HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - March 20, 1989 - CCCITY OF AZUSA
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 20, 1989 - 7:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Azusa met in regular session
at the above date and time in the Civic Auditorium.
Mayor Moses called the meeting to order, and led in the Call to Order
salute to the Flag.
INVOCATION was given by Reverend Dale Ausherman of the Invocation
Berean Christian Center.
ROLL CALL Roll Call
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: STEMRICH, NARANJO, LATTA, MOSES
ABSENT : COUNCILMEMBERS: AVILA Avila absent
ALSO PRESENT Also Present
City Attorney Thorson, City Administrator Fuentes, Assistant
City Administrator Diaz, Chief of Police Wood, Director of
Finance Craig, Director of Community Development Bruckner,
'Electric Operations Supervisor Perkins, Director of Public
Works DeLoach, Director of Community Services Guarrera, City
Librarian Alaniz, Redevelopment Director Steel, Business
Marketing/Public Information Officer Katchen-Gall, City
Treasurer Talley, Fire Chief Jones, City Clerk Solis,
Deputy City Clerk Lara.
Moved by Mayor Moses, seconded by Councilman Latta and Avila excused
unanimously carried by roll call* to excuse Councilwoman
Avila from the meeting.
CEREMONIAL
NONE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Mr. Art West addressed the Council and advised that at the
last City Council meeting, he had wished to speak but the
time allotted for public participation had been exhausted,
and that when the Mayor requested Council to extend the
time, Councilman Latta stated that he did not want to hear
anymore about the recall. Mr. West felt that the other side
the proponents of the recall) should have been allowed to
oice their views. He then stated that the City could save
30,000.00 if Councilmen Stemrich and Naranjo would resign.
They could run for election again in 1990. He also
requested that he be able to re -address the Council at the
end of public participation to use his remaining time.
Councilman Stemrich requested that a transcript of Mr.
West's comments be provided for Council perusal.
Ceremonial
None
Pub.Prtc.
Comments
A. West
re: recall
Reg for
transcript
Councilman Naranjo responded to Mr. West's comments by Comments
stating that there were still people in the community who Naranjo
supported and backed him and Councilman Stemrich and to
resign their seats was premature. He felt that the recall
proponents were using the recall for their own political
aspirations.
Councilman Stemrich also requested that Councilman Naranjo's Req for
comments be included with the transcript of Mr. West. transcript
Mr. John Lambrecht addressed the Council stating, in effect,
Comments
that the Council are stewards holding the residents' lives,
J. Lambrecht
past and future, in their hands. He went on to say that
re: Council
some decisions that staff and Council have to make are very
unity
difficult, and consideration has to be taken as to what is
the best for the majority of the people; one such decision
was the Azusa Rock quarry issue. He commended the Mayor for
supporting the election of Councilmen Stemrich and Naranjo.
He further stated that derision and lack of unity on the
Council cause staff members to become disenchanted and leave
the City.
Mr. Art Morales addressed the Council stating that an
Comments
article that appeared in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune
A. Morales
cited the Mayor as saying that 400 units (dwellings) were to
re: articles
be built on a six acre parcel. There is no way that so many
in press
units could be placed on such a parcel and he did not know
if the Mayor was misquoted or not. He felt this type of
publicity harmed the City. Another article appearing in a
Los Angeles paper quoted the Mayor as saying that after
World War II, the City of Azusa stagnated. He did not
agree, as at that time the City had a theater, Sears and
Penney's stores and the downtown was busy. The article also
said that Azusa was a joke. Azusa has never been or will be
a joke, it is a fine community.
'Mr. David James, Chairman of the Forest Preservation Society
Comments
addressed Council reporting the Society's findings on the
D. James
surface mining being done at Fish Canyon. The entire canyon
re: law
had been turned into a wasteland. There has been no
suit
compliance with the surface mining laws. He also stated
that they had inspected the records of the City of Azusa and
discovered that the special use permits covering Fish Canyon
were terminated 32 years ago and that this termination was
accomplished by a vote of the Planning Commission. He
stated further that on February 15th his Society sent a
letter to the City asking the Council to correct the
deficiencies at Fish Canyon and to bring the operation into
compliance to the laws of the state of California. He
elaborated on CEQA guidelines and the City's self interests
on this issue. He stated that they had no alternative but
to sue the City and they had filed, this date, in Pomona
Superior Court. A Process Server then served the law suit
by presenting it to the City Clerk.
Mrs. Linda Stahl -Smith addressed the Council stating that Comments
the Committee to Save the Foothills is behind the Forest L. Stahl -
Preservation Society's actions, and this is one way for the Smith
City Council to take this matter seriously. They have asked Azusa Rock
for a copy of the conditional use permit in the past and
ever received it, and they don't believe there ever was
one. This suit will bring full disclosure to the citizens
f the City.
Mrs. Frances Gonzales addressed the Council complaining that Comments
a clown was parading in front of City Hall on March 3rd, F. Gonzales
with a recall sign that had five small American Flags on it. complaints
She found this to be insulting and disgraceful to the Flag. of clown @
City Hall
03/20/89 PAGE TWO
She further stated that the person in the clown suit was not
even an American citizen and was abusing the.hospitality of
our country. She went on to state that Art West a proponent
of the recall was taking pictures and laughing at this
incident which she felt was revolting.
Mr. Louis Zamora, Chairman of the Azusa Taxpayers
Association, addressed the Council stating that his group
was formed to promote good government and advance the idea
that unity is the single best means of assuring good
government. He stated that there have been serious charges
made against his group, such as signs being posted on
school property and citizens receiving seven to eight calls
and being harassed. He denied these accusations and stated
that the other side was causing the problems by removing
their legally posted signs and also making the phone calls.
He went on to state that the Mayor had called their card
campaign as sleazy. He felt there was nothing sleazy about
a citizen learning the facts about the recall and then
deciding that they wanted their names removed. He, again,
requested that the Mayor take a stand regarding the recall.
Mr. Glenn Watson, representing Azusa Rock, addressed Council
because of the remarks made earlier regarding Azusa Rock not
having a permit to do surface mining. He stated that he
would be very happy to make a copy of Resolution No. 3546,
adopted November 27, 1956, for Mrs. Stahl -Smith's perusal.
He also stated that comments made by Mr. James that the
Planning Commission terminated the permit, were erroneous,
as the Planning Commission does not have the authority to
do so, only the City Council. Comments made that CEQA
guidelines were not adhered to are also false, as there was
no CEQA in 1956, however, the former Council made provisions
to protect the environment and alleviated traffic problems.
As far as the writ of mandate filed against the City, which
,he was sure was also filed against Azusa Rock, he stated
that the case would be well defended and, further, that the
case is not worth the paper it is written on.
Mr. Art West addressed the Council and read part of an
editorial that appeared in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on
March 8, 1989, which stated, in essence, that the "Save the
Foothills Committee" can make a good case that Stemrich and
Naranjo voted wrongly in letting the Azusa Rock Quarry
continue to carve up the mountainside.
Councilman Stemrich stated to Mr. West that at the time Mrs.
Gonzales was discussing the use of the American Flag on a
recall plaque held by the clown in front of City Hall that
he and Mr. Alexander were laughing. He felt that Mr. West
owed Mrs. Gonzales an apology. Mr. West stated that he did
not owe anyone an apology.
Mr. Stephen Alexander addressed Council and stated that he
did not laugh about the American Flag; that he would never
do that.
Mr. Stemrich still felt that they were laughing and owed
Mrs. Gonzales an apology.
Comments
L. Zamora
re: recall
Comments
G. Watson
re: lawsuit
of Forest
Pres.Soc
Comments
A. West
Tribune
article
Comments
Stemrich
Comments
S. Alexander
ouncilman Latta made an announcement that the American Comments
ittle League had their opening last Saturday and he was Latta re:
oncerned that two teams did not have sponsors. He appealed Little League
to the businesses and service clubs in Azusa to consider needs spon-
sponsoring these teams. sors
Mayor Moses advised that he was not able to attend the New address
opening as he was in the process of moving and advised his Mayor
new address as 1551 Nob Hill.
03/20/89 PAGE THREE
r
The CONSENT CALENDAR consisting of Items 1 through 14 was Cons Cal appv
approved by motion of Councilman Stemrich, seconded by G-3 Spec Call
Councilman Naranjo and unanimously carried by roll call G-6 joint
vote, with the exception of Item G-6, which was considered Cncl/Cra; G-1
under the Joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency portion of add'1 comment
the Agenda; Item G-3 which was considered under the Special
Call portion of the Agenda. Item G-13 had an additional
comment made by Councilman Latta, which is stated with that
item number in the body of the Minutes.
' 1. The Minutes of the regular meeting of March 6, 1989, Min appvd
were approved as written.
2. The appointment of John Szabo to the position of Meter Appt J.
Reader, effective March 21, 1989, was approved. One of Szabo
the two meter readers approved at the last Council
meeting declined to accept the position.
3. SPECIAL CALL ITEM
4. In order that technical maintenance support for the
telephone system at the Senior Center be continued,
GTEL requires the Tel -Assurance Service Agreement to be
renewed annually. A standard maintenance contract
providing on site service between the hours of 8:00
A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, at an annual
cost of $576.00 was approved.
5. Employee step increase and permanent status
recommendations were approved for the following:
NAME STATUS EFFECTIVE
J. Francone Step 5 03/24/89
T. Baker Step 5 03/17/89
' D. Ramirez PermStat 03/07/89
R. Rex PermStat 03/07/89
6. ITEM TO BE HANDLED UNDER JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
7. The City and Caltrans entered into an agreement on
April 16, 1986, to share the cost of modifying the
traffic signals on Azusa Avenue at Gladstone Street and
Paramount Avenue. The agreement expired at the end of
1988 before a construction contract could be awarded by
the City, due to delays in plan reviewing and funding
revision procedures. A new agreement, No. 3919, was
approved extending the date to December 31, 1990, to
allow adequate time to complete the project.
8. Bid opening was held in the City Clerk's Office on
March 13th for Project No. 775-88, Construction of
restrooms for Civic Center Park. Four bids were
received from: Mickelson & Campbell Construction Co.,
Brugman Management, B. Marrs Construction Co., Inc.,
and Pruitt Construction. The low bidder, Mickelson and
Campbell, requested that its bid be removed due to the
prevailing wage requirements, which were not considered
in its proposal, and the request was honored. The
' contract was awarded to Brugman Management in the
amount of $75,000.00, and its execution authorized.
The estimate for construction for this project was
$60,000.00. As a result of the low bid exceeding the
budgeted amount, staff was directed to reallocate Park-
in -lieu funding, presently identified for other park
projects, to fund the balance of the restroom
construction.
Spec Call
GTEL agmt
@ Sr Cntr
Emp step inc/
perm status
Joint Cncl
Cra item
Agmt 3919
w/Caltrans
Bid award
Proj 775-88
Brugman
Mngmnt &
use of park
in -lieu funds
9. The appointment of Mr. Al Muhlethaler to the position Appt. A.
of Water Equipment Operator, effective April 3, 1989, Muhlethaler
was approved.
03/20/89 PAGE FOUR
10.
Public Works Department solicited Requests for
Agmt w/
Proposals (RFP) for professional landscape
Kobata Assoc.
architectural services for the relandscaping of a
arch.lndscpng
portion of State Right-of-way at the I-210 Freeway
I-210 & Azusa
interchange at Azusa Avenue. Five firms responded to
the RFP: Willdan Associates, Kobata Associates, Inc.,
BSI Consultants, Inc., Lawrence R. Moss and
Associates and Environmental Images. The contract was
awarded to Kobata Associates, Inc., in the amount of
$4,010.00 and its execution authorized.
' 11.
The contract for the testing and servicing of Azusa
Bid award
Sub -station breakers and relays was awarded to
Westinghouse
Westinghouse, low bidder, in the amount of $27,853.00,
sub -station
and its execution authorized. Bid opening was held in
testing &
the City Clerk's Office on March 1st and two bids were
servicing
received from Westinghouse and General Electric.
12.
At the General Election held on November 8, 1988, the
Agmt w/OSCO
voters of the City approved the ballot measure imposing
multiuser
a tax of up to ten percent (10%), or such other amount
haz waste
as authorized by state law of the annual gross receipts
tax
for the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous
waste. Only one such facility exists in the City, Oil
and Solvent Process Company (OSCO). An agreement with
OSCO was approved calling for a minimum annual payment
of $520,000.00 and its execution authorized. The
following resolution was also adopted:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
Res. #8593
SETTING THE RATE OF AN OFFSITE, MULTIUSER HAZARDOUS
setting tax
WASTE FACILITIES TAX.
rate
13.
The City Treasurer's Financial Statement showing a
City Treas.
balance of $11,369,230.03, as of February 28, 1989, was
Fin. Stmnt
received and filed. Councilman Latta wanted to bring
Expenditures
attention to the fact that expenditures for February
less than
were marked by fiscal restraint; a total of $3,573,550
last year
was spent during the month compared with $4,266,355 for
the same month a year ago. Thus, we have cut our
expenditures by almost $700,000.
14.
A resolution authorizing payment of warrants by the
City was adopted and entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA
Res. #8594
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AND SPECIFYING THE
Warrants
FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID.
THE CITY COUNCIL CONVENED JOINTLY WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT Cncl convened
AGENCY AT 8:25 P.M. w/CRA
In conjunction with the redevelopment project area merger, Redevelopment
all taxing agencies were consulted to ascertain fiscal Project Area
impact. No agencies, except the County of Los Angeles, Merger
tfgency
equired that an agreement be drafted to identify possible
iscal impact. The agreement must be considered by both the
and the Council prior to its presentation before the
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.
Director Latta offered a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF Res. #558
AZUSA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AN AGREE- appvng Agmt
MENT FOR ALLOCATION OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS" BETWEEN THE w/County re:
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, THE CITY OF allocation
AZUSA, AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. of tax incre-
ment funds
03/20/89 PAGE FIVE
Moved by Director Latta, seconded by Director Stemrich to
waive further reading and adopt. Resolution passed and
adopted by the following vote of the Agency:
AYES: DIRECTORS: STEMRICH, NARANJO, LATTA, MOSES
NOES: DIRECTORS: NONE
ABSENT: DIRECTORS: AVILA
Councilman Stemrich offered a resolution entitled:
'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA Res. #8595
APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AN AGREEMENT appvng Agmt
FOR ALLOCATION OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS" BETWEEN THE w/County re:
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF AZUSA, THE CITY OF allocation
AZUSA, AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. of tax incre-
ment funds
Moved by Councilman Stemrich, seconded by Councilman Latta
to waive further reading and adopt. Resolution passed and
adopted by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: STEMRICH, NARANJO, LATTA, MOSES
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AVILA
The Mayor/Chairman was authorized to execute all necessary
documents in conjunction with said agreement.
An analysis performed by Management Services Institute, and Poss bond
the City's Master Plans for its sanitary sewer, storm drain, issue for
streets and highways, and water systems, concluded that City's in-
sufficient funds do not exist with which to pay for frastructure
immediate and long-term needs for the upgrading, repair and
maintenance of these vital components of the City's
infrastructure. It was recommended that the Council/Agency
'designate an underwriter to look into the feasibility of a
bond issue for this purpose. The bonds would be issued by a
financing authority and would be paid by revenue from
various fees, charges and taxes of the City.
It was then moved by Councilman/Director Latta, seconded by Creation of
Councilman/Director Naranjo and unanimously carried by roll a financing
call* that consideration of a financing authority to issue authority &
bonds or certificates of participation to fund improvement agmt for un -
projects to eliminate deficiencies, as stated, be approved derwriter
and to authorize the execution of an agreement to provide Chilton &
underwriter's services with the firm of Chilton and O'Connor
O'Connor.
City Attorney/General Counsel advised that the action taken Comments
tonight was just the first step, authorizing staff to Cty Atty/
prepare the necessary documents and information, and that Genl Cnsl
before any formal action is taken it would be returned to
the Council/Agency for review.
THE CITY COUNCIL RECESSED AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CONTINUED AT 8:31 P.M.
itHE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 8:35 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL DID NOT CONVENE AS THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS NO BUSINESS WAS NECESSARY TO BE
TRANSACTED.
ORDINANCES/SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS
Councilman Latta offered a Resolution entitled:
03/20/89 PAGE SIX
Cncl recessed
CRA cont.
Reconvened
No bus IDA
Ord./Spec.Res
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA Res. #8596
DENYING THE APPEAL OF WYNN OIL.COMPANY AND APPROVING PRECISE denying appl
PLAN OF DESIGN NO. P-88-237 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1151 of Wynn Oil
WEST FIFTH STREET. & appvng Pre-
cise Plan
Moved by Councilman Latta, seconded by Councilman Naranjo to
waive further reading and adopt. Resolution passed and
adopted by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NARANJO, LATTA, MOSES
'NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: STEMRICH
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AVILA
Public Hearing was held on this matter at the March 6th
Council meeting.
At the Council meeting of March 6th, Council approved the
Waiver to
waiver to sell beer at Memorial Park by the Manresa Council
sell beer
3522 Knights of Columbus. The following documents were
@ Mem'1 Pk
presented in order to implement that request.
Councilman Naranjo offered an Urgency Ordinance entitled:
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
Urg. Ord
AZUSA AMENDING SECTION 8.52.136 OF THE AZUSA MUNICIPAL CODE
2396 amending
RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC.
AMC re: alco-
holic bev in
Moved by Councilman Naranjo, seconded by Councilman Stemrich
public
to waive further reading and adopt. Ordinance passed and
adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: STEMRICH, NARANJO, LATTA, MOSES
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AVILA
'Councilman Naranjo offered an Ordinance entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA 1st rdg Ord
AMENDING SECTION 8.52.136 OF THE AZUSA MUNICIPAL CODE amending AMC
RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC. re: alcoho-
lic bev in
Moved by Councilman Naranjo, seconded by Councilman Stemrich public
and unanimously carried by roll call* to waive further
reading and introduce the Ordinance.
Councilman Stemrich offered a Resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA Res. #8597
APPROVING THE SERVICE AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES appvng svc &
BY THE MANRESA COUNCIL 3522 KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, AT MEMORIAL consumption
PARK DURING THE PERIOD MAY 5 THROUGH MAY 7, 1989. of alcohol
by Manresa
Moved by Councilman Stemrich, seconded by Councilman Latta Cncl @ Mem'1
to waive further reading and adopt. Resolution passed and Park
adopted by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: STEMRICH, NARANJO, LATTA, MOSES
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AVILA
CHEDULED ITEMS Sched. Items
PUBLIC HEARING - to receive and consider all evidence and Pub Hrg
reports presented relating to fees and charges for various fees & chgs
City services. for Cty secs
03/20/89 PAGE SEVEN
The Mayor declared the Hearing open. The City Clerk read Hrg opened
the affidavit of proof of publication.of notice of said
Hearing published in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune on March
10, 1989.
City Administrator advised that after reviewing the Need for
documents to be presented tonight, that some modifications modifications
needed to be made and would take in excess of two weeks to
finalize them.
It was then moved by Councilman Latta, seconded by Referred back
Councilman Stemrich and unanimously carried by roll call* to to staff
refer the matter back to staff and that a new Public Hearing
be scheduled and advertised as required by law.
PUBLIC HEARING - extending a moratorium prohibiting the Pub Hrg
issuance of land use entitlements for all multi -family mor. multi -
residential uses within the City. family uses
The Mayor declared the Hearing open. The City Clerk read Hrg opened
the affidavit of proof of publication of notice of said
hearing published in the Azusa Herald on March 8, 1989.
Community Development Director Bruckner addressed this item Comments
stating that according to state law, the City could extend Bruckner
the moratorium for another year. He advised that the
Planning Commission has rezoned certain areas of the City,
but that more time is needed to complete their studies and
requested that the moratorium be extended.
Mayor questioned the R3a zone; the meaning of detached or Comments
unattached condominiums; lot sizes and other questions Moses
relating to condominiums. Community Development Bruckner
responded to his concerns.
,Mr. Charles Key addressed this item stating that he was in Comments
favor of the moratorium as he felt that there were too many C. Key
apartments and condominiums in the City, and our schools
were overcrowded.
Mr. Art Morales addressed this item stating that he was in Comments
favor of a moratorium for apartments, however, condominiums A. Morales
were acceptable. He further stated that some apartments are
needed, such• as the senior citizen apartments on the old
school site, and the Casden project, downtown, which will be
more like condominiums than apartments.
Ray Zavala addressed this item stating that he was undecided Comments
about his feelings regarding this moratorium. He stated
R. Zavala
that the apartments behind St. Frances of Rome Church were a
problem, as the police were always there for either
burglary, drugs etc. He preferred single family homes to be
built in the City.
Mayor Moses stated that condominiums and apartments cause
Comments
more police problems and parking problems.
Moses
Mr. Ray Zavala addressed this item again, stating that the
Comments
building of apartments and condominiums should have been
R. Zavala
stopped many years ago. We should have more single family
Comes.
ouncilman Stemrich stated that the present Council has been
Comments
trying to stop the proliferation of apartments in the City.
Stemrich
That previous Councils allowed this type of building, and
they should have put a stop to it.
Moved by Councilman Latta, seconded by Councilman Stemrich
Hrg closed
and unanimously carried by roll call* to close the hearing.
03/20/89 PAGE EIGHT
Councilman Latta stated that many years ago, previous
Councils allowed too much R3 zoning in the City. That this
Council was now trying to correct the problems. He further
stated that condominiums do bring new people into the
community and they establish roots, and take pride in
ownership. He recently purchased a condominium in the City.
He requested that staff research methods to reduce
the number of apartments in the City.
,Lengthy discussion was held between Council and Community
Development Director Bruckner regarding density, single
family dwellings, lot sizes and other matters of zoning
laws.
Mayor Moses then offered an Urgency Ordinance entitled:
Comments
Latta
General
discussion
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Urg. Ord
AZUSA EXTENDING A MORATORIUM PROHIBITING THE ISSUANCE OF #2397
LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS FOR ALL MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES extending
WITHIN THE CITY OF AZUSA. moratorium
Moved by Mayor Moses, seconded by Councilman Latta to waive
further reading and adopt. Ordinance passed and adopted by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: STEMRICH, NARANJO, LATTA, MOSES
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AVILA
Prior to the next item being discussed, which dealt with the Advice of
Edwards Drive -In Theater, City Attorney advised that last
Cty Atty
year when the admissions tax issue was brought up, the
re: movie
Council could not vote on it, as they had all received movie
passes - No
passes from Edwards Theaters, and that constituted a
conflict of
conflict of interest. He further reminded them of the Fair
interests as
Practices Commission ruling, that if any one had
passes were
IPoliticial
received more than $250.00 in gifts from the applicant
returned
during the last year they could not vote on this issue.
However, if they had returned the passes prior to this
evening's meeting, or had not used them to the extent of
$250.00, they would be able to vote. The Councilmembers
then advised the City Attorney that their passes had not
been used and that they had returned them to the applicant.
Director of Community Development Bruckner then addressed
Swap Meet
this issue, stating that negotiations were held between
report
staff and Mr. Jim Edwards to overcome the problems that have
Bruckner
been created by the swap meet, and to discuss the proposal
of conducting a swap meet on Saturdays in addition to
Sundays. Many points of agreement were decided, which are
embodied in a Memorandum of Understanding. The approach
selected that would best address the issues and would best
protect the City's interests, would be the application by
Edwards Theater of a conditional use permit, legalizing the
Sunday swap meet and approving the additional Saturday swap
meet. The points contained in the MOU would become
conditions of approval to the conditional use permit, which
would be subject to revocation if the conditions were not
met. He elaborated on the various points in the MOU, such
as health permits, parking, vendor stalls and annual impact
ees of $150,000.00 for Sundays and $100,000.00 for
aturdays for the first year, and $150,000.00 thereafter.
Questions arose regarding signage and red curbing on Alosta
Signage on
and sales tax proceeds through resale permits.
Alosta
Director of Finance Craig advised that the sales tax would
Comments
be tracked down through the State Board' of Equalization.
Craig
That, currently, it was suggested that each seller be
registered with the City prior to commecing business at the
swap meet.
03/20/89 PAGE NINE
Mr. James Edwards advised that he had spent a lot of time
with staff members discussing all the items. He would
cooperate with the City regarding the sales tax issue and
hopefully reach a satisfactory solution. He agreed with all
the points in the MOU, save one, that being the three year
limit on the conditional use permit. He felt that with all
the costs involved in upgrading the swap meet, three years
would not fully amortize those costs. He wanted a future
beyond the three year period.
Discussion ensued between Council and Mr. Edwards regarding
the use of the Krems property for parking and if Mr. Krems
had been approached to sell the property; amount of vendors
at the swap meet and parking spaces within the complex
itself; number of people attending the swap meet; assurances
that all repairs will be made; whether or not Mr. Edwards
would be willing to absorb the costs for signage on Alosta,
and he agreed to do so; and receiving reimbursement for
direct costs by using police patrolling the area; emergency
evacuation plans and other items of importance.
Comments
J. Edwards
General
discussion
Los Angeles County Fire Chief Jones responded to questions Comments
regarding emergency evacuation at the swap meet and advised LA Cnty Fire
that he had toured the area and would be evaluating the Chief
system. He stated that they routinely inspect all
businesses at least once a year, by law.
Discussion was held regarding an incident that occurred at General
the swap meet, wherein a gentleman had had a heart attack at discussion
the snack bar and the para -medics could not drive in and had
to go in on foot.
Mr. Ray Zavala addressed this item stating that at the Town
Hall meeting he bitterly opposed the swap meet, because of
all the vehicles parking at the St. Frances of Rome parking
lot. However, since that time Mr. Edwards had taken care of
the problem. He also stated that the swap meet now has
security guards and that they have been policing the area of
the church and the Krems property, picking up litter and
debris. He now supported Mr. Edwards, and felt that he was
making an effort to reconcile the problems and that in time
would solve all the problems, plus bring in extra revenue to
the City. If they did not comply then the City could shut
them down.
Mr. Ted Garcia addressed this item stating that he was
shocked to read that the swap meet might be open on both
Saturdays and Sundays. He felt that this decision should be
made by the citizens of Azusa and that the matter be placed
on the ballot. He did not feel the swap meet was in the
best interests of Azusa as it did nothing for our image,
that the property needed improvement.
Comments
R. Zavala
Comments
T. Garcia
Mr. Ray Zavala addressed the Council, again, stating that Comments
the Krems property has been deteriorating for years and R. Zavala
wondered why the Council did not do something to get Mr.
Krems to rehabilitate it.
City Administrator Fuentes responded to Mr. Zavala's Comments
question and advised that the property is very expensive to Fuentes
uy, and that there has been no interest from developers to
pgrade the area. If a developer were interested, City
intervention would be necessary, and the City does not have
the money to do that. The City is here to help, and a lot
of redevelopment is happening, but there is only so much
that the City can do. The owners should clean up their own
property. The rental inspection program and the landscape
maintenance ordinance will enable the City to police
properties that are not up to standard.
03/20/89 PAGE TEN
Mr. Art Morales addressed the Council stating that a Comments
developer should be secured for the Krems property and that A. Morales
the City enter into a contract to secure the property
through eminent domain, and that the costs for the property
would be determined by the courts. With regard to the swap
meet issue, he felt that Mr. Edwards would upgrade the
property and comply with all conditions. However, he felt
that more rest rooms were needed, as well as trash
receptacles and bicycle racks.
City Attorney advised the Council that all the terms and Comments
conditions as stated in the MOU would be incorporated in the Cty Atty
conditional use permit, after the Planning Commission holds
the necessary hearings. If their action is appealed, then
the Council would review the matter.
General discussion was held regarding the Public Hearing Discussion
process and that notices of the hearings, besides being
published in the legal section, also be advertised in the
Azusa Herald, San Gabriel Valley Tribune and the Los
Angeles Times and that the matters discussed this evening be
presented to the Planning Commission; further that Mr.
Edwards' absorbing the cost of the signage on Alosta Avenue
be incorporated in the conditional use permit and also the
placement of drinking fountains at the site.
It was then moved by Councilman Stemrich, seconded by Referred to
Councilman Latta and unanimously carried by roll call* to Ping Comm
refer the matter of the swap meet to the Planning Commission for Hrgs.
for the necessary hearings.
Moved by Councilman Latta, seconded by Councilman Naranjo
and unanimously carried by roll call* to approve the
preparation of a Proclamation for Architecture Week, April
9th through the 15th, 1989.
Community Development Director Bruckner presented a status
report on the Azusa Landfill expansion. He stated that the
City of Azusa is not in a decision making role in this
matter. The ultimate authority to decide whether or not the
permit should be approved lies with the State Water
Resources Control Board. He further advised that the
landfill proposes to add an 80 mil thick synthetic plastic
liner between the trash and a clay liner in order to protect
the groundwater. He stated that no evidence has been found
that the landfill is the source of present water
contamination.
Councilman Latta requested that Mr. Bruckner explain the
term "decision making body." He responded that the City of
Azusa could not issue the permit to the landfill that only
the State Board could do so; the City of Azusa could
participate in the proceedings, but could not be the body
deciding whether or not the expansion were to be approved or
not approved.
The Mayor questioned if toxic waste was being dumped at the
landfill and what class it was categorized. He was advised
that the facility was a Class III, which meant that no
hazardous waste can be accepted for disposal.
' Since there was a problem with the microphone, it was
consensus of Council that a recess be taken in order to have
the matter looked into and corrected.
TIME OF RECESS: 10:25 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 10:37 P.M.
03/20/89 PAGE ELEVEN
Proclo for
Architecture
Week
Status rpt
Azusa Land-
fill
Bruckner
Comments
Latta
Comments
Moses
Microphone
probs
Recessed
Reconvened
Mr. Rick Spencer, Manager of the Azusa Land Reclamation,
addressed the Council stating that he has been the Manager
at the landfill since September of 1987, when the parent
firm of Browning Ferris Industries purchased the stock in
the Azusa Land Reclamation Company. He advised of the many
environmental controls that they initiated since they took
over the landfill, manner of checking trash that comes in so
as not to have hazardous waste, and the methane gas control
systems.
'Mayor Moses stated that the landfill had been denied
expansion and since then started to upgrade their systems,
and asked if this were not true. Mr. Spencer advised that
the prior owners had applied for expansion and had been
denied, and that since BFI came in they were upgrading the
system. At this point, he presented slides for Council
review of the proposed liner to be placed at the site to
protect the groundwater. As the slides were presented, a
narrative was given by Joan Lundy, geologist, who has been
working on the project for over five years. Samples of the
liner were also distributed.
Discussion ensued regarding other landfills using this
system and Ms. Lundy advised that the Bradley Landfill was
presently using this system, but without the high density
polyethylene liner. They proposed to use it in Azusa, as an
added safeguard. Discussion was held regarding methane gas
controls and other dump sites using the liners.
Mr. Spencer, again, addressed the Council stating that the
State of California has established criteria for all
landfill operations.
Mayor Moses advised him that he took offense at his
operation, as he did not put in all the sophisticated
'systems until he was denied a permit by the State.
Councilman Naranjo advised that BFI had only recently taken
over the landfill, in September of 1987, and had been
striving to upgrade it ever since. That BFI is not
responsible for the past owners.
Mr. Spencer advised that BFI had not applied to the State
for the permit, the past owners had done so. That they came
in after the permit had been in process. And when it had
been denied, they decided to resubmit their design to the
State. He elaborated on the many improvements and
safeguards they have incorporated, as well as proposed
landscaping on Gladstone, and presented renderings for
Council review.
Question arose about the term "expansion", when in fact,
the landfill was not expanding, only using that portion of
the landfill that had been excluded by the Regional Quality
Water Board, some time ago. The term expansion came into
being, because of the complete redesign of the landfill that
was presented to the State Board. The acreage has not
changed, however, the floor elevation of the landfill has
been lowered by 25 feet.
Discussion was held regarding the liner itself; and if the
State denied the permit, then the landfill would cease to
operate within a year; methane gas escaping; chemicals in
the water table; and what the residents would do with their
trash if the landfill closes down, which is a problem all
over California, not just Azusa.
Armando Camarena addressed the Council stating that
approximately four years ago, the City Council approved a 20
foot berm for the land reclamation, which would have
extended the life of the landfill for 20 years. He now
wondered if they were in violation, since they state the
landfill will close within one year.
03/20/89 PAGE TWELVE
Comments
R. Spencer
of Landfill
Comments
Moses
and slide
presentation
by Azusa
Landfill
General
discussion
Comments
R. Spencer
Comments
Moses and
Naranjo
Comments
R. Spencer
Definition
of expansion
General
discussion
Comments
A. Camarena
After lengthy discussion,
it was moved by
Mayor Moses,
Cty to act as
seconded by Councilman Latta
and carried by roll call* that
intervenor
the City of Azusa act as
an intervenor to
oppose the
to oppose
expansion of the landfill.
Councilman Naranjo
dissenting.
expansion
The California Health and Safety Code sets out specific
guidelines for the review of projects which involve the
handling or treatment of hazardous wastes. (Oil and Solvent
Process Company Wastewater Treatment Plan Application)
Included in the review process is the establishment of a
'committee, "The Tanner Committee", to contain seven members
to be appointed by the City Council. Appointments must be
made within 90 days of the filing of application, which in
the case of OSCO was January 13, 1989. The committee is
required to be appointed by April 13, 1989. Three members
shall be from the community at large, two members shall be
from environmental or public interest groups, and two
members shall be from affected businesses or industries.
Need for
Tanner Comm
to review
handling of
haz waste
It was then moved by Councilman Latta, seconded by Mayor Publicize
Moses and unanimously carried by roll call* that need for comm
announcement be made tonight and in the press regarding members
these appointments, and that names be submitted to Council
for action.
SPECIAL CALL ITEMS
For the past several years the City has disposed of its
surplus or abandoned property by way of public auction,
which either lost money or showed very little profit for all
the efforts involved; such as planning, tagging all items,
advertising, salaries, etc. Staff has contacted two auction
companies which perform these services and recommends use of
,Nationwide Commercial Auction Systems in the City of
Industry. Their commission is only 10% leaving only
transportation costs to pay from the 90% remainder for
moving property to their site.
Mr. Art Morales requested that this item be removed from the
Consent Calendar as he had comments to make, however, prior
to discussing the item, he made comment on the fact that he
had not been allowed to speak on the landfill expansion
item. He stated that the public should have been made aware
of the complexity of the landfill issue and there should
have been a public forum. He then addressed the item in
question. He felt that this item should be tabled until
input could be received from the community. He said the
people in the community look forward to this auction once a
year, and that if costs were prohibitive, to have our own
auction, perhaps, citizens of the community could volunteer
their time to operate the auction.
Spec Call
Use of public
auction for
Cty's surplus
propty
Comments
A. Morales
Moved by Mayor Moses seconded by Councilman Naranjo and Appv use of
unanimously carried by roll call* to approve the use of Nationwide
Nationwide Commercial Auction Systems, to auction city Comm Auction
surplus or abandoned property at public auctions held at Systems for
13005 East Temple, City of Industry. propty disp.
OTHER BUSINESS/CITY COUNCIL Oth Bus/Cncl�
=Moved by Councilman Latta, seconded by Mayor Moses and Proclo for
unanimously carried by roll call* to approve the preparation Ed Conley
of a Proclamation honoring retiring Athletic Director Ed
Conley from Citrus College.
Moved by Councilman Stemrich, seconded by Mayor Moses and Plaque for
unanimously carried by roll call* that a plaque be prepared A. Banuelos
for presentation to Alex Banuelos, Azusa youth, for his
honesty in returning lost wallet to rightful owner.
03/20/89 PAGE THIRTEEN
Moved by Councilman Latta, seconded by Mayor Moses and Proclo for
unanimously carried by roll call* to approve the Deacons
presentation of a Proclamation commending the Deacons on
their 41st anniversary.
Councilman Naranjo offered a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AZUSA TO
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION ON MARCH 20, 1989, PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957 AND MAKING
'FINDINGS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (a).
Moved by Councilman Naranjo, seconded by Mayor Moses to
waive further reading and adopt. Resolution passed and
adopted by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: STERMICH, NARANJO, LATTA, MOSES
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: AVILA
TIME OF RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION: 11:50 P.M.
THE CITY COUNCIL
AT 12:06 A.M.
A request for a Proclamation in honor of the Miss Azusa
Pageant was presented for Council consideration. This
request was not placed on the Agenda, and City Attorney
apprised the Council, that action could be taken on this
item, since it arose after the Agenda was posted and there
was a need to act on it prior to the next Council meeting,
as the Pageant is scheduled for April 1st, 1989, and the
next Council meeting is April 3rd.
It was then moved by Couniclman Naranjo, seconded by
Councilman Latta and unanimously carried by roll call* to
approve the preparation of a Proclamation in honor of the
Miss Azusa Pageant.
Res. #8598
Closed Sess
Recess
Closed Sess
Reconvened
Proclo for
Miss Azusa
Pageant
not on Agenda
but found
acceptable
to take
action
Moved by Councilman Latta, seconded by Councilman Stemrich Adj to 3/27
and unanimously carried* to adjourn the meeting to March 27, to meet
1989, 7:30 P.M., at the Library Auditorium to meet with the w/Plug Comm
Planning Commission.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 12:11 A.M.
ITY CL RK'
NEXT RESOLUTION NO. 8599
NEXT ORDINANCE NO. 2398
* Indicates Councilwoman Avila absent
03/20/89 PAGE FOURTEEN