Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet - May 6, 2013 - CCAPPROVED Date CONSENT CALENDAR D-4 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: TITO HAES, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER VIA: JAMES MAKSHANOFF, CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 6, 2013 SUB4ECT: SUBSTITUTION OF BONDS FOR LOTS 16-19 OF TRACT MAP NO. 66141, PALMETTO AT RO SEDALE RECOMMENDED ACTION It is recommended that the City Council acts and finds as follows: 1. The City Council approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute the attached Agreement for Completion of Public Improvements for Lots 16-19 of Tract 66141 to construct the required public improvements. 2. The City Council accepts the attached Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $512,874.62, and the attached Labor and Materials Bond for $512,874.62 for streets, sewers, storm drains and water lines, as guaranteed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. 3. The City Council hereby reduces the original bonds posted by William Lyon Homes, as guaranteed by Arch Insurance Company by the amount of $512,874.62, specifically for Lots 16-19 of Tract 66141. BACKGROUND The City Council originally approved the Final Map for Tract 66141, on May 17, 2007, as submitted by William Lyon Homes. This Tract comprises the Great Park neighborhoods and the Transit I neighborhood. At the same time, the City Council also approved an Agreement for Public Improvements and related surety bonds by Arch Insurance Company on behalf of William Lyon Homes. The bonds included a Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $2,614,605.13, and a Labor and Materials Bond also for $$2,614,605.13, for the construction of street, sewer, storm drain and water line improvements. While William Lyon Homes posted bonds for the entire Great Park Neighborhood and Transit I neighborhood, the company purchased only a portion of this tract from the master developer. This requested bond substitution will cover only lots 16-19 of Tract 66141, which is the easterly half of the Transit I neighborhood, formerly known as Gardenia. The applicant is Brookfield Homes, who intends to construct 66 condominium units on the site, which were recently approved by the Planning Commission. Brookfield desires to substitute the old bonds posted by Lyon Homes with new bonds in their name to guarantee the proposed public improvements. Attached is a new Agreement for Completion of Public Improvements for Lots 16-19 of Tract No. 66141 to construct required public improvements, as well as a Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $512,874.62, and a Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $512,874.62, as guaranteed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. The bond amount covers the remaining work on street, sewer, storm drain and water line improvements. FISCAL IMPACT This approval would have no fiscal impact on the City, as it is a substitution for security to guarantee tract -related public improvements. Pj A This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD 20130866791 III II IIIII II II IIIII II II IIIII II II II II IIIII IIIII II II I I II I1 Recorded/Filed in Official Records Recorder's Office, Los Angeles County, California 06/11/13 AT 09:35AM A Pa e O 33: FEES: 0.00 TAXES: 0,00 OTHER: 0.00 PAID: 0.00 IIIIIII�IIIIIVYNIIIInIIVIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIIIIIIIII�llltllllll�ll LEADSHEET 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 201306110870009 00007846356 004926634 SEQ: 01 DAR Mail (Hard Copy) IIIII�VIIIIYII�IIIVIIIIIIIYIIII��YI�IIIIIII�IIIW@�� -THISFORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED pIII�I�IIYIIVI�IIIV�lilll'III�IIIVIfll�lll'V�II�I � RECORDING REQUESTED BY ,j WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO Jeffrey Lawrence Cornejo 20130866791 City Clerk City of Azusa 213 E. Foothill Blvd. Azusa, CA 91702 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE TITLE(S) Agreement for Completion of Public Improvements Tract No. 66141 Between City of Azusa and Brookfield Rosedale 67, LLC RECORDING REQUESTED BY: WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: CITY OF AZUSA 213 E Foothill Blvd. Azusa, CA 91702 ATTN: City Clerk SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE ,x mpt from recording fee, per,Goyenrment Codc Section 6103 CITY OF AZUSA, CALIFORNIA By -- City 4 i rk 4 AGREEMENT FOR COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TRACT NO. 66141 between CITY OF AZUSA a California municipal corporation and BROOKFIELD ROSEDALE 67, LLC a Delaware limited liability company ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 1 4 AGREEMENT FOR COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TRACT MAP NO. 66141 I. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement for the Completion of Public Improvements ("Agreement") is entered into as of this IoA day of -1��, 2011 by and between the City of Azusa, a California municipal corporation ("City") and BROOKFIELD ROSEDALE 67, LLC with it's principal office located at 3090 Bristol Street, Suite 200, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 ("Developer"). City and Developer are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." II. RECITALS. A. Developer has heretofore submitted to City an application for approval of a tract map for real property located within City, a legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" ("Property"), and which is identified in City records Tract Map No. 66141. B. Developer has not completed all of the work or made all of the public improvements required by Chapter 66, Article V of the Azusa Municipal Code, the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code sections 66410 et seq.), the conditions of approval for Tract No. 66141 or other ordinances, resolutions, or policies of City requiring construction of improvements in conjunction with the subdivision of land. C. Pursuant to Section 66-4650) and the applicable provisions of the Map Act, Developer and City enter into this Agreement for the timely construction and completion of the public improvements and the furnishing of the security therefor, acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney, for Tract No. 66141. D. Developer's execution of this Agreement and the provision of the security are made in consideration of City's approval of the final map for Tract No. 66141. III. TERMS. 1.0 Effectiveness. This Agreement shall not be effective unless and until all three of the following conditions are satisfied: (a) Developer provides City with security of the type and in the amounts required by this Agreement; (b) Developer executes and records this Agreement in the Recorder's Office of the County of Los Angeles; (c) the City Council of the City ("City Council") approves the final map for Tract No. 66141 and (d) Developer records the final map for Tract No. 66141 in the Recorder's Office of the County of Los Angeles. If the above described conditions are not satisfied, this Agreement shall automatically terminate without need. of further action by either City or Developer, and Developer may not thereafter record the final map for Tract No. 66141. 2.0 Public Improvements. Developer shall construct or have constructed at its own cost, expense, and liability all improvements required by City as part of the approval of Tract ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 2 5 No. 66141, including, but not limited to, all grading, roads, paving, curbs and gutters, pathways, storm drains, sanitary sewers, utilities, drainage facilities, traffic controls, landscaping, street lights, and all other required facilities as shown in detail on the plans, profiles, and specifications which have been prepared by or on behalf of Developer for Tract Map No. 66141 ("Public Improvements"). The Public Improvements are more specifically described in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Construction of the Public Improvements shall include any transitions and/or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. The Developer shall be responsible for the replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the construction or installation of the Public Improvements. Such replacement, relocation, or removal shall be performed to the complete satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. Developer further promises and agrees to provide all equipment, tools, materials, labor, tests, design work, and engineering services necessary or required by City to fully and adequately complete the Public Improvements. 2.1 Prior Partial Construction of Public Improvements. Where construction of any Public Improvements has been partially completed prior to this Agreement, Developer agrees to complete such Public Improvements or assure their completion in accordance with this Agreement. 2.2 Permits -,Notices, Utility Statements. Prior to commencing any work, Developer shall, at its sole cost, expense, and liability, obtain all necessary permits and licenses and give all necessary and incidental notices required for the lawful construction of the Public Improvements and performance of Developer's obligations under this Agreement. Developer shall conduct the work in full compliance with the regulations, rules, and other requirements contained in any permit or license issued to Developer. Prior to commencing any work, Developer shall file a written statement with the City Clerk and the City Engineer, signed by Developer and each utility which will provide utility service to the Property, attesting that Developer has made all deposits legally required by the utility for the extension and provision of utility service to the Property. 2.3 Pre -approval of Plans and Specifications. Developer is prohibited from commencing work on any Public Improvement until all plans and specifications for such Public Improvement have been submitted to and approved by the City Engineer, or his or her designee. Approval by the City Engineer shall not relieve Developer from ensuring that all Public Improvements conform with all other requirements and standards set forth in this Agreement. 2.4 Quality of Work; Compliance With Laws and Codes. The construction plans and specifications for the Public Improvements shall be prepared in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, standards, and other requirements. The Public Improvements shall be completed in accordance with all approved maps, plans, specifications, standard drawings, and special amendments thereto on file with City, as well as all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, standards, and other requirements applicable at the time work is actually commenced. ORANGENMARTINED33457. 1 3 2.5 Standard of Performance. Developer and its contractors, if any, shall perform all work required to construct the Public Improvements under this Agreement in a skillful and workmanlike manner, and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Developer represents and maintains that it or its contractors shall be skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the work. Developer warrants that all of its employees and contractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perforin the work assigned to them, and that they shall have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the work, and that such licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. 2.6 Alterations to „Improvements. The Public Improvements in Exhibit `B" are understood to be only a general designation of the work and improvements to be done, and not a binding description thereof. All work shall be done and improvements made and completed as shown on approved plans and specifications, and any subsequent alterations thereto. If during the course of construction and installation of the Public Improvements it is determined that the public interest requires alterations in the Public Improvements, Developer shall undertake such design and construction changes as may be reasonably required by City. Any and all alterations in the plans and specifications and the Public Improvements to be completed may be accomplished without giving prior notice thereof to Developer's surety for this Agreement. 3.0 Maintenance of Public Improvements and Landscaping. City shall not be responsible or liable for the maintenance or care of the Public Improvements until City approves and accepts them. City shall exercise no control over the Public Improvements until accepted. Any use by any person of the Public Improvements, or any portion thereof, shall be at the sole and exclusive risk of the Developer at all times prior to City's acceptance of the Public Improvements. Developer shall maintain all the Public Improvements in a state of good repair until they are completed by Developer and approved and accepted by City, and until the security for the performance of this Agreement is released. Maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, repair of pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, parkways, water mains, and sewers; maintaining all landscaping in a vigorous and thriving condition reasonably acceptable to City; removal of debris from sewers and storm drains; and sweeping, repairing, and maintaining in good and safe condition all streets and street improvements. It shall be Developer's responsibility to initiate all maintenance work, but if it shall fail to do so, it shall promptly perform such maintenance work when notified to do so by City. If Developer fails to properly prosecute its maintenance obligation under this section, City may do all work necessary for such maintenance and the cost thereof shall be the responsibility of Developer and its surety under this Agreement. City shall not be responsible or liable for any damages or injury of any nature in any way related to or caused by the Public Improvements or their condition prior to acceptance. 4.0 Construction Schedule. Unless extended pursuant to this Section 4.1 of this Agreement, Developer shall fully and adequately complete or have completed the Public Improvements within twelve (12) months following approval of this agreement for Tract No. 66141. ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 4 7 4.1 Extensions. City may, in its sole and absolute discretion, provide Developer with additional time within which to complete the Public Improvements. It is understood that by providing the security required under Section 13.0 et seq. of this Agreement, Developer and its surety consent in advance to any extension of time as may be given by City to Developer, and waives any and all right to notice of such extension(s). Developer's acceptance of an extension of time granted by City shall constitute a waiver by Developer and its surety of all defense of laches, estoppel, statutes of limitations, and other limitations of action in any action or proceeding filed by City following the date on which the Public Improvements were to have been completed hereunder. In addition, as consideration for granting such extension to Developer, City reserves the right to review the provisions of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the construction standards, the cost estimates established by City, and the sufficiency of the improvement security provided by Developer, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted according to City's reasonable discretion. 4.2 Accrual of Limitations Period. Any limitations period provided by law related to breach of this Agreement or the terms thereof shall not accrue until Developer has provided the City Engineer with written notice of Developer's intent to abandon or otherwise not complete required or agreed upon Public Improvements. 5.0 Gradinlx. Developer agrees that any and all grading done or to be done in conjunction with construction of the Public Improvements or development of Tract No. 66141 shall conform to all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and other requirements, including City's grading regulations. In order to prevent damage to the Public Improvements by improper drainage or other hazards, the grading shall be completed in accordance with the time schedule for completion of the Public Improvements established by this Agreement, and prior to City's approval and acceptance of the Public Improvements and release of the Security as set forth in Section 13.0 et sec . of this Agreement. 6.0 Utilities. Developer shall provide utility services, including water, power, gas, and telephone service to serve each parcel, lot, or unit of land within Tract No. 66141 in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations, including, but not limited to, the regulations, schedules and fees of the utilities or agencies providing such services. Except for commercial or industrial properties, Developer shall also provide cable television facilities to serve each parcel, lot, or unit of land in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the cable company possessing a valid franchise with City to provide such service within City's jurisdictional limits. All utilities shall be installed underground. 7.0 Fees and Charges. Developer shall, at its sole cost, expense, and liability, pay all fees, charges, and taxes arising out of construction of the Public Improvements, including, but not limited to, all plan check, design review, engineering, inspection, and other service fees, and any impact or connection fees established by City ordinance, resolution, regulation, or policy, or as established by City relative to Tract No. 66141. 8.0 City IMection of Public Improvements. Developer shall, at its sole cost, expense, and liability, and at all times during construction of the Public Improvements, maintain reasonable and safe facilities and provide safe access for inspection by City of the Public ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457.. 1 5 A Improvements and areas where construction of the Public Improvements is occurring or will occur. 9.0 Default; Notice, Remedies. 9.1 Notice. If Developer neglects, refuses, or fails to fulfill or timely complete any obligation, term, or condition of this Agreement, or if City determines there is a violation of any federal, state, or local law, ordinance, regulation, code, standard, or other requirement, City may at any time thereafter declare Developer to be in default or violation of this Agreement and make written demand upon Developer or its surety, or both, to immediately remedy the default or violation ("Notice"). Developer shall substantially commence the work required to remedy the default or violation within ten (10) days of the Notice. If the default or violation constitutes an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, City may provide the Notice verbally, and Developer shall substantially commence the required work within twenty-four (24) hours thereof. Immediately upon City's issuance of the Notice, Developer and its surety shall be liable to City for all costs of construction and installation of the Public Improvements and all other administrative costs expenses as provided for in Section 10.0 of this Agreement. 9.2 Failure to Remedy: ,City Action. If the work required to remedy the noticed default or violation is not diligently prosecuted to a completion acceptable to City within the time frame contained in the Notice, City may complete all remaining work, arrange for the completion of all remaining work, and/or conduct such remedial activity as in its sole and absolute discretion it believes is required to remedy the default or violation. All such work or remedial activity shall be at the sole and absolute cost, expense, and liability of Developer and its surety, without the necessity of giving any further notice to Developer or surety. City's right to take such actions shall in no way be limited by the fact that Developer or its surety may have constructed any, or none of the required or agreed upon Public Improvements at the time of City's demand for performance. In the event City elects to complete or arrange for completion of the remaining work and improvements, City may require all work by Developer or its surety to cease in order to allow adequate coordination by City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if conditions precedent for reversion to acreage can be met and if the interests of City will not be prejudiced thereby, City may also process a reversion to acreage and thereafter recover from Developer or its surety the full cost and expense incurred. 9.3 Other Remedies. No action by City pursuant to Section 9.0 et seq. of this Agreement shall prohibit City from exercising any other right or pursuing any other legal or equitable remedy available under this Agreement or any federal, state, or local law. City may exercise it rights and remedies independently or cumulatively, and City may pursue inconsistent remedies. City may institute an action for damages, injunctive relief, or specific performance. 10.0 Administrative Costs. If Developer fails to construct and install all or any part of the Public Improvements within the time required by this Agreement, or if Developer fails to comply with any other obligation contained herein, Developer and its surety shall be jointly and severally liable to City for all administrative expenses, fees, and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, incurred in obtaining compliance with this Agreement or in processing any legal action or for any other remedies permitted by law. ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 6 11.0 Acceptance of Improveinents, As -Built or Record Drawings. If the Public Improvements are properly completed by Developer and approved by the City Engineer, and if they comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, standards, and other requirements, the City Council shall be authorized to accept the Public Improvements. The City Council may, in its sole and absolute discretion, accept fully completed portions of the Public Improvements prior to such time as all of the Public Improvements are complete, which shall not release or modify Developer's obligation to complete the remainder of the Public Improvements within the time required by this Agreement. Upon the total or partial acceptance of the Public Improvements by City, Developer shall file with the Recorder's Office of the County of Los Angeles a notice of completion for the accepted Public Improvements in accordance with California Civil Code section 3093, at which time the accepted Public Improvements shall become the sole and exclusive property of City without payment therefore. If Tract No. 66141 was approved and recorded as a single phase map, City shall not accept any one or more of the improvements until all of the Public Improvements are completed by Developer and approved by City. Issuance by City of occupancy permits for any buildings or structures located on the Property shall not be construed in any manner to constitute City's acceptance or approval of any Public Improvements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City may not accept any Public Improvements unless and until Developer provides one (1) set of "as -built" or record drawings or plans to the City Engineer for all such Public Improvements. The drawings shall be certified and shall reflect the condition of the Public Improvements as constructed, with all changes incorporated therein. 12.0 Warranly and Guarantee. Developer hereby warrants and guarantees all Public Improvements against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished in the performance of this Agreement, including a warranty and guarantee that all trees, shrubs and irrigation within the Property shall survive, with reasonable maintenance, in a vigorous and thriving condition reasonably acceptable to City, for a period of one (1) year following completion of the work and acceptance by City ("Warranty"). During the Warranty period, Developer shall repair, replace, or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory portion of the Public Improvements, including irrigation, shrubs, trees and/or transplanted trees that have died despite reasonable maintenance, in accordance with the current ordinances, resolutions, regulations, codes, standards, tree preservation plans or other requirements of City, and to the approval of the City Engineer. All repairs, replacements, or reconstruction during the Warranty periods shall be at the sole cost, expense, and liability of Developer and its surety. As to any Public Improvements which have been repaired, replaced, or reconstructed during the Warranty period, Developer and its surety hereby agree to extend the Warranty for an additional one (1) year period following City's acceptance of the repaired, replaced, or reconstructed Public Improvements. Nothing herein shall relieve Developer from any other liability it may have under federal, state, or local law to repair, replace, or reconstruct any Public Improvement following expiration of the Warranty or any extension thereof. Developer's warranty obligation under this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. In addition, nothing contained herein shall impose upon Developer additional maintenance obligations for any Public Improvements that are repaired, replaced or reconstructed once these are accepted by City. 13.0 Security, Surety Bonds. Prior to execution of this Agreement, Developer shall provide City with surety bonds in the amounts and under the terms set forth below ("Security"). ORANGE\MMARTMEZ\33457. 1 7 The amount of the Security shall be based on the City Engineer's approximation of the actual cost to construct the Public Improvements, including the replacement cost for all landscaping ("Estimated Costs"). If City determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that the Estimated Costs have changed, Developer shall adjust the Security in the amount requested by City. Developer's compliance with this provision (Section 13.0 et seq.) shall in no way limit or modify Developer's indemnification obligation provided in Section 16.0 of this Agreement. 13.1 Performance Bond. To guarantee the faithful performance of the Public Improvements and all the provisions of this Agreement, to protect City if Developer is in default as set forth in Section 8.0 et sec . of this Agreement, and to secure Developer's one-year guarantee and warranty of the Public Improvements, including the maintenance of all landscaping in a vigorous and thriving condition, Developer shall provide City a faithful performance bond in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED TWELVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVETY-FOUR DOLLARS AND SIXTY-TWO CENTS ($512,874.62), which sum shall be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Estimated Costs. The City Council may, in its sole and absolute discretion and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, partially release a portion or portions of the security provided under this section as the Public Improvements are accepted by City, provided that Developer is not in default on any provision of this Agreement or condition of approval for Tract No. 66141, and the total remaining security is not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the Estimated Costs. All security provided under this section shall be released at the end of the Warranty period, or any extension thereof as provided in Section 12 of this Agreement, provided that Developer is not in default on any provision of this Agreement or condition of approval for Tract No. 66141. 13.2 Labor & Material Bond_. To secure payment to the contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men, and other persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment for performance of the Public Improvements and this Agreement, Developer shall provide City a labor and materials bond in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED TWELVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVETY-FOUR DOLLARS AND SIXTY-TWO CENTS ($512,874.62), which sum shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Estimated Costs. The security provided under this section may be released by written authorization of the City Engineer after six (6) months from the date City accepts the final Public Improvements. The amount of such security shall be reduced by the total of all stop notice or mechanic's lien claims of which City is aware, plus an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of such claims for reimbursement of City's anticipated administrative and legal expenses arising out of such claims. 13.3 Additional Requirements. The surety for any surety bonds provided as Security shall have a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VIII, shall be licensed to do business in California, and shall be satisfactory to City. As part of the obligation secured by the Security and in addition to the face amount of the Security, the Developer or its surety shall secure the costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, incurred by City in enforcing the obligations of this Agreement. The Developer and its surety stipulate and agree that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of this Agreement, the Public Improvements, or the plans and specifications for the Public Improvements shall in any way affect its obligation on the Security. ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 8 13.4 Evidence and Inco_rpora#ion of Security. Evidence of the Security shall be provided on the forms set forth in Exhibit "C," unless other forms are deemed acceptable by the City Engineer and the City Attorney, and when such forms are completed to the satisfaction of City, the forms and evidence of the Security shall be attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference. 14.0 Monument Security. Prior to City's execution of this Agreement, to guarantee payment to the engineer or surveyor for the setting of all subdivision boundaries, lot corners, and street centerline monuments for Tract No. 66141 in compliance with the applicable provisions of City's Municipal and/or Development Code ("Subdivision Monuments"), Developer shall deposit cash with City in the amount of ZERO DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($0.00), which sum shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the costs of setting the Subdivision Monuments as determined by the City Engineer. Said cash deposit may be released by written authorization of the City Engineer after all required Subdivision Monuments are accepted by the City Engineer, City has received written acknowledgment of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor who set the Subdivision Monuments, and provided Developer is not in default of any provision of this Agreement or condition of approval for Tract No. 66141. 15.0 Lien. To secure the timely performance of Developer's obligations under this Agreement, including those obligations for which security has been provided pursuant to Sections 13 et seq. and 14 of this Agreement, Developer hereby creates in favor of City a lien against all portions of the Property not dedicated to City or some other governmental agency for a public purpose. As to Developer's default on those obligations for which security has been provided pursuant to Sections 13 et seq. and 14 of this Agreement, City shall first attempt to collect against such security prior to exercising its rights as a contract lienholder under this section. 16.0 Indemnification. Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents from any and all actual or alleged claims, demands, causes of action, liability, loss, damage, or injury, to property or persons, including wrongful death, whether imposed by a court of law or by administrative action of any federal, state, or local governmental body or agency, arising out of or incident to any acts, omissions, negligence, or willful misconduct of Developer, its personnel, employees, agents, or contractors in connection with or arising out of construction or maintenance of the Public Improvements, or performance of this Agreement. This indemnification includes, without limitation, the payment of all penalties, fines, judgments, awards, decrees, attorneys fees, and related costs or expenses, and the reimbursement of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and/or agents for all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them. This indemnification excludes only such portion of any claim, demand, cause of action, liability, loss, damage, penalty, fine, or injury, to property or persons, including wrongful death, which is caused solely and exclusively by the negligence or willful misconduct of Agency as determined by a court or administrative body of competent jurisdiction. Developer's obligation to indemnify shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, or agents. 17.0 Insurance. ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 9 f� 17.1 Types, Amounts. Developer shall procure and maintain, and shall require its contractors to procure and maintain, during construction of any Public Improvement pursuant to this Agreement, insurance of the types and in the amounts described below ("Required Insurance"). If any of the Required Insurance contains a general aggregate limit, such insurance shall apply separately to this Agreement or be no less than two times the specified occurrence limit. 17.1.1 General Liability. Developer and its contractors shall procure and maintain occurrence version general liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. 17.1.2 Business Automobile Liability. Developer and its contractors shall procure and maintain business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading, or unloading of any vehicle owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the insured or for which the insured is responsible. 17.1.3 Workers' Compensation. Developer and its contractors shall procure and maintain workers' compensation insurance with limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and employers' liability insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, at all times during which insured retains employees. 17.1.4 Professional Liability. For any consultant or other professional who will engineer or design the Public Improvements, liability insurance for errors and omissions with limits not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, shall be procured and maintained for a period of five (5) years following completion of the Public Improvements. Such insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability. 17.2 Deductibles. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either: (a) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers; or (b) Developer and its contractors shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims, and administrative and defense expenses. 17.3 Additional Insured; Separation of Insureds. The Required Insurance shall name City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds with respect to work performed by or on behalf of Developer or its contractors, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection therewith. The Required Insurance shall contain standard separation of insureds provisions, and shall contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. 17.4 Primark Insurance, Waiver of Subro ag tion. The Required Insurance shall be primary with respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs covering City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. All policies for the Required Insurance ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 10 13 shall provide that the insurance company waives all right of recovery by way of subrogation against City in connection with any damage or harm covered by such policy. 17.5 Certificates, Verification. Developer and its contractors shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage for the Required Insurance. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by City before work pursuant to this Agreement can begin. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 17.6 Term; Cancellation Notice. Developer and its contractors shall maintain the Required Insurance for the term of this Agreement and shall replace any certificate, policy, or endorsement which will expire prior to that date. All policies shall be endorsed to provide that the Required Insurance shall not be suspended, voided, reduced, canceled, or allowed to expire except on 30 days prior written notice to City. 17.7 Insurer Rating. Unless approved in writing by City, all Required Insurance shall placed with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a current A.M. Best rating of at least A:VIII. 18.0 Signs and Advertising. Developer understands and agrees to City's ordinances, regulations, and requirements governing signs and advertising structures. Developer hereby agrees with and consents to the removal by City of all signs or other advertising structures erected, placed, or situated in violation of any City ordinance, regulation, or other requirement. Removal shall be at the expense of Developer and its surety. Developer and its surety shall indemnify and hold City free and harmless from any claim or demand arising out of or incident to signs, advertising structures, or their removal. 19.0 Relationship Between the Parties. The Parties hereby mutually agree that neither this Agreement, any map related to Tract No. 66141, nor any other related entitlement, permit, or approval issued by City for the Property shall operate to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture, or agency between City and Developer. Developer's contractors and subcontractors are exclusively and solely under the control and dominion of Developer. Nothing herein shall be deemed to make Developer or its contractors an agent or contractor of City. 20.0 General Provisions. 20.1 Authority to Enter Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 20.2 Cooperation'. Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate, or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 20.3 Construction, References; Captions. It being agreed the Parties or their agents have participated in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 11 shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days, or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Developer include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Developer, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 20.4 Notices. All notices, demands, invoices, and written communications shall be in writing and delivered to the following addresses or such other addresses as the Parties may designate by written notice: CITY: City of Azusa P.O.Box 1395 213 E. Foothill Blvd. Azusa, Ca.91702 Attn: City Manager DEVELOPER: BROOKFIELD ROSEDALE 67, LLC 3090 Bristol St, Suite 200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Attn: Brian Geis Depending upon the method of transmittal, notice shall be deemed received as follows: by facsimile, as of the date and time sent; by messenger, as of the date delivered; and by U.S. Mail first class postage prepaid, as of 72 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail. 20.5 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 20.6 Waiver. City's failure to insist upon strict compliance with any provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right or privilege provided herein, or City's waiver of any breach of this Agreement, shall not relieve Developer of any of its obligations under this Agreement, whether of the same or similar type. The foregoing shall be true whether City's actions are intentional or unintentional. Developer agrees to waive, as a defense, counterclaim or set off, any and all defects, irregularities or deficiencies in the authorization, execution or performance of the Public Improvements or this Agreement, as well as the laws, rules, regulations, ordinances or resolutions of City with regards to the authorization, execution or performance of the Public Improvements or this Agreement. 20.7 Assignment or Transfer of Agreement. Developer shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignee, hypothecatee, or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation, or transfer. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in City's written consent, any assignment, hypothecation, or transfer shall not release or discharge Developer from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. 20.8 Binding Effect. Each and all of the covenants and conditions shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties, and their successors, heirs, personal ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 12 )6 representatives, or assigns. This section shall not be construed as an authorization for any Party to assign any right or obligation. 20.9 No Third Pariy Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 20.10 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 20.11 Consent to Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal action or proceeding brought to interpret or enforce this Agreement, or which in any way arises out of the Parties' activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, shall be filed and prosecuted in the appropriate California State Court in the County of Los Angeles, California. Each Party waives the benefit of any provision of state or federal law providing for a change of venue to any other court or jurisdiction including, without limitation, a change of venue based on the fact that a govenunental entity is a party to the action or proceeding, or that a federal right or question is involved or alleged to be involved in the action or proceeding. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing waiver, Developer expressly waives any right to have venue transferred pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 394. 20.12 Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If any arbitration, lawsuit, or other legal action or proceeding is brought by one Party against the other Party in connection with this Agreement or the Property, the prevailing party, whether by final judgment or arbitration award, shall be entitled to and recover from the other party all costs and expenses incurred by the prevailing party, including actual attorneys' fees ("Costs"). Any judgment, order, or award entered in such legal action or proceeding shall contain a specific provision providing for the recovery of Costs, which shall include, without limitation, attorneys' and experts' fees, costs and expenses incurred in the following: (a) post judgment motions and appeals, (b) contempt proceedings, (c) garnishment, levy, and debtor and third party examination, (d) discovery, and (e) bankruptcy litigation. This section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 20.13 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterpart originals, which taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 13 CITY OF AZUSA BR By: By: (sig] tuxe) AV 0:5 (print name) City Manager City of Azusa ATTEST: By: } By. 77- 16ature) rr _t (print name) City Clerk City of Azusa 67, LLC `k,WFMN FOMY President (print name) (title) (signature) (print name) (title) NOTE: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPER'S BUSINESS ENTITY. ORANGEWMARTINEZ133457. 114 ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of [f ss. On - before me, Public, personally ap ared Notary proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatures(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand andfgciai seal, � ature Date of Document Type or Title of Document Number of Pages in Document Document in a Foreign Language Type of Satisfactory Evidence: Personally Known Paper Identification Credible Witness(es) law of the State of California that the f SARAH H. GRIFFITH Commission # 1950237 Notary Public - California z Orange County My Comm Fxpires Aug 29.2015 OPTIONAL INFORMATION Capacity of Signer: Trustee Power of Attorney CEO/CFO/COO President / Vice -President / Secretary / Treasurer Other: Other Information: ORANGEWMARTINEZW457. 115 (seal) Thumbprint of Signer ❑ Check here if no thumbprint or fingerprint is available. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF AZUSA ) On M 6 _ o2O (� before me, V. H e (tcL o a e 2 - (Insert Name of Notary Public) Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared, ja'M es W NCAA'& who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the person�k) whose name(s) is/arm subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/fie/jhey executed the same in hislher/their authorized capacityO, and that by his/laerltbi�i-r signature(o on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person( acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. J. V. HERNA1 Commission # 1MM» $ NO" Fwft . Crl%MW in"""" C Signature (SEAL) Notary Public EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TRACT NO. 66141 LOTS 16, 17, 18 AND 19 OF TRACT NO. 66141 IN THE CITY OF AZUSA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1334 PAGES 69 THROUGH 79 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. ORANGE\MMARTINEZ\33457. 1 17 D, EXHIBIT "B" LIST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TRACT NO. 66141 ORANGEWMARTMED33457. 1 18 Tract 66141 Brookfield Palmetto Lots 16 - 19 Sewers House laterals Total Unit if Units Bond $ Streets Quantites Price 10" VCP Estimate 61.00 AC 755 $ 55.00 Tons $ 41,525.00 Base 1322 $ 40.00 Tons $ 52,880.00 4" C&G 1784 $ 17.50 7 $ $ 31,220.00 C&G 1070 $ 25.00 LF $ 26,750.00 Street Lights $ 1,500.00 EACH $ - Concrete Pavement 1764 $ 5.00 SO FT $ 8,820.00 Curb Ramps 19 $ 1,500.00 each $ 28,500.00 Sidewalk 47219 $ 3.50 sq ft $ 165,266.50 Misc items 10% $ 35,496.15 $ total $ 390,457.65 Storm Drains If 18" RCP 20 $ 58.00 If $ 1,160.00 24" RCP $ 82.00 If $ 30' RCP $ 110.00 if $ 36' RCP $ 140.00 If $ 42" RCP $ 156.00 If $ - 54" RCP $ 250.00 If $ - 60" RCP $ 300.00 If $ Other RCP $ 320.00 If $ Manholes $ 3,000.00 each $ - Junction Structures 3 $ 1,000.00 each $ 3,000.00 Catch Basins 4 $ 3,500.00 each $ 14,000.00 Catch Basins/grates $ 4,000.00 each $ - Misc items CDS unit at 50K 20% $ 3,632.00 $ $ 21,792.00 Sewers House laterals $ 30.00 if $ 8" VCP $ 57.00 If $ 10" VCP $ 61.00 If $ 12" VCP $ 70.00 If $ Manholes $ 3,000.00 each $ - Misc items $ 1,000.00 each $ 20,000.00 Fire Hydrants 7 $ 2,000.00 each $ 20,000.00 Water 8" DIP $ 43.00 If $ 12" DIP $ 60.00 If $ - 16" DIP $ 70.00 If $ 12" Valves $ 3,000.00 each $ 8" Valves $ 3,000.00 each $ Thrust Blocks $ 1,000.00 each $ - Fire Hydrants 7 $ 2,000.00 each $ 14,000.00 Misc items $ 20,000.00 $ 34,000.00 Grand Total est $ 466,249.65 Contingency 10% $ 46,624.97 Bond amount $ 512,874.62 354,961.50 18,160.00 EXHIBIT "C" SURETY BONDS AND OTHER SECURITY TRACT NO. 66141 As evidence of understanding the provisions contained in this Agreement, and of the Developer's intent to comply with same, the Developer has submitted the below described security in the amounts required by this Agreement, and has affixed the appropriate signatures thereto: PERFORMANCE BOND PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $512,874.62 Surety: Liberty Mutual Surety Attorney-in-fact: Sharon L. Tupper Address: 1001 4`h Avenue. Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98154 MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: $512,874.62 Surety: Liberty Mutual Surety Attorney-in-fact: Sharon L. I'Lipper Address: 1001 4`h Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98154 CASH MONUMENT SECURITY: $0.00 Amount deposited per Cash Receipt No. N/A _ _ Date: N/A BOND NO_ TM5146841/01.5040078 INITIAL PREMIUM: $5,129.00 SUBJECT TO RENEWAL CITY OF AZUSA TRACT MAP NO. 66141 RffROVEMENTS PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: WHEREAS the City of Azusa, California (`City") and BROOKKELD ROSEDALE 67, LLC ("Principal"), have executed an agreement for work consisting of, but not limited to, the furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidentals for all grading, roads, paving, curbs and gutters, pathways, storm drains, sanitary sewers, utilities, drainagc facilities, ilaffic controls, landscaping, street lights, and all other required facilities for Tract Map No. 66141 ("Public Tmprovements"); WHEREAS, the Public bmprovements to be performed by Principal are more particularly set forth in that certain Agreement for Completion of Pubic improvements dated 2013 ("Improvement Agreement"); WHEREAS, the Improvement Agreement is hereby referred to and incorporated herein by reference; and VirfiEREAS, Principal is required by the Improvement Agreement to provide a good and suftioient bond for performance of the Improvement Agreement, and to guarantee and warranty the Public Improvements constructed thereunder. NOW, THEREFORE, Principal and Liberty Mutual Insurance_Comuanv_ ("Surety"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Massachusetts , and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, are held and firmly bound unto City in the sure of FIDE ITUNDRED TWELVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVETY-FOUR DOLLARS AND SIXTY-TWO CENTS ($512,874.62), said sum being not less than one huudred percent (100%) of the total cost of the Public Improvements as set forth in the Improvement Agreement, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors acrd adininistrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such, that if Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions, agreements, guarantees, and warranties in the Improvement Agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, to be kept -and performed at the time and in the manner thexcin. specked and in all respects according to their intent and mcaning, and to indernnify and save harmless City, its officers, ORANCiEWIMARTEML33457. 120 •I s v ... a. .. ...ill_ .,.... .- 'S. •..... , _ ... .. ' Bond No: TM5146841/015040078 employees, and agents, as stipulated in the Improvement Ag •eement, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As part of the obligation secured hereby, and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be, included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incun-ed by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Improvement Agreement, or to any plans, profiles, and specifications related thereto, or to the Public Jmprovements to be aonstructed thereunder, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition. This bond is executed and riled to comply with Section 66499 et sec . of the Government Code of California as security for performance of the Improvement Agreement and security for the one-year guarantee and warranty of the Public Improvements. IN WITNESS WHMREOF, the seal and signature of the Principal is hereto affixed, and the corporate seal and the name of the Suretv is hereto affixed and attested by its duly authorized Attorney -in -Fact at Glendale, CA this 26th day of March , 2013./, BROOI{F1E R DALE 67; LLC Principal By. President (print name) (title) 24 i 1 I Liberty Mutual Insurance Company F Surety By: Attorney -in -Fact Sharon L. Tupper ; (print naive) NOTE. APPROPRIATE NOTARIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS OF EXECUTION BY PRINCIPAL AND SURETY, AND A COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY TO LOCAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BONDING COMPANY MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS BOND, ORANGEUMARTIM D33457. 12l CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Los Angeles On 03-26-2013 before me, Lupe Villarreal, Notary Public , (Here insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared Sharon L. Tupper , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(4 whose nam is/adsubscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thath Ishe/t46 executed the same inh A/her/heir authorized capacity s), and that by 46her/q/`�r signatureV on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of whi the person) acted, executed the ins m.ent. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. LUPE VILLARREAL �. Cor.,mission # 1957770 WITH S my hand and official al. Notary Public - California z Los Anpelta County n My Comm. Expires Nov 19, 2015 nntut'c nF?�ntsiy 1'ubiic Ltlpe ii arreal ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT (Title or description of attached document) (Title or description of attached document continued) Number of Pages Document Date (Additional information) CAPACITY CLAIMED BY THE SIGNER Individual (s) F1 Corporate Officer (Title) f� Partner(s) Attomey-in-Fact eTrustee(s) Other 2008 Version CAPA v12.10.07 800-873-9865 www.NotaryClasses.com INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM Any aclmowledgment completed in California must contain verbiage exactly as appears above in the notary section or a separate acknowledgment form must be properly completed and attached to that document. The only exception is if a document lr to be recorded outslde ofQrlly"ia. In such instances, any alternative aeknondedgment verbiage as may be printed on such a document sa long as the verbiage does not require the notary to do something that is illegal for a notary in California (i.e. certifying the authorized capacity of the signer). Please check the document carefully for proper notarial wording and attach lhisform ifrequired. • State and County information must be the State and County where the document signer(s) personally appeared before the notary public for acknowledgment. • Date of notarization must be the date that the signer(s) personally appeared which must also be the same date the acknowledgment is completed. • The notary public must print his or her name as it appears within his or her commission followed by a comma and then your title (notary public). • Print the name(s) of document signer(s) who personally appear at the time of notarization. • Indicate the correct singular or plural forms by crossing off incorrect forms (Le. he /shekliey; is/am) orofirling the corroot forms. Failure to correctly indicate this Information may lead to rejection ofdneument recording. • The notary seal impression must be clear and photographically reproducible. Impression must not cover text or lines. If seal impression smudges, re -seal if a sufficient area permits, otherwise complete a different acknowledgment fort. • Signature of the notary public must match the signature on file with the office of the county clerk. ❖ Additional information is not required but could help to ensure this acknowledgment is not misused or attached to a different document. ❖ Indicate title or type of attached document, number of pages and date. •:• Indicate the capacity claimed by the signer. If the claimed capacity is a corporate officer, indicate the title (i.e. CEO, CFO, Secretary). • Securely attach this document to the signed document S-4067/GE 9/09 XDP 2J CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1789 State of California County of On 1% 2013 before me, Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared bo Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the SARAH H. GRIFFITH person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the _ commission # 1950237 person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Notary Public California Orange County thy Comm Expires Aug 29 2015 1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the ~ laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my ha i and officials 4a, Signature: Place Notary Seal Above 4.1(,.t OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _ Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Individual ❑ Partner —[]Limited ❑ General Top of thumb here ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing Number of Pages: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Individual ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Top of thumb here ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing w zu iu rvationai Notary Association • NationalNotary.org • 1 -800 -US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS PRINTED ON RED BACKGROUND. 5093889 This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named herein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (the "Company"), a Massach.isetts stock insurance company, pursuant to and by authority of the By-law and Authorization hereinafter set forth, does hereby name, constitute and appoint TIM M. TOMKO, ERIC C. THORSEN, TIM M. FINNEGAN. LUPE VILLARREAL, SHARON L. TUPPER, TESSA A. ROMERO. ALL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. .......... I ...... I ..... I .......................................................................... , each individually if there be more than one named, its true and lawful attorney-in-fact to make, execute• seal• acknowledge and deliver, for and on its behalf as surety and as its act and deed, any and all undertakings, hands, recognizances and other surety obligations and the execution of such undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations, in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon the Company as if they had been duly signed by the president and attested by the secretary of the Company in their own proper persons. That this power is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By-law and Authorization: ARTICLE XIII - Execution of Contracts: Section 5. Surety Bonds and Undertakings. Any officer of the Company authorized for that purpose in writing by the chairman or the president, and subject to such limitations as the chairman or the president may prescribe, shall appoint such attorneys -in -fact, as may be necessary to act in behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations. Such attorneys - in -fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective powers of attorney, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach thereto the seal of the Company. When so executed such instruments shall be as binding as if signed by the president and attested by the secretary. By the following instrument the chairman or the president has authorized the officer or other official named therein to appoint attorneys -in -fact: Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 5 of the By-laws, David M. Carey, an official of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, is hereby authorized to appoint such attorneys -in -fact as may be necessary to act in behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations. All Powers of Attorney attested to or executed by David M. Carey in his capacity as an officer or official of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, whether before, on or after the date of the Authorization, including without limitation Powers of Attorney attested to or executed as Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, are hereby ratified and approved. That the By-law and the Authorization set forth above are true copies thereof and are now in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power ofAttorney has been subscribed by an authorized officer or official of the Company and the corporate seal of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company has been affixed thereto in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania this day of 12th day of January 2012 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY By,rry' Gam, David M. Carey, 49islant Secretary COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ss COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY On this 12th day of January 1 2012 , before me, a Notary Public, personally came David M. Care, to me known, and acknowledged that he is an Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; that he knows the seal of said corporation; and that he executed the above Power of Attorney and affixed the corporate seal of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company thereto with the authority and at the direction of said corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF. I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my notarial seal at Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, on the day and year first above written. �r Nh ,-14-r&-. Aa. Fa.r.�S:�ni.rf � B CERTIFICATE Ter. a Pastella, Notary Public 1, the undersigned. Assistant-Secrefary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the original power of attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the officer or official who executed the said power of attorney is an Assistant Secretary specially authorized by the chairman or the president to appoint attorneys -in -fact as provided in Article XIII, Section 5 of the By-laws of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. This certificate and the above power of attorney may be signed by facsimile or mechanically reproduced signatures under and by authority of the following vote of the board of directors of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 12th day of March, 1980. VOTED that the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any assistant secretary of the company, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the company in connection with surety bonds, shall be valid and binding upon the company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed +h 6MrY ERE rl h e hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said company, this day of Gregory WYDavenport, Assistant Secretary N! N O C 7 a r to — O u� aLU m C E as Q M C� L "o d C 3M O E L +� o 's c oc >d a3 O O 00 N w M E t01 0 o BOND NO. TM5146841/015O40O78 INITIAL PREMIUM: Included SUBJECT TO RENEWAL CITY OF AZUSA TRACT MAP BIPROVEMENTS LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: WHEREAS the City of Azusa, California ("City") and BROOKFIELD ROSEDALE 67, LLC ("Principal"), have executed an agreement for work consisting of, but not limited to, the furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidentals for all grading, roads, paving, curbs and gutters, pathways, storm drains, sanitary sewers, utilities, drainage facilities, traffic controls, landscaping, street lights, and all other required facilities for Tract Map No. 66141("Public Improvements"); WHEREAS, the Public Improvements to be performed by Principal are more particularly set forth in that certain Agreement for -Completion of Pubic Improvements dated 2013 ("Improvement Agreement"); WHEREAS, the Improvement Agreement is hereby referred to and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with the Ianprovement Agreement providing that if Principal or any of its subcontractors shat] fail to pay for any materials, provisions, or other supplies, or terms used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the Public improvements, or for any work: cr labor done thereon of any kind, or for amounts due lander the provisions of Title 15 (commencing with section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the California Civil Code, with respect to such work or labor, that the Surety on this bond will pay the same together with a reasonable attorney's fee in case suit is brought on the bond_ NOW, THEREFORE, Principal and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company . ("Surety"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Massachusetts f and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, are held and firmly bound unto City and to any and all material men, persons, companies or corporations furnishing materials, provisions, and other supplies used in, upon, for or about the perfon-nanee of the Public Improvements, and all persons, companies or corporations renting or hiring teams, or implements or machinery, for or contributing to the Public Improvements to be done, and all persons performing work or labor upon the same and all persons supplying both work and materials as aforesaid excepting the Principal, the sum of FIVE HUIN'DRED TWELVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SE'VETY-FOiJR DOLLARS AND SIXTY-TWO ORINGEMMARTINET33457. 123 Bond No: TM5146841/015040078 21 CENTS ($51.2,874.62), said sum being not less than 100% of the total cost of the Public lmprnvernents under iiia tenors of the Improvement Agreement, we bind ourselves, our i-Icirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns jointly and severally, firmly by ti)(�se Presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that if the Principal, his or its subcontractors, heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, small fail Co pay for any materials, provisions, or other supplies or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the Public Improvements, or for work or labor thereon of any kind, or fail to pay any of the persons named in Califox-nia Civil Code Section 3181, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed by any such claimant, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the contractor and itis subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work and labor, and all other applicable laws of the State of California and rules and regulations of its agencies, then said Surety will pay the same in or to an amount not exceeding the sum specified herein. As part of the obligation secured hereby, and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expcnses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred. by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. This bond is executed and filed to comply with Section 66499 et seMr . of the California Government Code as security for payment to contractors, subcontractors, and persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment for construction of the Public Improvements or performance of the Improvement Agreement. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure, to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section. 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the California Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Improvement Agreement, or to any plans, profiles, and specifications related thereto, or to the Public Improvements to be constructed thereunder, shaU in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition. ORANGE\MMtA=Z133457 124 Bond No: TM5146841/015040078 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the seal and signature of the Principal is hereto affoczd, and the corporate seal and the name of the Surety is hereto affixed and attested by its duly authorized Attomey-in-Fact at Glendale, CA this • 26th day of March .2013 BR00KF1EL R DALE 67, LLC Principal 1 By: PR �OLEY Presi&nt (title) Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Surety By: Attorney -in -Fact kL—W Sharon L. Tupper (print name) NOTE: APPROPRIATE NOTARIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS OF EXECUTION BY PRINCIPAL AND SURETY, AND A COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY TO LOCAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BONDING COMPANY MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS BOND. ORANGMMMARTQIED334 57. 125 a ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of - Los Angeles }ss. On March 26, 2013 before me, Lupe Villarreal Public, personally appeared Sharon L. Tupper Notary *0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whos name(�Iislad subscribed 0 fhe within instrument and ac nowledged to me that fshelt ey executed the, same inritheperson lherl eir authorized capacity(K ), and that by hisMerltheir signatures s'f on the instrume,d�, or the entiryuponbehalf of which the person(s�acted, executed the instrument,r I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS m hand and official seal. LUPE ionVIL#iREAL y Cor..mission � 1957770 �d Notary Public - California n ' Los Angeles County My Comm. Expires Nov 19, 2015 C-SignatuF6L e Villarreal (seal) OPTIONAL INFORMATION Date of Document Thumbprint of Signer Type or Title of Document Number of Pages in Document Document in a Foreign Language Type of Satisfactory Evidence: Personally Known Paper Identification Credible Witness(es) Check here if Capacity of Signer: noihumbprint Trustee orfingerprint Power of Attorney is available. CEO/CFO/COO President I Vice -President I Secretary I Treasurer Other: Other Information: ORANGEIMMARTMMZ133457. 126 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 State of California County of K01 0 On rRefore me, Zail V/ -Dale _ • &,nffl7A % Here insert Nahe and Title of the Officer personally appeared SARAH H GRIFFITH r{ a� Commission # 1950237 _ .� Notary Public - California ,� •t '' Orange County Poly Comm Expires Aug 29. 2D15 who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my nd and official seal. Signature: Y� / AlhILA Place Notary Seal Above Signature N rary uhii OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date.- Signer(s) ate: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: .... . Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): .... ❑ Individual jai ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Top of thumb here ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing Number of Pages: Signer's Name _ ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Individual ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Top of thumb here ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing 0 2010 National Notary Association • NationalNotarv.nrn - 1-ann-I is NnTARV !1-Ann-R7R_aA971 :THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS PRINTED ON RED BACKGROUND. 5093890 This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named herein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS POWER OF ATTORNEY 1;: KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: ` That Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (the "Company"), a Massachusetts stock insurance company, pursuant to and by authority of the Sy -law and Authorization hereinafter set forth, does hereby name, constitute and appoint TIM M. TOMKO, ERIC C. THORSEN, TIM M. FINNEGAN, LUPE VILLARREAL, SHARON L. TUPPER, TESSA A. ROMERO, ALL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA................................................................................................... each individually if there be more than one named, its true and lawful attorney-in-fact to make. execute. seal, acknowledge and deliver, for and on its behalf as surety and as its act and deed, any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations and the execution of such undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations, in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon the Company as if they had been duly signed by the president and attested by the secretary of the Company in their own proper persons. That this power is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By-law and Authorization: ARTICLE XIII - Execution of Contracts: Section 5. Surety Bonds and Undertakings. Any officer of the Company authorized For that purpose in writing by the chairman or the president, and subject to such limitations as the chairman or the president may prescribe, shall appoint such attorneys -in -fact, as may be necessary to act in behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations. Such attorneys - in -fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective powers of attorney, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach thereto the seal of the Company. When so executed such instruments shall be as binding as if signed by the president and attested by the secretary. By the following instrument the chairman or the president has authorized the officer or other official named therein to appoint attorneys -in -fact: Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 5 of the By-laws, David M. Carey, an official of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, is hereby authorized to appoint such attorneys -in -fact as may be necessary to act in behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations. All Powers of Attorney attested to or executed by David M. Carey in his capacity as an officer or official of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, whether before, on or after the date of the Authorization, including without limitation Powers of Attorney attested to or executed as Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, are hereby ratified and approved. That the By-law and the Authorization set forth above are true copies thereof and are now in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been subscribed by an authorized officer or official of the Company and the corporate seal of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company has been affixed thereto in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania this day of 12th day of January 2012 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ss COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY /11 By N7 David M. Carey, Agsistant Secretary On this '1 2th day of January 1 2012 , before me, a Notary Public, personally came David M. Carev, to me known, and acknowledged that he is an Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; that he knows the seal of said corporation; and that he executed the above Power of Attorney and affixed the corporate seal of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company thereto with the authority and at the direction of said corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, i have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my notarial seal at Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, on the day and year first above written. CERTIFICATE — Tere�a Pastella, Notary Public I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the original power of attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and 1 do further certify that the officer or official who executed the said power of attorney is an Assistant Secretary specially authorized by the chairman or the president to appoint attorneys -in -fact as provided in Article XIII, Section 5 of the By -taws of Liberty Mutual insurance Company. This certificate and the above power of attorney may be signed by facsimile or mechanically reproduced signatures under and by authority of the following vote of the board of directors of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 12th day of March, 1980. VOTED that the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any assistant secretary of the company, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the company in connection with surety bonds, shall be valid and binding upon the company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed. IN TE TIM REO have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said company, thi4LJ,d y of -f 7— Gregory W Davenport- Assistant Secretary APPROVED Date sic, /?_0/ 3 o .. r E ' T'AZIUSAIV CONSENT CALENDAR D-3 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT NEIUBER, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES/PERSONNEL OFFICER VIA: JAMES MAKSHANOFF, CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 6, 2013 SUBJECT: HUMAN RESOURCES ACTION ITEMS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the following Personnel Action Requests in accordance with the City of Azusa Civil Service Rules and applicable Memorandum of Understanding(s). BACKGROUND On April 23,2013 the Personnel Board confirmed the following Department Head recommendations regarding the following Personnel Action request. A. MERIT INCREASE AND/OR REGULAR APPOINTMENT: DEPARTMENT NAME CLASSIFICATION ACTION/EFF RANGE/STEP DATE BASE MO SALARY PD Steven Rodriguez Property, Evidence & Merit Increase 9191/3 Crime Scene Technician 04/11/2013 $5,287.14 UTL Manuel Sencion Customer Service Reg Appt/Merit 5164/4 Representative II Increase $4,268.07 04/15/2013 PW Christopher Street Maintenance Worker Reg Appt/Merit 8153/2 Gutierrez I Increase $3,558.02 01/01/2013 FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact, as positions listed are funded in approved department budgets. Of us INFORMATION ITEM B-6 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JAMES MAKSHANOFF, CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 6, 2013 SUBJECT: MAY 20, 2013, COUNCIL MEETING The 2013 International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) will be held in Las Vegas, May 19th through May 21st. Mayor Pro-tem Uriel Macias, Council Member Angel Carrillo, City Attorney Marco Martinez, Community Development Director Kurt Christiansen and myself, will be attending the conference. Neither one of us will be attending the May 20, 2013 Council Meeting, and Council has the options: 1) Hold the May 20th meeting with the remaining Council, as there will be a quorum. 2) Cancel the May 20th meeting all together. 3) Cancel the May 20th meeting, and schedule a Special Meeting for Wednesday May 22, 2013. Information Item Presented)14 a-V_ 0/0 s" Hee+i1U&d C°�.�.e(el ec( APPROVED Date /7 /?Olok.iititA3 F, G tr - r- ""�° a„�"`�.� �r ;` ',n,��.,, � sir ✓ * ,...iG _ _ AGENDA ITEM C-1 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARCO MARTINEZ, CITY ATTORNEY ROBERT NEIUBER, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES VIA: JAMES MAKSHANOFF, CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 6, 2013 SUBJECT: DISCUSSION CONCERNING MILITARY LEAVE FOR CITY OFFICERS AND DIRECTION ON OPTIONS AVAILABLE REGARDING THE VACANCY CAUSED BY THE TEMPORARY ABSENCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council discuss options available to them when a member of the City Council is on Military Leave and provide staff with direction, which includes keeping the position open during Mayor Pro-Tem Macias' absence due to Military Leave. BACKGROUND At the April 15, 2013, City Council Meeting Mayor Pro-Tem Uriel Macias informed the City Council that he received mobilization orders effective May 31, 2013, through the end of January 2014. He requested Military Leave for that period and asked that his Council position be held while he was deployed. Military Leave is a right afforded under the law and requires no action from the City Council. Under California law, Military & Veterans Code section 395.8 provides that an officer of a City who enters into active service in the military shall be reinstated and restored to his office upon his discharge or release from such active service . . . provided, such discharge or release is prior to the expiration of the term for which he has been elected. The officer must present himself to the legislative body or other appointing authority of such city ready and willing to assume the duties of his office, within six months from the time of his discharge or release from active service with the armed forces. This rule is consistent with other generally applicable State laws requiring a private employer to restore an employee who is called to active duty to his former position or a position of similar seniority, status and pay upon application filed within 40 days (with limited exceptions) (Mil. & Vet. C A§ 396.06(a)) Irl auto £ro--re/4 9i ac«s' Page 1 of 2 sever 1'11( be /ek VG`C.li ct7 Wkile he. is el Hilira-/`- ) ea, v,e., and giving state employees called to duty during a time of war or national emergency the right to return and reenter upon the officer or position within six months after the termination of his or her active service with the armed forces. (Mil. & Vet. C A§ 395.1.) This rule is also consistent with the Federal Law known as the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA, 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301 —4335). USERRA is a federal law intended to ensure that persons who serve or have served in the Armed Forces, Reserves, National Guard or other "uniformed services:" (1) are not disadvantaged in their civilian careers because of their service; (2) are promptly reemployed in their civilian jobs upon their return from duty; and (3) are not discriminated against in employment based on past, present, or future military service. In March of 2009, the City Council adopted a Resolution 09-C26 authorizing temporary continuation of benefits and salary for employees called to active duty in support of "Operation Enduring Freedom." This resolution extended the 30 days of salary and benefit continuation required by State and Federal law to six months and extended the flexible benefit plan for twelve months. As "Operation Enduring Freedom" is ongoing, Mayor Pro-Tern Macias would fall under the provisions of this Resolution. Military and Veterans Code section 395.8, provides that the office vacated by a councilmember called into active military service is not vacant, but the legislative body may appoint an officer to temporarily replace any such officer so absenting himself . . . . Such temporary officers [sic.] shall have all of the powers and duties of the office to which he may be temporarily appointed and shall hold said office until the expiration of the term thereof or until the officer returns from service with the armed forces, whichever event first occurs. Under State law as outlined above, the City Council has the option of leaving the office vacated by the absent Councilmember unfilled during his absence or temporarily appointing someone to fill-in while Mayor Pro-Tern Macias is on Military Leave. As there is no timeline for this appointment, staff would suggest that the Council consider leaving the office vacant during the absence, and should an operational issue arise that would require an additional member, consider temporarily filling the position at that time. It has been the past practice of the City Council to have the most senior Councilmember become the presiding officer of the Council in the absence of the Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tem. This practice is in line with Section 2-52 of the Azusa Municipal Code. The City Council can continue to follow this practice or choose to designate the order of progression after Mayor Pro-Tem as they so choose. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact if the position is left open during the absence. Staff estimate that there is a $15,000 impact to the General Fund should the position be temporarily filled. Attachments Resolution 09-C26 and related Agenda Item Commentary from March 16, 2009 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT C-1 RESOLUTION NO. 09-C26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY CONTINUATION OF BENEFITS AND SALARY FOR EMPLOYEES CALLED TO ACTIVE MILITARY DUTY IN SUPPORT OF "OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM" WHEREAS, Section 395.01 of the California Military and Veterans Code (the "CMV Code"), requires public agencies, including the City of Azusa, to continue to compensate city employees who have been employed for a period of at least one year by the City prior to being"called"to active military training, inactive duty training, encampment, navel cruises, special exercises or the like, for the first 30 day period of absence from work in any fiscal year when such employees are"called;"and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 395.01, Section 395.03 of the CMV Code specifically acknowledges the right of public agencies, including cities, to authorize payment of compensation in an amount greater than the pay for 30 calendar days by resolution of the legislative body; and WHEREAS, the United States of America has mobilized United States Reserve Military and members of the California National Guard to serve the nation in a military operation known as "Operation Enduring Freedom:" and WHEREAS, the City of Azusa is supportive of the employees of the City who have been "called" into active military duty and believes that it is in the public interest to provide these employees with continuing employee benefits and that portion of their City base salary which may be lost due to a leave of absence from City service for active military duty; and WHEREAS, it is the interests of the health, safety and general welfare of the City of Azusa to extend the time during which compensation is provided for those"called"to serve in"Operation Enduring Freedom" as permitted by California law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Azusa does hereby adopt in full the terms and conditions contained in the said staff report dated March 16, 2009. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting held on 16`h day of March 2009. JOSEPH R. ROCHA,MAYOR I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 09-C26 was duly adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 16th day of March 2009, by the follow roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: GONZALES, CARRILLO, MACIAS, HANKS, ROCHA NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:NONE ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE VERA MENDOZA, CITY CLERK li1/4i c4 Q itT -Jd ^� rU Y* S A _r.a:ai3 14k1U,7 '_- ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE ITEM C-1 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: KERMIT FRANCIS, INTERIM HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR VIA: F.M. DELACH, CITY MANAGER DATE: MARCH 16, 2009 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY CONTINUATION OF BENEFITS AND SALARY FOR EMPLOYEES CALLED TO MILITARY DUTY IN SUPPORT OF "OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM" RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: reaffirm the intent of the policy authorizing a temporary continuation of salary and benefits,for a period not to exceed six(6)months; consider the policy on the continuation of the flexible benefit plan,for a period not to exceed twelve(12)months for city employees called to active duty in connection with "Operation Enduring Freedom;"adopt the attached resolution. BACKGROUND On April 7, 2003, City Council approved resolution No. o3-C3o that authorized a temporary continuation of salary and benefits for city employees called to active duty in connection with the nation's response to the terrorist attack on the United States of America-"Operation Enduring Freedom." On June 6, 2005, City Council approved resolution No. o5-CS3 that authorized a temporary continuation of salary and benefits for city employees called to active duty in connection with- "Operation Enduring Freedom." The City of Azusa is currently in compliance with the Federal and State law regarding military leaves. While current law does guarantee the reinstatement of reservists once their military assignment has been completed, it only requires that agencies provide those individuals with continued salary for the first 3o days of duty. In consideration of this potential loss of income, municipalities in the San Gabriel Valley and throughout Southern California have been providing additional temporary paid leave and continuation of benefits for employees recalled to active duty to defend the United States of America. Because the tour of duty for reservists generally lasts over 3o days, an employee called to active duty may experience a financial hardship for that individual and their family. The attached resolution authorized by City Council,would allow employees who are recalled to be compensated by the City for the difference between the amount the employee would receive from the regular city gross bi-weekly wage (base rate, not including overtime)and the amount the employee receives from their military service including all allowances. The continuation of salary would extend for an additional iso days beyond the required 3o days under Federal and State law. This action in total may not exceed 18o days(a total of 6 months). The employee's benefits(retirement and leave accruals)would be continued for the employee and their family in the manner it would be provided if the employee was still actively employed by the City. Additionally,the Police Officers Association requests consideration of a continuation of the employee's Flexible Benefit Plan (health, dental, et al)for a total period not to exceed twelve (12)months commencing with the date the employee is ordered to report for duty for active service. At the conclusion of the twelve(12)months, the employee may elect to continue their health benefit coverage under the provisions of C.O.B.R.A.(maximum for military reservists is for a period of up to 24 months paid by the employee). In order to access this temporary continuation of salary and benefits,the employee must provide documentation of their military pay in a form acceptable to both the Director of Human Resources and Director of Finance. Underwriting policy for the City's Long Term Disability(LTD), Life Insurance and Accidental Death & Dismemberment(AD&D) plans require that an employee be "regularly working at least 40 hours each week"for continued coverage. Due to this carrier restriction, coverage under these plans is suspended during time of active military service. This would be a temporary modification, authorized by City Council, applied to the City's existing Military Leave Policy(Civil Service Rule 6.5). As such, the temporary salary and benefit continuation would only be provided to those individuals who are called to active duty as a result of the President's Executive Order specific to the current military action. As cited under the City's Military Leave Policy an employee must be in City employment for a period of one(1) year, upon being called for military duty to qualify. Like Resolution No. o3-C3o and o5-053, this is a temporary continuation and additional City Council approval would be needed to authorize any extension of this temporary provision. Future military actions would require authorization by City Council to extend benefits and continue salary beyond the City's existing Military Leave Policy. FISCAL IMPACT It is estimated that the City may experience a slight salary savings, offsetting the flexible benefit plan continuation, as the fiscal impact would be the cost of salary and benefit continuance minus the employee's military pay. APPROVED Date qt,v(?0,3 z CONSENT ITEM D-8 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROBERT NEIUBER, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES VIA: JAMES MAKSHANOFF, CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 6, 2013 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE LOOK BACK MEASUREMENT SAFE HARBOR UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution adopting the Look Back Measurement Safe Harbor under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. BACKGROUND Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the City could be subject to a penalty if it fails to offer affordable health coverage to an employee who averages 30 hours or more of service per week in any given month. The purpose of the safe harbor is to measure the hours of employees. Because the City has many seasonal and hourly employees, the safe harbor will allow the City to measure and average the hours of service for its employees over a one year time span. If a seasonal employee averages under 30 hours of service per week over the entire year, the City will not be subject to a penalty for failing to offer health coverage. Without the safe harbor, the City could be subject to a penalty for any given month if a seasonal employee averages 30 hours or more of service per week. Implementation of the safe harbor requires specific legal restrictions relating to timing and length of periods that must be established. The attached Resolution complies with those legal restrictions. The Resolution is recommended in order to plan for and avoid potential penalties that the City may face under the ACA starting January 1, 2014. This is based on the most current information available to us on the ACA. FISCAL IMPACT The City may have to pay a penalty under the ACA of $3,000 per employee if the medical insurance that we offer to full-time employees (Under the ACA this is anyone working 30 hours or more on average) does not meet minimum value requirements or affordability requirements and the employee enrolls in subsidized Exchange coverage. At this time staff is estimating the potential fiscal impact as $30,000 in FY 2013/14. RESOLUTION NO. 13-C29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA ADOPTING THE LOOK BACK MEASUREMENT SAFE HARBOR UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT WHEREAS, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA") was enacted on March 23, 2010; WHEREAS, ACA added Section 4980H Shared Responsibility for Employers Regarding Health Care Coverage to Title 26 of the United States Code, the Internal Revenue Code (Section 4980H); WHEREAS, Section 4980H imposes an assessable payment on an applicable large employer when (1) it fails to offer"substantially all" of its full-time employees (and their dependents) the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage or offers coverage to "substantially all" of its full-time employees (and their dependents) that is "unaffordable" or does not provide "minimum value" and (2) any full-time employee is certified to the employer as having received a subsidy for coverage through the exchange ("Assessable Payment"); WHEREAS,the City of Azusa("City") is considered an applicable large employer because it employed an average of at least 50 full-time equivalent employees on business days during the preceding calendar year; WHEREAS,the Department of Treasury issued proposed regulations regarding Section 4980H, that permit the City to adopt a look-back measurement method safe harbor in order to determine the status of an employee as full-time for purposes of determining and calculating the Assessable Payment(78 Federal Register 218, 243, January 2, 2013); and WHEREAS, the City intends to adopt the provisions of the look-back measurement method safe harbor in order to determine the full-time status of employees for purposes of the Assessable Payment. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Azusa as follows: 1) That all of the recitals set forth above are true and correct, and the Council so finds and determines. 2) The City establishes the look-back measurement method with regard to all ongoing employees as follows: a. The City establishes a twelve (12) month standard measurement period for ongoing employees. b. Starting with October 3, 2013, a standard measurement period will start each year on October 3rd and end the following year on October 2nd. c. The standard measurement period will be the period during which an ongoing employee's hours are measured. d. The City will establish an administrative period of ninety (90) days. e. The administrative period associated with the standard measurement period will start each year on October 3rd and end on December 31st. f. The City will establish a twelve (12) month stability period for ongoing employees. g. Starting with January 1, 2014, the twelve (12) month stability period for ongoing employees will start each year on January 1st and end on December 31St h. For purposes of the 2014 stability period, a transitional measurement period will be implemented starting on May 1, 2013 and ending on October 31, 2013. i. The administrative period associated with the transitional measurement period will start on November 1, 2013 and end on December 31, 2013. j. If an ongoing employee's employment status changes before the end of a stability period, the change in status will not affect the classification of the employee (as full or part time) for the remaining portion of the stability period. 3) On the start date of a new employee, the City will make a determination as to whether that new employee is reasonably expected to be a full-time employee. If the new employee is reasonably expected to be a full-time employee and is not a seasonal employee, the City will offer minimum essential coverage to that employee before the end of the employee's initial three full calendar months of employment. 4) If, based on the facts and circumstances at the start date of a new employee, the City is unable to determine that the employee is reasonably expected to be employed an average of at least thirty (30) hours per week over the initial measurement period, then the employee is considered a variable hour employee. 5) The City establishes the look-back measurement method with regard to new variable hour employees as follows: a. The City establishes a twelve (12) month initial measurement period for each new employee. 2 b. The initial measurement period will start the first day of the first calendar month after the start date, unless the start date is the first of a calendar month in which case the initial measurement period will start on that date. c. The administrative period shall start the day following the last day of the initial measurement period and shall end no later than the last day of the first calendar month beginning on or after the first anniversary of the employee's start date. d. The City establishes a twelve (12) month stability period associated with the initial measurement period. e. If the new variable hour employee does not measure as a full-time employee during the initial measurement period, the stability period associated with the initial measurement period must not exceed the remainder of the standard measurement period (plus any associated administrative period). 6) A new employee will be measured during the first complete standard measurement period for which he/she is employed. This means that a new employee may be tested under an initial measurement period and at the same time be measured under the overlapping standard measurement period. a. If an employee measures as full-time during the initial measurement period, he/she will retain full-time status for the entire associated stability period (even if the employee does not qualify as full-time during the standard measurement period). b. If an employee does not measure as full-time during the initial measurement period, but qualifies as full-time during the standard measurement period, the employee must be treated as full-time during the stability period associated with the standard measurement period (even if that means coverage must be offered before the end of the stability period associated with the initial measurement period). 7) When an employee is rehired after termination, upon return the employee will retain the status the employee had previously with respect to any stability period, except that an employee will be treated as a new employee: a. if the employee resumes employment after a period of at least 26 consecutive weeks with less than an hour of service; or b. if the period (measured in weeks) during which no services are performed is at least four consecutive weeks long and exceeds the number of weeks of that 3 employees period of employment immediately preceding the period during which the employee was not credited with any hours of service. 8) When an employee takes special unpaid leave (i.e. unpaid leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, unpaid leave under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, or unpaid leave on account of jury duty), to determine hours of service the City will exclude any periods of special unpaid leave during the measurement period and apply that average for the entire measurement period. 9) The City intends to employ its seasonal employees up to a maximum of five and one half months per year and seasonal employees are designated as at will employees. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 2013. AU//(1 seph R. Rocha, Mayor I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 13-C29 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Azusa at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of May, 2013, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: GONZALES, CARRILLO, MACIAS, ALVAREZ, ROCHA NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE i'elf L. „xe ce Cornejo J ., C. , •rk 4 APPROVED Date 6/6/01-0/3 zus CONSENT CALENDAR D-9 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: TITO HAES, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR VIA: JAMES MAKSHANOFF, CITY MANAGER DATE: MAY 6, 2013 SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the positions recommended on the legislation listed in this report. BACKGROUND During the federal and state legislative sessions, bills are considered that may impact Azusa or cities in general. In order to keep the City Council informed of these bills, staff has developed the attached legislative update to track these important bills, including recommended positions. Following Council approval, staff will draft letters including the recommended positions and send them to Sacramento or Washington D.C. accordingly. As bills are introduced, amended or there is a change in position from the League of California Cities, staff will provide the Council with updated position recommendations. On March 22, 2013 a representative from Assemblyman Hernandez's Office contacted the City of Azusa seeking support letters for AB 1357 and AB 185. Following is a summary of both bills with staffs recommended position. In addition, attached is the regular legislative update for the Council's consideration. AB 1357 (Emergency Departments: Diversion of Patients) is currently on the League of California Cities' `Watch' list. Essentially the bill requires funds collected by the County of Los Angeles through a voter approved initiative for emergency rooms from properties within the San Gabriel Valley to remain within the geographic region of the County. The bill will establish a Task Force to study and audit funds collected; and ultimately ensure funds are being allocated evenly throughout the County. The City of Glendora and various health care providers support the legislation, the County of Los Angeles opposes the legislation. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a position of `Support' for AB 1357. AB 185 (Open and Public Meetings: Televised Meetings) is currently on the League of Cities' "Oppose" list. The bill requires local municipalities that collect cable franchise fees be mandated to televise council meetings. The bill links franchise fees to Public, Educational and Government (PEG) programming. The bill argues that fees collected should be used for PEG programming, however, franchise fees were never intended to be utilized for PEG programming. Franchise fees reimburse the municipalities for the cable utilities use of the right-of-way to install and maintain their infrastructure. The bill is currently opposed by a series of county agencies and the City of West Covina. The City of Azusa currently televises and streams the Council and Planning Commission Meetings online, however, verbiage in this bill also requires "local agencies to also televise the open and public meetings of their advisory committees that are governed by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act)." The City of Azusa has various Council appointed committees that would fall within this requirement, approval of this bill will result in a prohibitive and un-needed expenditure. Setting a precedent for an unfunded mandate is not in the best interest for California cities, many of which utilize these funds for infrastructure maintenance and public safety. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a position of `Opposition' for AB 185. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with approving the legislative update. Attachment: Legislative Update City of Azusa 2013 - 2014 Legislative Bill Report May — Update New Legislative Positions BILL DESCRIPTION AB 5 Author: Ammiano Title: Homelessness Position: Oppose Location: Commitee on Appropriations • Summary: Would enact the Homeless Person's Bill of Rights and Fairness Act, which would provide that no person's rights, privileges, or access to public services may be denied or abridged because he or she is homeless, has a low income, or suffers from a mental illness or physical disability. While the legislation has good intent, it does not address cause and prevention. AB 5 will undermine local decision making (e.g. prohibit enforcement of local ordinances based on County actions). The bill is also an unfunded mandate (e.g. requires every local government to have a health hygiene center open 24/7). Council has previously demonstrated support on more productive homelessness related legislation, such as the Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Act. 2°'reading scheduled on 5/1/13 AB 28 Author: Perez Title: Economic Development : Enterprise Zones Position: Support Location: Economic Development & Enterprise Committee Summary: Would revise various definitions for purposes of the Enterprise Zone Act and modify specified requirements for designating and administering enterprise zones and G- TEDAs, collectively. The bill would impose new requirements on the Department of Housing and Community Development with respect to the enterprise zone program and modify department and Franchise Tax Board reporting requirements. 2' read on 4/29/13 AB 145 Author: Perea Title: State Water Resources Control Board: Drinking Water Position: Oppose Location: Committee On Appropriations The California Safe Drinking Water Act (state act) provides for the operation of public water systems and imposes on the State Department of Public Health various duties and responsibilities. Existing law requires the department to conduct research, studies, and demonstration projects relating to the provision of a dependable, safe supply of drinking water, to adopt regulations to implement the state act, and to enforce provisions of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. This bill would transfer to the State Water Resources Control Board the various duties and responsibilities imposed on the department by the state act. The bill would require these provisions to be implemented during the 2014-15 fiscal year. The municipal water utilities in California oppose this change since the SWRCB's mission is not focused on public health and the surveillance/protection of public health rightly belongs to DPH. The municipal water community is seeking to move the bill to Senate Health Committee, chaired by Dr. Ed Hernandez. AB 162 Author: Holden Title: Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Position: Oppose Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: Would prohibit a local government from denying an eligible facilities request, as defined, for a modification of an existing wireless telecommunications facility or structure that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of the wireless telecommunications facility or structure, as specified. The bill would require a local government to act on an eligible facilities request within 90 days of receipt of a request, as specified. By adding to the duties of a local government, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program. Hearing not yet reschedule, 1st was cancelled on 4/24/13 AB 178 Author: Gaines Title: Highways: Exit Information Signs Position: Support Location: Committee on Rules Summary: Current law requires the Department of Transportation to adopt rules and regulations that allow the placement, near exits on freeways in rural areas, of information signs identifying specific roadside businesses. Current law prohibits the department from approving the placement of any sign within any urban area with a population of 5,000 or more. This bill would require the department to allow the placement of information signs within an urban area with a population of 50,000 or less if the urban area has had a highway bypass completed since 2002. Read first time on 4/25/13 AB 185 Author: Hernandez Title: Open and Public Meetings: Televised Meetings Position: Oppose Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: The bill requires local municipalities that collect cable franchise fees be mandated to televise council meetings. Would provide that an audio or video recording of an open and public meeting made at the direction of a local agency may be erased or destroyed 2 years after the recording. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. Second hearing cancelled on 4/29/13 AB 194 Author: Campos Title: Open Meetings: Protections for Public Criticism: Penalties for Violations Position: Oppose Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: Would make it a misdemeanor for a member of a legislative body, while acting as the chairperson of a legislative body of a local agency, to prohibit public criticism protected under the Ralph M. Brown Act. This bill would authorize a district attorney or any interested person to commence an action for the purpose of obtaining a judicial determination that an action taken by a legislative body of a local agency in violation of the protection for public criticism is null and void, as specified. 1st hearing cancelled on 4/18/13 AB 229 Author: Perez Title: Local Government: Infrastructure and Revitalization Financing Districts Position: Support Location: Appropriation Committee Summary: Would authorize the creation of an infrastructure and revitalization financing district, as defined, and the issuance of debt with 2/3 voter approval. The bill would authorize the creation of a district for up to 40 years and the issuance of debt with a final maturity date of up to 30 years, as specified. The bill would authorize a district to finance projects in redevelopment project areas and former redevelopment project areas and former military bases. Scheduled for hearing on 5/1/13 AB 294 Author: Holden Title: Local-State Joint Investment Partnership Pilot Program Position: Support Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: Would, until January 1, 2020, establish a pilot program whereby certain local government entities, upon the approval and oversight of the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, are authorized to reallocate their annual payments of property tax revenue directed to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund to instead finance certain kinds of public works that further state policy, as specified. This bill would require each local government entity operating a project under the pilot program and the bank to submit annual reports, as specified, on the results of the pilot program. Scheduled for hearing on 5/1/13 AB 537 Author: Bonta Title: Meyes-Milias-Brown Act: Impassee Procedures Position: Oppose Location: Committee on Appropriations Summary: Would authorize the representatives of the public agency or the employee organization, if they fail to reach an agreement, to request mediation. The bill would require that the parties agree upon the appointment of a mediator mutually agreeable to the parties within 5 days of a request by one of the parties. If the parties fail to agree on the selection of a mediator within 5 days, the bill would provide that either party may request the appointment of a mediator, as specified. By requiring a higher level of service by a local public agency, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Heard on 4/24/13 AB 574 Author: Lowenthal Title: Sustainable Communities Strategies Position: Support Location: Committee on Appropriations Summary: Would require the State Air Resources Board, in consultation with the California Transportation Commission and the Strategic Growth Council, to establish standards for the use of monies allocated from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund for sustainable communities projects, as specified. The bill would require the state board, in consultation with the California Transportation Commission and the Strategic Growth Council, to establish the criteria for the development and implementation of regional grant programs, as specified. Heard on 4/30/13 AB 667 Author: Hernandez Title: Land Use: Development Project Review: Superstores Position: Oppose Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: Would require a city, county, or city and county, including a charter city, prior to approving or disapproving a proposed development project that would permit the construction of a superstore retailer, as defined, to cause an economic impact report to be prepared, as specified, to be paid for by the project applicant, and that includes specified assessments and projections, including, among other things, an assessment of the effect that the proposed superstore will have on specified designated economic assistance areas, as defined, and an assessment of the effect that the proposed superstore will have on retail operations and employment in the same market area. The bill would also require the governing body to provide an opportunity for public comment on the economic impact report. By increasing the duties of local public officials, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program. The bill would additionally find and declare that these provisions are an issue of statewide concern and not a municipal affair. Hearing scheduled for 5/1/2013 AB 1235 Author: Gordon Title: Local Agencies: Financial Hardship Training Position: Oppose Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: Would require that if a local agency provides any type of compensation, salary, or stipend to, or reimburses the expenses of, a member of the legislative body, all local agency officials, except a member whose term of office ends before January 1, 2015, in local agency service as of January 1, 2014, or thereafter receive training in financial management, as specified. This bill would provide that if any entity develops criteria for the financial management training, then the Treasurer's office and the Controller's office shall be consulted regarding any proposed course content. Because this bill would impose new duties on local governments, it would impose a state-mandated local program. Hearing scheduled on 5/1/13 AB 1357 Author: Hernandez Title: Emergency Departments: Diversion of Patients. Position: Support (On League of Cities 'Watch"List) Location: Committee on Health Summary: Existing law establishes the State Department of Public Health and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, the licensing and regulations of health facilities, including, but not limited to, health facilities operating emergency departments. This bill would require emergency room funds in the County of Los Angeles that were approved by voter initiative, which are collected from properties within the San Gabriel Valley, to remain in that geographic region of the county. Hearing scheduled for 4/30/13 SB 56 Author: Roth Title: Local Government Finance: Vehicle License Fee Adjustments Position: Support Location: Committee on Governance & Finance Summary: Would, for the 2013-14 fiscal year, provide for a new vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as specified. This bill would also, for the 2013-14 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, provide for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount for certain cities incorporating after a specified date, as provided. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. Hearing scheduled for 8/3/13 SB 64 Author: Corbet Title: Proposition 39 Implementation Position: Support Location: Committee on Appropriations Summary: Would require the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to develop and administer programs, consistent with the California Clean Energy Jobs Act, to provide financial assistance to school districts, cities, and counties to install energy efficiency or clean energy technology in public schools and municipal facilities. The bill would appropriate for the 2013-14 fiscal year an unspecified sum from the Clean Energy Job Creation Fund to the commission for the above purpose, thereby making an appropriation. Scheduled for a hearing on 5/6/2013 Previously Approved Legislative Positions BILL DESCRIPTION AB 20 Author: Waldron Title: Obscene Matter : Minors Position: Support Location: Committee on Public Service Summary: Would provide that every person who is convicted of a violation of specified offenses relating to obscene matter involving minors, as specified, in which the violation is committed on, or via, a government-owned computer or via a government-owned computer network, or in which the production, transportation, or distribution of which involves the use, possession, or control of government-owned property shall, in addition to any imprisonment of fine imposed for the commission of the underlying offense, be punished by a fine not exceeding $2,000, unless the court determines that the defendant does not have the ability to pay. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. AB 22 Author: Blumenfield Title: Sidewalks: Repairs Position: Oppose Location: Assembly Local Government Summary: Would prohibit a city, county, or city and county that has an ordinance in operation that requires the city, county, or city and county to repair or reconstruct streets, sidewalks, or driveways that have been damaged as a result of tree growth from repealing the ordinance without the concurrence of the local electorate by majority vote. The bill would also declare that this is a matter of statewide concern. AB 265 Author: Gatto Title: Local Government Liability: Dog Parks Position: Support [Amended Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: Would provide that a city, county, city and county , or special district that owns or operates a dog park shall not be held liable for any injury or death suffered by any person or pet resulting solely from the actions of a dog in the dog park. With the current language the municipality is 'solely' protected from actions of the dog and not that of the negligent or intentional acts of the owner, 'including but not limited to' is the preferred language. AB 416 Author: Gordon Title: State Air Resourced Board: Local Emission Reduction Program Position: Support Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: Would create the Local Emission Reduction Program and would require money to be available from the General Fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of providing grants and other financial assistance to develop and implement greenhouse gas emissions reduction projects in the state. The bill would require the State Air Resources Board, in coordination with the Strategic Growth Council, to administer the program, as specified. The bill would require the implementation of the program to be contingent on the appropriation of moneys by the Legislature, as specified. AB 564 Author: Mullin Title: Community Redevelopment: Successor Agencies Position: Support Location: Committee on Local Government Summary: Current law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, make payments due for enforceable obligations, as defined, perform obligations required pursuant to any enforceable obligation, dispose of all assets of the former redevelopment agency, and to remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing entities. This bill would prohibit the Department of Finance from taking any future action to modify the enforceable obligations described above following the effective date of the approval of those enforceable obligations after review by the oversight board and the department. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. AB 639 Author: Perez Title: Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Act of 2014 Position: Support in Concept Location: Committee on Housing & Community Development and Veterans Affairs Summary: Would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $600,000,000, as specified, for expenditure by the Department of Housing and Community Development for purposes of the construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of multifamily housing for veterans, in collaboration with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The bill would authorize the Legislature to amend the provisions of this act, by majority vote, under specified criteria. The bill would impose a specified reporting requirement on the California Housing Finance Agency. This bill contains other related provisions. AB 683 Author: Mullin Title: Local Government: Fines and Penalties: Assessments Position: Support Location: Third Reading in Assembly Summary: Would, until January 1, 2020, authorize a city, county, or city and county to, after notice and public hearing, specially assess any fines or penalties not paid after demand by the city, county, or city and county against real property owned by the person owing those fines or penalties where the fines or penalties are related to ordinance violations on the real property upon which the fines or penalties would be specially assessed, and the ordinance violations constitute a threat to public health and safety. This bill contains other related provisions. AB 792 Author: Mullin Title: Local Government: Open Meetings Position: Support Location: Third Reading in Assembly Summary: The Ralph M. Brown Act requires the legislative body of a local agency to post, at least 72 hours before the meeting, an agenda containing a brief general description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at a regular meeting, in a location that is freely accessible to members of the public, and to provide a notice containing similar information with respect to a special meeting at least 24 hours prior to the special meeting. This bill, if the local agency is unable to post the agenda or notice on its Internet Web site because of software or hardware, or network services impairment beyond the local agency's reasonable control, would require the local agency to post the agenda or notice immediately upon resolution of the technological problems. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. AB 810 Author: Muratsuchi Title: Law Enforcement: Data Sharing Position: Support Location: Committee on Public Safety Summary: Would require the Attorney General to examine the feasibility of an inter- county criminal offender database that would be accessible to local law enforcement agencies, including municipal police departments, for the purpose of facilitating and enhancing local law enforcement operations by ensuring readily available information on criminal offenders. The bill would require the Attorney General to consult with specified entities. The bill would require the Attorney General to report its findings by July 1, 2014, as provided. AB 981 Author: Bloom Title: Redevelopment Dissolution Position: Support Location: Committee on Local Government and Housing & Community Development Summary: Current law provides for the transfer of housing assets and functions previously performed by a dissolved redevelopment agency to one of several specified public entities. This bill would authorize that entity to designate the use of, and commit, indebtedness obligation proceeds that were issued prior to June 28, 2011. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. AB 1080 Author: Alejo Title: Community Revitalization and Investment Authorities Position: Support Location: Committee on Housing & Community Development Summary: Would authorize certain public entities of a community revitalization and investment area, as described, to form a community revitalization plan within a community revitalization and investment authority (authority) to carry out the Community Redevelopment Law in a specified manner. The bill would require the authority to adopt a community revitalization plan for a community revitalization and investment area and authorize the authority to include in that plan a provision for the receipt of tax increment funds. This bill contains other existing laws. AB 1229 Author: Atkins Title: Land Use: Zoning Regulations Position: Support Location: Committee on Local Government and Housing & Community Development Summary: The Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of any city or county to adopt ordinances regulating zoning within its jurisdiction, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize the legislative body of any city or county to adopt ordinances to establish, as a condition of development, inclusionary housing requirements, as specified, and would declare the intent of the Legislature in adding this provision. The bill would also make a technical, non-substantive change. SB 33 Author: Wolk Title: Infrastructure Financing Districts: Voter Approval: Repeal Position: Support Location: Second Senate Reading Summary: Would revise and recast the provisions governing infrastructure financing districts. The bill would eliminate the requirement of voter approval for creation of the district and for bond issuance, and would authorize the legislative body to create the district subject to specified procedures. The bill would instead authorize a newly created public financing authority, consisting of 5 members, 3 of whom are members of the city council or board of supervisors that established the district, and 2 of whom are members of the public, to adopt the infrastructure financing plan, subject to approval by the legislative body, and issue bonds by majority vote of the authority by resolution. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. SB 470 Author: Roth Title: Local Government Finance: Vehicle License Fee Adjustments Position: Support Location: Committee on Governance and Finance Summary: Would state the intent of the Legislature to promote economic development on a local level so that communities can enact local strategies to increase jobs, create economic opportunity, and generate tax revenue for all levels of government. The bill would define economic opportunity and declare that it is the policy of the state to protect and promote the sound development of economic opportunity in cities and counties, and the general welfare of the inhabitants of those communities through the employment of all appropriate means. This bill contains other related provisions. SB 684 Author: Wright Title: Community Development: Economic Opportunity Position: Support in Concept Location: Second Senate Reading Summary: Would provide that an advertising display advertising businesses and activities within the boundary limits of, and as a part of, an individual redevelopment agency project, as the project boundaries existed on December 29, 2011, may continue to exist and be considered an on-premises display, for a period not to exceed 10 years or the expiration of the redevelopment project area if the advertising display meets specified criteria . This bill would authorize the designated agency to request from the department an extension, as specified, and would provide that the 10-year period for an existing display shall commence on January 1, 2013. By imposing new conditions on a redevelopment project advertising display to remain lawfully erected, a violation of which would constitute a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws.