HomeMy WebLinkAboutA- 6 Minutes of January 23, 2003 City
CITY OF AZUSA
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING
THURSDAY, JANUARY 23, 2003 - 8:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Azusa met in Adjourned Regular session, at the above date and time in the
Azusa Auditorium located at 213 East Foothill Boulevard, Azusa, California.
Mayor Madrid called the meeting to order.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HARDISON, STANFORD, ROCHA, CHAGNON, MADRID
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ALSO PRESENT:
City Attorney Martinez, City Manager Cole, Community Development Director Bruckner, Project Manager
Jenny Suvari, City Clerk Mendoza, Deputy City Clerk Toscano. Azusa Unified School District
Superintendent Gaeta and Azusa School Board Members: Garcia, Torres, Ochoa, Harrington, and
Gonzales.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Mr. Phil Doudar addressed Council expressing his support of the Monrovia Nursery Project. He noted his
objection to what is being proposed for Sierra Madre Boulevard.
Monrovia Nursery School Site and Park Concept.
City Manager Cole addressed the issue stating that the reason for the meeting is that the City Council
wanted to be assured that the concerns of education and future inclusion of school issues have been
discussed with the Azusa School Board. He stated that the K-8th School that is being proposed in the
Monrovia Nursery project is on a 14 ½ acre site, it will be a nine acre school site, separate middle school
and K-5 component as well as a kindergarten component. He advised that a joint use 5.5 acre park of
which 3.5 which will be owned by the School District and 2 acres will be owned by the City will also be
included. He noted that the School District have concerns that in the future if it is necessary to put an
additional facility in their 3.5 acre park, that they need to reserve the right to do that. He stated that the
City had concern regarding that because they need to have the 5.5 acre joint use park, which is critical to
the park plan and the promenade district. The applicant offered to work out an arrangement that if the
School District needed to expand on the 3.5 acre site, it would be replaced by the adjacent 5 acre
Vosburg House site which the Nursery is retaining title to. He noted that the basic elements of the
existing former MOU have been retained and that the details of a design build agreement and formal
negotiations are still being worked on.
Dr. Rod Gaeta addressed the issue expressing his appreciation for the efforts that have made with the
ongoing negotiations of the MOU and the communication between the City as well as the School Board.
Mr. Cliff Schuster, Attorney for the AUSD, addressed the issue with clarifications regarding a bullet point
in the staff report with regard to the “Design/Build Agreement”, stating that it means: the School
District Design it and it’s turned over the builder to build it. Further that the discussion of High School
mitigation, has not been entered into yet, but will be part of the MOU. He then answered questions
posed by Mayor Madrid regarding the old MOU, the school size, who will attend, and formula for density.
City Manager Cole responded to question regarding formula.
Question/Answer Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Also Present
Pub Part
P. Doudar
Comments
Mon Nur
School site
R. Cole
Comments
R. Gaeta
Super-
intendent
C. Schuster
Attny AUSD
Councilmember Stanford asked that due to the reduction in density, will the value of the land also
reduce? City Manager Cole responded, yes.
Councilmember Chagnon asked questions regarding the following: Maintenance of school, impacts on
Dalton enrollment, number of units needed to supplement the school, how to control use of the field,
Dalton School egress and ingress at 10th street, and clarification on the Vosburg House.
Councilmember Rocha expressed his concern regarding the use of parks by residents outside the City.
He requested options regarding parking, fencing, staff parking structure, and proximity of park to school.
Superintendent Gaeta responded stating that he has no answers regarding maintenance at this time. He
stated that discussion have been held regarding possible attractive security fence but, the design has not
been done yet. He stated that they have a School of Choice Policy based on seat availability and that no
school would be impacted due to the seat availability.
Lengthy discussion was held between regarding the Dalton School ingress/egress and 10th Street .
Concerns were that if 10th street is to become an in and out street there is a concern in the neighborhood
regarding traffic; it was noted that there needs to put emphasis on these concerns. Councilmember
Rocha stated that the mitigation there is a four way stop at Palm Drive and that he turned in a petition of
52 signatures of residents Old Mill and 10th Street that are against the opening of 10th street. He stated
that Dalton school will be the only school impacted by traffic and that he is in agreement not to make
that an exit and entrance to the new project. Councilmember Chagnon stated that it’s not going to be
a thoroughfare and she wants to see some type of ingress and egress in Dalton school and that if it’s
something that the school is planning to improve at that site with the bond money and it’s already in the
plans, then she would like to see that happen, if not, if it’s not going to happen, then she would like to
ask the land owner for their help in putting in the ingress and egress. She stated that she thinks that by
keeping it closed, this creates more of a circulation problem. Additional discussion was held regarding
Dalton School and the problems with pick up and drop off of children. And further discussion was held
regarding outside groups using the parks and problems that have arisen with regard to trash, human
waste, drinking alcoholic beverages, etc.
Mr. Schuster responded stating that Dalton School is not the only schools that have problems with pick
up and drop off and that their problems are going to be addressed within about 7 years.
City Manager Cole advised that the designers of the plan discussed the current issues and came up with
many possible solutions. He stated that they would study the solutions and make a recommendation for
the best one.
Mr. Gaeta advised that the Civic Center Act advises that they do not have the legal right to say “no” to
outside groups. Discussion was held regarding the issue. Suggestions were made i.e. additional police
presence, or the creation of policies that can address those issues. He answered questions regarding the
ROP Program and that there is not policy regarding naming of the school.
City Manager Cole noted that there is a need to continue to work on items of concern such as the Dalton
Avenue issues, the joint use agreement, the park and school site issues and parking.
Members of the School Board and City Council expressed their pleasure of meeting together to discuss
items of mutual interest and that they are looking forward to working with staff.
Mr. Schuster advised that the schools have specific designs that they are more and more defined and the
Azusa Unified School District will be leading the process.
Moved by Councilmember Chagnon, seconded by Mayor Madrid and unanimously carried to adjourn to
Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 6:30 at the Azusa Auditorium to conduct an adjourned meeting on the
Continued Public Hearing on the Monrovia Nursery Project.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:33 P.M.
________________________________________
CITY CLERK
NEXT RESOLUTION NO. 03-C5. (Council)
Q & A
Session
Stanford
Comments
Chagnon
Comments
Rocha
Comments
Gaeta
Comments
Lengthy
Discussion
Schuster
Response
City Mgr
Response
Gaeta
Response
City Mgr
Comments
AUSD
Members
Schuster
Comment
Adjourn to
1/28/03
01/23/03 PAGE TWO