Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - January 7, 1985 - CC (3)yds CITY OF AZUSA MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 71 1985 - 6:00 P.M. The City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Azusa met in a joint adjourned regular session at the above date and time in the City Hall Conference Room. The Mayor/Chairman called the meeting to order. Call to Order ROLL CALL Roll Call PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS/DIRECTORS: COOK, CAMARENA, MOSES ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS/DIRECTORS: CRUZ,,LATTA Cruz & Latta, absent(excsd) Moved by Councilmember/Director Camarena, seconded by Mayor/ Chairman Moses and unanimously carried by roll call*to excuse Councilmembers/Directors Cruz and Latta from the meeting. ALSO PRESENT City Attorney/General Counsel Thorson, City Administrator/ Executive Director Wood, Assistant to the City Administrator/ Executive Director Fuentes, Consultant Werner, Deputy City Clerk/Deputy Secretary Lara. Moved by Councilman Cook, seconded by Mayor Moses and unanimously carried by roll call * that staff be directed to send a letter of interest to the Azusa Unified School District 'with regard to the purchase of school property on 4th Street, between Soldano and Dalton; further requesting appraisal price as well as terms and conditions of the sale. Moved by Director Cook, seconded by Director Camarena and unanimously carried by roll call * that a 90 day exclusive right to negotiate agreement be approved with Urban Pacific for proposed shopping center on Foothill Blvd., west of Azusa Avenue. Moved by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Camarena and unanimously carried by roll call * that no conflict of interest under California law, nor a violation of the California rules of professional conduct governing attorneys would exist by the City Attorney representing the City in the application of Enercan for the waste -to -energy facility. Bi -lateral agreements for Enercan were discussed and action to be taken at the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency, this date, to allow members of the Agency and General Counsel time to review said documents. Moved by Director Camarena, seconded by Director Cook and unanimously carried by roll call * that no conflict of interest under California law, nor a violation of the California rules 'of professionalconduct governing attorneys would exist by the General Counsel representing the Agency in the application of Enercan for the waste -to -energy facility. The Owner Participation Agreement - Lyle Moritz was deferred to the meeting of January 21, 1985. Moved by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Camarena and unanimously carried by roll call * to approve relocation agreement with Municipal Services, Inc., for those households involved in the senior citizen center project. Ltr of intrst purch of schl propty 90 day, ex- clusive right to neg. agent Urban Pacific No conflict of int. for Cty Atty to rep Cty re: Enercan Bi-lat• agents Enercan to be acted on @ regCRA mtg No conflict of int. for GenCnsl to rep Agncy re: Enercan OPA-L.Moritz dfrd to 1/21 Relocation Agmt - MSI q97 Moved by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Camarena, Admin dec re: and unanimously carried by roll call * that request of Citrus banner hnging College to hang banners across Foothill Blvd., be an acrs Fthill administrative decision and that all subsequent requests of that nature be handled by the City Administrator's Department. It was the consensus of the Agency that it would be beneficial Baste -to for members of the Agency and the Executive Director, with Energy site he possibility of some Planning Commission members, to visit visitation nercan's Waste -to -Energy sites. A total of six members were o authorized. Moved by Councilman Camarena, seconded by Councilman Cook and Adj City Cncl unanimously carried * to adjourn. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL: 6:29 P.M. General Counsel requested a closed session pursuant to Genrl Cnsl Government Code Section 54957 for the purpose of advising advice on the Agency of certain matters of potential litigation within closed sess. the attorney-client privilege, the disclosure of which would be adverse to the interests of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Azusa; further, that pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.9(b) significant exposure to litigation against the Agency exists by the Azusa Unified School District. He further advised that pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.9 he had prepared a letter to the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency advising the grounds for and authorization for said closed session. TIME OF RECESS FOR CLOSED SESSION: 6:30 P.M. Closed seas THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECONVENED AT 7:28 P.M. Reconvened 'oved by Director Camarena, seconded by Director Cook and Adjourn nanimously carried * to adjourn. Agency TIME OF ADJOURNMENT OF THE AGENCY: 7:29 P.M. DEPUTY CITY CLERK XT RESOLUTION NO. 7632 XT ORDINANCE NO. 2252 * Denotes that Councilmembers/Directors Cruz and Latta absent. 01/07/85 PAGE TWO