HomeMy WebLinkAboutD-3 Staff Report - Reso to Consolidate Elections and Change Elected Mayor to Appointed OfficeSCHEDULED ITEM
D-3
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
VIA: SERGIO GONZALEZ, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCO A. MARTINEZ, CITY ATTORNEY
JEFFREY CORNEJO, CITY CLERK
ADRIAN GARCIA, CHIEF DEPUTY CITY CLERK
DATE: JULY 20, 2020
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED
VOTERS OF THE CITY OF AZUSA A MEASURE THAT WOULD CHANGE
THE OFFICE OF MAYOR FROM AN ELECTED OFFICE TO AN APPOINTED
OFFICE AT A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED
WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
NOVEMBER 3, 2020; AND SETTING RULES AND DEADLINES FOR THE
ELECTION
BACKGROUND:
At the May 18, 2020 City Council meeting, the City Council directed the City Attorney and staff
to prepare necessary resolution(s) calling a special election to be held on the consolidated
statewide election on November 3, 2020 to submit a measure that would change the City’s
governance from an elective mayor to a mayor selected from the members of City Council on a
rotational basis (“Proposed Measure”).
The attached resolution would:
1. Call an election for the submittal to Azusa voters and ordinance to change the office of
elective mayor to a rotational mayor;
2. Request that the election be consolidated with next Statewide election on November 3, 2020;
and
3. Set rules for arguments/rebuttals regarding the Proposed Measure.
ITEM NOT APPROVED
CITY COUNCIL
7/20/2020
Submittal to Azusa Voters and Ordinance to Change the Office of elective Mayor
July 20, 2020
Page 2
DISCUSSION
The City of Azusa (“City”) is governed by an elective mayor and a City Council consisting of
four elective councilmembers. The mayor is a member of City Council and serves a two-year
term as mayor from the Tuesday succeeding his or her election, until his or her successor is
elected and qualified. A councilmember who is not acting as mayor serves a four-year term from
the Tuesday succeeding his or her election, until his or her successor is elected and qualified.
This composition is codified in Azusa Municipal Code Sections 2-26 through 2-28 (Attached).
Prior to December 16, 1974, there was no elective office of mayor. Instead, the members of the
Azusa City Council would select one of its members to act as mayor. However, in April of
1974, the City Council placed a ballot measure on the November 1974 ballot asking the voters to
change the City’s governance structure to include a directly-elected mayor and determine the
appropriate term of office. That proposition was passed by Azusa voters 4,128 votes to 1,026
votes.1 That governance structure exists today.
California Law
State law allows general law cities like Azusa, by ballot measure, to eliminate the elective office
of mayor and reestablish its prior form of governance whereby a member of City Council is
chosen by the other Councilmembers to act as mayor for a specified term. California
Government Code, Section 34902, in relevant part, provides:
(b) After an office of elective mayor has been established, the city
council may subsequently submit to the electors the question of
whether or not to eliminate the elective office of mayor, pursuant
to the procedures enumerated in this article, and thereby
reestablish the procedure of selection of the mayor by the city
council. If a majority of the votes cast on the proposition are in
favor of the elimination of the office of elective mayor, the office
shall be eliminated on the expiration date of the incumbent's term,
and on the date the procedure of selection of the mayor by the city
council shall be reestablished. (Gov. Code § 34902(b).)
Thus, such a change in governance requires a vote of the people before it becomes effective.
While the City Council may call a special election to submit such a proposition to the voters on a
date where no statewide election is occurring, a less costly alternative would be to combine the
proposition at an election in which Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters is already providing
election services county-wide. The next such statewide general election will be held on
November 3, 2020.
In order to place the Proposed Measure on the November 3, 2020 statewide general election
ballot, the City Council must adopt a resolution that does the following:
(1) Calls for a special election to be held on November 3, 2020 for purposes of
submitting the Proposed Measure and related ordinance to the electors;
1 A two year term of office for the mayor was also approved by the voters 3,603 to 1,248.
Submittal to Azusa Voters and Ordinance to Change the Office of elective Mayor
July 20, 2020
Page 3
(2) Requests the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (“County”) to consolidate
the November 3, 2020 statewide general election with the City’s special election;
(3) Sets the deadlines to submit an impartial analysis of the Proposed Measure,
arguments for and against the Proposed Measure, and rebuttals to those
arguments; and
(4) Requests the County Clerk to prepare the City’s election materials. The adopted
resolution (and applicable ordinance) must be filed with the County no later than
August 7, 2020.
The proposed resolution under consideration today (“Resolution”) satisfies these requirements.
Unless other arrangements satisfactory to the County have been made, the City must reimburse
the County in full for the election services performed for the City.
Ordinance Adopted if Measure Succeeds
If the Proposed Measure receives a majority of votes, the Ordinance, attached as Exhibit A to the
Resolution, will be adopted. The Ordinance amends the Azusa Municipal Code by changing the
office of mayor from an elected office to an office that is selected by City Council from its
members on a rotational basis. This new system of governance will not start until after the
March 8, 2022 General Municipal Election, and the mayor shall be selected annually from
among the city councilmembers.
The details of how the rotational system will work do not need to be formalized in a resolution,
however many cities do have formal (by resolution) procedures for the selection of mayor on a
rotational basis. As an example, the City of Azusa maintains formal selection procedures for the
position of Mayor Pro Tem (attached). These can similarly be adapted to the office of mayor.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council review the proposed Resolution No. 2020-C41 and related
Ordinance to place a measure on the November 3, 2020 statewide general election ballot that
would change the elected office of mayor to an office selected by City Council from its members
annually and determine whether it should be placed on the November 3, 2020 statewide election
ballot.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The exact fiscal impact is currently unknown. However, the City will be required to reimburse
the County for services performed on the City’s behalf to conduct the election on the City’s
Proposed Measure. At the time of this writing, the County had not provided a specific cost to the
City regarding such election. However, it is anticipated to cost $80,000 to $100,000.
Submittal to Azusa Voters and Ordinance to Change the Office of elective Mayor
July 20, 2020
Page 4
Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved:
Marco A. Martinez Jeffrey Lawrence Cornejo, Jr.
City Attorney City Clerk
Fiscal Impact Review Reviewed and Approved:
Talika M. Johnson Sergio Gonzalez
Director of Administrative Services City Manager
Attachments:
1)Sample Los Angeles County Election Timeline
2)AMC 2-26 to 2-28
3)Selection Mayor Pro-Tem
4) Proposed Resolution No. 2020-C41 with Exhibit A (Ordinance)
SAMPLE TIMELINE
In accordance with the above-mentioned procedures and additional state requirements,
below is a sample timeline for placement of the Proposed Measure on the November 3,
2020 statewide general election ballot.
•June 15 (M) through July 20 (M) (Suggested) – City Council adopts a
resolution/ordinance that does all of the following (“Resolution”):
o Calls for a special election to be held on November 3, 2020 for purposes of
submitting the Proposed Measure and its enacting ordinance
(“Ordinance”) to the voters;
o Provides the exact form of the Proposed Measure to appear on the ballot
and attaches the Ordinance as an exhibit to the Resolution;
o Orders and requests that the special election on the Proposed Measure be
consolidated with the statewide general election to be held on November
3, 2020;
o Acknowledges that the consolidated election will be held and conducted
in the manner prescribed in Elections Code Section 10418;
o Requests that the Board of Supervisors permit the Registrar-
Recorder/County Clerk to render specified elections services for the City,
including preparation of the City’s election materials;
o Directs the City Clerk to set dates for arguments, rebuttals, and analysis;
and
o Authorizes the City Council (or certain Councilmembers) to file an
argument regarding the Proposed Measure (Elec. Code § 9282) (optional).
•August 6 (Th) – Last day for City Clerk to publish in a newspaper of general
circulation in the City (1) a synopsis of the Proposed Measure and (2) the County
deadlines for submission of impartial analysis, arguments, rebuttals, and the 10-
day public examination periods (Elec. Code §§ 10418, 9163; Gov. Code § 6061)
•August 7 (F) – Last day for City Clerk to file adopted Resolution/Ordinance with
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk requesting the consolidation, ballot measure
placement, services, etc. (Elec. Code §§ 10401 and 10403.)
•August 14 (F) – Last day for City Attorney to submit impartial analysis to the
Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (Elec. Code §§ 10418, 9160, 9280.)
•August 14 (F) – Last day to submit arguments for or against Proposed Measure
to the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (Elec. Code §§ 10418, 9162, 9282.)
•Aug. 15 (Sa)1 to Aug. 24 (M) – Public examination period for ballot measure
materials (Elec. Code §§ 10418, 9190, 9295(a).)
•August 24 (M) – Last day to file rebuttals with Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk
(Elec. Code §§ 10418, 9167, 9285(a)(4).)
1 County Clerk’s office will be closed August 15 and 22 (Saturdays) and August 16 and 23 (Sundays).
Attachment 1
• Aug. 25 (T) – Sept 3 (Th) – Public examination period for rebuttals (Elec. Code
§§ 10418, 9190, 9295(a).)
• September 3 (Th) – Last day for City Clerk to supply Registrar-
Recorder/County Clerk with a list of City’s precincts, or consolidated precincts,
as applicable, if City has requested County Clerk to render specified elections
services in the consolidated election (Elec. Code § 10002.)
• November 3 (T) – Election Day
(a)
(b)
Sec. 2-26. - Composition; election.
The city council shall consist of the mayor and four city councilmembers, all of
whom shall be elected at the time and in the manner provided by law.
The successors of all initial officers will be elected by the city electors at a general
municipal election.
(Code 1971, § 2.04.001)
Sec. 2-27. - Mayor's term.
The mayor shall hold office for two years from the Tuesday succeeding his election and until
his successor is elected and qualifies.
(Code 1971, § 2.04.002)
Sec. 2-28. - Councilmembers' terms.
Each city councilmember shall hold office for four years from the Tuesday succeeding his
election and until his successor is elected and qualifies.
(Code 1971, § 2.03.003)
Page 1 of 1Azusa, CA Code of Ordinances
5/14/2020about:blank
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION NO. 1 O-C20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NO. 97-C51
CONCERNING THE SELECTION CRITERIA AND TERM OF THE MAYOR
PROTEM.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Azusa as follows:
SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Azusa hereby amends Resolution No. 97 -C51 in its entirety
and adopts the following mayor pro tem selection criteria and te1m of office.
(1) Intent. Tbe primary intent of this Resolution is to ensure that the city's mayor protem is selected on
objective criteria. Criteria such as seniority and public support as expressed in the number of votes
received in an election are to be used as the basis for selecting the mayor pro tern. It is the
Council's intent to ensure that each council member serving on the Council receives the
opportunity to serve as mayor pro tern at least once during his or her four-year term as a council
member.
(2) Selection Criteria. Annually, at the City Council meeting on the third Monday in March, the mayor
pro tem shall be that council member with the greatest seniority, which has not previously served as
mayor pro tem. However, if such council member does not accept the nomination for mayor pro
tem, then the next most senior council member, which has not yet served as mayor pro tem, shall be
offered the position of mayor pro tern. However, if two or more councilmembers qualify for the
position of mayor pro tern by virtue of having equal seniority, then that council member who
received the highest number of votes in the March general City election shall be the mayor pro rem.
(3) Selection Criteria in the Event All Have Served. If all council members have previously sep1ed as
mayor pro tern, then the mayor pro tem shall be that councilmember with the greatest senh:mty. If
such councilmember does not accept the nomination for mayor pro tem, then the next most senior
councilmember shall be offered the position of mayor pro tern. However, if two or more council
members qualify for the position of mayor pro tem by virtue of having equal seniority, then that
council member who received the highest number of votes in the March general City election shall
be the mayor pro tem.
(4) Term. Mayors pro tern shall serve from March until March of each year succeeding year. A new
successor shall be selected on the third Monday in March in even numbered years and at the
reorganization meeting in March in odd numbered years. Notwithstanding this section, the mayor
pro tem shall continue to serve until his or her successor takes office.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nct day of March, 2010.
ORANGE\MMART!NEZ\66404.1
Attachment 3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Azusa at a special meeting thereof, held on the 2211d day of March, 2010, by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: GONZALES, CARRILLO, MACIAS, HANKS, ROCHA
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
VERA MENDOZA ~
CITY CLERK
ORANGE\MMARTJNEZ\66404.1
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-C41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA,
SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
A MEASURE DELETING SECTION 2-27 AND AMENDING SECTION 2-
26 OF DIVISION 1 (GENERALLY) OF ARTICLE II (CITY COUNCIL)
OF CHAPTER 2 (ADMINISTRATION) OF THE AZUSA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO CHANGE THE OFFICE OF MAYOR FROM AN ELECTED
OFFICE TO AN APPOINTED OFFICE, AT A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE STATEWIDE
GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2020; AND
SETTING RULES AND DEADLINES FOR THE SUBMITTAL OF
ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST THE MEASURE
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 34902(a), the office of
Mayor is currently an elected office in the City of Azusa (“City”); and
WHEREAS, the office of Mayor stands for election every two years, the last election for
this office being March 3, 2020 and the current term for this office expiring in March, 2022; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 34902(b) provides that:
“After an office of elective mayor has been established, the city council may
subsequently submit to the electors the question of whether or not to eliminate the
elective office of mayor, pursuant to the procedures enumerated in this article,
and thereby reestablish the procedure of selection of the mayor by the city
council. If a majority of the votes cast on the proposition are in favor of the
elimination of the office of elective mayor, the office shall be eliminated on the
expiration date of the incumbent's term, and on the date the procedure of
selection of the mayor by the city council shall be reestablished.”
WHEREAS, California Elections Code section 9222 authorizes the City Council to
submit local measures to the voters; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 34902 authorizes the City Council to
submit to voters the question of whether the elective office of Mayor should be eliminated and
replaced with a City Council-appointed office; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to submit to Azusa voters a measure that would
change the office of Mayor from an elective office to a City Council-appointed office; and
WHEREAS, the question of changing from an elective to an appointed Mayor has not
been submitted to Azusa voters within the last 11 months; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to consolidate the special municipal election for
the ballot measure described herein with the Statewide General Election to be held on November
3, 2020; and
Attachment 4
City of Azusa
Resolution No. 2020-___
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council further desires to set rules and deadlines for the submittal
of written arguments and rebuttals for and against the measure; and
WHEREAS, the specific terms of the measure are provided for in the ordinance to be
considered by the qualified voters, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (the “Ordinance” or
“Measure”) and by this reference made an operative part hereof, and in accordance with all
applicable laws.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City hereby finds and determines that
the foregoing recitals are true and correct, are incorporated herein and by this reference made an
operative part hereof.
SECTION 2. Submission of Ballot Ordinance/Measure. The City Council of the
City, pursuant to its right and authority as contained in California Elections Code sections 9222,
10201, and 10400 et seq. and Government Code section 34902, hereby orders the
Ordinance/Measure attached hereto as Exhibit “A” to be submitted to the qualified voters of the
City at the Special Municipal Election to be held and consolidated with the Statewide General
Election on November 3, 2020. The proposed Ordinance shall be in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit “A” to this Resolution and is incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 3. Ballot Question. The City Council, pursuant to its right and authority
under California Elections Code sections 10400 et seq. and Government Code section 34902,
does hereby order that the ballot question shall be presented and printed upon the ballot
submitted to the qualified voters in the manner and form set forth in this Section 3. On the ballot
to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election to be held at the Special Municipal election
to be consolidated with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, in
addition to any other matters required by law, there shall be printed substantially the following
question:
“Starting March 8, 2022, shall the office of Mayor no longer
be elected, but instead selected by the City Council from its
members on a rotational basis?”
YES
NO
SECTION 4. Election Procedures/Request for Consolidation.
A. The City Council consents to the consolidation of the election on this Measure with
all other elections being held in the same territory on November 3, 2020, and to hold
and conduct the consolidated election in the manner prescribed in Elections Code
Section 10418.
City of Azusa
Resolution No. 2020-___
Page 3
B. The ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content as required by
law.
C. In accordance with Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of
Los Angeles County is hereby requested to consent to consolidation of the election on
this Measure with the Statewide General Election and all other elections being held in
the same territory on November 3, 2020, and to having the Registrar of Voters render
such election services to the City of Azusa as may be requested by the City Clerk of
said City, the County of Los Angeles to be reimbursed in full for such services as are
performed.
D. The election services which the City of Azusa requests the Registrar of Voters, or
such other official as may be appropriate, to perform and which such officer is hereby
authorized and directed to perform, if said Board of Supervisors consents, include: the
preparation, printing and mailing of sample ballots and guides; the establishment or
appointment of precincts, voting centers, and election officers, and making such
publications as are required by law in connection therewith; the furnishing of ballots,
voting booths and other necessary supplies or materials for voting centers; the
canvassing of the returns of the election and the furnishing of the results of such
canvassing to the City Clerk of the City of Azusa; and the performance of such other
election services as may be requested by the City Clerk.
E. The City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and
all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and
paraphernalia, or cause such actions to be made, that may be necessary in order to
properly and lawfully conduct the election.
F. That the precincts, ballot drop box locations and hours of operations, vote center
locations and hours of operations, vote-by-mail procedures and timing, and election
officers, and all other persons and procedures for the Special Municipal Election shall
be the same as those utilized by the County of Los Angeles; and
G. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and
conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in the City.
H. Notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is
authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election,
in time, form, and manner as required by law.
I. All ballots shall be tallied at a central counting place and not at the precincts. Said
central counting place shall be at a County center as designated by the Registrar of
Voters.
J. The Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized to canvass the
returns of said election.
K. The City Clerk of the City of Azusa shall receive the canvass as it pertains to the
City of Azusa
Resolution No. 2020-___
Page 4
election on the measure, and shall certify the results to the City Council, as required
by law.
SECTION 5. Arguments and Analysis.
A. The City Council authorizes (i) the City Council or any member(s) of the City
Council, (ii) any individual voter eligible to vote on the above measure, (iii) a bona
fide association of such citizens or (iv) any combination of voters and associations, to
file a written argument in favor of or against the City measure, in accordance with
Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections Code of the State of California and
may change the argument until and including August 14, 2020, after which no
arguments for or against the measure may be submitted to the City Clerk. Arguments
in favor of or against the measure shall each not exceed 300 words in length. Each
argument shall be filed with the City Clerk, signed, and include the printed name(s)
and signature(s) of the author(s) submitting it, or if submitted on behalf of an
organization, the name of the organization, and the printed name and signature of at
least one of its principal officers who is the author of the argument.
B. The City Clerk shall comply with all provisions of law establishing priority of
arguments for printing and distribution to the voters, and shall take all necessary
actions to cause the selected arguments to be printed and distributed to the voters.
C. Pursuant to Section 9280 of the Elections Code, the City Council directs the City
Clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall
prepare an impartial analysis of the measure, not to exceed 500 words in length,
showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the
measure. The City Attorney shall transmit such impartial analysis to the City Clerk,
who shall cause the analysis to be published in the ballot pamphlet along with the
ballot measure as provided by law. The Impartial Analysis shall be filed by the
deadline set for filing of primary arguments as set forth in subsection (A) above. The
impartial analysis shall include a statement indicating whether the measure was
placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the requisite number of voters of by the
City Council. In the event the entire text of the measure is not printed on the ballot,
nor in the voter information portion of the sample ballot, there shall be printed
immediately below the impartial analysis, in no less than 10-font bold type, the
following: “The above statement is an impartial analysis of Ordinance or
Measure ____. If you desire a copy of the ordinance or measure, please call the
election official’s office at (insert phone number) and a copy will be mailed at no
cost to you.”
SECTION 6. Rebuttals.
A. That pursuant to Section 9285 of the Elections Code of the State of California, when
the Clerk has selected the arguments for and against the various City initiated
measures which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the Clerk shall send
copies of the argument in favor of the measures to the authors of the argument
against, and copies of the argument against to the authors of the argument in favor.
City of Azusa
Resolution No. 2020-___
Page 5
The authors or persons designated by them may prepare and submit rebuttal
arguments not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the
City Clerk not later than August 24, 2020. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the
same manner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately
follow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
B. That all previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for City
measures are repealed.
C. That the provisions herein shall apply only to the election to be held on November 3,
2020, and shall then be repealed.
SECTION 7. Placement on the Ballot. The full text of the Ballot Ordinance shall be
printed in the voter information guide, and a statement shall be printed in the ballot pursuant to
Section 9223 of the Elections Code advising voters that they may obtain a copy of this
ordinance, the Ballot Ordinance and/or ballot measure, at no cost, upon request made to the City
Clerk.
SECTION 8. Delivery of Resolution to County. The City Clerk shall certify to the
passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. The
City Council directs the City Clerk to deliver copies of this Resolution, including the Ballot
Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Los
Angeles County and to the Registrar of Voters of Los Angeles County not later than 88 days
prior to the Special Municipal Election.
SECTION 9. CEQA. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the ballot
measure relates to organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result
in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore is not a project within the
meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the State CEQA
Guidelines, section 15378(b)(5).
SECTION 10. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other
provisions or applications of the Resolution which can be given effect without the invalid
provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. The City
Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution irrespective of the invalidity
of any particular portion thereof.
SECTION 11. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Azusa,
California, at a regular meeting held on this 15th day of June, 2020.
___________________________________
City of Azusa
Resolution No. 2020-___
Page 6
Robert Gonzales
MAYOR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted at a regular
meeting of said City Council on the 15th day of June 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NAYS: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ _________________________________
Jeffrey Lawrence Cornejo, Jr. Marco A. Martinez
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
City of Azusa
Resolution No. 2020-___
Page 7
EXHIBIT “A”
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF AZUSA,
CALIFORNIA, DELETING SECTION 2-27 AND AMENDING SECTION
2-26 OF DIVISION 1 (GENERALLY) OF ARTICLE II (CITY COUNCIL)
OF CHAPTER 2 (ADMINISTRATION) OF THE AZUSA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO CHANGE THE OFFICE OF MAYOR FROM AN ELECTED
OFFICE TO AN APPOINTED OFFICE.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF AZUSA DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Subject to the approval of a majority of the voters of the City of Azusa at
the scheduled election so designated by the City Council in a separate resolution placing this
proposal on the ballot for such election, section 2-27 is hereby deleted from Division 1 of Article
II of Chapter 2 of the Azusa Municipal Code and marked “Reserved” and section 2-26 of
Division 1 of Article II of Chapter 2 of the Azusa Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
“Sec. 2-26. – Composition; Election.
(a) Until the March 8, 2022 General Municipal Election, the city council shall consist
of the mayor and four city councilmembers, all of whom shall be elected at the time and
in the manner provided by law. Commencing with the March 8, 2022 General Municipal
Election, the Office of Mayor in the City of Azusa shall cease to be an elective office and
shall become an appointive office, and a City Council of five members shall annually
choose one of its number to act as Mayor, through those rules and procedures it may
prescribe by ordinance or resolution.
(b) The successors of all initial officers will be elected by the city electors at a
general municipal election.
”Sec. 2-27. – Reserved.”
SECTION 2. If any portion of this Ordinance is declared invalid by a court of law or
other legal body with applicable authority, the invalidity shall not affect or prohibit the force and
effect of any other provision or application of the Ordinance that is not deemed invalid. The
voters of the City hereby declare that they would have circulated for qualification and/or voted
for the adoption of this section, and each portion thereof, regardless of the fact that any portion
of the initiative may be subsequently deemed invalid.
SECTION 3. To the fullest extent allowed by law, the provisions of this Ordinance
shall prevail over, and supersede, all other provisions of the Municipal Code and any ordinances,
resolutions or administrative policies of the City of Azusa which are in conflict with any
provision of this Ordinance.
City of Azusa
Resolution No. 2020-___
Page 8
SECTION 4. This section shall not be repealed or amended except by a measure
approved by a majority of the electors voting on the issue at a General Municipal Election, or at
a special election called for that purpose.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall take effect only if approved by a majority of the
eligible voters of the City of Azusa voting at a Special Municipal election to be held on
November 3, 2020, and shall take effect ten (10) days after the City Council has certified the
results of the Special Municipal election by resolution.
SECTION 6. The Mayor is hereby authorized to attest to the adoption of this Ordinance
by the People voting thereon on November 3, 2020, by signing where indicated below.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was p assed, approved and adopted by the
People of the City of Azusa on the 3rd day of November, 2020.
Dated: _______________________ ______________________________
ROBERT GONZALEZ
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________
JEFFREY LAWRENCE CORNEJO. JR. MARCO A. MARTINEZ
CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY