Street 45% min. for retail 30% min. for office Window Glazing Public Street G. Product display windows shall have a minimum height of four feet and be internally lit. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT2 2-46 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2.5.4 Downtown Expansion District Design Guidelines All of the design guidelines provided in Section 2.4.4, Downtown Design Guidelines should be adhered to for buildings within the Downtown Expansion District. In addition, the following guidelines apply to stand- alone residential within this District. 1. A variety of one-, two-, and three-bedroom dwelling units should be provided to encourage a variety of product types. Units should be mixed throughout the development. 2. Units should front primary streets to provide eyes on the street, create pedestrian environments, and support the character of Downtown. 3. Dwellings should incorporate porches, trellises, landscaping, and other features to extend the living area toward the street and soften the transition between the street and the dwelling. 4. The site area adjacent to the street should not be dominated with parking. Parking should be concentrated in areas behind buildings, and away from the street when possible. 5. The design of multi-family developments should consider compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood by mimicking existing architectural styles, colors, and rhythm. 6. Monolithic structures should be avoided. Buildings designs should include a combination of the following techniques: Ê Variation in the wall plane (projecting and recessed elements). Ê Variation in wall height. Ê Roofs located at different levels. Ê Combinations of one-, one and one-half, and two-story units should be used to create visual interest and variation in the massing and building height. Residential units engage the street. Building designs that incorporate variations in wall planes, heights, and roof levels create visual interest at street-level. DOWNTOWN EXPANSION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-47 May 2018 Recessed upper stories reduce the overall massing and scale of a building. 7. Architectural features such as porches, balconies, chimneys, door placement, window proportions, dormers, wood detailing, fencing, siding, and color scheme should be used to complement the overall building design, site and neighborhood context. 8. Where appropriate, the upper stories of new multi-family buildings should be stepped back to reduce the scale of facades that face the street, courtyards, or open space areas. 9. Roofs should reflect a residential appearance through roof pitch and material selection. 10. Roofs covering the entire building such as hips and gables should be used rather than mansard roofs. 11. Locate windows and entrances adjacent to street and public spaces to improve public safety and security and provide “eyes on the street”. 12. Windows should be articulated with accent trim, sills, kickers, shutters, window flower boxes, balconies, awnings, or trellises authentic to the architectural style of the building. 13. Property owners should not propose installing awnings unless they are prepared to maintain and regularly replace the awnings every eight to ten years. 14. Windows on walls adjacent to a neighbor’s home should be offset to prevent direct views into neighbor’s windows, with specific attention to new second floor windows that look into windows, pools, spas, etc. on adjacent properties. Consider using clerestory windows or translucent glass to interrupt direct sight lines to neighbor’s windows and livable outdoor spaces. 15. If decorative shutters are installed, they should be proportional to the window and complement the architectural style of the building. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM ROUTE 66 DISTRICT 2-48 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2 Route 66-themed signage and public art aid in defining the unique character and identity of the Route 66 District. 2.6.1 District Character The Route 66 District will reflect a bold and modern interpretation of the historic and iconic Route 66 of the past. The portions of Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue that traverse Azusa will embrace and draw attention to its historic Route 66 context. 2.6 ROUTE 66 DISTRICT While balancing the requirements of the automobile with the needs of the pedestrian, new development in this district will front onto Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue, creating an active street environment with special signage and setback requirements. Thematic, 1950s-style diners and drive-thru restaurants, retail shops, Modern interpretations of the classic Route 66 diner reinvigorate the environment of the historic route. Route 66-themed signage provides visual intrigue and a unique identity for businesses and the community. ROUTE 66 DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-49 May 2018 SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES - Related to the Route 66 District TO-3 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that support and encourage TOD and increase safe, direct, and convenient pedestrian access to transit facilities. A. Enhance pedestrian street crossings, streetscapes, and landscaping to facilitate safe and convenient access to the Azusa Downtown and APU/Citrus College Gold Line Stations. ED-1 Provide zoning and land use regulations to support future market-driven revitalization and investment. A. Establish a Route 66-themed overlay zone with new development incentives for public art and signage along Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue. ED-3 Provide increased uses, services, and transportation options to support and benefit the local community. A. Encourage mixed-use, commercial, hospitality, and other land uses to expand the variety of recreation, retail, and services within the community. ED-4 Provide a range of supporting benefits for the local community including a variety of housing, a more walkable environment, and community amenities. A. Allow for mixed-use and stand-alone residential uses in order to expand housing variety within the local community. HC-1 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that enhance architectural quality, improve the overall identity of the Specific Plan Area, and enrich the quality of life through the built environment. A. Include good-neighbor development standards and guidelines to ensure new development remains compatible and minimizes impacts on adjacent residential neighborhoods. CP-1 Incorporate Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies that contribute to the safety and vitality of residents and visitors of Azusa. A. Encourage positive social interactions and deter potential criminal behavior through the design and development of both public and private spaces (refer to Section 1.7.6). and opportunities for new hospitality uses will populate Route 66, creating a fun and inviting environment for all ages. Stand-alone residences will be sited off Foothill Boulevard, allowing for appropriate buffering into adjacent neighborhood areas. Quirky, customized architectural elements are encouraged to create vibrant and colorful landmarks, paying homage to the historic route. Incentives will encourage developers and businesses to incorporate Route 66-themed public art and signage along the Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue street frontages, creating a unique atmosphere and identity within the Route 66 District. 2.6.2 Land Use A wide array of commercial, retail, hospitality, and mixed-use residential uses are allowed within the Route 66 District focused along Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue and are intended to reinvigorate this portion of the historic route. New development within the Route 66 District is permitted up to 40 feet in height, with hospitality uses allowed up to 50 feet. Maximum lot coverage is allowed up to 80%, with the remaining 20% required to be appropriately landscaped to accent the Route 66 District context. A Route 66 Overlay identifies LAND USE AND URBAN FORM ROUTE 66 DISTRICT 2-50 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2 Diners, creative signage, and landscape create a pleasant and thematic Route 66 street scene. parcels within the District that may take advantage of new height and setback incentives for incorporating Route 66-themed public art and/or signage along the Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue street edge. Route 66 District proximity to existing low and medium density residential neighborhoods is addressed through the inclusion of good neighbor policies. These policies require new development to incorporate additional screening, setback, siting, and other site planning techniques to minimize light, noise, and other impacts within the community. A major component of the Route 66 District includes significant improvements to the streetscape along Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue to provide a pleasant pedestrian experience while still accommodating the automobile, public transit, and other non- motorized transit options (refer to Section 3.2 and 3.3.5). Additional landscaping within the Route 66 District is required for new development where surface parking areas are to be located adjacent to public streets, requiring 15 feet minimum from the street edge. Route 66-themed public art creates visual interest and brings a vibrant energy to the historic route’s street frontage. ROUTE 66 DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-51 May 2018 AT & SF R ail w a y Foothill Blvd Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel AveAzusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Park AzusaAveSOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Æb Specific Plan Districts 0 150 30075Feet μCivic District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District Transition District Corridor District Gold Line District Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 No Change 8th St 6th St Pasadena AveCerritosAveAl o s t a A v e 5th St Citrus AveAPaUni C Foothill Vista Mobile Home Park Lindley-ScottHouse Palm StAPUHousing iorter Citrus Citrus AveFoothill Blvd AREA OFNO CHANGE AtlantisGardens AREA OFNO CHANGE Azusa PacificUniversity St Francis ofRome School SlausonPark LeeElementarySoldano AveSoldano AvePasadena AveSOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Æb Specific Plan Districts 0 250 500125Feet μCivic District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District Transition District Corridor District Gold Line District Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 No Change Foothill Blvd Azusa AveAzusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA District Key Map 0 500 1,000250Feet μ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 Gold Line District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District No ChangeRoute 66 District Transition District Civic District Route 66 District Key Map Western Portion Eastern Portion Figure 2-5: Route 66 District N Route 66 Overlay The Route 66 Overlay incentivizes private development to assist in implementing the District’s desired character. Parcels fronting onto Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue (as noted in Figure 2-5: Route 66 District) have the opportunity to incorporate Route 66-themed public art and/or signage along the street edge in exchange for height and setback incentives. Appropriate examples of Route 66-themed public art and signage include restored classic cars, gas pumps, electric car chargers, unique and/or vintage signage, etc. Route 66 Overlay Parcels PROJECTS WITHIN ROUTE 66 OVERLAY A. Shall adhere to the guidelines presented in Section 2.6.4. B. Shall incorporate themed streetscape furnishings presented in Section 3.6.3. C. May take advantage of height, setback, and signage incentives provided on the following pages. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM ROUTE 66 DISTRICT 2-52 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2 LAND USE REGULATION LAND USE REGULATION RECREATION, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC ASSEMBLY RETAIL SALES CONT. Commercial Recreation Facility‐Indoor P Groceries, Specialty Foods P Commercial Recreation Facility‐Outdoor MUP Neighborhood Market P Conference/Convention Facility P Night Club UP Health/Fitness Facility P Outdoor Displays and Sales MUP Library, Museum P Restaurant, Café, Coffee Shop P Live Entertainment MUP SERVICES ‐ BUSINESS, FINANCIAL, AND PROFESSIONAL Park, Playground P ATM P School‐College, University UP Banks, Financial Services P School‐Specialized Education/Training UP Buisness Support Service P Studio‐Art, Dance, Martial Arts, Music, Etc.P Medical Office/Service P1 RESIDENTIAL Office P2 Caretaker/Manager Unit P SERVICES ‐ GENERAL Courtyard Housing P Day Care Center ‐ Child or Adult MUP Duplex/Triplex/Fourplex P Lodging ‐ Bed & Breakfast Inn (B&B)P Home Occupation P Lodging ‐ Hotel or Motel P Live/Work Unit P Mortuary, Funeral Home MUP Multifamily P Personal Services P Organizational House UP Public Safety Facility P Residential Accessory Use or Structure P Repair Service ‐ Equipment, Large Appliance,  Etc.P Residential Care (six or fewer clients)P TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE Residential Care (seven or more clients)P Parking Facility, Public or Commercial MUP Senior Citizen Apartment P Public Facilities P Townhouse, Rowhouse P Telecommunications Facility S RETAIL SALES Utility Facilty P Bar/Tavern UP Building and Landscape Materials Sales ‐  Indoor MUP Drive‐Thru Facilities P Farmers Markets MUP Furniture, Furnishings and Appliance Store P General Retail P     Alcoholic Beverage Sales UP     Floor Area Under 20,000 sf P     Floor Area Over 20,000 sf MUP     Operating between 9:00 pm and 7:00 am MUP ALLOWABLE USES: Route 66 District P             Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required Refer to Chapter 88.70 of the Development Code for Definitions               uses permitted on a second or upper floor.               permitted on a second or upper floor. 1             Only Medical Services ‐ Doctor Office use 2             Only Office‐Processing and Office‐Professional      MUP      Minor Use Permit required UP          Use Permit required S             Permit requirement set by Specific Use Regulations Table 2-4: Route 66 District Allowable Uses A. Single-Family Dwellings - adjacent to Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue. B. Auto Vehicle Sales and Rentals C. Vehicle ServiceNote: A combination of any of the permitted uses may be provided within a horizontal or vertical mixed-use project provided the Ground Floor Use Standard (provided below) and Mixed-Use Standards provided on Page 2-7 are adhered to. PROHIBITED USES ROUTE 66 DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-53 May 2018 2.6.3 Development Standards The following development standards are specific to the Route 66 District. These standards have been tailored to reflect the desired character and implement the vision of the Route 66 District. They provide the framework for the creation of a unique Route 66-themed automobile and pedestrian-oriented district environment. In addition to the development standards located on the following pages, projects will be evaluated on their adherence to standards provided in Section 2.2.5, Section 3, and the design guidelines and strategies located in Sections 1.7, 2.5.2, and 2.5.3. A. SITE PLANNING Site planning and design is key to quality development. The following standards promote orienting buildings toward the street to promote an active street environment and regulations that minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts. COVERAGE Lot Coverage A. 80% maximum. Landscaping Coverage A. 20% maximum. B. Areas dedicated to the installation of public art within the Route 66 Overlay may be counted to satisfy this requirement. Landscaping Standards A. Refer to Chapter 88.34 - Landscaping Standards of the Development Code for specific requirements. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Lot Coverage Landscaping Coverage 80% Lot Coverage 20% Landscape Coverage BUILDING USE Ground Floor Uses A. Ground floor uses fronting Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue shall be non-residential except for lobby, gym, and other pedestrian oriented uses. Building Use Retail & Commercial Residential & Office Public S t r e e t LAND USE AND URBAN FORM ROUTE 66 DISTRICT 2-54 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2 SERVICE AND DELIVERY AREAS Loading and Service Areas A. Loading docks and service bays shall be located a minimum of 15’ from Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue. B. Trash and recycling enclosures shall not be located adjacent to a public street. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Service and Delivery Areas Service Loading 15’ min.Parking Public Stre e t 7’-6” min.7’-6” min.7’-6” min.Public Street Line of SightVEHICULAR LINE OF SIGHT Clear Zones A. The clear zone shall consist of an isosceles right triangle with 7’6” sides on the driveway and street. B. The clear zone shall not be occupied by a ground floor building footprint, site features, or landscaping that is taller than 3’. Residential Open Space 30 sf/unit min. of Common Open Space 150 sf/unit min. of Private Open Space RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE Residential Private Open Space A. Private open space shall be provided at a minimum of 150 sf per unit with a minimum dimension of 10’x10’. Residential Common Open Space A. Common open space shall be provided at a minimum of 30 sf per unit with a minimum of 10’ in any direction. B. Common open space shall be purposefully designed as active or passive recreational facilities. C. Rooftop open space may satisfy this requirement, provided it is available for use by all residents. ROUTE 66 DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-55 May 2018 STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Single/Double-Vehicle Access Double-Vehicle Access Reciprocal Access Building Building RECIPROCAL ACCESS Ingress and Egress A. Reciprocal ingress and egress access with adjacent properties shall be provided for parcels fronting Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue. This requirement may be waived with City approval due to the following circumstances: • The location of existing structures or infrastructure • Lack of agreement between adjacent owners • Other extreme hardship VEHICULAR ACCESS Single-Vehicle Access A. A maximum of one (1) vehicle point shall be provided from a public street for parcels with less than 100 linear feet of street frontage and/ or a parcel less than 15,000 sf. Double-Vehicle Access A. A maximum of two (2) vehicle access points shall be provided from a public street for parcels with more than 100 linear feet of street frontage. B. Access points shall be separated a minimum of 80’ in consultation with the Director of Public Works. C. Additional access points may be permitted from secondary streets with Economic and Community Development Director approval. D. Unused vehicle access points shall be closed and reconstructed per City standard. >100’ <100’ Public Street LAND USE AND URBAN FORM ROUTE 66 DISTRICT 2-56 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2 BUILDING LOCATION Placement A. Parcels fronting Foothill Boulevard and Alosta Avenue shall orient buildings toward the street. Building Placement Public Street 15’ m i n BUILDING SETBACKS Street A. 15’ minimum to building. B. 20’ minimum landscape setback where surface parking areas are located adjacent to a public street. Side A. 0’ minimum. Rear A. 0’ minimum. Route 66 Themed Public Art Incentive A. Development dedicating 5% of the front setback area to Route 66 themed public art within the Route 66 Overlay may reduce the minimum street setback requirements by 5’. B. An additional 5’ of building height is permitted (10’ for hospitality use) if 10% of the front setback area is dedicated to Route 66 themed public art within the Route 66 Overlay. C. Public art shall comply with Chapter 88.39 - Art in Public Places of the Development Code and shall be installed prior to occupancy. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Building Setbacks Parking Setbacks Public StreetParki n g B. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION Building placement refers to the physical siting of a structure on a parcel with considerations being given to building orientation, setbacks, and parking. The following standards promote building placement that creates an active public realm, creates a strong continuity of frontages, and contributes to greater utilization of parcels within the Route 66 District.15’ min.0’ min. Rear & Side SetbackPub l i c S t r e e t ROUTE 66 DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-57 May 2018 STANDARDS Primary Entrances Public Stree tBuilding Entrance s BUILDING ENTRANCES Primary Entrances A. Buildings shall have a primary entrance door facing the public street. Entrances at building corners may be used to satisfy this requirement. BUILDING HEIGHT Minimum Height A. 20’ minimum. Architectural projections/features may exceed the height limits of this District up to 10 feet, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. Projections/features should be architecturally compatible and aesthetically pleasing or be screened from view. Neon signage, historic graphics, and/or other non-business or project specific related screening methods may be considered appropriate, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. Route 66 Themed Public Art Incentive A. Development dedicating 5% of the required front setback area to Route 66 themed public art within the Route 66 Overlay area may increase the maximum allowed building height by 5’ (10’ for hospitality uses), subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. Building Height 40’ max; 50’ max for hospitality uses20’ min.C. BUILDING FORM AND MASSING Building form refers to the shape, configuration, and relationship of a building to its environment. A number of details must be considered when designing a building’s form including building height, plate height, configuration, roof form, facades, articulation, entrances, and window glazing. Building forms should encourage a pedestrian-friendly environment by including amenities, facade articulation, and street level building openings. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Public Stree t INTERPRETATION Maximum Height A. 40’ maximum; 50’ maximum for hospitality uses. B. Building height may be increased 10’ (20’ for hospitality use) if 10% of the required front setback area is dedicated to Route 66 themed public art within the Route 66 Overlay area, subject to Economic and Community Development Director approval. C. Public art shall comply with Chapter 88.39 - Art in Public Places of the Development Code and shall be installed prior to occupancy. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM ROUTE 66 DISTRICT 2-58 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2 STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Building Plate Height 14’ min.Floor StructureT.O.P. BUILDING ARTICULATION Plate Height A. Ground floor plate height shall be a minimum of 14’. BUILDING MASSING Maximum Wall Plane A. No building façade visible from a public street shall extend more than 50’ in length without a 5’ minimum variation in the wall plane. 50 ft. max. 5 ft. min. Building Massing Public Street 45% min. for retail 30% min. for office Window Glazing Public Street WINDOW GLAZING Solid-to-Void RatioA. 45% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for retail uses adjacent to a public street. B. 30% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for office uses adjacent to a public street. C. Transparent or translucent glazing is required on the first floor facade of a commercial or retail use facing a public street. D. Opaque, reflective, or dark tinted glass is not permitted. E. Window stickers or exterior window treatments that obstruct interior building views at the street level are prohibited. F. The bottom of any window or product display window shall not be more than three and one-half feet above the adjacent sidewalk. G. Product display windows shall have a minimum height of four feet and be internally lit. ROUTE 66 DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-59 May 2018 FREESTANDING/MONUMENT SIGNAGE Neon tube/LED freestanding/monument signage is required for those parcels fronting onto Foothill Boulevard (Route 66) within the Route 66 District. Freestanding/monument signage shall comply with the following requirements in addition to those outlined in Section 88.38 of the Azusa Sign Ordinance. MAXIMUM SIGN AREA The total sign area on a parcel shall comply with the following requirements. All other signage not identified within the Route 66 District shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 88.38 of the Azusa Sign Ordinance. 1. Maximum sign area per parcel. The total sign area on a parcel shall comply with the following requirements: A. 1.25 sf for each linear ft. of primary building frontage. B. 0.5 additional sf for each linear foot of secondary building frontage. C. Each use is allowed a total sign area of at least 25 sf regardless of frontage length. D. The total sign area per use shall not exceed 125 sf, without Master Sign Plan approval. 2. Maximum sign area per building frontage. The total area of all signs on a single structure frontage shall not exceed the total linear feet of that frontage. ROUTE 66 THEMED SIGNAGE In order to facilitate and further expand on the desired character of the Route 66 District, specific signage requirements, beyond those required under the City of Azusa’s Sign Ordinance (Chapter 88.38), have been provided below. In particular, expanded sign area and neon tube/LED lighting requirements are permitted in exchange for the design and installation of freestanding/monument signage that reflects the culture, character, form, and style historically present on Route 66 be incorporated into the project signage program. The standards provided below are subject to the approval of a Sign Permit or Master Sign Plan, in compliance with Chapter 88.38. 3. Site with 4 or more tenants. An additional freestanding identification sign of 0.35 sf for each linear ft. of total primary structure frontage, up to 125 sf maximum. USE OF EXPOSED NEON TUBING The use of neon (exposed gaseous light tubing) and LED signage is required within the Route 66 District and shall meet the following requirements: A. Neon signs and linear tubing shall be UL (Underwriters Laboratories) listed with a maximum 20 amps for each circuit; B. Neon manufacturer shall be registered with Underwriters Laboratories; C. Neon tubing shall not exceed 13 millimeters in diameter; D. Neon lighting adjacent to residential uses shall not exceed 1/2 foot candle measured at the property line; E. When used as an architectural element, neon tubing shall be used only to reinforce specific architectural elements of the structure and shall be concealed from view through the use of parapets, cornices, ledges or similar devices; and F. Neon signs, together with other permitted window signs, shall not occupy more than 25% of the total window area, and shall be used to enhance the business name, not a specific brand or product. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-60 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 ROUTE 66 DISTRICT 2.6.4 Route 66 District Design Guidelines In the early 1900s, Route 66 served motorists making a long east/west trip. Consequently small stores, gas stations, cafes, and motels began to pop up along the route. Building designs were creative to capture the attention and desires of motorists and made of local materials such as wood, brick, and stucco. Early hotels were organized as cabins or individual structures and often were characterized by labels such as the “Colonial Clapboard,” “Western Bungalow,” “Craftsman Bungalow,” “Spanish Colonial,” or “Spanish Pueblo.” With the establishment of indoor plumbing, a more unified architectural style was desired and motel builders adopted the “Streamline Moderne” architecture. These unique attributes provide the foundation for Route 66 architecture. Designers are encouraged to embrace this whimsical and creative approach to architecture and signage along the corridor and conform to the following guidelines: 1. Design features should be incorporated to capture the essence of Streamline Modern or Art Deco, such as curved canopies and walls, thin horizontal canopies over sidewalks, elements with oblique angles, or creative roof forms. 2. “Off the shelf” or “chain” corporate architecture and generic designs are not recommended for new development. Each project should strive to achieve the unique theme of the corridor. 3. Signs in a 1950s theme are encouraged. Consider the use of neon, pylons, signs with angular geometric configurations, and signs with animated displays. Roof signs and pole-mounted may also be considered, if provided as a part of Master Sign Plan application. In addition, the corridor is composed of larger parcels with extensive street frontage. As such, the following guidelines shall be considered in the design of any project within this district. 4. 360-Degree architecture is the concept of designing a building where all sides of the building have been detailed to complement the primary street elevation in architecture, massing, and materials. Buildings should be aesthetically pleasing from all angles. Massing design should include: Ê Variation in the wall plane (project and recess) Ê Variation in wall height Ê Roofs located at different levels Ê Surface detailing should not serve as a substitute for distinctive massing 5. Building scale should be reduced through the proper use of window patterns, structural bays, roof overhangs, siding, awnings, moldings, fixtures, and other details. 6. Locate windows and entrances adjacent to street and public spaces to improve public safety and security and provide “eyes on the street”. 7. The ground level should be distinguished from the upper levels of a building, especially where a building orients to the street and/or defines public space. Design elements such as separate storefronts, display windows, shop entrances, awnings and overhangs should be incorporated to add interest and give a human dimension to street- level building facades. 8. Pedestrian-level exterior walls should have elements of building depth and character. Emphasize windows, trellises, roof overhangs, Example of streamlined modern style architecture. ROUTE 66 DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-61 May 2018 recessed or projected stories, columns, balconies, wainscots, and awnings. 9. Property owners should not propose installing awnings unless they are prepared to maintain and regularly replace the awnings every eight to ten years. 10. Parapets should have sufficient articulation of detail, such as precast treatments, continuous banding, or projecting cornices, lentils, caps, corner details, or variety in pitch (sculpted). 11. Parapets should not appear “tacked on” and should convey a sense of permanence. 12. If the interior side of a parapet is visible from pedestrian view, it should be finished with the same materials and a similar level of detail as the front façade. 13. Parking lots should be well landscaped to help reduce heat buildup and soften the perceived negative impact of large paved areas. 14. Parking lot trees are intended to provide a broad shade canopy for the majority of the parking spaces. Utilize shade trees that have a canopy of 25 feet to 35 feet at maturity. 15. Parking lots should be well lit to provide safety, convenience, and promote evening use. Use pedestrian-scale lighting to avoid excessively tall stadium style lighting. 16. Any outdoor equipment, whether on a roof, side of a structure, or on the ground should be appropriately screened from view and should not be placed adjacent to the street. The method of screening should be architecturally integrated with the adjacent structure in terms of materials, color, shape and size. 17. Service, utility, and loading areas should be carefully designed, located, and integrated into the site plan. They should be located and designed for easy access by service vehicles, for convenient access by each tenant, and located to minimize circulation conflicts Thematic, Route 66 themed signage. Buildings should be placed to engage the street and designed with a creative architectural style. with other site uses. These critical functional elements should not detract from the public viewshed area or create a nuisance for adjacent property owners. 18. Roof access should be provided from the interior of the building. Exterior roof access ladders are strongly discouraged. 19. The trash/recycle enclosure should be consistent with the design and materials with the project and building architecture. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM TRANSITION DISTRICT2 2-62 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2.7.1 District Character The Transition District will maintain a residentially-oriented environment that provides an appropriately scaled buffer for existing single- family residential neighborhoods, adjacent to areas of higher intensity within the Specific Plan Area. Professional office and creative studio cottages will repurpose existing single- 2.7 TRANSITION DISTRICT Local neighborhood market and food hall located at the historic Packing House off 9th Street and Soldano Avenue. family residences, maintaining the residential character of the district, while creating new job opportunities within the community. New, detached courtyard and attached townhome residential developments will enhance the housing variety within the City and enable convenient access to dining, service, retail, and public transit. A Neighborhood Market/Food Repurposing single-family residences into professional office cottages maintains the residential character of a neighborhood. Attached townhomes with front porches expand housing options and create semi-private spaces to engage the neighborhood. TRANSITION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-63 May 2018 SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES - Related to the Transition District ED-1 Provide zoning and land use regulations to support future market-driven revitalization and investment. A. Incorporate development standards that promote desired architectural features and conditions. ED-3 Provide increased uses, services, and transportation options to support and benefit the local community. A. Provide opportunities for expansion of small, home businesses through allowable land uses. ED-4 Provide a range of supporting benefits for the local community including a variety of housing, a more walkable environment, and community amenities. A. Maintain residential character and orientation, while encouraging additional stand-alone housing variety within the community. HC-1 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that enhance architectural quality, improve the overall identity of the Specific Plan Area, and enrich the quality of life through the built environment. A. Include standards that require new development to remain appropriately scaled and compatible with existing residential neighborhoods. B. Encourage protection and reuse of existing single-family residences through allowable land use opportunities for office, art and dance studios, live-work, and other residentially compatible uses. HC-2 Encourage grocery, outdoor dining, and other healthy food related land uses that are easily accessible to the community. A. Incentivize repurposing of the historic packing house location into a neighborhood market and food hall making unique foods and healthy produce easily accessible to the community through a Specialty Market/Food Hall Overlay. HC-3 Emphasize streetscape and landscaping enhancements to improve walking, bicycling, and transit use options. A. Enhance pedestrian connectivity to other districts within the Specific Plan Area through landscaping, mobility, and streetscape improvements. CP-1 Incorporate Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies that contribute to the safety and vitality of residents and visitors of Azusa. A. Encourage positive social interactions and deter potential criminal behavior through the design and development of both public and private spaces (refer to Section 1.7.6). Hall Overlay to the historic Packing House, at the corner of 9th Street and Soldano Avenue, will allow for a neighborhood specialty market and food hall, creating a regional destination for unique and healthy foods, as well as a local gathering space that facilitates community interaction. Bicycle lanes and streetscape improvements within the district will enhance pedestrian and bicycle mobility and create a pleasant and enjoyable experience when traveling to the historic Packing House, the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station, or nearby districts. 2.7.2 Land Use Expanding the housing variety within the Transition District creates additional housing opportunities near the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. New courtyard, townhome, and LAND USE AND URBAN FORM TRANSITION DISTRICT2 2-64 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 IMAGE PLACEHOLDER Recent landscaping and streetscape enhancements within the Rosedale development may inspire improvements to 9th Street. Food halls and specialty markets create community gathering spaces that provide convenient access to unique, healthy foods. duplex residential development within this District supports the commercial, retail, and restaurant uses within adjacent Specific Plan districts. Office, dance and martial arts studios, and day care center uses repurpose existing single-family residences in order to protect and maintain the residential character of the Transition District. Lot coverage for new development within the Transition District is restricted to 80% maximum of the total lot area. The remaining 20% is required to be landscaped in order to beautify and enhance the District’s character. Maximum building heights for new development are limited to 35 feet within this District in order to remain compatible with existing building heights. Street setbacks are required to be a minimum of 10 feet, although porches may encroach 5 feet within the required street setback. Lack of appropriate buffers and transitioning of higher intensity uses can negatively affect neighboring properties. Landscaping improvements are encouraged to form a gradual change in character from surrounding Specific Plan districts. Bicycle lanes and streetscape enhancements along 9th Street, San Gabriel Avenue, Soldano Avenue, and Alameda Avenue improve non-motorized mobility and beautify the Transition District TRANSITION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-65 May 2018 Figure 2-6: Transition District Foothill Blvd Azusa AveAzusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA District Key Map 0 500 1,000250Feet μ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 Gold Line District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District No ChangeRoute 66 District Transition District Civic District Æb Goldline & BNSF Railway 8th St AT & SF R ail w a y Foothill Blvd Foothill Blvd Orange AveLemon AveSunset AveAngeleno Ave6th St San Gabriel Ave6th St Pasadena AveCerritosAve5th St Azusa DowntownStation Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy AT&T Verizon Post Office Target Park PublicLibrary SeniorCenter Alameda AveDalton Ave9th St 5th St AREA OFNO CHANGE AtlantisGardens Azusa PacificUniversity Sp St Francis ofRome School SlausonPark LeeElementarySoldano AveDalton AveAlameda AveAzusa AveSan Gabriel AveVeteran'sMemorialPark CityHallAzusa AveSoldano AvePasadena AvePackingHouse SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Æb Specific Plan Districts 0 280 560140Feet μCivic District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District Transition District Corridor District Gold Line District Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 No Change Transition District Key Map Azusa Foothill Citrus Association Packing House NSpecialty Market/Food Hall Overlay environment. Recent enhancements along 10th Street provide a local example for informing future 9th Street improvements. A. SPECIALTY MARKET/FOOD HALL OVERLAY The former Azusa Foothill Citrus Association Packing House is located at 9th Street and Soldano Avenue (see Figure 2-6). The Specialty Market/Food Hall Overlay encourages the protection and repurposing of the historic structure. A specialty market and food hall is envisioned as a unique culinary and ethnic food hall that sells local products and fresh produce to the community while creating a regional destination for visitors. Refer to Page 2-71 for detailed Specialty Market/Food Hall incentives. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM TRANSITION DISTRICT2 2-66 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Table 2-5: Transition District Allowable Uses A. Commercial Recreation Facility-Indoor B. Conference/Convention Facility C. Health/Fitness Facility D. Library/Museum E. School-Specialized Education/Training F. Alcoholic Beverage Sales G. Auto Vehicle Sales and Rental H. Bar/Tavern I. Drive-Through Facility J. Furniture, Furnishings, and Appliance Store K. General Retail L. Night Club M. Lodging - Hotel or Motel N. Mortuary, Funeral Home O. Public Safety Facility P. Repair Service Q. Vehicle Service R. Public Facility S. Telecommunications Facility T. Transit Station or Terminal U. Utility Facility P             Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required Refer to Chapter 88.70 of the Development Code for Definitions               uses permitted on a second or upper floor.               permitted on a second or upper floor. 1             Only Medical Services ‐ Doctor Office use 2             Only Office‐Processing and Office‐Professional      MUP      Minor Use Permit required UP          Use Permit required S             Permit requirement set by Specific Use Regulations Note: A combination of any of the permitted uses may be provided within a horizontal or vertical mixed-use project provided the Ground Floor Use Standard (provided below) and Mixed-Use Standards provided on Page 2-7 are adhered to. PROHIBITED USES LAND USE REGULATION LAND USE REGULATION RECREATION, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC ASSEMBLY SERVICES ‐ BUSINESS, FINANCIAL, AND PROFESSIONAL Museum P ATM P Park, Playground P Banks, Financial Services P Studio‐Art, Dance, Martial Arts, Music, Etc.P Business Support Service P RESIDENTIAL Medical Office/Service P1 Caretaker/Manager Unit P Office P2 Courtyard Housing P SERVICES ‐ GENERAL Duplex/Triplex/Fourplex P Day Care Center ‐ Child or Adult MUP Home Occupation P Lodging ‐ Bed & Breakfast Inn (B&B)P Live/Work Unit MUP Personal Services P Mixed‐Use P Organizational House MUP Residential Accessory Use or Structure P Residential Care (six or fewer clients)P Senior Citizen Apartment P Single‐Family Dwelling P Multifamily P RETAIL SALES Neighborhood Market P Restaurant, Café, Coffee Shop P Specialty Market P ALLOWABLE USES: Transition District TRANSITION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-67 May 2018 COVERAGE Lot Coverage A. 80% maximum. COVERAGE Landscaping Coverage A. 20% maximum. Landscaping Standards A. Refer to Chapter 88.34 - Landscaping Standards of the Development Code for specific requirements. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Lot Coverage Landscaping Coverage 2.7.3 Development Standards The following development standards are specific to the Transition District. These standards have been tailored to reflect the desired character and implement the vision of the Transition District. They provide the framework for the creation of a safe, vibrant, and pedestrian-friendly environment that maintains the residential orientation of the District. In addition to the development standards located on the following pages, projects will be evaluated on their adherence to standards provided in Section 2.2.5, Section 3, and the design guidelines and strategies located in Sections 1.7, 2.5.2, and 2.7.4. A. SITE PLANNING Site planning and design is key to quality development. The following standards promote orienting buildings toward the street to promote an active street environment and regulations that minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts. 80% Lot Coverage 20% Landscape Coverage LAND USE AND URBAN FORM TRANSITION DISTRICT2 2-68 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 SERVICE AND DELIVERY AREAS Loading and Service Areas A. Loading docks and service bays shall be located a minimum of 15’ from any public street. B. Trash and recycling enclosures shall not be located adjacent to a public street. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Service and Delivery Areas Service Loading 15’ min.Parking Public Stre e t 7’-6” min.7’-6” min.7’-6” min.Public Street Line of SightVEHICULAR LINE OF SIGHT Clear Zones A. The clear zone shall consist of an isosceles right triangle with 7’6” sides on the driveway and street. B. The clear zone shall not be occupied by a ground floor building footprint, site features, or landscaping that is taller than 3’. Residential Open Space 40 sf/unit min. of Common Open Space 200 sf/unit min. of Private Open Space RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE Residential Private Open Space A. Private open space shall be provided at 200 sf per unit minimum and a minimum dimension of 10’x10’. Residential Common Open Space A. Common open space shall be provided at a minimum of 40 sf per unit with a minimum of 10’ in any direction. B. Common open space shall be purposefully designed as active or passive recreational facilities. C. Rooftop open space may satisfy this requirement, provided it is available for use by all residents. TRANSITION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-69 May 2018 10’ m i n BUILDING SETBACKS Street A. 10’ minimum to building. Porches may encroach 5’ into the required street setback. B. 10’ minimum landscape setback where surface parking areas are located adjacent to a public street. Side A. 5’ minimum. Rear A. 10’ minimum. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Building Setbacks Parking Setbacks Public StreetParki n g B. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION Building placement refers to the physical siting of a structure on a parcel with considerations being given to building orientation, setbacks, and parking. The following standards promote building placement that creates an active public realm, creates a strong continuity of frontages, and contributes to greater utilization of parcels within the Transition District. 10’ m i n .5’ min.10 ’ m i n .Public StreetBUILDING LOCATION Placement A. Parcels fronting a public street shall orient buildings toward the street. Building Placement Public Street LAND USE AND URBAN FORM TRANSITION DISTRICT2 2-70 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 BUILDING ARTICULATION Plate Height A. Ground floor plate height shall be a minimum of 14’. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Primary Entrances Public Str e et Building En t r a n c e s BUILDING ENTRANCES Primary Entrances A. Buildings shall have a primary entrance door facing the public street. Entrances at building corners may be used to satisfy this requirement. BUILDING HEIGHT Maximum Height A. 35’ maximum. Building Height C. BUILDING FORM AND MASSING Building form refers to the shape, configuration, and relationship of a building to its environment. A number of details must be considered when designing a building’s form including building height, plate height, configuration, roof form, facades, articulation, entrances, and window glazing. Building forms should encourage a pedestrian- friendly environment by including amenities, facade articulation, and street level building openings. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION 35’ maxBuilding Plate Height 14’ min.Floor StructureT.O.P. TRANSITION DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-71 May 2018 STANDARDS INTERPRETATION Window Glazing Public Stre e t WINDOW GLAZING Solid-to-Void Ratio A. Transparent or translucent glazing is required on the first floor facade of a commercial or retail use facing a public street. B. Opaque, reflective, or dark tinted glass is not permitted. C. Window stickers or exterior window treatments that obstruct interior building views at the street level are prohibited. D. The bottom of any window or product display window shall not be more than three and one- half feet above the adjacent sidewalk. E. Product display windows shall have a minimum height of four feet and be internally lit. SPECIALTY MARKET/FOOD HALL OVERLAY INCENTIVES A. Lot Coverage: 100% maximum B. Landscape Coverage: 0% C. 0’ minimum setback on all sides. D. Parking Ratio: 1 space/1,000 sf E. Loading and unloading is not permitted off of 9th Street. F. Historic architectural character shall be maintained. SPECIALTY MARKET/FOOD HALL OVERLAY INCENTIVES LAND USE AND URBAN FORM TRANSITION DISTRICT2 2-72 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 2.7.4 Transition District Design Guidelines 1. Architectural character of a building should build upon and maintain the traditional neighborhood character with an emphasis on historic architectural styles, building type, materials and details. 2. 360-Degree architecture is the concept of designing a building where all sides of the building have been detailed to complement the primary street elevation in architecture, massing, and materials. Buildings should be aesthetically pleasing from all angles. 3. Continuity among buildings contributes to neighborhood identity. The intent of the Transition District is to provide a physical and visual buffer between more intense districts and established single-family development. As the area develops, buildings within this District should complement the form, scale, and proportion (relationship of height and width) of adjacent buildings within the District and should acknowledge the historic character of the neighborhood. 4. Conversions of residential structures to commercial use shall retain the residential character of the existing building and existing architectural moldings, ornamentation, and other interesting detailing should be retained and repaired or replaced to match the original detail. 5. The main entrance to a building or residential unit should be clearly identifiable and unique. These elements should be integrated into the building design to avoid the look of “tacked on” architectural features. One or more of the following methods should be incorporated in the entrance design: Ê A change in wall plane Ê Wall articulation around the door and projecting beyond the door Ê Placement of decorative detailing at the entry Ê A projecting element above the entrance Ê A change in material or detailing Ê Implementation of architectural elements such as flanked columns or decorative fixtures Ê Recessed doors, archways, or cased openings Ê A portico or formal porch projecting from or set into the surface Ê Changes in the roof line 6. Locate windows and entrances adjacent to street and public spaces to improve public safety and security and provide “eyes on the street”. 7. Porches, stoops, and balconies are encouraged to complement and enhance overall building design. 8. Covered porches or patios at the first floor level oriented toward the front and/or side yard should be a minimum of 6’ in depth, and shapes, sizes, and setbacks should vary from house to house. 9. Siding should wrap around the outside corners of the building to the fence line at a minimum. The use of siding on the entire building is recommended. 10. Fencing and wall materials should be compatible with the building and should be used to reinforce the architectural theme of the building. CIVIC DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-73 May 2018 2.8.1 District Character The Civic District will remain the focal point of community involvement and identity in Azusa through the historic buildings, public facilities, and memorials that provide special functional and symbolic importance. Limited changes to the Azusa Development Code will ensure that any new development remains both physically 2.8 CIVIC DISTRICT City of Azusa City Hall. and visually complementary to the existing City Hall, library, senior center, police station, and other public buildings. Veteran’s Freedom Park and other open spaces within the Civic District will provide opportunities for expanding active recreation and outdoor community events. New and/or expanded memorials for community veterans will further the importance of the Veterans Freedom Park provides the platform for expanded recreational and outdoor community events. Civic buildings and public facilities represent Azusa’s history and contribute to the City’s identity. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM CIVIC DISTRICT2 2-74 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES - Related to the Civic District TO-6 Establish pedestrian linkages to and from the future Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station to support a walkable station area and function as a community gateway to downtown Azusa. A. Propose extending the welcome plaza from the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station in the Gold Line District to strengthen pedestrian linkages to the Civic District along Santa Fe Avenue and Alameda Avenue. ED-4 Provide a range of supporting benefits for the local community including a variety of housing, a more walkable environment, and community amenities. A. Emphasize improvements to existing parks and open space to enhance active recreational and outdoor community gathering spaces. B. Celebrate the history of democratic, military, and public service involvement in the community by improving and expanding upon existing memorials. S-2 Maintain and enhance structures identified as having historic value to retain and support the existing historic character of Azusa. A. Focus on maintaining existing civic, cultural, and public institutions to protect the history and identity of Azusa. HC-1 Provide district-specific development standards and design guidelines that enhance architectural quality, improve the overall identity of the Specific Plan Area, and enrich the quality of life through the built environment. A. Tailor the allowable land uses to ensure that new development remains compatible with existing civic and public facilities. B. Minimize changes to existing Development Code requirements to maintain the character and quality of the built environment within the Civic District. HC-3 Emphasize streetscape and landscaping enhancements to improve walking, bicycling, and transit use options. A. Incorporate improved landscaping, streetscape, and pedestrian amenities to facilitate inter-district connectivity and ease of access to the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station. CP-1 Incorporate Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies that contribute to the safety and vitality of residents and visitors of Azusa. A. Encourage positive social interactions and deter potential criminal behavior through the design and development of both public and private spaces (refer to Section 1.7.6). Civic District as a symbolic focal point of Azusa. Enhancing pedestrian connections to the Azusa Downtown Gold Line Station and adjacent Gold Line District, through the incorporation of a new welcome plaza, will enrich the overall character and sense of place representing the Azusa community. 2.8.2 Land Use The Civic District is mostly comprised of existing civic, cultural, and public service buildings and facilities. These existing civic and public service uses provide the central framework for celebrating the community’s history of democratic involvement. While the identity of CIVIC DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-75 May 2018 Veterans Park Memorials honor those past and present members of the community who served their country and their community. the Civic District remains oriented toward public uses, the incorporation of complementary uses adds additional activity and vitality to the District in the future. Minimal changes are proposed to the existing Azusa Development Code relating to the Civic District in order to maintain its existing character. While almost all areas of the District are already developed, any new development may build out to 100% of lot coverage. In addition, the massing of new buildings visible from a public street are required to incorporate a minimum of 5 feet variation in the facade for every 50 feet of wall plane in order to create visual interest and continuity. The Civic District requirements place a greater emphasis on improving existing park and Public facilities provide a central gathering space for holding events to bring together members of the community. open space areas. Future incorporation of a community amphitheater within Veterans Freedom Park will provide a central community gathering place for hosting events for residents and visitors. In addition, closing portions of Alameda Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue will LAND USE AND URBAN FORM CIVIC DISTRICT2 2-76 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 Figure 2-7: Civic District Æb 8th St Foothill Blvd Azusa DowntownStation Azusa Light & Water CVS Pharmacy Target PublicLibrary SeniorCenter St FrRomDalton AveAlameda AveSan Gabriel AveVeteran'sMemorialPark CityHallAzusa AveSoldano AvePasadena AveSOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA Æb Specific Plan Districts 0 125 25062.5 Feet μCivic District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District Transition District Corridor District Gold Line District Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 No Change Foothill Blvd Azusa AveAzusa DowntownStation APU/CitrusCollege Station SOURCE AND REFERENCE DATABASE MAP FEATURES TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Parcel Boundary Transit Site CITY OF AZUSA District Key Map 0 500 1,000250Feet μ Image from EIR Report - TAHA Inc. 03.22.13 Date: 5/4/2015 Notes and Sources: 1) Base data from the City of Azusa GIS Dept. 2) Aerial photo from the City of Azusa GIS Dept - 2010 3) Aerial photo of Target area from Google Earth - 04.2013 Gold Line District Downtown District Downtown Expansion District No ChangeRoute 66 District Transition District Civic DistrictCivic District Key Map N allow for the creation of a welcome plaza that continues into the adjacent Gold Line District and facilitates inter-district connectivity (refer to Section 3.2.6). Additional opportunities exist for integrating and facilitating connections between adjacent Specific Plan districts through the incorporation of landscaping, streetscape, and pedestrian improvements. CIVIC DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-77 May 2018 LAND USE REGULATION LAND USE REGULATION RECREATION, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC ASSEMBLY SERVICES ‐ GENERAL Library, Museum P Day Care Center ‐ Child or Adult MUP Live Entertainment UP Public Safety Facility P Meeting Facility, Public or Private MUP TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE Park, Playground P Parking Facility, Public or Commercial MUP RESIDENTIAL Public Facilities P Senior Citizen Apartment MUP Telecommunications Facility S RETAIL SALES Utility Facilty P Farmers Markets MUP General Retail P Restaurant, Café, Coffee Shop P SERVICES ‐ BUSINESS, FINANCIAL, AND PROFESSIONAL ATM P Banks, Financial Services MUP Business Support Service P Office MUP1 ALLOWABLE USES: Civic District Table 2-6: Civic District Allowable Uses Uses not Identified within the Allowable Use Table are not permitted within the Civic District. P             Permitted Use, Zoning Clearance required Refer to Chapter 88.70 of the Development Code for Definitions               uses permitted on a second or upper floor.               permitted on a second or upper floor. 1             Only Medical Services ‐ Doctor Office use 2             Only Office‐Processing and Office‐Professional      MUP      Minor Use Permit required UP          Use Permit required S             Permit requirement set by Specific Use Regulations PROHIBITED USES LAND USE AND URBAN FORM CIVIC DISTRICT2 2-78 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 COVERAGE Lot Coverage A. 100% maximum. Landscaping Standards A. Refer to Chapter 88.34 - Landscaping Standards of the Development Code for specific requirements. STANDARDS STANDARDS INTERPRETATION INTERPRETATION Lot Coverage 100% Lot Coverage 2.8.3 Development Standards The following development standards are specific to the Civic District. These standards have been tailored to reflect the desired character and implement the vision of the Civic District. For development standards not included within this section, refer to the City of Azusa Development Code for additional requirements. In addition to the development standards located on the following pages, projects will be evaluated on their adherence to standards provided in Section 2.2.5, Section 3, and the design guidelines and strategies located in Sections 1.7, and 2.5.2. A. SITE PLANNING Site planning and design is key to quality development. The following standards promote orienting buildings toward the street to promote an active street environment and regulations that minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts. B. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION Building placement refers to the physical siting of a structure on a parcel with considerations being given to building orientation, setbacks, and parking. The following standards promote building placement that creates an active public realm, creates a strong continuity of frontages, and contributes to greater utilization of parcels within the Civic District. BUILDING LOCATION PlacementA. Parcels fronting a public street shall orient buildings toward the street. Building Orientation Public Street CIVIC DISTRICT LAND USE AND URBAN FORM 2 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan 2-79 May 2018 Primary Entrances Public Str e et Building En t r a n c e s C. BUILDING FORM AND MASSING Building form refers to the shape, configuration, and relationship of a building to its environment. A number of details must be considered when designing a building’s form including building height, plate height, configuration, roof form, facades, articulation, entrances, and window glazing. Building forms should reflect the architectural character of the existing buildings within the Civic District. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION BUILDING MASSING Maximum Wall PlaneA. No building façade visible from a public street shall extend more than 50’ in length without a 5’ minimum variation in the wall plane. Roof FormsA. Gable, shed, and hip tile roof forms shall be integrated into buildings within this district. 45% min. for retail 30% min. for office Window Glazing Public Street WINDOW GLAZING Solid-to-Void Ratio A. 45% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for retail uses adjacent to a public street. B. 30% minimum transparent glazing of first floor facade for office uses adjacent to a public street. C. Transparent or translucent glazing is required on the first floor facade of a commercial or retail use facing a public street. D. Opaque, reflective, or dark tinted glass is not permitted. E. Window stickers or exterior window treatments that obstruct interior building views at the street level are prohibited. 50’ ma x . 5’ min. Maximum Wall Plane Public Street F. The bottom of any window or product display window shall not be more than three and one-half feet above the adjacent sidewalk. G. Product display windows shall have a minimum height of four feet and be internally lit. STANDARDS INTERPRETATION BUILDING ENTRANCES Primary Entrances A. Buildings shall have a primary entrance door facing Alameda Avenue and Dalton Avenue. Entrances at building corners may be used to satisfy this requirement. LAND USE AND URBAN FORM2 2-80 City of Azusa | TOD Specific Plan May 2018 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK