HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - April 20, 2019 - CC OF
Q.
L4tiroo.
,zusA
DECLARATION OF POSTING CITY COUNCIL,
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
AND PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA
I, P aAAV '"1')-U declare that:
I am an employee of the City of Azusa.
On PlaYi 1 i L I posted copies of the Agenda, as stated above for
the meeting of ' ' ; a , in the City Clerk's Office, 213 E. Foothill Blvd.;
the lobby of the Police Department, 725 N. Alameda Ave.; the Civic Auditorium, 213 E. Foothill
Blvd.; the City Library, 729 N. Dalton Ave.; and the and the City's Web Page
www.ci.azusa.ca.us. A true, correct and complete copy of the agenda which I posted is attached
hereto.
I completed posting of the agendas as described in Paragraph two, at ' `` � � on
the date of posting.
Access to the agenda posted in the lobby of the Police Department and the Azusa City Library
reference desk is available to members of the public during their normal business hours.
The foregoing is within my personal knowledge and if called as a witness in a court of law, I
could testify competently thereto.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct.
EXECUTED 'rC\VT) , at Azusa, California.
STAFF MEMB
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE \\\
CITY OF AZUSA
APPROVED
COUNCIL MEETING
Date, a
r
►ZUS
REPORTS/UPDATES
C-1
WHEREAS: Since 1985, Public Service Recognition Week is organized annually by the Public
Employee Roundtable, each year the first week of May is recognized as a national
event to honor the men and women who serve our nation as federal, state, county
and local government employees, the theme chosen for 2015 is Government
Works; and
WHEREAS: Public employees take not only jobs, but oaths, do amazing things across our
great nation, and in our hometown and community, they are the men and women
who have taken a variety of challenging rewarding professions in order to serve
each of us; and
WHEREAS: Throughout the week of May 3-9, 2015, the City of Azusa will celebrate Public
Service Recognition Week, to publicly honor all the men and women who
dedicate their careers, and sometimes their lives, to keep others safe and provide
them with the common needs of our society, they are the ones who work at every
level, by providing services, meeting the demands of our community and
connecting Citizens with our local Government.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Azusa proclaims the week of May 3-9,
2015, as
PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK
and calls to all residents to recognize the accomplishments and contributions of the 359 Azusa
City Employees, who everyday help make the quality of life more pleasant and better for this
beautiful community we call home.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF we have set our hands and caused the Seal of the City of Azusa to be
affixed on this 20th day of April Two Thousand Fifteen.
Signed by the Mayor and the City Council
APPROVED
COUNCIL MEETING
Date, 1"i /0 ( I
.t-404
AZUSA
SCHEDULED ITEM
D-1
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
VIA: TROY L. BUTZLAFF, ICMA-CM,CITY MANAGER
r
FROM: SUSAN PARAGAS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: APRIL 20, 2015
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GENERAL FUND
RESERVE BALANCE POLICY
SUMMARY
In order to make prudent decisions related to financial matters, it is critical that the City have
sound financial policies in place. Currently, the City does not have a written reserve policy that
establishes appropriate levels and uses of General Fund reserves. This action adopts a resolution
approving a General Fund Reserve Policy with targeted minimum levels of designated reserves
in the General Fund to address unforeseen emergencies, changes in the economic environment
and replacement of key capital assets and infrastructure.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-C18 (Exhibit A) adopting and approving a General Fund
Reserve Policy.
DISCUSSION
The City of Azusa does not have a written reserve policy that establishes appropriate levels and
guidelines for the use of General Fund reserves. In an effort to evaluate and formalize the City's
General Fund Reserve Policy, staff undertook a review of policies adopted by other cities. In
addition, recommendations from the Government Finance Officers' Association (GFOA) "best
practices in budgeting" were considered in the development of the enclosed draft policy. While
specific reserve policy "targets" vary greatly across cities, several elements appear in numerous
adopted policies, consistent with best practices and prudent fiscal management. Individual
community circumstances and characteristics greatly influence actual reserve level targets;
however the following are some of the common themes found in many well-written reserve
policies:
General Fund Reserve Policy
April20,2015
Page 2
• Reserve acts as a"risk management"tool
• Reserves provides a"buffer"against revenue fluctuations inherent in economic cycles
• Prohibition of use of reserve funds for ongoing operating expenditures
• Guidelines for use of reserve funds
• Guidelines for replenishment of reserve funds,as needed
• Regular review of reserve policy and reserve levels
The City needs to set aside funds to address unforeseen emergencies or disasters, significant
changes in the economic environment,and key infrastructure and capital projects.
Following sound financial practices and adhering to the Government Finance Officers' of
American (GFOA) recommendations, the proposed reserve fund policy establishes reserves for
known and unknown contingencies,and takes into consideration the following:
• Diversity of revenue base
• Cyclical nature of revenue
• Changes in community priorities
• Frequency of budget surpluses/deficits
• Cash flow management practices
The amount of funds held in reserves varies city to city. A commonly cited standard is five per
cent(5.0%) of annual operating expenditures. Others argue that the standard should be anywhere
from one month's operating expenditures (roughly 8.3% of budgeted operating expenditures) to
three months' expenditures (about 25%). A survey of surrounding cities and their reserve fund
levels is attached as Exhibit B. It is recommended that the City set a minimum of 15% of
General Fund annual operating expenditures (less one-time expenditures) to reserves using the
following reserve categories and allocations:
CATEGORY PURPOSE RESERVE LEVEL
Catastrophic Reserve To mitigate costs due to 10%of General Fund
unforeseen emergencies or Annual Operating
catastrophic events. Expenditures(less one-time
expenditures).
Budget Stabilization Reserve To mitigate annual budget 5% of General Fund Annual
revenue shortfalls due to changes Operating Expenditures
in economic environment and/or (less one-time
one-time expenditures. expenditures).
Capital Assets& To use for replacement of capital Equal to estimated City
Infrastructure Replacement assets and infrastructure. asset replacement cost after
Reserve reserves stated above are
met.
Should a catastrophic disaster or loss of a significant source of the City's property and sales tax
revenue occur, the required reserve level should be adequate to meet the City's immediate
financial needs. Likewise, should the City experience a loss of a primary property tax payer or
sales tax contributor, the reserve level in the Budget Stabilization Fund would provide for a two-
year transition period, giving the City adequate time to realign its operating costs with available
resources,while minimizing service impacts.
The General Fund Reserve Policy will be reviewed by the City Council as part of the annual
operating budget review and adoption process. Appropriations of any General Fund reserves
require formal Council authorization.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct financial impact as a result of the adoption of this item.
Prepared by:
Susan Paragas
Director of Finance
Reviewed and Approved:
Troy L. Butzlaff, ICMA-CM
City Manager
Attachments:
Exhibit A- Resolution No.2015-C18
Attachment A—General Fund Reserve Policy
Exhibit B—Survey of Reserve Fund Levels of Surrounding Cities
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-C18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
ADOPTING AND APPROVING THE GENERAL FUND RESERVE
POLICY
WHEREAS, the City of Azusa ("City") desires to maintain current and comprehensive
financial policies; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to formalize the policies regarding General Fund reserves;
and
WHEREAS,the City desires to adopt a General Fund Reserve Policy (Attachment A);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AZUSA DOES HEREBY:
Section 1. Approve and adopt the General Fund Reserve Policy attached hereto
as Attachment A;
Section 2. Authorize City staff to take all actions necessary to carry out the
Policy.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 2015.
,r/tv,(414srbal,
foseph Romero Rocha
Mayor
ATTEST:
iti/P- Air
J f - L.,' ''ceCornejo, Jr
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF AZUSA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2015-C18 was duly adopted
by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20` day of
April, 2015, by the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: GONZALES, CARRILLO, ALVAREZ, ROCHA
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: MACIAS
' ri' OPP
...__r f
J-ff e .•'s ce Cornejo Jr. /
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
e
Marco A. Martinez
Best B st & Krieger ' LP
City Attorney
GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICY
(See Attachment A)
ATTACHMENT A
•
r �
#
•
........ _. A US
CITY OF AZUSA
GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICY
POLICY STATEMENT AND PURPOSE:
It is the policy of the City of Azusa (City) to establish sound financial policies that are
guidelines for prudent decision-making related to financial matters. The purpose of this
policy is to establish a target minimum level of designated reserves in the General Fund
to:
• Reduce the risk of financial impacts resulting from a natural disasters or other
catastrophic events;
• Respond to the challenges of a changing economic environment, including
prolonged downturns in the local, state, or national economy;
• Demonstrate continued prudent fiscal management and creditworthiness; and
• Provide funding stability for core services and infrastructure funded through the
General Fund.
BACKGROUND:
General Fund reserves are classified into two categories: Restricted and Designated.
Restricted reserves are those that are not considered available due to financial,
accounting, or legal restrictions. Designated reserves are established by Council policy
for an intended purpose and are available for use per Council direction.
In addition, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") Statement No. 54
defines five specific classifications of fund balance. The five classifications are intended
to identify whether the specific components of fund balance are available for
appropriation and are therefore "Spendable." The classifications also are intended to
identify the extent to which fund balance is constrained by special restrictions, if any.
Al
ATTACHMENT A
The five classifications are:
CLASSIFICATIONS NATURE OF RESTRICTION
Non-spendable Cannot be readily converted to cash
Restricted Externally imposed restrictions
Committed City Council imposed commitment
Assigned City Manager assigned purpose/intent
Unassigned Residual balance not otherwise restricted
Restricted Fund Balance Components:
• Non-spendable— resources which cannot be spent because they are either a) not in
spendable form or b) legally or contractually required to be maintained intact.
• Restricted— resources with constraints placed on the use of resources which are
either a) externally imposed by creditors (such as through debt covenants),
grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments; or b) imposed by
law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.
Unrestricted Fund Balance Components:
• Committed— resources which are subject to limitations the government imposes
upon itself at its highest level of design making (City Council) and that remain
binding unless removed in the same manner.
• Assigned— resources neither restricted nor committed for which a government has a
stated intended use as established by the City Council or a body or official
(management) to which the City Council has delegated the authority to assign
amounts for specific purposes.
• Unassigned— resources which cannot be properly classified in one of the other four
categories. The General Fund should be the only fund that reports a positive
unassigned fund balance amount.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES:
Following sound financial practices and adhering to the Government Finance Officers'
of American (GFOA) recommendations, the City's designated reserves include reserves
for known and unknown contingencies, which take into consideration the:
A2
ATTACHMENT A
• Diversity of revenue base
• Cyclical nature of revenue
• Changes in community priorities
• Frequency of budget surpluses/deficits
• Cash flow management practices
POLICY:
Reserve Levels
The City will set aside funds into three (3) designated reserves to address unforeseen
emergencies or disasters, significant changes in the economic environment, and key
infrastructure and capital projects. These include the Catastrophic Reserve, Budget
Stabilization Reserve, and Capital Assets and Infrastructure Replacement Reserve.
The City commits to maintaining these reserves at a minimum of 15% of General Fund
annual operating expenditures (minus one-time expenditures), divided between the
Catastrophic Reserve (10%) and Budget Stabilization Reserve (5%), excluding the
Capital Assets and Infrastructure Replacement Reserve. The General Fund Reserve
Policy is reviewed by the City Council as part of the annual operating budget review and
adoption process. Appropriations of any General Fund reserves require formal Council
authorization.
Should a catastrophic disaster or loss of a significant source of the City's property and
sales tax revenue occur, the required reserve level should be adequate to meet the
City's immediate financial needs. For example, in the event of natural disaster, the
Catastrophic Reserve would provide necessary coverage for basic operating expenses
for approximately 90 days, including salary and benefits for safety and non-safety City
employees, while still meeting debt service obligations. This time frame would enable
the City to explore other available cash alternatives. Likewise, should the City
experience a loss of a primary property tax payer or sales tax contributor, the reserve
level in the Budget Stabilization Fund would provide for a two-year transition period,
giving the City adequate time to realign its operating costs with available resources,
while minimizing service impacts.
Key General Fund Designated Reserves
Catastrophic Reserve. Funds reserved under this category shall be used to mitigate
costs associated with unforeseen emergencies, including natural disasters or
catastrophic events. Should unforeseen and unavoidable events occur that require the
expenditure of City resources beyond those provided for in the annual budget, the City
Manager or designee shall have authority to approve Catastrophic Reserve
appropriations. The City Manager or designee shall then present to the City Council a
A3
ATTACHMENT A
budget amendment confirming the nature of the emergency and authorizing the
appropriation of reserve funds.
Budget Stabilization Reserve. Funds reserved under this category shall be used to
mitigate, should they occur, annual budget revenue shortfalls (actual revenues less than
projected revenues) due to changes in the economic environment and/or one-time
expenditures that will result in future efficiencies and/or budgetary savings. Examples
of"economic triggers" and one-time uses include, but are not limited to:
• Significant decrease in property or sales tax, or other economically sensitive
revenues;
• Loss of businesses considered to be significant sales tax generators;
• Reductions in revenue due to actions by the state/federal government;
• Workflow/technical system improvements to reduce ongoing, personnel costs
and enhance customer service;
• One-time maintenance of service levels due to significant economic/budget
constraints; and
• One-time transitional costs associated with organizational restructuring to
secure long-term personnel cost savings.
Capital Assets and Infrastructure Replacement Reserve. The City will maintain a
Reserve for Capital Assets and Infrastructure Replacement. After allocating General
Fund balance to the Budget Stabilization Reserve and City Council designated projects
and purposes, any remaining fund balance shall be apportioned to the Reserve for
Capital Assets and Infrastructure Repair and Replacement as follows: 60% to Streets
and 40% to Other Capital Assets and Infrastructure. It is the long-term goal of the City to
build and maintain this reserve in an amount equal to the estimated replacement cost of
all City capital assets at the end of their design life and to use this reserve for such
replacement.
Replenishment of Unreserved Fund Balance
In keeping with the principles discussed in this policy, when either fund is used, City
Council will develop a one (1) to five (5) year reserve replenishment plan to meet the
minimum threshold of 15% of General Fund ongoing, operating expenditures, excluding
one-time expenditures.
Excess Fund Balance
At the end of each fiscal year, the Finance Department reports on the audited year-end
budgetary fiscal results. Should actual General Fund revenues exceed expenditures
and encumbrances, a year-end operating surplus shall be reported. Any year-end
surplus that results in the General Fund fund balance exceeding the level required by
the reserve policy shall be available for allocation for the following, subject to Council
approval:
A4
ATTACHMENT A
• Offset projected future deficits
■ Anticipated intergovernmental fiscal impacts
■ One-time funding, non-recurring needs
■ Loan repayment acceleration
Upon funding of the above, any remaining surplus balances shall be divided equally
between the Budget Stabilization Reserve and Capital Assets and Infrastructure
Replacement for appropriation.
A5
EXHIBIT "B"
General Fund Reserve Fund Balance Survey
-as of March 22,2015
City General Fund Reserve Policy
Alhambra 10% Could not find details
Baldwin Park 10% -Emergency
Brea 8% Could not find details
Covina 20% -No specifics;Excess reserves for nonrecurring activities or capital improvements
El Monte $5,000,000 -Working capital 15% -Cash flow requirements,unforeseen operating or capital needs,economic uncertainties,
disasters,economic downturns
Glendora 45% -Working capital; Excess reserves for capital improvement
Irwindale $5,000,000 -Economic uncertainties
La Puente 15% -Contingency reserve for unanticipated expenses of non-recurring nature or for unexpected cost increases
Monrovia 20% -Economic uncertainties
Temple City $1,000,000 -Emergency/Disaster $2,000,000 -Liquidity $500,000 -Econ Uncertainty
Upland 10% -Econ uncertainties and unforeseen expenses
Walnut 10% -Emergency 0.50% -Council Contingency $45,000 -CM Contingency(2-year period)
West Covina 20% -Emergency
Whittier 5% -Emergency
Sources: California Society of Municipal Finance Officers(CSMFO)Surveys and Cities'websites
ltkAoli ck /1
,.
`(b p \ r ,
��7711RRllEE��"If
.ti„b<, bx�,.4a'" �" ,., �,u a.. . .v,, cu...,w_. ,.„ t ,. .._ ,,.2.,✓.r.,MG,...v.. aS.L�.....,„. .....w%,,, ,<_.. v i°
itZUSJJ
SCHEDULED ITEM
D-2
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
VIA: TROY L. BUTZLAFF, ICMA-CM, CITY MANAGER
FROM: SUSAN PARAGAS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: APRIL 6, 2015
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GENERAL FUND
RESERVE BALANCE POLICY
SUMMARY
In order to make prudent decisions related to financial matters, it is critical that the City have
sound financial policies in place. Currently, the City does not have a written reserve policy that
establishes appropriate levels and uses of General Fund reserves. This action adopts a resolution
approving a General Fund Reserve Policy with targeted minimum levels of designated reserves
in the General Fund to address unforeseen emergencies, changes in the economic environment
and replacement of key capital assets and infrastructure.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-C16 (Exhibit A) adopting and approving a General Fund
Reserve Policy.
DISCUSSION
The City of Azusa does not have a written reserve policy that establishes appropriate levels and
guidelines for the use of General Fund reserves. In an effort to evaluate and formalize the City's
General Fund Reserve Policy, staff undertook a review of policies adopted by other cities. In
addition, recommendations from the Government Finance Officers' Association (GFOA) "best
practices in budgeting" were considered in the development of the enclosed draft policy. While
specific reserve policy "targets" vary greatly across cities, several elements appear in numerous
adopted policies, consistent with best practices and prudent fiscal management. Individual
community circumstances and characteristics greatly influence actual reserve level targets;
however the following are some of the common themes found in many well-written reserve
policies:
General Fund Reserve Policy
March 16, 2015
Page 2
• Reserve acts as a"risk management"tool
• Reserves provides a"buffer"against revenue fluctuations inherent in economic cycles
• Prohibition of use of reserve funds for ongoing operating expenditures
• Guidelines for use of reserve funds
• Guidelines for replenishment of reserve funds, as needed
• Regular review of reserve policy and reserve levels
The City needs to set aside funds to address unforeseen emergencies or disasters, significant
changes in the economic environment,and key infrastructure and capital projects.
Following sound financial practices and adhering to the Government Finance Officers' of
American (GFOA) recommendations, the proposed reserve fund policy establishes reserves for
known and unknown contingencies,and takes into consideration the following:
• Diversity of revenue base
• Cyclical nature of revenue
• Changes in community priorities
• Frequency of budget surpluses/deficits
• Cash flow management practices
The amount of funds held in reserves varies city to city. A commonly cited standard is five per
cent (5%) of annual operating expenditures. Others argue that the standard should be anywhere
from one month's operating expenditures (roughly 8.3% of budgeted operating expenditures) to
three months' expenditures (about 25%). A survey of surrounding cities and their reserve fund
levels is attached as Exhibit B. Based on this survey the average reserve fund level is 17%. It is
recommended that the City set a minimum of 15% of General Fund annual operating
expenditures (less one-time expenditures)to reserves using the following reserve categories and
allocations:
CATEGORY PURPOSE RESERVE LEVEL
Catastrophic Reserve To mitigate costs due to 10%of General Fund
unforeseen emergencies or Annual Operating
catastrophic events. Expenditures(less one-time
expenditures).
Budget Stabilization Reserve To mitigate annual budget 5% of General Fund Annual
revenue shortfalls due to changes Operating Expenditures
in economic environment and/or (less one-time
one-time expenditures. expenditures).
Capital Assets& To use for replacement of capital Equal to estimated City
Infrastructure Replacement assets and infrastructure. asset replacement cost after
Reserve reserves stated above are
met.
Should a catastrophic disaster or loss of a significant source of the City's property and sales tax
revenue occur, the required reserve level should be adequate to meet the City's immediate
financial needs. Likewise, should the City experience a loss of a primary property tax payer or
sales tax contributor, the reserve level in the Budget Stabilization Fund would provide for a two-
year transition period, giving the City adequate time to realign its operating costs with available
resources,while minimizing service impacts.
The General Fund Reserve Policy will be reviewed by the City Council as part of the annual
operating budget review and adoption process. Appropriations of any General Fund reserves
require formal Council authorization.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct financial impact as a result of the adoption of this item.
Prepared by:
Susan Paragas
Director of Finance
Reviewed and Approved:
Troy L. Butzlaff,ICMA-CM
City Manager
Attachments:
Exhibit A-Resolution No.2015-C15
Exhibit B—Survey of Reserve Fund Levels of Surrounding Cities
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-C16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
ADOPTING AND APPROVING
THE GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICY
WHEREAS, the City of Azusa ("City") desires to maintain current and comprehensive
financial policies;and
WHEREAS,there is a need to formalize the policies regarding General Fund reserves;and
WHEREAS,the City desires to adopt a General Fund Reserve Policy;
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AZUSA DOES HEREBY:
Section 1. Approve and adopt the General Fund Reserve Policy attached hereto as
Attachment A;
Section 2. Authorize City staff to take all actions necessary to carry out the
Policy.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 6th day of April 2015.
JOSEPH ROMERO ROCHA,MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2015-C15 was duly adopted
by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting thereof on the 6th day of April 2015,by
the following vote of City Council Members.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS;
JEFFREY LAWRENCE CORNEJO,JR.,CITY CLERK
EXHIBIT B
General Fund Reserve Fund Balance Survey
-as of March 22,2015
City General Fund Reserve Policy
Alhambra 10% Could not find details
Baldwin Park 10% -Emergency
Brea 8% Could not find details
Covina 20% -No specifics; Excess reserves for nonrecurring activities or capital improvements
El Monte $5,000,000 -Working capital 15% -Cash flow requirements,unforeseen operating or capital needs,economic uncertainties,
disasters,economic downturns
Glendora 45% -Working capital; Excess reserves for capital improvement
Irwindale $5,000,000 -Economic uncertainties
La Puente 15% -Contingency reserve for unanticipated expenses of non-recurring nature or for unexpected cost increases
Monrovia 20% -Economic uncertainties
Temple City $1,000,000 -Emergency/Disaster $2,000,000 -Liquidity $500,000 -Econ Uncertainty
Upland 10% -Econ uncertainties and unforeseen expenses
Walnut 10% -Emergency 0.50% -Council Contingency $45,000 -CM Contingency(2-year period)
West Covina 20% -Emergency
Whittier 5% -Emergency
Sources: California Society of Municipal Finance Officers(CSMFO)Surveys and Cities'websites
Item D-2 ATTACHMENT A
euu_n;.crmr.;x;m;;E4
ffi,*111,01110P4i
A
= ry
/ F
Zr
�,x'sRifiefR€:
CITY OF AZUSA
GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICY
POLICY STATEMENT AND PURPOSE:
It is the policy of the City of Azusa (City) to establish sound financial policies that are
guidelines for prudent decision-making related to financial matters. The purpose of this
policy is to establish a target minimum level of designated reserves in the General Fund
to:
• Reduce the risk of financial impacts resulting from a natural disasters or other
catastrophic events;
• Respond to the challenges of a changing economic environment, including
prolonged downturns in the local, state, or national economy;
• Demonstrate continued prudent fiscal management and creditworthiness; and
• Provide funding stability for core services and infrastructure funded through the
General Fund.
BACKGROUND:
General Fund reserves are classified into two categories: Restricted and Designated.
Restricted reserves are those that are not considered available due to financial,
accounting, or legal restrictions. Designated reserves are established by Council policy
for an intended purpose and are available for use per Council direction.
In addition, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") Statement No. 54
defines five specific classifications of fund balance. The five classifications are intended
to identify whether the specific components of fund balance are available for
appropriation and are therefore "Spendable." The classifications also are intended to
identify the extent to which fund balance is constrained by special restrictions, if any.
Al
ATTACHMENT A
The five classifications are:
CLASSIFICATIONS NATURE OF RESTRICTION
Non-spendable Cannot be readily converted to cash
Restricted Externally imposed restrictions
Committed City Council imposed commitment
Assigned City Manager assigned purpose/intent
Unassigned Residual balance not otherwise restricted
Restricted Fund Balance Components:
• Non-spendable — resources which cannot be spent because they are either a) not in
spendable form or b) legally or contractually required to be maintained intact.
• Restricted— resources with constraints placed on the use of resources which are
either a) externally imposed by creditors (such as through debt covenants),
grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments; or b) imposed by
law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.
Unrestricted Fund Balance Components:
• Committed— resources which are subject to limitations the government imposes
upon itself at its highest level of design making (City Council) and that remain
binding unless removed in the same manner.
• Assigned— resources neither restricted nor committed for which a government has a
stated intended use as established by the City Council or a body or official
(management) to which the City Council has delegated the authority to assign
amounts for specific purposes.
• Unassigned— resources which cannot be properly classified in one of the other four
categories. The General Fund should be the only fund that reports a positive
unassigned fund balance amount.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES:
Following sound financial practices and adhering to the Government Finance Officers'
of American (GFOA) recommendations, the City's designated reserves include reserves
for known and unknown contingencies, which take into consideration the:
A2
ATTACHMENT A
• Diversity of revenue base
• Cyclical nature of revenue
• Changes in community priorities
• Frequency of budget surpluses/deficits
• Cash flow management practices
POLICY:
Reserve Levels
The City will set aside funds into three (3) designated reserves to address unforeseen
emergencies or disasters, significant changes in the economic environment, and key
infrastructure and capital projects. These include the Catastrophic Reserve, Budget
Stabilization Reserve, and Capital Assets and Infrastructure Replacement Reserve.
The City commits to maintaining these reserves at a minimum of 15% of General Fund
annual operating expenditures (minus one-time expenditures), divided between the
Catastrophic Reserve (10%) and Budget Stabilization Reserve (5%), excluding the
Capital Assets and Infrastructure Replacement Reserve. The General Fund Reserve
Policy is reviewed by the City Council as part of the annual operating budget review and
adoption process. Appropriations of any General Fund reserves require formal Council
authorization.
Should a catastrophic disaster or loss of a significant source of the City's property and
sales tax revenue occur, the required reserve level should be adequate to meet the
City's immediate financial needs. For example, in the event of natural disaster, the
Catastrophic Reserve would provide necessary coverage for basic operating expenses
for approximately 90 days, including salary and benefits for safety and non-safety City
employees, while still meeting debt service obligations. This time frame would enable
the City to explore other available cash alternatives. Likewise, should the City
experience a loss of a primary property tax payer or sales tax contributor, the reserve
level in the Budget Stabilization Fund would provide for a two-year transition period,
giving the City adequate time to realign its operating costs with available resources,
while minimizing service impacts.
Key General Fund Designated Reserves
Catastrophic Reserve. Funds reserved under this category shall be used to mitigate
costs associated with unforeseen emergencies, including natural disasters or
catastrophic events. Should unforeseen and unavoidable events occur that require the
expenditure of City resources beyond those provided for in the annual budget, the City
Manager or designee shall have authority to approve Catastrophic Reserve
appropriations. The City Manager or designee shall then present to the City Council a
A3
ATTACHMENT A
budget amendment confirming the nature of the emergency and authorizing the
appropriation of reserve funds.
Budget Stabilization Reserve. Funds reserved under this category shall be used to
mitigate, should they occur, annual budget revenue shortfalls (actual revenues less than
projected revenues) due to changes in the economic environment and/or one-time
expenditures that will result in future efficiencies and/or budgetary savings. Examples
of"economic triggers" and one-time uses include, but are not limited to:
• Significant decrease in property or sales tax, or other economically sensitive
revenues;
• Loss of businesses considered to be significant sales tax generators;
• Reductions in revenue due to actions by the state/federal government;
• Workflow/technical system improvements to reduce ongoing, personnel costs
and enhance customer service;
• One-time maintenance of service levels due to significant economic/budget
constraints; and
• One-time transitional costs associated with organizational restructuring to
secure long-term personnel cost savings.
Capital Assets and Infrastructure Replacement Reserve. The City will maintain a
Reserve for Capital Assets and Infrastructure Replacement. After allocating General
Fund balance to the Budget Stabilization Reserve and City Council designated projects
and purposes, any remaining fund balance shall be apportioned to the Reserve for
Capital Assets and Infrastructure Repair and Replacement as follows: 60% to Streets
and 40% to Other Capital Assets and Infrastructure. It is the long-term goal of the City to
build and maintain this reserve in an amount equal to the estimated replacement cost of
all City capital assets at the end of their design life and to use this reserve for such
replacement.
Replenishment of Unreserved Fund Balance
In keeping with the principles discussed in this policy, when either fund is used, City
Council will develop a one (1) to five (5) year reserve replenishment plan to meet the
minimum threshold of 15% of General Fund ongoing, operating expenditures, excluding
one-time expenditures.
Excess Fund Balance
At the end of each fiscal year, the Finance Department reports on the audited year-end
budgetary fiscal results. Should actual General Fund revenues exceed expenditures
and encumbrances, a year-end operating surplus shall be reported. Any year-end
surplus that results in the General Fund fund balance exceeding the level required by
the reserve policy shall be available for allocation for the following, subject to Council
approval:
A4
ATTACHMENT A
■ Offset projected future deficits
■ Anticipated intergovernmental fiscal impacts
■ One-time funding, non-recurring needs
■ Loan repayment acceleration
Upon funding of the above, any remaining surplus balances shall be divided equally
between the Budget Stabilization Reserve and Capital Assets and Infrastructure
Replacement for appropriation.
A5
APPROVED
COUNCIL MEETING
Date, A.-124),( 1' #i
r
40-01.74.
iti
ZUS ,
CONSENT ITEM
E-6
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DANIEL BOBADILLA, P.E., INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY
ENGINEER
VIA: TROY L. BUTZLAFF, ICMA-CM, CITY MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 20, 2015
SUBJECT: INSTALLATION OF STOP CONTROL AT TENTH STREET/DALTON
AVENUE AND ELLIOTT AVENUE/MASON STREET
SUMMARY
The intersections of Tenth Street/Dalton Avenue and Elliott Avenue/Mason Street were analyzed to
determine if stop control was warranted. The analyses concluded that stop signs were warranted at both
directions. The proposed actions will approve installation of stop signs at both intersections.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the installation of stop control at Tenth Street and Dalton Avenue.
2. Approve the installation of stop control at Elliott Avenue and Mason Street.
DISCUSSION
The installation of a new stop sign requires the satisfaction of certain requirements, or warrants, set by
the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD). Warrant analyses were
conducted to determine whether the required warrants were satisfied for the intersections at Tenth
Street/Dalton Avenue and Elliott Avenue/Mason Street. Stop signs may be installed if a minimum of one
of the following warrants required under CA-MUTCD are satisfied:
• Minimum traffic volume on street approaches to the intersection
• Minimum volume of pedestrians crossing at the intersection
• Speed of traffic through the intersection
• Number of accidents at the intersection
• Potential sight obstructions at the intersection
The intersection of Tenth Street and Dalton Avenue is currently controlled by stop signs in the north and
south direction, with no control in the east and west direction. A stop sign warrant analysis was
conducted at the intersection to determine if stop control in all directions was warranted. The warrant
study concluded that stop control in all directions is warranted.
The intersection of Elliott Avenue and Mason Street is currently controlled by yield signs in the north
and south direction, with no stop control in any direction. During a visual inspection of the intersection,
it was determined that sight obstructions exist due to the intersection's curve alignment. As a result,
replacement of the existing yield signs with stop signs is warranted.
Installation of the proposed stop signs will mitigate sight distance restrictions, meet driver expectations
in the area, and generally provide a higher level of vehicle and pedestrian safety.
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
This action is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)
pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Structures) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) of the
State of California CEQA Guidelines. Staff is directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the Los
Angeles County Clerk's Office upon project approval.
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed stop signs and legends will cost approximately $1,000 per intersection. Funds are
available in the Street Maintenance budget.
Prepared by:
Daniel Bobadilla
Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed and Approved:
Troy L. Butzlaff, ICMA-CM
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Stop Sign Warrant Analysis— Tenth Street and Dalton Avenue
2. Exhibit A —Proposed Four-Way Stop Sign Installation at Tenth Street and Dalton Avenue
3. Exhibit B—Proposed Two-Way Stop Sign Installation at Elliott Avenue and Mason Street
MULTI-WAY STOP EVALUATION CITY OF AZUSA
Location: Dalton Avenue and 10th Street
Date of Count: February 25, 2015
WARRANT STUDY
Count Warrants Met?
A. Temporary measure in lieu of traffic signal installation Not Studied
B.Correctible Collisions: 5 or more correctible collisions in a 12 month period.Number of correctible collisions 1 No
occuring between January 1,2011 and December 31,2011
C.Minimum Volumes:
1.The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major approaches(total of both)averages at least 300 52 No
vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day,and
2.The combined vehicular,pedestrian and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches
(total of both)averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours,with an average delay to minor-street 78 No
vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour,but
3.When the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 65 km/h(40 mph),the minimum N/A No
vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the above values. (210/140) 85th percentile speed:25 MPH
D. Where no single criterion is satisfied,but where Criteria B,C.1,and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the 1 /52/78 No
minimum values. (4/240/160) Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Installation of an all-way stop is
Recommendation: recommended for consideration at this time. By: Monae Pugh/Terry Renner Date: 3/3/2015
See Attached E&TS Worksheet For TKE Engineering
Additional Factors.
Engineering and Traffic Study Multi-Way Stop Control
Dalton Avenue and 10th Street
Dalton Avenue (NB/SB) is a 44'residential roadway which functions as a collector.
Posted 25 m.p.h.
10th Street(EB/WB)is a local/residential roadway. Stop Signs control this movement.
Posted 25 m.p.h.
Crosswalks are marked on all four legs of intersection. School Pedestrian Warning signs
exist at the intersection on Dalton Ave. There are no advance warning signs.
Dalton Elementary School has established 10th Street at Dalton Avenue as a"walking
stop" in the Walking School Bus exercise thereby designating 10th Street as the east/west
safe route to the campus(October 2014). As one of two routes in this program coupled
with a 50%walking population,this route carries approximately 160 walking/bicycling
students daily. There is no crossing guard at this location.
Sight Distance is limited/restricted looking NB due to high parking demand on Dalton
Ave. for WB vehicles entering intersection.
Adjacent intersections in the area predominately are controlled by multi-stop controls.
The intersection volumes and collision history does not meet minimum criteria for all-
way stop installation.
Recommendations
CA MUTCD provides general guidelines for all-way stop installation which quantifies
volumes and collisions coupled with engineering judgment. Based on the above; all-way
stop installation for this intersection will mitigate sight distance restrictions,meet driver
expectation in the area, and generally provide a higher level of vehicle and school age
pedestrian safety. All-way stop installation is recommended for consideration.
In lieu of all-way stop installation,existing School Pedestrian Warning signs on Dalton
Ave. should be upgraded to include advance warning signs in compliance with CA
MUTCD.
Counts Unlimited, Inc Page 1
City of Azusa PO Box 1178
N/S:Dalton Avenue Corona,CA 92878
ENV:10th Street Phone:951-268-6268 AZ0002EW
24 Hour Entering Volume Count email:counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:999-15091
Start 25-Feb-15 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Wed Moming Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Moming Afternoon Morning Afternoon
12:00 0 1 1 1
12:15 1 5 0 3
12:30 0 4 0 0
12:45 0 7 1 17 0 4 1 8 2 25
01:00 0 6 0 12
01:15 0 12 0 5
01:30 1 4 1 6
01:45 0 10 1 32 0 9 1 32 2 64
02:00 0 11 0 17
02:15 1 6 0 9
02:30 1 5 1 7
02:45 0 4 2 26 0 5 1 38 3 64
03:00 0 2 0 15
03:15 0 6 0 7
03:30 0 12 0 6
03:45 0 3 0 23 2 2 2 30 2 53
04:00 0 9 1 6
04:15 2 6 1 5
04:30 2 10 0 3
04:45 0 15 4 40 0 8 2 22 6 62
05:00 1 8 1 7
05:15 0 10 1 5
05:30 3 4 2 7
05:45 2 7 6 29 2 10 6 29 12 58
06:00 1 3 5 5
06:15 0 5 1 0
06:30 2 9 4 2
06:45 6 4 9 21 5 2 15 9 24 30
07:00 2 1 3 4
07:15 12 7 14 2
07:30 13 4 13 2
07:45 18 4 45 16 21 3 51 11 96 27
08:00 6 5 7 1
08:15 1 2 6 3
08:30 1 4 3 1
08:45 2 3 10 14 6 0 22 5 32 19
09:00 5 3 5 0
09:15 5 0 2 0
09:30 3 3 1 0
09:45 2 2 15 8 5 3 13 3 28 11
10:00 4 1 4 3
10:15 4 4 5 0
10:30 5 0 1 1
10:45 5 0 18 5 8 1 18 5 36 10
11:00 4 0 6 0
11:15 4 0 4 0
11:30 3 0 4 0 .
11:45 4 2 15 2 2 0 16 0 31
Total 126 233 126 233 148 192 148 192 274 425
Combined 359 359 340 340 699
Total
AM Peak - 07:15 - - - 07:15 - - - - -
Vol. - 49 - - - 55 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.681 0.655
PM Peak - - 04:30 - - - 01:45 - - - -
Vol. - - 43 - - - 42 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.717 0.618
Percentag 35.1% 64.9% 43.5% 56.5%
e
ADT/AADT ADT 699 AADT 699
Counts Unlimited, Inc Page 1
City of Azusa PO Box 1178
NIS:Dalton Avenue Corona,CA 92878
E/W:10th Street Phone:951-268-6268 AZU002NS
24 Hour Entering Volume Count email:counts@countsunlimited.com Site Code:999-15091
Start 25-Feb-15 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon__
12:00 12 9 0 1
12:15 5 4 1 3
12:30 6 7 0 4
12:45 5 10 28 30 0 0 1 8 29 38
01:00 4 8 0 3
01:15 5 10 0 1
01:30 1 12 0 1
01:45 7 6 17 36 0 2 0 7 17 43
02:00 1 14 0 3
02:15 2 7 0 1
02:30 2 12 0 1
02:45 2 11 7 44 0 1 0 6 7 50
03:00 0 4 1 3
03:15 3 10 0 4
03:30 2 12 0 3
03:45 0 13 5 39 1 3 2 13 7 52
04:00 2 10 0 1
04:15 2 14 1 4
04:30 0 12 3 3
04:45 2 13 6 49 0 3 4 11 10 60
05:00 5 6 1 6
05:15 6 10 1 5
05:30 4 7 1 5
05:45 6 11 21 34 1 6 4 22 25 56
06:00 6 14 2 3
06:15 3 7 1 4
06:30 4 9 3 5
06:45 3 9 16 39 4 3 10 15 26 54
07:00 9 6 4 0
07:15 2 4 8 0
07:30 7 4 5 0
07:45 13 6 31 20 4 1 21 1 52 21
08:00 12 5 2 1
08:15 7 11 4 1
08:30 4 8 3 0
08:45 3 8 26 32 2 2 11 4 37 36
09:00 8 11 3 2
09:15 3 3 3 0
09:30 5 4 6 1
09:45 13 3 29 21 4 2 16 5 45 26
10:00 4 5 1 0
10:15 7 2 2 1
10:30 2 5 2 1
10:45 3 0 16 12 1 0 6 2 22 14
11:00 9 7 2 1
11:15 6 10 2 0
11:30 10 13 2 0
11:45 4 6 29 36 2 0 8 37 37
Total 231 392 231 392 83 95 83 95 314 487
Combined 623 623 178 178 801
Total
AM Peak - 07:30 - - 06:45 - -
-
- - -
Vol. - 39 - - 21 - - - -
-
-
P.H.F. 0.750 0.656
PM Peak - 03:30 - - - 05:00 -
-
- - -
Vol. -
- 49 22 --
P.H.F. 0.875 0.917
Percentag 37.1% 62.9% 46.6% 53.4%
e
ADT/AADT ADT 801 AADT 801
��.
Cal �., r`
i e .Q ir
t� .: .r, ,
LE:
Y
SCAINJCH•OOR Y
r_ — ..- .i
•
a_,
! t M
Iii,
dOLS
a
TENTH STREET
B liI R U. I
3 ,
a a
STOP
ON I IIII
.,
UNI i
24." 1
W 1 ..r
at
LEGEND Z
O <,
••
lIOPOMpMA :F MIN
OMNI R14 MEM 11 J
Q
STOP wKoPoroaOPLIMO �.-
I UMW
EXHIBIT"A"
DATE: 03/30/15 PROPOSED FOUR-WAY STOP SIGN INSTALLATION REVIEWED BY: C.C.
DALTON AVENUE.TENTH STREET
PREPARED BY: P.F. CITY OF AZUSA APPROVED BY: D.B.
ENGINEERING DMSION
i 1
Ind
I
r wLbs
I
4,
MASON STREET ',- .'
1
w STOP
,,,„.7 .
1
1 .
. - . . 1
40.
—41111.4404. 44114414
.,. a "u".".".." a '� ., V,"4 , u
4ft
Z
LEGEND r Q * .d
,,,,, r
.;..F,, .
ito ..
amwitu ®ar
roaaraa
-STOP Immo mai moo '- /.1'
PROPCMODUITLNI LU
• y w .. .
EXHIBIT"B"
DATE: 03/30/15 PROPOSED FOUR-WAY STOP SIGN INSTALLATION REVIEWED BY: C.C.
ELLIOTT AVENUE fa MASON STREET
PREPARED BY: P.F. CITY OF AZUSA APPROVED BY: D.B.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
APPROVED
COUNCIL MEETING
Date, ,p
4:f atiii;41
AZUSA
CONSENT ITEM
E-9
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
VIA: TROY L. BUTZLAFF, ICMA-CM, CITY MANAGER
FROM: ANN GRAF, DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND
LIBRARY SERVICES
DATE: APRIL 20, 2015
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF AMERICAN DREAM GRANT FROM AMERICAN
LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
SUMMARY
Azusa City Library's Adult Literacy Program has been awarded The American Dream Grant in
the amount of$8,425 to support Spanish literacy programs at the Library. This action accepts the
grant award on behalf of the Library.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council takes the following actions:
1) Approve acceptance of grant award from the American Library Association in the
amount of$8,425.
2) Approve the budget amendment associated with this grant.
BACKGROUND
Becoming literate in Spanish offers immediate benefits while preparing students to increase their
income and attain personal goals and life skills by learning English. Without basic literacy skills
in their native language, adults struggle in English as a Second Language classes and often drop
out. For many Spanish speaking adults, learning to read and write in Spanish is the first step to
learning English. Illiterate Spanish speaking adults will directly benefit from the program.
The Library applied for a grant through the American Library Association to support Spanish
literacy programs. The grant will fund a program to introduce Spanish speaking adults to the
public library and its vast array of services for them and their families. This includes the use of
Leamos a simple easy to use on-line Literacy course for non-literate Spanish speaking adults.
_
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact is positive. The grant covers funding for the Spanish Literacy programs at the
Library. No additional matching funds are required.
Prepared by:
Ann Graf
Director of Information Technology
and Library Services
Reviewed and Approved:
Troy L. Butzlaff,ICMA-CM
City Manager
APPROVED
COUNCIL MEETING
Date, I '
•
AZUSi
CONSENT ITEM
E-1
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: AMELIA AYALA,DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES &RISK MANAGEMENT
VIA: TROY BUTZLAFF, ICMA-CM, CITY MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 20, 2015
SUBJECT: HUMAN RESOURCES ACTION ITEMS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the following Personnel Action Requests in accordance with the City of
Azusa Civil Service Rules and applicable Memorandum of Understanding(s).
BACKGROUND
On April 14,2015,the Personnel Board confirmed the following Department Head(s)recommendation regarding the following
Personnel Action request(s).
A. MERIT INCREASE AND/OR REGULAR APPOINTMENT:
DEPARTMENT NAME CLASSIFICATION ACTION/EFF RANGE/STEP
DATE BASE MO SALARY
CC Annette Juarez Administrative Technician Merit Increase 4174/3
3/24/2015 $4,454.67
FN Naomi Narvaez Senior Administrative Regular Appt. 4179/5
Technician 11/19/2014 $5,128.37
PD Anthony Conwell Police Officer Merit Increase 6101/2
3/12/2015 $6,245.84
PD Rick Hayden Police Sergeant Merit Increase 3416/5
2/4/2015 $9,592.22
PD Rosa Sok Police Records Specialist III Merit Increase 9160/5
3/15/2015 $4,389.01
PW Christopher Street Maintenance Worker I Merit Increase 8153/4
Gutierrez 3/28/2015 $4,047.63
B. NEW APPOINTMENT: The following appointments have been requested by department heads pursuant to the Rules
of The Civil Service System.
DEPARTMENT NAME CLASSIFICATION EFFECTIVE DATE RANGE/STEP
BASE MO.
SALARY
Human Resources Lislene Ledezma Human Resources Technician Pending successful 4174/2
completion of $4,252.59
fingerprint and physical
C. RECLASSIFICATION—The following reclassification has been requested by the department head and is being made
in accordance with the City of Azusa Rules of the Civil Service System.
DEPARTMENT NAME CLASSIFICATION EFFECTIVERANGE/STEP
FROM/TO DATE BASE MO.SALARY
Police Rose Rodriguez From: Police Records Specialist III 07/01/2014 9165/5
To: Police Records Supervisor $4,608.46
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact,as positions listed are funded in approved department budgets.